Talk:Black Isle's Torn
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Black Isle's Torn has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
 GA |
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
 |
This is a selected article of WikiProject Video games. | |
 |
This article has an archived CVG peer review that may contain ideas for improvement. | |
|
CVG To-do:
|
||
 |
Black Isle's Torn (reviewed version) has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. |
[edit] Good Article nomination has failed
The Good article nomination for Black Isle's Torn has failed, for the following reason:
- Longer than the subject warrantedGhosts&empties 17:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Citations
As citing every source separately would be pure madness (since most of the article is taken from only a handful of sources), I have placed a single citation at the bottom of each section and subsection (aside from Development history), which act as a citations for their entire respective sections. This is to address possible future citation concerns. So please do not pepper the article with {{fact}} templates and the like. JimmyBlackwing 19:45, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Good Article nomination on hold
I am placing this nomination on hold for the following reasons.
- I would like to see the redlinks eliminated especially for Mr. Maldonado, understand if the games section redlinks are next projects, however maybe they should be left off until those articles are completed?
- Possibly explain the citing rationale listed above (and I do understand working from limited resources) in a sentence within the lead or a tag at top, something along the lines of "Due to the limited nature of source materials, citations will appear at the end of sections", this will reduce the attempts by other editors to request citation, without checking the existing ones.
- In all, for a cancelled game, I think this is well done, though I do not forsee WP:FA in it's future. I also think the length is appropriate. What would be inappropriate would be fifteen or twenty paragraphs of "It would have been cool if..."UnseemlyWeasel 02:05, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for the response. I have taken care of the issues you mentioned. JimmyBlackwing 05:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Categories: Old requests for peer review | Old requests for CVG peer review | GA-Class video game articles | Low-priority video game articles | WikiProject Video games articles | Wikipedia good articles | Wikipedia CD Selection-GAs | Uncategorized good articles | GA-Class Good articles | Former good article nominees
