Wikipedia:Pengelasan orang
Dari Wikipedia bahasa Melayu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Garis Panduan Gaya |
|---|
| Manual Gaya Penulisan Utama |
| Manual-manual tambahan |
| Bagaimana menyunting halaman |
| Garis panduan reka letak |
| Penulisan yang lebih baik |
| Unsur-unsur dasar |
| Tajuk rencana |
| Tajuk bahagian |
| Bahagian |
| Pautan |
| Imej: Tajuk |
| Imej: Tutorial |
| Kategori |
| Menyebut sumber-sumber |
| Unsur-unsur khas |
| Istilah teknikal dan takrif |
| Menerangkan jargon |
| Matematik: Simbol |
| Nama benda dan perkara |
| Nama khas |
| Nota kaki |
| Pengelasan orang |
| Perintah kendali: Contoh |
| Senarai |
| Tanda niaga |
| Tanda sengkang |
| Tarikh dan nombor |
| Gaya untuk halaman istimewa |
| Biografi |
| Halaman nyahkekaburan |
Originally, this policy was developed in response to some dragging Wikipedia:Categories for deletion procedures that debated the categorization of people. As has been proven since, this guideline can be helpful for other "delicate" categorization issues. See also the talk page.
Jadual isi kandungan |
[Sunting] Bagaimana mengelaskan orang
Currently, people tend to be categorized by the following broad categories.
[Sunting] Mengikut tahun
People are categorized by their year of birth and year of death. See Wikipedia:People by year for how to categorize people by their years of birth and death.
The report "People by year/Reports/No other categories" lists articles that haven't been categorized in any other category than births by year, deaths by year, 1911 Britannica, people stubs, etc.
[Sunting] Mengikut kewarganegaraan dan pekerjaan
People are categorized by their nationality and occupation, such as Category:Ethiopian musicians. The template {{Fooian fooers}} is used to provide navigation on each category page, such as:
|
|
Please note that this template may need to be modified for some categories, because some nationalities are listed as "People of Foo" instead of "Fooian", such as Category:Musicians from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Category:Musicians of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
[Sunting] Mengikut perkaitan
Currently, the Wikipedia supports categorizing People by educational institution, People by company, and People known in connection with religion or philosophy, as well as numerous more specific categories. See also Category:Customary categories of people.
[Sunting] Mengikut agama dan bangsa
Currently, the Wikipedia also supports categorizing People by religion and People by race or ethnicity. The placement of people in these categories may be problematic.
- Note: Wikipedians are divided about whether categories should be used for such topics, and might propose such categories for deletion.
For more information, please see Wikipedia:Categorization/Gender, race and sexuality.
Potentially problematic categories can be labeled with {{CategorisationDisputedPeople}}, resulting in:
Templat:CategorisationDisputedPeople
or with {{SCD}}, resulting in:
Disclaimer
This category may inappropriately label persons. See Wikipedia:categorization of people for advice on how to apply categorization to articles relating to people.
[Sunting] Mengikut nama orang
In certain very notable cases, people are being categorized by the name of the person itself, for example Category:Abraham Lincoln. However, this should not be done simply to reduce the number of categories displayed at the foot of an article. The best solution to this problem is to reduce the number of categories to those most applicable to the person, as indicated in the next section.
[Sunting] Kategori tambahan
Be aware that mis-categorizations are more sensitive for articles on people than for articles on other topics.
- Example: Categorizing a politician involved in a scandal as a "criminal" would create much more controversy than categorizing a bear that raided a campsite as a "criminal".
Please consider the following:
- Categories are not automatically assigned: Categories are only assigned as the result of an individual assessment of the content of an article (lists are easier in this sense, because a doubtful assignation can be marked as such). See also Wikipedia:Bots for a general discussion of contra-indications regarding robotized operations.
- Categories can be representative: For some "sensitive" categories, it is better to think of the category as a set of representative and unquestioned examples, while a list is a better venue for an attempt at completeness. (Note: You can tag a list with {{Listdev}} if it is not complete or {{Dynamic list}} if you think it will never be complete.) Particularly for "sensitive" categories, lists can be used as a complement to categorization.
- Double check: Always check after saving an article whether the categorization strikes you as offensive or indelicate. The wikipedia system allows anybody to edit the article and remove a questionable categorization. In order to avoid that, follow your intuition in finding those categories you think most to the point and inoffensive. Create a new category that better serves what you want to communicate, rather than using an existing category that is (partly) inconsistent with the content of the article. Improving category definitions might also help in this stage.
- Limit the number: Try to limit the number of categories. For example, a film actor that holds a law degree should be categorized as a film actor, but not as a lawyer unless his or her legal career was notable in its own right. However it is also important to ensure that categories contain all of the most relevant articles. This means that some prominent people, such as senior politicians who have held many different offices, will be in a considerable number of categories.
[Sunting] Mencipta kategori baru
Finding a good category name for sensitive people-related topics is not a "mathematical" science, but relies on good taste, and more than often on a bit of creativity to find a good solution that satisfies all.
