User talk:Josh290

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1 A Jim
2 The Jim
3 26 January 2007
4 IP Blocked
- 4.1 March 2007
5 Blocked

[edit] A Jim

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article A Jim, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. --W o o ty Woot? contribs 19:49, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as The Jim) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Mhking 20:02, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Im sorry that you think my page is nonsence, but its no fake. the Jim, as silly it may sound is actually real. i live in aycliffe, everyone in aycliffe knows what it is! there are even 'Laws of jim!! so please do not delete this page, its not nonscence!!!

Please read wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Sorry, we cannot believe your word. `'mikka 20:06, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

What do i need to do to make this a reliable source, i have no problems with publishing a website etc...

Your "invention" describes something that was just conjured up by you. It violates WP:NOT -- Wikipedia is not for something made up at school one day. If you continue to post your entry, you will be prohibited from posting to Wikipedia. --Mhking 20:14, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Jim

This is your last warning.
The next time you create an inappropriate page such as The Jim, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Mhking 20:13, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

i do not mean to cause offence, but what can i do to keep this article here?

Bottom line? You can't. Period. Go find a web site of your own to post it in. --Mhking 20:15, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

ok, sorry to cause any bad relations, i thought wiki was a friendly community based website

Wikipedia is not a community site; it is an encyclopedia. It doesn't exist to provide space for "made up" items. --Mhking 20:18, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

i understand what you are saying about the encyclopedia, but it isnt a made up item

I'm sorry you feel this way, but I have a low tolerance for someone who blatantly disregards the guidelines and rules that are established and posts blatantly made-up content that does not have empirical and independent notable sources to back it up. There are a large number of people whose sole purpose on Wikipedia is to violate said guidelines and post nonsense articles; your actions fell within that pattern. If you are not a blatant vandal, then I apologize. However, unless you can provide independent qualified verification of the term, then your article will not be able to stay. --Mhking 20:52, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 26 January 2007

If an article violates the guidelines established for inclusion, then it will be removed from Wikipedia; whether nominated by me, or by someone else. You still have yet to establish what makes the term you have been talking about worth including in Wikipedia; what sort of verifiable evidence you can provide of its existence. My nomination for deletion or speedy deletion is based on the established guidelines. --Mhking 19:20, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] IP Blocked

HI i am josh290 an i share this IP address with many people, who cause a newcence, (trust me, i know lol) and was wondering if my IP could be unblocked, if you need proof that im not a vandal, please see my user contributions.

many thanks, josh290

This user's request to have the autoblock on their IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Josh290 (block log • contribs • • [http://en.wikipedia.org../../../i/p/b/Special%7EIpblocklist_2536.html unblock)
89.242.172.19 (block log • contribs • ipblocklist • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • proxycheck • unblock)
Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Pie man126". The reason given for Pie man126's block is: "Abusive sockpuppet".

Blocking admin: Gwernol (talk • autoblocks • blocks)
Decline reason:

This account is almost certainly also an abusive sockpuppet. -- Yamla 17:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Note: declined unblock requests may only be removed after two days or when the block has expired.

I am not a sock puppet!! i have told you, this is my account. other people use this ip address, people who like to do stupid things,and make stupid accounts like 'pie man 126', if you wont reason whith me, how long will my IP be blocked for?... i was auto blocked anyway!!!

[edit] March 2007

All contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Can't sleep, clown will eat me may be offensive or unwelcome. In case you are the user, please login under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, particularly to userpages. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Will (aka Wimt) 13:25, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users, as you did to User:Wimt. Thank you. Will (aka Wimt) 13:27, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Custard, you will be blocked. Will (aka Wimt) 13:28, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

As a result of your blanking of the page De Pardieu Brocas Maffei, your username has been forwarded for blocking. matt.smart ^talk/contribs 13:30, 6 March 2007 (UTC)