Talk:Custer's Revenge
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. | |
|
CVG To-do:
|
||
Contents |
[edit] Matt Ingoglia/Arthur "The Yellow Dart" Pyott (aka Fencer Poot)
ĥ Is there any good reason to keep this section? It just seems like vanity to me. Not to mention that the name appears to be rather hazy.
[edit] ...soiled the image of the Atari 2600
- ...soiled the image of the Atari 2600.
I removed that part because it's POV and anyway, I can't see why it would be true, since the game was not made by Atari, but by an independent publisher. bogdan 00:28, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- It didn't matter that the game was not made by Atari in the minds of many people. When looking for people to hold responsible, people didn't really distinguish between Atari and Mystique, even though Atari was not really at fault for the game.
- JesseG 02:10, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
/
[edit] Racist
This video game isn't just "pornographic" -- it's racist and depicts rape as a tool of war.
Also, the word "squaw" should be lowercased, and should really be changed to "woman".
What are you talking about?? Squaw is not even tied up, so how is this game depicting rape?
[edit] Replaced "rape" with "(sexual) intercourse"
In the description of the game, I replaced the word "rape" with "intercourse" or "sexual intercourse". There was no indication in the game or manual that it was supposed to be rape, that was an interpretation by critics, as stated clearly in the article:
The game prompted criticism from women's rights groups who stated that the simulation of having sex with a tied-up woman was a simulation of rape.
This sentence does not make sense if the description already talks about rape. — Graf Bobby 00:19, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
