Talk:Hanshin Tigers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Hanshin Tigers is maintained by WikiProject Baseball, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of baseball and baseball-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: |
|||
|
WikiProject Baseball To-do:
Here are some tasks you can do to help with WikiProject Baseball:
|
|||
 |
Hanshin Tigers is part of WikiProject Japan, a project to improve all Japan-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Japan-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance for this Project's importance scale. |
|
Japan To-do:
|
|
[edit] Koshien
Shouldn't it be "Hanshin Koshien Stadium"? Osakadave 18:05, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
Someone should make an ontology like the one that exists for the MLB teams on wikipedia, with uniform design for home and away and and bits of other important info on the top right of the page in its own box for all the Japanese pro teams. Migrations 03:16, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Sister Team
"It is the sister team of the Major League baseball team Detroit Tigers and in Steven King and Stewart O'Nan's 2004 book Faithful: Two Diehard Boston Red Sox Fans Chronicle the Historic 2004 Season, the Tigers are often portrayed as the Japan Red Sox." I question this statement. There is no official "Sister Team" program, so this is no more than just stating that they have the same mascot. Furthermore, this does nothing to tell you anything about the team. If anything, this should be in a footnote or trivia section. I'd be content to just remove it, though. That they were mentioned in a Boston Red Sox 2004 season book? It just seems irrelevant. 24.13.141.176 05:56, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- I question it as well for exactly the same reasons. As with any unreferenced information on Wikipedia, you should feel free to delete it. I added the {{unreferenced}} template to the top, and will work on adding citations to this article over the next few months. Vir4030 19:41, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
