User talk:KojiDude
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
AntiVandalBot Global Notice:
|
| WikiDefcon |
 WikiDefcon 4: Low to normal levels of vandalism from shared IPs and experimenting users. |
| [] |
|
Vandalism levels back to normal. CAT:CSD still backlogged. -- Hdt83 Chat 06:24, 8 April 2007 (UTC) |
 Archives |
|---|
Hi, this is my talk page (me being KojiDude). Feel free to leave me a message if you want, as long as you follow a couple rules. Yeah, I know what you're thinking. "Rules? Wtf? Why should I waste my time reading your rules when I can just leave a message?" Well, because if you break any of these the entire comment you made will be deleted.
- The number one rule would be no personal attacks please. If I have angered you in any way, or reverted any edits you made, I was likley following Wikipedia policy. Even if I didn't have a legitmit reason to anger you, you still shouldn't insult me.
- Please sign your posts. It's very disruptive and against policy not to. Just type: --~~~~ after your comments.
- Please don't edit your comments after making them, unless you're fixing a typo. It grinds my gears when you do that.
- Don't vandalize. It can and will get you blocked
- Don't troll. Seriously, no good comes out of it. All you'll get is a {{subst:test2-n}} on your talk page.
- Don't be a dick
If you would like to contact me in a more private manner, you can do so at My Forum or a Chat Room I attend to talk to my out-of-state friends.
[edit] Why'd you remove the Dragon World map?
There's no indication of vandalism on the article page anywhere. Please tell me why you removed it. User:Kabuto Yakushi
- Because there are no referneces proving it is Dragon World. If you can cite a source stating that it is, then you can re-add it. =) --KojiDude (viva la BAM!) 21:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ultimate Battle 22
Hey, KojiDude. I've made a suggestion on the Ultimate Battle 22 talk page to change the title from Ultimate Battle 22 to Dragon Ball Z: Ultimate Battle 22. Details can be seen on the talk page. I just wanted to know if you had any feedback on the suggestion or not. Happy editing! Sasuke-kun27 20:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for your help
...on the page protection request. I've been here for a while, but it's the first time I've ever filed a request on that page, so needless to say I made a few mistakes. I went back to reformat it and move it, and you'd beaten me to it! | Mr. Darcy talk 00:15, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- No problem, happy to help. I was confused the first time I wrote one too. I think filing a 3RR vio is the most confusing, though. >_< --KojiDude (viva la BAM!) 00:23, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] What's up?
Just passing through since I don't edit Wiki much anymore, thought I'd say hey (HEY!). Looking through your contributor history to see what you've been up to; are you an administrator now? If so, congratulations! The things that go down when I take time off. ^_^;
My recent edits aren't much I'm afraid, just a difference in opinion on the Coola page, which brought me here. Just think since official title translations of the films are given in FUNi's subtitles they should have prominence (and be listed regardless) in the movie listing; it's not even a sub or dub thing really. Probably all you'll hear from me on that, since I won't be around anyway. :(
Oh well. Whatever you're doing, have fun and stay safe. Take care now, and drop kick a few vandals for me! Voice of Treason 09:58, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Paragus
Are you sure about that? Most of the page is about Broly and is mostly a summary of the movie. It can't be expanded at all. Minor characters that have a small role in one movie don't really need a page in the first place. Nemu 20:36, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well, after reading your summary for him on the list of Saiyans page, I changed my mind. Good work. Just remember to let Bra, Goku Jr., and the 2 Dragons keep their own seperate articles. #'s 14&15 should keep their own articles too, but it wouldn't hurt to just merge them.--KojiDude 20:58, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Ok, I redirected it again. While I don't think Bra and Goku Jr. need pages, I woun't bother to pursue merging them. I'll probably merge 14 and 15 sometime later. I think I already merged the dragons a while ago. Nemu 21:05, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Shenlong really has no need for a page either. The couple of small, mostly unexpandable paragraphs are much better suited on the list than their own page. Nemu 21:17, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- He should keep his own page. He's a major character. All we need to do is expand the article a little. Add a personality section, a section listing the wishes he granted, and maybe a section about what wishes he can't grant and why he can't grant them.--KojiDude (Contributions) 21:34, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- I really wouldn't classify him as major. He only had like a half hour of screen time in the entirety of the three anime. It's more the idea of the Dragon Balls that's major. The additions to the page would mostly be fluff and cruft. I just think it would be better to leave a nice, short summary on the list. Nemu 21:52, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
Why did you revert Androids 14 and 15? They are very minor, and their articles are just small plot summaries. They have no personality, and really don't need pages. I can sort of see the main villians of movies needing pages, but minor characters that play very small roles really don't need any.
As for your edits to Shenlong, you seem to be mostly reiterating points that are already made. The big list of wishes is cruft and already found on Dragon Ball. I think it would be much better to just leave at as a redirect, and have the little blurb on that page do. Nemu 22:34, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- I reverted Android 14 and 15 because I don't think they should be redirects for 2 reasons.
1) If merged, they would do just fine. Somethig like Androids 14&15
2) The List of Androids in Dragon Ball article sucks. It has horrible grammar and a couple pathces of false information. It also has people who don't even belong there.
Shenlong is an important character because, were it not for him, the entire universe would probably be destroyed. The point about the list of wishes being taken from Dragon Ball doesn't make much sense to me. It's not a big deal that two articles have similar information. I'm also going to re-read the Dragon Ball manga during the week and add on to Shenlong as I do. Another point I want to bring up is that I don't have much knowledge of Shenron, so maybe somone who does know alot about him could help us out. We should probably have a Video Games section too.--KojiDude (Contributions) 22:49, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- The android list can always be cleaned up(I'll start on it in a little bit). A combined article would be pretty pointless as they both only have a paragraph of information each. They should just be redirected.
-
- A character being important in the series doesn't relly earn them an article. It's more about notablity and information. He's notable as far as Dragon Ball goes, but he really doesn't have enough information. The personality and un-Grantable wishes are mostly rehashes of information from the first paragraph(which also does a better job to just summarize it). The granted wishes section is not needed. It's very pointless, crufty, and much too large. It's not a big deal that two articles have similar information, but it seems pointless that over a quarter of the page is just a direct copy and paste from another page. A video game section will add a very small paragraph that's really not needed.
-
- The page really just doesn't need to exist. It's already pretty much maxed out in terms of useful information, and way over the amount of fluff an aricle should have. Nemu 00:15, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] kiwi
wasn't kiwi stronger at first 18,000 was vegeta's level??—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zadsat (talk • contribs).
- Kiwi's power level was 18,000. He claimed to be stronger than Vegeta to intimidate him. That's when Vegeta powered up to 22,000 and killed Kiwi. (This is from the Manga)--KojiDude (Contributions) 04:52, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
but in the anime it is said in a way that makes kiwi's advantage pretty clear do you mean in the magna? in the anime Zarbon says his powerlevels way higher than vegeta you wont be seein that monkey again or something like that?? - Zadsat 04:58, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not entirley sure what you're trying to say. The Manga has the final say in things like Power Levels. TOEI Studios and FUNimation fucked up alot of the storyline and dialouge in some parts. Zarbon was indeed more powerful than Vegeta in his Monster form, but in his Base state he was not.--KojiDude (Contributions) 05:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
no no no no no no no zarbon says that cui was much more powerfull than vegeta. - Zadsat 05:03, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- First, Zarbon said that before Vegeta powered up. Second, get a life Taracka.--KojiDude (Contributions) 05:04, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
i understand you now zarbon did say that before dude. - Zadsat 05:06, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] note about attacks
With regards to your comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dragon Ball special abilities: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. "Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users." Please keep this in mind while editing. Thanks. In particular, your asking another user "Are you fcuking high?" Andrew Levine 05:01, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Examples of personal attacks
"Specific examples of personal attacks include but are not limited to:
- Accusatory comments such as "George is a troll", or "Laura is a bad editor" can be considered personal attacks if said repeatedly, in bad faith, or with sufficient venom.
- Negative personal comments and "I'm better than you" attacks, such as "You have no life."
- Racial, sexual, homophobic, ageist, religious or ethnic epithets directed against another contributor. (Disagreement over what constitutes a religion, race, sexual preference, or ethnicity is not a legitimate excuse.)
- Using someone's affiliations as a means of dismissing or discrediting their views — regardless of whether said affiliations are mainstream or extreme.
- Profanity directed against another contributor.
- Threats of legal action.
- Threats of violence, including death threats.
- Threats of vandalism to userpages or talk pages. May be direct or indirect.
- Threats or actions which expose other Wikipedia editors to political, religious or other persecution by government, their employer or any others. Violations of this sort may result in a block for an extended period of time which may be applied immediately by any sysop upon discovery. Sysops applying such sanctions should confidentially notify the members of the Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee and Jimbo Wales of what they have done and why.
- Posting a link to an external source that fits the commonly-accepted threshold for a personal attack, in a manner that incorporates the substance of that attack into Wikipedia discussion. Suggesting a link applies to another editor, or that another editor needs to visit a certain link, that contains the substance of an attack."
Nowhere does it say that questioning a user's reliablity and current status is a personal attack. Saying "Are you fucking high?" Is not a means of insulting somone. And there's no policy against saying the word fuck. Last time I checked, there was one promoting it.--KojiDude (Contributions) 13:21, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Vegito23.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Vegito23.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:51, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Glitch City
I saved the OR version of Glitch City at User:The Hybrid/Glitch, and then I merged it. Cheers THL 17:31, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, nice work. =D I would've done it myself but I was at school, and the computer I was assigned to in the Tech Lab was blocked for 3 months (because of a different student).--KojiDude (Contributions) 21:48, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
I was happy to do it. Feel free to edit the page as much as you like, thats why I gave you a link. Cheers. THL 09:43, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] DBZ Character Page Images
Hello mate. I have looked through the pages and I am trying to correspond with the style. I know that you care equally about maintaining a proper amount for each page. I see that the Zarbon, Dodoria, Cui, Pikkon, Babidi, and some other pages are in good format, with a maximum of five pics on their pages. This is a good format. However, these characters are major players in their respective sagas whereas people like Janemba, Hildegarn, and Tapion are not. People have a tendency to put up a hooplah of images on the movie characters. Tapion was in 38 or so minutes. Hildegarn was in about 24 minutes. Janemba was in around 30 minutes of total airtime. These characters all appear in one movie and they aren't necessarily important nor influential. People are adding 6 images on their pages when they actually barely deserve one. This is why I am telling you to help me maintain control of pages like Janemba, Hildegarn, and Tapion. For example, Janemba can have 3 images on his page, such as his first form, his second form, and one of tank boy before his emergence. But to add three or four more images of him when he's smiling, angry, or lunging at an enemy is just plain overkill. I learned to maintain your method because of how you tried to bring control to my favorite pages. Thus, Zarbon has one image of his first form, one image from a game, one from his second form, one from his saga in mid battle, and one from when he returns in GT. This is a good method and it covers the character well. And I don't go and add 20 images on a page identifying every single move they make. I would also like to bring to your attention the very miserable Buu page. There's just too many images on the page, and many of them are just battle pics. Again, I hope you can help me and we can work together to maintain the 4-5 images per page for series characters and 3 images max for people like Janemba. Thank you very much and I hope to hear from you soon. - Zarbon
- The size of the article merits the numder of images, not importance. The Dodoria, Zarbon, Pikkon and ect's article's are short. I think you kind of have it backwards.--KojiDude (Contributions) 21:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Ok, why do you accuse me of vandalism? I haven't done anything wrong. I really believe you're mistaken and think I'm somebody else. Dragonball1986 23:24, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Simply because some of your edits were made in violation of WP:NPOV. Almost all of your edits are being reverted, and you seem to be doing the same thing over and over to different articles. I'm not saying you're doing it on purpose, I'm simply letting you know that your edits are questionable and you need to consider reading some of the policies concering images and behavior and ect.--KojiDude (Contributions) 23:41, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] How can I find a source?
