User talk:Luigifan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please keep an eye on this page, as I will frequently reply here (before finding your own talk page,) and, if I still don't get a reply, potentially creating a crapflood. Sorry, folks, but I'm a bit impatient. Just ask the folks at the Moogle Cavern. I believe that you could also just talk to Blaze and H Hog if you want more information on the Moogle Cavern, as they both happen to be members there.
|
[edit] What
who the hell are you and what do u want.
- I could say the same to you. --Luigifan 12:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] My response
Please look at my response on User talk:Eagle_101. Thanks —— Eagle (ask me for help) 00:26, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AfD Nomination: Sonic: The Fated Hour
I've nominated the article Sonic: The Fated Hour for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Sonic: The Fated Hour satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonic: The Fated Hour. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Sonic: The Fated Hour during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. Hbdragon88 20:17, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] lol moderator
I only wish I as an administrator/sysop. Nope. I'm just an ordinary Wikipedian, just like you. Hbdragon88 22:54, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Prestige Class
.*waves* Did you finally work out what you were doing with the template? It took me a while too, actually, although I don't think my edit summories were quite so amusing. I thought I should let you know I removed duelist from the list since it's still a red link. If all the class from this list were added I think the page might be just a little too long. Morgrim 15:21, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- Right, saw you'd changed the link. I look forwards to seeing what you do with the duelist article, and I added it to my WIP template. Morgrim 02:25, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Spacing out
I am curious why you are adding spaces and a bot is taking them out. Ideas? ... aa:talk 05:00, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
Because it's proper grammar to double space after every period, exclamation mark, or question mark. Actually, that goes for whenever you end a sentence, unless it starts a new line (by which I mean hitting the Enter key, not the limits of the computer monitor,) or if it starts a new paragraph. Why those bots don't have proper grammar within their programming, I have no clue... --Luigifan 20:04, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_archive_(spaces_after_a_full_stop/period). It doesn't matter in the end, but note that double spacing after a period is a North American practice. ColourBurst 05:28, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] edit content
Hello, Luigifan. I noticed your changes to Candidiasis [1]. Thanks for contributing here. I was wondering why you made so many edits to the document, rather than encapsulating all the changes in a single edit. It makes it easier to track what's been changed when more changes are committed per single edit. Also, I want to thank you ver much for using clear edit summaries. That bit saves me a lot of time when I am trying to go over a large list of changes. Thanks again for contributing (Candidiasis is unfortunately one of my favorite subjects). ... aa:talk 05:36, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- I made so many edits because I kept forgetting minor details! I know, it's a bit embarrassing, huh? Hopefully my contributions page isn't too cluttered! :p --Luigifan 20:00, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- And, I'm currently doing a science project on Candidiasis, or, rather, the systemic version, so I was spending a lot of time at the page.
- I've rephrased you're paragraph on Candidiasis so that it's not touting a controversial point of view that much. Now it may be touting the scepticist point of view too much :). If you think so go ahead and try to find a middle ground. --Cyhawk 21:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, it looks excellent. --Luigifan 01:45, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- I've rephrased you're paragraph on Candidiasis so that it's not touting a controversial point of view that much. Now it may be touting the scepticist point of view too much :). If you think so go ahead and try to find a middle ground. --Cyhawk 21:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- And, I'm currently doing a science project on Candidiasis, or, rather, the systemic version, so I was spending a lot of time at the page.
