Talk:Fort Charlotte, Shetland
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality, if possible. Wikipedians in Scotland may be able to help! |
I am transferring information from my web pages at www.forts.org.uk into Wikipedia, and have no problems with the reassignment of copyright
John Bray
I have e-mailed the owner of that webpage and indeed have received the following confirmation:
From: John Bray <e-mail omitted> To: [[User talk:Lupo|Lupo's e-mail omitted]] Subject: Re: Wikipedia articles Date sent: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 16:48:20 +0100 (BST) I confirm that any text copyright to my website Fortress UK (www.forts.org.uk) can be copied to Wikipedia in any form and the copyright reassigned > 1) You are the copyright holder of this text > 2) the text is posted to Wikipedia with your permission, and > 3) that you authorize the re-licensing of this text under the > GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anybody to edit > and re-distribute this text, even for commercial purposes? All confirmed.
Thank you very much, John. Lupo 15:57, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
"slighted" doesn't make sense in this context, at least in American English, and my British English A to Zed doesn't mention a difference. Can somebody rephrase using a more commonly understood wording? Niteowlneils 14:56, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- I'm at a loss here. Maybe "razed"? (Based on the wild coincidence that German has the expression "eine Burg schleifen" with the meaning of tearing it down. Maybe there's a connection there?) Lupo 15:59, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Our article on Dunbar seems to support this. See the paragraph in the middle. It seems it's a technical term for "deliberately destroying". Lupo 16:09, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Yes, definitely. See this Google search. Lupo 16:16, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Our article on Dunbar seems to support this. See the paragraph in the middle. It seems it's a technical term for "deliberately destroying". Lupo 16:09, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
.