I know for a fact that those power levels are official because they are listed in the Japanese Dragonball of Wikipedia for combat power. Look it up and see that I'm not lying. (make sure you have a Japanese to English translator though) 69.167.112.220 03:16, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- I do have a translator, but not a very good one. If you've already translated it, maybe you could just cite whatever reference the Japanese Wikipedia does? It sounds like the simplest thing to do, imo.--KojiDude (Contributions) 03:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- The only official power levels come either from Toriyama's manga or from the Daizenshû databook. Everything else is original research, even on the japanese Wikipedia. It's not because it's in japanese that Wikipedia becomes suddenly a primary source ! Folken de Fanel 10:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- I got it! The Japanese wikipedia has it from Akira Toriyama's staff called Mt. Toriyama Discernment. That proves they're official. Correct me if I'm wrong though, but at least have those characters whose power levels were revealed in the anime. Dragonball1986 13:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Like I said, Wikipedia, in japanese or in english language, will never be a primary source. Everything not coming from official sources is original research. If I contributed under the name "George W. Bush" it would never mean that I really am the president of the USA. Folken de Fanel 17:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- I got it! The Japanese wikipedia has it from Akira Toriyama's staff called Mt. Toriyama Discernment. That proves they're official. Correct me if I'm wrong though, but at least have those characters whose power levels were revealed in the anime. Dragonball1986 13:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] User:Wikistar3
Thank you for catching this problematic username. I have advised the user to request a name change, and we can play it by ear. --Ginkgo100 talk · e@ 02:22, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- No prob.--KojiDude (Contributions) 02:23, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Muchas gracias
Hey Koji, thanks a lot for supporting me in my recent RfA. It succeeded, and I am very grateful to all of you. If you ever need help with anything, please don't hesitate to ask. Also, feel free point out any mistakes I make! Thanks again, —Khoikhoi 04:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- No problem. =) If you ever find yourself in a position where you don't know what to do, just remember; 42...--KojiDude (Contributions) 05:02, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Edits
If you were to look at the summary for the edit in question and at what I removed, you would hopefully realize I was removing a redundant section. Gokule, the section I removed, already exists as Gotan. Unless you believe there is a need for the same character to have two sections on the same page, then my edit was just. I admit my edit summary may not have been incredibly clear, but looking at what I removed should have answered any questions you may have had. ~SnapperTo 05:20, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Edit warring
Please don't do it. You are not entitled to three reverts in every twenty-four hours, as your edit summary here[1] seems to suggest. Tom Harrison Talk 23:10, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- I know, I've read WP:3RR; I only said that because he was accusing me of breaking 3RR.--KojiDude (Contributions) 23:13, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hirudegarn
First off, what's with you calling it vandalism? I listed the reason right in the summary. Just say you disagree with it. Don't call it vandalism. Why does he need the page? It's just a basic plot summary of the movie. It's pointless as hell. A small section on the list with a link to the movie should do. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TTN (talk • contribs) .
- Because you blanked an entire article without any consenseous from other people. You can't just go aroudn redirecting any page you want. It's disruptive and not fair to the people who've been working hard to make the article. How would you feel if you wrote a big long article, spent alot of time on it, and I came and redirected saying it was pointless (when it isn't)?--KojiDude (Contributions) 23:48, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- I'm never going to write anything that pointless. I don't see how anyone could work very hard on a basic plot summary that only should be on the movie's article. I have no clue how it would ever reach a consensus as the few pages I have left a message on haven't been replyed to. These pages are really pointless. I have no idea how people want them to exist. If the character can only have a plot summary, what's the point? Nemu 23:52, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- "Few pages"? You've redirected about 10-15. What you're doing is lazy; you're blanking articles instead of doing clean-up on them. All these pages need is a little extra information about the character. That's what Wikipedia is for. You create a small article, and then it gradually grows. Not you create a small article and TTN comes and redirects it callign your work pointless. And don't think this is a WP:OWN issue, because I've hardly worked on the Hirudegarn article.--KojiDude (Contributions) 23:56, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- When did I say you thought you owned it? I'm saying that you're magnifying it's importance way beyond what it actually is. So far, I've only redirected pages that don't need to exist, and can't be "cleaned". All these movie characters articles are just plot summaries. They characters have no importance outside of them. If I was to clean them, there would be nothing left as I would reduce the summary to a paragraph(as it is on the list). The only movie characters that should have articles are Coola, Broly, and Garlic Jr. They at least build up more than just a "villain of the week" reputaion.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Saying the articles should stay just because people worked on them is pointless. I'll go around and add the plot summaries to the movie articles if they're good or better than what's there. The other good info can be placed on the list. See, no "important" info or work lost. Nemu 00:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
Wikipedia has no limit to the number of articles it can have or the amount of content in articles. If you disagree with the notability of an article, then discuss among your fellow Wikipedians. If the consensus agrees with you then it may be removed. However, if you continue this disruption, your edits will be considered as Vandalism. -- bulletproof 3:16 00:04, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Really, it wouldn't. I could easily AfD these articles, and most people would agree to delete them as they are not notable at all and for the fact that they're plot summaries(which I believe the writing about fiction policy says not to do). How am I going to discuss it when nobody replies? Nemu 00:10, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
-
- Thats what this fool said about this. And look what happened. -- bulletproof 3:16 00:13, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- So, if you just straight up deleted a page without AfDing it, nobody would care? At least having an AfD would allow discussion. Just redirecting it out of nowhere is disruptive.--KojiDude (Contributions) 00:11, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Well, I assume nobody should disagree with it(which is why I didn't try to do it with characters that really aren't important, but can be seen as important like Cui and Dodoria). Do you disagree with the redirects because you find the characters notable, or that you don't like pages being removed? The later is what I'm sensing.
-
-
-
-
-
- You know what? Screw trying to justify my actions. Let's just discuss it now. The articles for King Cold(which I tried to discuss after, but Bulletproof just seemed to ignore it) and Hirudegarn should be merged with their lists. Why do you disagree?
-
-
-
-
-
-
- First, I disagree because King Cold has plenty of info, and Hirudegarn just needs to be expanded a bit. You shouldn't redirect articles without giving some sort of notice, so somone has time to clean them up (you should probably be doing it yourself, though). Second, why the hell do you wanna discuss wether or not a page should be removed on my talk page?--KojiDude (Contributions) 00:22, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Because if I bother to put it on the talk page, it'll be ignored. How can either of them be expaned while having on the essential history on their pages? They have nothing besides that and a quick personality description which fits better on the list. Do you think either could look like Kuririn(which needs a general clean up)? He has a nice brief history, but the article actually has substance. Neither of those two could have anything close to that. Nemu 00:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- If all you need is an example of what I'm talking about, look at Janemba. Me, Jeinum, and Voice of Treason all worked together to clean it up. If you notice. we also comunicated on the talk page about our edits (and don't just go Redirect that one because I mentioned it).--KojiDude (Contributions) 00:44, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Another day, Another WP:TROLL... -- bulletproof 3:16 00:25, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Wow. That's just stupid. Because I feel that a couple of pointless pages need to be redirected, I'm a troll? You haven't even discussed it yet. I put it right on King Cold's talk page right after you reverted it again. Wait until I keep redirecting it(which I won't, just to clarify) before calling me a troll. Nemu 00:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Count up how many articles you've redirected so far, and then read what you just said.--KojiDude (Contributions) 00:44, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
As far as fully redirected, six that I could find. That's not very many as they were all small articles like Android 14, 15, Porunga and others that can easily be summed up in a paragraph. I tried to redirect Hirudegarn, King Cold, Rou Dai Kaioshin and Shenlong, but they were reverted. Both Shenlong and Rou Dai Kaioshin are debatable, I guess, but Hirudegarn and King Cold are minor at best. I guess I could have discussed Shenlong and Rou Dai Kaioshin, but the rest shouldn't need one at all. Nemu 00:54, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dragon Ball Z article named
Okay, I'm confused on everything now. Some articles use dub names, some use manga names, some use Japanese names, some use fan names, it doesn't make any sense. You said the ones where a diffrent name was used more they used that name, like Coola. Coola gets 1,810,000 results. Cooler gets 79,000,000 results. And people say to discuss changing artilce names but when I bring it up it will get one or two comments and then be forgoten. If I try to move it someone reverts it and gets on my case for not discussing it when I did. So what am I suposed to do? Takuthehedgehog 05:54, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- Well, in my eyes there's 3 options. 1) Make the point about Google hits in your move summary or on the talk page 2) Find somone very active to debate with or 3) Forget about it, it's anime.--KojiDude (Contributions) 05:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Someone deleted Bebi blatantly
Please see Bebi's talk page to decifer who deleted him. --Dragon BallPower levels (Contributions) 19:36, 8 November
- I honestly have no idea what happened here. I think it's just a Redirect gone bad. Maybe bring it up at WP:ANI?--KojiDude (Contributions) 20:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Please see Broly's talk page
I suggested a move from Broly (Dragon Ball) to Broly. See his talk page for commenting. Power level (Dragon Ball) 21:45, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] What do you think of this?