[edit] I appreciate the article/Marioween Discussion
But I'm not entirely sure it should be on Wikipedia, since the game isn't out yet. It's one thing to put an official game up on Wikipedia before it's release, but a fangame? Wikipedia likes having proof that something is notable. And while certainly the game is notable to you now, to a large portion of planet earth, it unfortunately is not. Should I ever get the game out and it gains enough popularity, perhaps then it'll deserve it's own article, but right now? I don't think it does, sorry. BlazeHedgehog 00:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Did you like the additions to the storyline that I proposed? (Personally, I think it would be interesting to bring back the Grand Battle Kukku the 15th and the Battle Bird Army, or to incorporate Mammoth Mogul into the game...) I still have the article on Microsoft Word, but I won't put it up, with respect to your opinions. --Luigifan 01:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- I really have my own plans for the plot and have had for a very, very long time. About MarioWeen: Read the manual. There's a move in there I describe with the bunny ears that helps solve the problem in the Ghost House. BlazeHedgehog 20:04, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Do your own plans have anything to do with Dracula? --Luigifan 02:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- That move works with Mario with the Bunny Ears, but not for Luigi! --Luigifan 21:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Are you sure you have the latest version (1.04)? MWNDX.exe's "last modified" date should be October 11th, 2005. I just booted up MarioWeen and tried it, and 1.04 fixes the spring bug, I believe. BlazeHedgehog 00:05, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, and: To get the real ending, either set your computer's clock to October 31st, or just wait for it to happen legitimately. There's other holidays that give you secret levels, too (Christmas and April fools). BlazeHedgehog 00:24, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- October 31st? I KNEW IT!!!!!! The evil castle arises on Halloween night, so that's when Mario can enter and confront the Count!!!! --Luigifan 01:46, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Okay. I just got the real ending, and, I have to say, I have no clue what it's supposed to mean. Where the heck is Princess Peach? How the heck did Luigi end up in the Death Egg? And, what the heck is Able Juice? Is this just because I beat the game with Luigi? What the heck is going on?!? --Luigifan 02:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- October 31st? I KNEW IT!!!!!! The evil castle arises on Halloween night, so that's when Mario can enter and confront the Count!!!! --Luigifan 01:46, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, and: To get the real ending, either set your computer's clock to October 31st, or just wait for it to happen legitimately. There's other holidays that give you secret levels, too (Christmas and April fools). BlazeHedgehog 00:24, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Are you sure you have the latest version (1.04)? MWNDX.exe's "last modified" date should be October 11th, 2005. I just booted up MarioWeen and tried it, and 1.04 fixes the spring bug, I believe. BlazeHedgehog 00:05, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- That move works with Mario with the Bunny Ears, but not for Luigi! --Luigifan 21:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Reposting/"Reviving" deleted content
Please note that reposting or "reviving" (as you called it) deleted articles after they have gone through the Articles for Deletion process will be speedily deleted. --Wafulz 15:57, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Judging from your posts on the AfD discussion last time, I think you might be unclear about what does and does not belong on Wikipedia. Every article on the encyclopedia has to meet a few basic policies, ie verifiability, no original research, neutrality, What Wikipedia is not, etc. For specific things like websites, video games, or people, we have actual guidelines developed. In the case of Sonic: The Fated Hour, we use WP:SOFTWARE to help us judge whether or not the game will be able to meet the above policies. Typically, fan games and game mods need to be extraordinarily popular, or they have to have several non-trivial third party publishings about them, like a gaming magazine writing a full article on it. If you have any questions feel free to ask me. --Wafulz 16:04, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] YOur edits to User:Chadbryant
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. yandman 07:45, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism warnings
Warning vandals is a good thing, but comments like this are utterly inappropriate. Never, ever, make threats—even in jest. This is especially important when dealing with AOL IP addresses; the person reading your message is almost certainly someone other than its intended recipient. Kirill Lokshin 03:07, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Reply
