Talk:Catullus 51
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. | |
This is a much better translation, and is actually more literal. Literal translations should translate idioms into the exact equivalent idiom of the target language, not simply offer a word-for-word rendering. Word for word translation is for machines and middle and high school students, generally. I'm going to post my translation below for discussion.
- That man seems equal to a god to me.
- That man, if it is not profane, above the gods
- He who sitting across from you
- Repeatedly listens to you laughing sweetly,
- Which destroys the senses of wretched me
- I have seen you, Lesbia, nothing is beyond me
- But my tongue becomes immobile,
- A flame goes down my weak limbs,
- My ears ring with their own sound,
- Both my eyes are covered with darkness.
- Leisure, Catullus, is trouble for you:
- In leisure you gambol about and celebrate:
- Leisure has destroyed kings before
- And prosperous cities.
Billy Blythe 12:34, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Line 8
I am by no means an expert on Catullus, but from what I know line 8 of this poem has been lost. The text used here before I removed it was merely a scholarly suggestion based on Sappho's poem which Catullus has translated into Latin. The line and its corresponding translation are thus a only a possibility, not an actual line of Catullus.
Thus, quoting it as an authentic part of the poem, without any explanation, is misleading, especially since there are other suggestions for this missing line(such as "uocis amanti" "getture uocis" etc.) and nobody knows for certain what it was.
Therefore, I removed this line and left it empty, similar to the way it appears in the Oxford Classical text edition of Catullus' poems, which, to the best of my knowledge, is considered one of the most reliable editions.
If anybody has the time, and feels confident enough, to add a new section about the missing line and explain the different suggestions, that will be great, but please leave the the line in the actual text clear. Tal642 (talk • contribs) 16:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC).
