Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Williams F1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Williams F1
And another excellent sports photograph from User:Rdikeman showing a Formula One car in action. Used to illustrate various Formula One relate pages, but I think it best represents the Formula One page. -- Solipsist 19:21, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Support. -- Solipsist 19:21, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Support very much. I had intended to nominate it myself. [[User:Rdsmith4|User:Rdsmith4/sig]] 21:18, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Support. How did you (User:Rdikeman) get such a good view?! Fantastic shot. But I think image:Webber usgp 2004.jpg is better :)--Fir0002 22:15, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Car very sharp, while background shows speed. Cool. -- Chris 73 Talk 00:44, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose. Nice but not special enough to be featured. Just a F1 car. We need more less geeky images. Janderk 13:05, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Added a rotated version. Unfortunately, a lot of the background had to be cropped. Support the first. — David Remahl 12:38, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Support; more like this please! --Twinxor 21:20, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support the original one showing the car at an angle. --ScottyBoy900Q∞ 01:36, 05 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose. This one's "OK", but Fir0002 is right, image:Webber usgp 2004.jpg is much better. We want the best of the best. Why doesn't someone nominate that one? NickP 09:21, Nov 6, 2004 (UTC)
- Well one reason would be that Jaguar is no longer racing in F1 (ironically Webber is moving into Ralf S's Williams car). Its a bit of a toss-up, the Jaguar has the advantage of being a little sharper, nicer colours and a less cluttered background. But to me, the Williams just looks like it is going faster and speed is a big part of illustrating Formula One. -- Solipsist 09:42, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose, agree with NickP. image:Webber usgp 2004.jpg has better detail on the car/driver. ed g2s • talk 00:59, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose, I think image:Webber usgp 2004.jpg should be nominated, I might support this image, but as there is a better one available, I oppose. -- [[User:Solitude|Solitude\talk]] 10:55, Nov 11, 2004 (UTC)
