Talk:Figleaves
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Fashion WikiProject. Please work to improve this article, or visit our project page to find other ways of helping. Thanks! |
||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. |
||
| Low | This article is on a subject of low-importance within fashion. | ||
 |
It is requested that a image or images be included in this article to improve its quality. | ||
|
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|||
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Is Richard Brooks really a DUDE? I mean, I think so, but perhaps this is POV and should be deleted. In all seriousness, this article is sketchy and reads like a boring advertisement. Online retailers who have lasted as long as Figleaves are notable by their rarity and some more information about the company's history should be included, such as Robin Terrell's previous employment with Amazon and Figleaves' own Lingerie Awards.
I would also question the inclusion in the "United States" company category - much as the management may wish to pretend otherwise, Figleaves is only technically American and should be included as a British company.
The article should also have clarification that Figleaves is a retailer and only sells branded goods.
