User talk:LuxOfTKGL

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to the Wikipedia

I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

• M:Foundation issues
• Wikipedia:Tutorial
• Wikipedia:Cleanup resources
• Wikipedia:Help desk
• Wikipedia:Five pillars

For more information click here. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be bold!

User:Sam Spade

Contents 1 WikiMedia Theme 2 Hey 3 Questions 4 On behalf of Lux 5 Christ

[edit] WikiMedia Theme

Hi Lux,

Sorry, all I have for the theme is the CSS as well as the wikipic.jpg picture. You need to change the address of the hot-linked pic in the CSS from puellula.org to puellula.com. As you may know, puellula.org was recently suspended by GoDaddy. Zanthalon , 22:01, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hey

Hey, thanks for the comment on my talk page.
By the way, your forum's really cool. It provides some interesting insight which can't really be found elsewhere (though a bit too much pink for my tastes :) 24 at 21:48, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Questions

You claim to be a Bible-believing, born-again Christian, and yet you state that your primary attraction is for pre-pubescent females. Do you believe, then, that lusting after someone who is not your wife is sin? Do you view marriage as a prerequisite for sexual intimacy? If so, and if your desires are part of God's design, then you'd be looking to marry a pre-pubescent child. Obviously, that's deeply problematic (and not least because she wouldn't remain pre-pubescent for very long). Purely from a Christian point of view, surely you have to conclude that your attraction is a disorder? — Matt Crypto 18:55, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

I disagree. How would the girl not being pre-pubescent for very long be problematic? He states to be attracted "to both adult and non-adult females." Therefore, once the girl is post-pubescent it would follow that he would still be attracted to her. On another note, I don't believe it states anywhere (I may be wrong, I don't follow the bible closely) in the bible that it is an actual sin to be with pre-pubescent girls nor a sin to be with underaged post-pubescent girls.

If we are going to argue disorders from a Christian point of view then maybe we should argue about homosexual christians? Afterall, the bible does state that it is a sin for a male to be with another male, whether child or adult, therefore, would your logic conclude that homosexual attraction is a disorder? After all, that makes more sense considering scripture condemns homosexuality, but makes no mention of pedophilia.

Now for my disclaimer: I would like to make it clear that my point in no way supports homophobia, but is trying to make a point by saying if you consider pedophilia to be a disorder from a Christian point of view, then you must also consider homosexuality as being a disorder from a Christian point of view. -Jelligraze 19:07, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] On behalf of Lux

I'd just like to point out that Lux is currently unable to access the internet, so is unable to respond to questions or edit wikipedia. Silent War 01:47, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Christ

The way Lux has described "child-oriented pedophiles" I would have to say that this description applies to Jesus. I'm not trying to be blasphemous or flippant, but if you really think about it, Jesus always said things like "Suffer the little children to come to me." He also said, "Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven." (Matt 18:3, KJV) I suppose the only difference is that there is no evidence that He was ever sexually attracted to children. I personally believe that people are capable of being in control of their sexual desires and that they should do so. Basically, I'm saying that I believe Lux when he says that he can be trusted around chilren. The people that can't be trusted are the ones that actually act on their desires and cause trauma or other problems among children. --Gandalf 18:32, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

He says that he does act on them

Where does he say that? HolokittyNX 08:14, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

...with the child's supposed "choice". The fact is that children look up to adults and make very few actual choices completely on their own until they are well into their teens. There is no such thing as "consentual adult-child sexual play"...it is completely wrong. Child-child sexual play is normal, private childhood sexual exploration is normal (a child experimenting in private with their own body), but pedophiles like to use this as an excuse to sexually abuse children. I can say from personal experience, that even the methods touted as "harmless" by pedophiles such as this one, are indeed quite harmful. A pedophile is a pedophile is a pedophile. Period. bcatt 06:50, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Does any of the deep discussion really matter? He's admitted openly that he fantasizes about raping children. The only sane course of action from the point of view of society is to either imprison him for life, or terminate his life now.