Well I'm pretty busy and only on wiki now and again to relieve stress, but it's always good to see someone else trying to clean up vandalism.D1Puck1T 03:52, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AFD for MarioWeen
I'm not blind, man. BlazeHedgehog 00:23, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Dude, it's 17 keep to 11 delete (and a couple of those deletes are "weak deletes", at that, which means it's probably more like... 17 keep to 10 delete.). It's kind of close, but I'm not really sweating bullets or anything. BlazeHedgehog 13:21, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Warning
Please refrain from vandalising the user pages of other users, or making changes which the user indicates are unhelpful. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Andre (talk) 01:25, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
I hated to do it, but me, Blaze, and several others were all clamoring for you to come to your senses. Unfortunately, you did not. --Luigifan 01:27, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Vandalism is not a "wake-up call." Additionally, please direct correspondence to my talk page or the AFD itself, not my user page. Andre (talk) 01:41, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think you understand how our deletion policy works. I do not have to respond specifically to all criticisms, nor am I able to de-list an AFD if I am convinced that it was a bad idea (which I am not). "Getting my attention" was not necessary, and vandalism is certainly not the proper route to do so. If you are going to do anything rash, it will only get you blocked. I suggest you listen to your friend BlazeHedgehog and allow the AFD to take its course. Andre (talk) 02:03, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Please stop editing my user page. Use the talk page. Andre (talk) 02:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- What's that going to accomplish? You refuse to listen to him. If you're a bigot, I have to burst your bubble, because I have little tolerance for sin. As for the eruption on the AFD, yes, that was purely my fault. I let myself get riled up and explode, and it just made me look like a barbarian. >_< But deafening yourself to the opinion of others is inexcusable. If you continue to give Blaze a hard time, you are going to regret it. --Luigifan 02:11, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- I do not believe the page is notable. I believe many fangames are similarly non-notable. I do not see how this makes me a bigot. Andre (talk) 02:18, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- If this isn't notable, I have no clue what is. This is one of the most popular fangames in existence, on par with, if not better than, Estel's When Tails Gets Bored. If you believe that Marioween isn't notable, then you cannot enjoy fangames. I fail to see how you cannot realize this. --Luigifan 02:22, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Are you for real? Andre (talk) 03:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- The Ninja of Peace? There's no sockpuppetry going on, it's still the same username. It's more like a voluntary split personality. You should notice that I'm much more calm and introspective as the Ninja of Peace. --Luigifan 11:04, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- That's not what I mean. I mean, are you serious? Are you taking this seriously? Andre (talk) 03:31, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, yes. Quite seriously. The way of the ninja is stealth... He strikes when his foe least expects it... However, as you seem to have dropped out of the discussion, punishing your bigotry would be a moot cause at the moment. Therefore, I have no reason to pursue you. --Luigifan 12:24, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- As an unbiased passerby third-party, I'd say Luigifan is seriously pushing his luck. Dude, you're gonna get blocked. Don't push it. --172.191.91.69 21:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- dot...dot...dot...Drahcirmy talkget my skin 01:28, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- As an unbiased passerby third-party, I'd say Luigifan is seriously pushing his luck. Dude, you're gonna get blocked. Don't push it. --172.191.91.69 21:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, yes. Quite seriously. The way of the ninja is stealth... He strikes when his foe least expects it... However, as you seem to have dropped out of the discussion, punishing your bigotry would be a moot cause at the moment. Therefore, I have no reason to pursue you. --Luigifan 12:24, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- That's not what I mean. I mean, are you serious? Are you taking this seriously? Andre (talk) 03:31, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- The Ninja of Peace? There's no sockpuppetry going on, it's still the same username. It's more like a voluntary split personality. You should notice that I'm much more calm and introspective as the Ninja of Peace. --Luigifan 11:04, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Are you for real? Andre (talk) 03:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- If this isn't notable, I have no clue what is. This is one of the most popular fangames in existence, on par with, if not better than, Estel's When Tails Gets Bored. If you believe that Marioween isn't notable, then you cannot enjoy fangames. I fail to see how you cannot realize this. --Luigifan 02:22, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- I do not believe the page is notable. I believe many fangames are similarly non-notable. I do not see how this makes me a bigot. Andre (talk) 02:18, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- What's that going to accomplish? You refuse to listen to him. If you're a bigot, I have to burst your bubble, because I have little tolerance for sin. As for the eruption on the AFD, yes, that was purely my fault. I let myself get riled up and explode, and it just made me look like a barbarian. >_< But deafening yourself to the opinion of others is inexcusable. If you continue to give Blaze a hard time, you are going to regret it. --Luigifan 02:11, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- Please stop editing my user page. Use the talk page. Andre (talk) 02:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think you understand how our deletion policy works. I do not have to respond specifically to all criticisms, nor am I able to de-list an AFD if I am convinced that it was a bad idea (which I am not). "Getting my attention" was not necessary, and vandalism is certainly not the proper route to do so. If you are going to do anything rash, it will only get you blocked. I suggest you listen to your friend BlazeHedgehog and allow the AFD to take its course. Andre (talk) 02:03, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your recent behaviour
You've asked me to help out on a deletion discussion. I'm taking a look through it now. However, your behaviour has been absolutely appalling. Others are entitled to their opinions- just because you disagree doesn't mean that you need to give them a "wake up call." You're lucky you haven't been blocked for incivility and personal threats. I recommend you just step aside from the discussion entirely. Also, cut back on the ninja stuff. It's making you look quite ridiculous- combined with your absolute rudeness and arrogance towards others, you're hurting your case more than you're helping it. --Wafulz 17:34, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- The "ninja stuff" was my way or realizing that I had been a barbarian, and changing my tune in order to better present my case. Yes, maybe I was a bit arrogant as the Ninja of Peace, but rude? I don't see how. --Luigifan 12:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Alrighty
I'm going to be blunt with you: if you continue with your current behavior, you will be blocked. If you wish to contribute the right way, please keep the following in mind:
- Always be civil. Always. No matter how upset you get, keep a cool head.
- Do not vandalise other people's pages, especially over content dispute, i.e., someone else's listing of an article on AFD.
- Wikipedia is not a chat room. Trying to ask how other people which characters they use in Super Smash Brothers is un-encyclopedic and does not belong here.
- If articles are deleted, you cannot re-create them. I can't stress this enough. Even if you create it again, it will be deleted. Continuing to add it will result in it being salted.
- Edit wars happen, and using offensive edit summaries will not help.
- Just because you think a fangame is great doesn't mean it is. If you disagree with Andre on it, fine, but that gives you no right to blatently insult him on your userpage.
- Your "Ninja of Peace" spiel is getting out of hand, and, quite frankly, is disturbing to those of us who have dealt with vandals in the past. It's being interpreted as threatening because it truly is.
I don't wish to make you angry or upset you in any way, but you've got to understand that Wikipedia has rules. If you keep ignoring them the way you have been, you will be blocked. --172.193.88.79 01:47, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sourcing statements
I've reverted an edit you made to Boss (video games). Please remember to cite sources when you make assertions or generalizations in articles. --Wafulz 00:07, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism warnings
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to List_of_Super_Smash_Bros._series_NPCs. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dlong 03:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Nonsense?!? --Luigifan 03:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Damsels in distress
Sorry to undo all those categories, but like I said, the category is better applied to characters where traditionally getting kidnapped or in trouble is all the character does. I tried to find some characters that fit better and added them.D1Puck1T 02:42, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Changing other peoples' comments
Hi Luigifan
You changed comments from someone else here and made them say things the writer (me) didn't mean them to say.