About the Super Saiyan page, under super saiyan, there is a list of 'known users' that had achieved that level, Future Trunks was included, but I was wondering would Future Gohan be qualified to be included, since he did make an appearance in the DBZ movie "絶望への反抗!! 残された超戦士・悟飯とトランクス", but you probably have a point to disagree to this, somehow I see one coming..
[edit] Notice: A fellow user
A User:Zhahzha has been placing orphan tags on several Dragon Ball related images that are in current use. I'll revert this person's doings as soon as I'm done here, but I need you or any other Wikipedians to warn this person. Power level (Dragon Ball) 17:11, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
-
My mistake, I was badly misinformed and have already apologized to Zhahzha on Nemu's talk page. --
// Power level (Dragon Ball) // 15:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Barnstar
 |
The Original Barnstar | |
| You've done way more than enough to deserve such an award. So here you go.--SUIT42 03:26, 9 November 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] Hello!
Hey, Kojidude... its been a while huh? I was out for a couple of weeks cause my computer started acting up. So I went to go get it fixed, and it turns out the motherboard was completly fucked up. So I did what any other pissed off person with cash would do. I kicked my COM around a few minutes, then I spit on it another few minutes, and finally I went out to Best Buy and got a new one! See, it all worked out for BP. So now that im back...eh... what'd I miss? Any new trolls? -- bulletproof 3:16 18:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
-
What?!?!? that Powerlevel guy is still around? I thought Deskana would have blocked him by now... -- bulletproof 3:16 18:30, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] I need a little help here...
We're having an argument over at Talk:Rou Dai Kaioshin about the spelling of Majin Buu in the english manga. I said that they could either check volumes 24-26 of the DBZ manga or Majin Buu's page (under "manga name") to prove that I was right. TTN had changed "Boo" to "Majin Buu" on the article to avoid revert wars, but they still argue about the spelling on the talk page. Now they're demanding manga scans that prove that I'm right. Do you know how hard it is to find manga scans of a specific page on the internet? Hopefully, you and possibly someone other users, besides Suit and myself, can talk some sense into them. Thank you. // Sasuke-kun27 20:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Bardock
Hey there, KojiDude! Um, could you check out Talk:Bardock? I posted up a discussion but nobody has answered yet....maybe if you put up your opinion on the site, more will take a look at it and give their opinion. So, when you get the chance, visit the talk page. It's section is at the very bottom. There's a link to the site; see if it has good information. If not, can you find a link needed or something. Thanks! ----Power level(Dragon Ball)Stacy's Mom 16:25, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
It's me again, could you see Paragus' talk page also for comment?----Power level(Dragon Ball)Stacy's Mom 21:26, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Well, to be completley honest, I really don't care about the Paragus page. If Nemu wants to go and redirect every stub because he's too lazy to fix them up, let him. It's just a meaningless Wikipedia article anyway =/ --KojiDude (Contributions) 16:22, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Trouble in paradise
We're having a little problem we're trying to resolve. Another move request over at Talk:Hercule (Dragon Ball), since apparently winning the last one didn't "count." Care to weigh in? Onikage725 07:48, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] What do you think?
There's a troll that is reverting my redirects from a few articles that seem to be plain listcruft. (List of Dragon Ball DVDs List of Dragon Ball video games, List of Dragon Ball episodes) I believe it is unnecessary to have such lists because of the fact that there are templates that list most of the information there already. The third article in question is nothing more than a list of movies and links to other lists. A comment on this issue would be greatly appreciated. -- bulletproof 3:16 03:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dragon World
Please see Talk:Dragon World dispute for your vote on whether we should keep the Human (Dragon World) article or have it merged into Dragon World. Thanks! Power level (Dragon Ball) 15:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move Hercule (Dragon Ball) to Mister Satan
It's happening again. Place your vote/comment on the respective talk page for which name Wikipedia should use; a censored name, or an orignal name. Power level (Dragon Ball) 15:21, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] I love your userpage
It is hilarious :D —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.50.143.66 (talk) 12:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC).
Thanks. =D --KojiDude (Contributions) 07:27, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:DMC4Dante.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DMC4Dante.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:50, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Please try to remain CIVIL
Recently, I have noticed that you haven't been very friendly with me and swearing, as you did on my user talk page. Attacking other users only esculate the tension between you and the oposing user/s so please try to remain civil at all times, even though the opposing contributor has made a mistake or angered you in any way. Read Personal attacks and disruptive comments if you're unsure of what's civil and what's not. Try to always keep cool and pipe down a little before posting hurtful comments on people's user talk pages. You, yourself regard having no personal attacks has very important and you should keep to your word. This notice was not put there just to annoy you, it was put there because I believe your comments for me and other contributors, need improvement. Please read the guidelines carefully before further disrupting mine or any other user talk pages. Thank you! Shaggy9872004 05:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
-
Another day, another troll... Wikipedia is not censored... -- bulletproof 3:16 23:53, 16 January 2007 (UTC)How is any of this a personal attack, uncivility, or disruption on KojiDude's part? He obviously didn't do any of that towards you Shaggy so what's up with the ridiculous warning? Power level (Dragon Ball) 01:02, 17 January 2007 (UTC)If you both need refreshing please note that ethnic epithets and profanity is a personal attack. Please see this little statement written by Serpent's choice if you need verifying. Even if this is not a rule, it is strongly discouraged by wikipedia. Read Personal attacks if you need refreshing. Please respond on my talk page if you need further refreshing of Wikipedian rules and discouragement. I will gladly help you. Good day to you. By the way User:3bulletproof16, how was I being a troll. I was only suggesting that he has manners and speak politely. You look there has been another user, accusing KojiDude of being uncivil. Shaggy9872004 10:45, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] PL (DB) Comment
When you can, see Talk:Power level (Dragon Ball)#Okay, let's get these power levels right!, thanks! Power level (Dragon Ball) 19:08, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:DemonKingYouth.GIF)
Thanks for uploading Image:DemonKingYouth.GIF. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MECU≈talk 01:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject
Hey Kojidude, would you be interested in joining our Wikiproject? Wikipedia:WikiProject Dragon Ball -- bulletproof 3:16 02:33, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Barnstar
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For your fine contribs to Wikipedia. Keep 'em coming. -- bulletproof 3:16 07:50, 29 January 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] Your userboxes
I was wondering why you had more than one {{User DBZfan}} on your userpage. Is it cause you like Dragon Ball that much? Just askin'! Power level (Dragon Ball) 19:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] A new Dragon Ball attack list
I should let ya know too. Whenever you can, please see Talk:List of Dragon Ball special abilities#Garlic Gun. If you see that Garlic Gun there, that is just a sample of how the techniques should be classified and titled. I am going to change all of the techniques on the list (except Kamehameha, Dodonpa, Genki Dama, Kaio Ken and any others that were used as romaji names in the English manga/anime) into their literal English translation in about five days from now. This change will be similar as to how Bardock was changed to Burdock (name pun) and Hercule to Mr. Satan (which was his original Japanese/romaji name). Please comment on anything else if you have something you may want to add on to it. Thanks! Power level (Dragon Ball) 00:04, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Stuff you don't wanna read
Hilarious section. That made me have a big laugh :D. Good job!! --Taraborn 08:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] How's it going man?
Dude where you at? been a while since you've been on the Wiki. Hope you come back soon man. The DBZ Wikiproject could use some extra help. -- bulletproof 3:16 04:47, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Soul_Punisher.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Soul_Punisher.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BigrTex 22:15, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Chaos.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Chaos.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:44, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