[Sunting] Sebelum mencipta kategori baru
Before creating a new category, please be sure a similar category does not exist.
- Example: You might want to list someone in Category:Canadians. Before creating that category, try to find it under a similar name. By starting at Category:People by nationality, you will discover that Canadians are placed in Category:Canadian people.
[Sunting] Mempertimbangan penciptaan senarai
Consider whether a list or other grouping technique would be more appropriate:
- for trivia (such as "dog owners" etc..., see also general trivia policies)
- for categories whose members would require frequent notes to explain the reasons for each inclusion.
- Note: Wikipedians are divided about whether categories should be used for such topics, and might propose such categories for deletion. Nonetheless: always follow your own gut instinct in this matter.
[Sunting] Menggunakan nama jantina berkecuali
As a general recommendation for categories on people, have the category names as gender-neutral as possible (unless, of course, there is a distinct reason to otherwise; please mention that reason on the category page in that case).
- Example: instead of a category for "Kings" and a different category for "Queens", use Category:Monarchs.
[Sunting] Gunakan nama yang paling berkecuali dan/atau umum
Some categories can be used in a stigmatizing way; always try to find the most neutral and/or generic name.
- Example: "Prostitutes" is a better name for a category than "whores". "Sex workers" might work even better for a category name, while more gender-neutral and better approaching Business Card style.
[Sunting] Menggunakan kepanjangan yang berpatutan
Avoid names that are too long or too short. Short, clear names are preferred for categories. It is possible to deviate from this principle for neutrality and clarity reasons, but don't exaggerate on length or complexity of category names. Avoid abbreviations.
[Sunting] Mentakrifkan kategori dengan jelas
It is preferable that the category definition (on the category page) tries to exclude vague and/or non-Neutral point of view (NPOV) cases. In many cases, only referencing a wikipedia article explaining the term is not sufficient as a definition for a category. This is true for almost every sensitive category. If the article you want to use as definition is problematic in itself, consider improving the article. Otherwise, or if that is not sufficient, write a definition of what goes in and what goes out of the category on the category page, with the reference article(s) as background information.
- Example: "Atheist" can be used as an offensive term (people living under a Fatwa are still today often called atheist by their condemnors, irrespective of whether they consider themselves atheist or not). Some of the vague (and non-NPOV) edges of an "Atheists" category are about the unclear distinction between "strong" and "weak" atheism (see atheism article) and about whether only outspoken followers of atheistic beliefs should be named or everyone generally considered to be an "Atheist". See Category:Atheists for how the category is currently defined.
[Sunting] Place the new category in another category
See the general rules regarding categorization, and try to position the new category in a suitable place on the tree of "people" categories.
[Sunting] Mengalami pengelasan yang menyusahkan
[Sunting] Pengelasan yang salah
If a person has an "incorrect" categorization, remove the category from the article and replace it (if applicable) with a correct category.
If the categorization is both "correct" and the category is reasonable, but still seems problematic, please list it here:
- Resolved people categories, 2004 - April 2005
- Unresolved people categories, 2004 - April 2005
- Category:People by surname: see Wikipedia talk:Category schemes
- Category:Dramatists and playwrights (as a solution to the problems mentioned on Category talk:Dramatists)
- ...
You can also nominate the category for deletion ({{cfd}}), for renaming ({{cfr}}), or for merging ({{cfm}}). See the instructions at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion.
[Sunting] Kategori yang mempunyai nama salah
If the category name has an obvious typo, please list it for speedy deletion at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion.
[Sunting] Kategori lewah
If the category name has an obvious and unnecessary redundancy with another existing category, please list it for deletion or merging at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion.
[Sunting] Kategori yang tidak sesuai
If the problem is not about accuracy, but about an "(in)appropriateness" for a single article to be in this category, you can remove that categorization from that article, but also consider the following:
- Check whether you can solve (part of) the problem by making (a) better category definition(s);
- If still needed, find or create a more appropriate category, for re-categorizing this single article.
- If it seems clear to you that there are more articles to which this category is applied "inappropriately", add the {{SCD}} disclaimer to the bottom of the text or the {{CategorisationDisputedPeople}} dispute notice to the top of the text of the category description. Allow some time for this notice to take effect—possibly help with some manual recategorization (if you are familiar with the topics of the articles to which this categorization was applied). Remove the "disclaimer"/"dispute notice" if the use of this category seems OK again.
- If you have a proposition for a better name for the category and/or a proposal for a wider re-arrangement of the categorization scheme and/or if you see a more general contradiction with wikipedia policies and guidelines regarding this category, participate in and/or post new discussions on the discussion page of the category. Consider whether you can invite more people that might be interested, to take part in the discussion, for example by leaving messages on their user talk pages (check, for example, the discussion page of the category and history tabs to find out who might be concerned by this category—also try to contact project people if the category is part of one or more wikipedia projects).
- If there is no agreement within a week or so, and you are in the middle of a conflict-like situation, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution for what to do next. When reaching the "voting" (or "poll") step, Wikipedia:Categories for deletion is the usual platform to proceed with such a vote.