Why? ➨ ЯEDVERS 08:42, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
I was simply doing things like fixing spelling or the grammar. --Luigifan 12:07, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- As a rule, refrain from editing others' comments without their permission. Though it may appear helpful to correct typing errors, grammar, etc., please do not go out of your way to bring talk pages to publishing standards, since it is not terribly productive and will tend to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. You also added wikilinks, for instance linking my use of the word "test" with the policy WP:POINT. That was something I certainly didn't mean. Please don't do this again. Thanks ➨ ЯEDVERS 12:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Friends
I appreciate the gesture. However, you'd be better off adding me to a messenger list :) Contact dta is on my page.GrandMasterGalvatron 13:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Civility in your edit summaries
Please remember to avoid personal attacks and incivility at all times, including edit summaries. This is particularly true of the following edits:
Thanks. --Wafulz 04:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. This is referring to the personally insulting edit summaries you made recently. Timkovski 12:39, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Please use the preview button
I would like to thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. --Wafulz 14:15, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Eggman
Yo luigifan, just to let you know, "Eggman" is no longer a nickname. It may not be his "real" name, but now it's his "official" name. And it's all supported by these links, which are of all the recent Sonic games: http://www.sega.com/gamesite/sonicnext/sonicnext_full/index.php http://www.sega.com/gamesite/sonicheroes/content.html http://www.sega.com/gamesite/shadow/base.html http://www.sega.com/gamesite/sonicriders/ 65.100.167.180 03:05, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Katana
Your recent edit to the Katana article is somewhat questionable, as is its reasoning. The inclusion of the videos into the article does not add any 'encyclopaedic' information. It shows a single unsubstantiated and misconstrued experiment. You may see other information of the talk page of the article. I would ask you to retract that edit, as it has been discussed and ultimately found to be unsuitable, unscientific, uninformative, and unencyclopaedic. - xiliquiernTalk 21:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hey.
Well, what do you want me to say, exactly? Luigi woke up from a dream, you see. Able Juice is from Mario RPG. BlazeHedgehog 11:27, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding edits made during December 13, 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 18:00, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Um, what did I do? --Luigifan 11:57, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- For example, you added the line "(This is mainly because Trudeau's critics are all ignorant/prejudiced LIARS!!!!!)" to the Kevin Trudeau entry. See here [4]. I note that you even labeled the change as, "I know this is going to be reverted, but it needs to be said." So you obviously knew what you were doing was vandalism. If you have something to say, say it articulately on the talk page, not by vandalism. Thank you. -- HiEv 07:34, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah. Apologies for not responding to the question promptly, and thanks HiEv for doing so. It wasn't intentional, I've just got far too many pages on my watchlist. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 07:44, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- For example, you added the line "(This is mainly because Trudeau's critics are all ignorant/prejudiced LIARS!!!!!)" to the Kevin Trudeau entry. See here [4]. I note that you even labeled the change as, "I know this is going to be reverted, but it needs to be said." So you obviously knew what you were doing was vandalism. If you have something to say, say it articulately on the talk page, not by vandalism. Thank you. -- HiEv 07:34, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Uhm...What?
Hi Lui! I noticed that you've added a comment on H Hog's talk page where I've described him my problems. Well, my English is not very well and so I hardly understodd what you were talking about. Well, do you know where I can play Alex Kidd in Miracle World online over Java? Morris Munroe 16:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I can't help you there. --Luigifan 12:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Need some help
Check out this debate in Rouge's talk page. This dude is actually trying to say that Sonic Channel isn't a reliable source, even though it's directly from Sonic Team. He's also insisting that Rouge should be mentioned as 17/18 even though that's a direct contradiction to Sonic Team's data. Can I get a little assistance here?GrandMasterGalvatron 15:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Is this the same one where I made that Fire Emblem gag? --Luigifan 12:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yep. It's the one where I made the Fire Emblem gag. (Specifically, I asked what in the world Fire Emblem had to do with Rouge's age.) --Luigifan 12:17, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Please don't abuse talk pages
Please don't abuse talk pages by adding nonsense like this. Thank you. Andy Mabbett 12:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
You might try posting it here instead.[5] Shui9 14:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
That stuff isn't nonsense, it's a serious concern of mine! And, who said that I was "abusing" talk pages? --Luigifan 23:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Article talk pages are not supposed to be used for chatting, but for collaborating on articles (WP:NOT, WP:TALK). The reference desk is more suited to asking questions. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 23:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- The reference desk is a place to ask questions to the users of Wikipedia. Your questions there will not be removed.Shui9 12:37, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Please be reminded that talk pages exist to discuss the associated article, not the subject of the article. Wikipedia is not a help desk for your personal issues. AecisBrievenbus 12:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Characters
You are free to chime in on the talk page, but this is already over. Nobody objected with a valid reason. Nemu 12:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC)