Perverted-Justice

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Perverted-Justice (also known as PeeJ) is an organization based in Portland, Oregon, dedicated to identifying adults willing to have chat room sexual encounters with minors. PeeJ consists of volunteers who carry out sting operations by posing as minors with names like "sara_so_bored," and waiting for older men to approach them in chat rooms. After obtaining identifying information from these men, who may offer their telephone numbers and other details so that meetings can be arranged, PeeJ passes the information to law-enforcement. ^[1] The organization also maintains a list of "Corporate Sex Offenders" (including LiveJournal, Google, and Wikipedia), which it defines as "[a]ny company who is informed of pedophiles using their service to advocate the lifestyle of child/adult rape which then does not remove the pedophiles from their service."[1]

Perverted Justice was set up in 2002 by Xavier Von Erck (born "Phillip John Eide"^[2]). The organization says that its online operations have led to the convictions of 162 men as of March 2, 2007,^[3] with over 200 more currently awaiting trial, and an average of 25 arrests a month for the year of 2006.^[4] Von Erck is also credited with locating a 14-year-old girl who was kidnapped, raped, and tortured by a 47-year-old man she met online.^[5]

Von Erck, who said he got the idea for the website while watching men attempt to groom young girls in chat rooms in Oregon, says that PeeJ is a computer watchdog agency that works closely with law-enforcement agencies. "The media likes to use the term 'vigilante' because it gets attention, but we don't consider ourselves vigilantes. We cultivate cooperation with police and work within the law to get justice, not outside of the law." ^[6]

Contents 1 Methods 2 Media 3 Convictions 4 Praise 5 Criticism 6 See also 7 References 8 Further reading

[edit] Methods

Perverted-Justice functions by supporting volunteers who act as bait in chat rooms where children and minors can typically be found. The volunteers' public profiles generally have youthful-sounding usernames and pictures of children. The administrators of the site say they do not initiate online contact with the men they pursue, and also refuse to act on tips from Internet users in order to reduce the risk that someone might use the website to take revenge. The administrators also say that their volunteers do not look for targets in adult chatrooms. If a man starts chatting to the volunteer and turns the conversation to sex, the volunteer attempts to persuade the man to divulge personal details, particularly a telephone number, ostensibly needed to verify the man's identity so that a meeting can be arranged.

In the past, around this point the chatlog and details would be published on the site. However, in December 2003, the organization set up its "Information First" program, in which interested police departments could contact Perverted-Justice, and any "busts" made within that department's jurisdiction would be sent straight to them without being posted to the website.^[7] In the early days of the program, Perverted-Justice.com did not initiate contact with the police, professedly because officers were skeptical that its information could be used in a court of law.

However, ever since July 2004 when they made their first conviction, the site's operators switched to a policy of cold calling local police with the information they obtained.^[8] If a government agency is interested (police, FBI, military CID, etc.) then the chatlog and other information is not posted to the site until after a conviction has been reached.

Before their Information First program and their cold-calling policy became widespread, if no agency expressed interest in the information then the log was posted on the site. Volunteers on the site's forums would then engage in "follow-up", attempting to track down and notify family members, employers, and neighbors. In November 2006, after the site's 100th conviction, Perverted-Justice announced that this was no longer necessary, as Information First agreements were sufficient to cover any U.S. resident caught in a sting. Chat logs are now posted only after the person's legal case has been resolved.

To begin the follow-up process, the site's volunteers would do a reverse-directory lookup to obtain the man's name, as well as checking on the Web for any other information they can find about him. They then would post his name, address, and photograph if he has supplied one, on the website, as well as the chat log: a record of the conversation he had with the volunteer. In a process called "Follow-up," additional volunteers on the site's forums, operating under rules and restrictions set up by Perverted-Justice administrators, would contact the man's family, friends, neighbors, and employer to alert them to the website posting.^[9] The intent of this was to warn anyone who may know the man about his activities and persuade them to help convince the man to receive counseling. The volunteers in these "Follow-up Forums" number in the thousands. With the elimination of chatlogs that are posted without law enforcement involvement, the site administration is working to redirect the efforts of follow-up volunteers to other purposes.

All telephone numbers are removed from the site's main pages after two months (though still available on the site's forums), to avoid another case like that of the Milwaukee bank teller, who received a threatening phone call from a man who had obtained her number from the website. The woman had never been online or even owned a computer, and was forced to change her number, which had previously been registered to the subject of a Perverted-Justice sting.^[10]

Currently, the site only operates within the United States, but plans to expand into Canada.^[11]

[edit] Media

Volunteers also take part in what the site's operators call "group media busts," where men are invited to a house with the promise of a sexual encounter with a minor. When the man arrives, he is greeted by a television news reporter. The first of these stings was conducted in late 2003, in co-operation with Milwaukee's WTMJ-TV and Emmy-winning investigative reporter John Mercure, whom the site credits with initially conceiving of the concept. Other stings with other local news organizations took place in the following months.

In November 2004, the site teamed up with Dateline NBC in New York to conduct a large sting operation, or "group media bust," entitled To Catch a Predator. Dateline rented a house and wired it with hidden cameras, while volunteers posed as minors in chat rooms, telling men who approached them that they were home alone. "Within hours there were men literally lining up at our door," Dateline reported. In two-and-a-half days, 18 men showed up at the house after making a date with a perverted-justice volunteer.^[12]

It's reported that after the third installment, Perverted Justice hired an agent and put the group's services out for bid to serveral television networks. NBC came out ahead and continued the highly rated series ^[13]. Since then, the To Catch a Predator series of reports has grown into a widely-recognized phenomenon, with busts all over the United States and numerous references and parodies in the media. Law enforcement is now involved in all of the sting operations, and they have arrested doctors, religious leaders, teachers, and other men from all walks of life.

NBC currently pays Perverted Justice a consultancy fee for their contributions, which Von Erck says is used for operating costs.^[2] This remuneration was reported to have been over $100,000 for a 2006 sting in Ohio^[14].

[edit] Convictions

The Web site documents 162 convictions in 35 states across the United States attributed to its sting operations, with 33 of these taking place in 2005 and 81 in 2006.^[3] Convictions have included disorderly conduct, indecently soliciting a child, attempting to entice a juvenile to travel with intent to engage in sexual act, transporting child pornography, and possession and dissemination of child pornography.

In September 2004, site administrators helped locate a 14-year-old girl from Camas, Washington, who had been missing from her foster home for almost two weeks. Local detectives were unable to follow leads on the girl's computer, citing lack of knowledge and resources. The girl's mother believed the computer might hold the key to the girl's location and contacted Von Erck, who noticed that the girl had logged in several times to her Yahoo! account, only to log out again. Von Erck was able to obtain the IP address of the computer the girl had logged in from; using this, the Internet Service Provider located the address. When police arrived at the house, they found the girl. She had met her 47-year-old kidnapper in a chat room. He was subsequently charged with child rape and unlawful imprisonment.^[5][15][16]

[edit] Praise

Perverted-Justice, as well as it's volunteers, have been praised over the years by a number of individuals and organizations, running the gamut from active-duty law enforcement to child-safety advocates to pop culture icons.

Those praising the site include America's Most Wanted, among others. John Walsh, host of the show, has said: "Well, I think it's great. I think that -- my hat's -- my hat is off to Chris Hansen, to NBC, to the people at Perverted Justice for showing the American public repeatedly that the creep who preys upon our children could live next door. And he could be a rabbi, a school teacher or a priest or anybody. That -- I think they've done a great job. Now that they've partners with law enforcement and they're putting these guys away, I think they've provided a tremendous educational tool to the American public." ^[17]

Long-time child-safety advocate Marc Klaas has also come out publicly in support of Perverted-Justice.com and the work they do, suggesting that they go from city to city with their efforts. "I think if you were to take this “Dateline” piece and turn it into a regular program, where Perverted Justice and Chris Hansen or somebody else were to go from city to city to city on a weekly basis, you would create a real deterrent effect that would put some fear into the minds of these perverts." ^[18]

Active-duty law enforcement who have worked with the website on arrests have also gone on record speaking about the organization.

Detective Mike Burns of Darke County, Ohio on what Perverted-Justice.com brought to the table, "It was just a miracle from heaven as far as meeting our needs because we are just struggling so badly to get things going that here it is. Here’s the answers for you." ^[19] Echoing that praise, Sgt. Chad Bianco of Riverside County, California, "We were approached by Perverted-Justice to do this large sting and they told us that “Dateline” would be following along. We jumped at the chance." ^[20] Police Chief Hilton Daniels of the Fort Myers Police Department wanted his department to learn how to do an online internet predator sting, "We decided “Well, let’s get a hold of Perverted-Justice” and have them teach us how to do this operation." ^[21]

Officer Kevin Pineda of Flagler Beach, Florida was tasked with researching Perverted-Justice.com in order to ascertain whether using the organization would be a good idea.

"Officer Pineda: He was a little wary at first. He told me to do my research on it, contact other departments that actually used Perverted Justice.

Hansen: And what did you find?

Officer Pineda: Absolutely nothing but, just overwhelming joy from other departments that have actually utilized their services." ^[22]

The Laguna Beach Police Department went one step further, giving Perverted-Justice.com administrators Del Harvey and Dennis Kerr an award for the sting they performed in their city. ^[23]

Child-safety advocate Ross Ellis, founder and executive director of Love Our Children USA sent out a press release praising the efforts of Perverted-Justice.com, while sending a special plaque to the organization. “We owe it to our children to keep them safe. The work that Chris Hansen, Dateline and Perverted Justice are doing should be a wake up call to every parent – because no child is immune from these predators. We are proud to present them with awards and express our gratitude for the courageous work they have done on behalf of children.” ^[24]

Internet safety website ChildSeekNetwork set up a special webpage praising Perverted-Justice.com. "The Child Seek Network has come under fire by a Texas Organization because of our link to Perverted-Justice web site. It is our belief that children's safety is of the utmost importance. Peej works very hard to see that children are safe on the internet from online predators. Although some of their methods seem harsh or controversial they get results, and have aided the police in getting convictions on those who prey on children and teens. Every child has a right to be protected and feel safe, we will continue our efforts and applaud Peej for the work they do to assist in that goal." ^[25]

A letter was sent from Senator Orrin Hatch to Perverted-Justice.com praising their efforts, especially in regards to getting his legislation passed. "The Efforts of Perverted-Justice.com deserve a very special "Thank you" from everyone interested in stopping the seduction and sexual attack on our children. NBC's Dateline has highlighted your efforts at catching sexual predators, using the internet to hunt the hunters. I believe these shows have directly impacted the timely passage of my bill. So I want to join Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist who acknowledged your efforts from the floor of the United States Senate the day the bill was passed. I want to say "Thank you" for your tireless efforts to stop sexual predators." ^[26]

[edit] Criticism

Perverted-Justice, as well as its volunteers, have been criticized over the years by a number of individuals and organizations.

The critics of the site include the U.S. National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC), among others. Tina Schwartz, NCMEC director of communication, has said: "It's really not the safest, most effective way to combat this problem ... From what I've seen ... they embarrass the people, but I don't know that complete justice is ever served".^[27].

According to the magazine Radar, Von Erck "once set out to destroy an enemy by posing as a woman, seducing him online with graphic sex chats, posting the transcripts on the web, and threatening to release a purported video of his target masturbating..." The individual was lured to an airport waiting area, where he was secretly photographed by associates of Von Erck. The photos were later posted online. The targeted individual had made online threats to Perverted Justice contributors via instant message in the past. [2] ^[28]

Scott Morrow runs Corrupted-Justice, a Web site set up to challenge perverted-justice. Morrow told ABC News there is currently no way to hold Von Erck or any other administrators, operators, or volunteers at perverted-justice accountable for mistakes. "When you're running an organization or running a group of people with the potential to do as much damage to people's lives as this does, I think there also has to be some accountability."^[9]

Morrow suggests many of Perverted-Justice's tactics are harrassment "designed to destroy a person's life." He points out that even sex offender registries don't "list the names and background information of neighbors, employers and family members of the accused", as the Perverted-Justice website does. Perverted Justice members are encouraged to spread information about their targets in internal forums and to contact their target's families, employers, and neighbors ^[29].

Lee Tien, an attorney for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, is quoted as being concerned that the organization could send real predators into hiding. ^[30] The site's operators respond that this is in fact their goal, to have real predators hide away from the places that children go; they liken the site to putting up a Community Watch sign at a local playground, which could be argued to discourage predators from kidnapping children there.^[31] Tien also argued that chat transcripts can be easily doctored. In order to bolster credibility, the organization has implemented a number of safeguards to prevent this from happening, including routing all chats through an encrypted proxy server that mirrors the data.

Child safety advocate Julie Posey describes Perverted Justice's tactics as "a gross invasion of privacy." Posey indicates that she doesn't feel their methods are completely effective, "What it does is embarrass them for the moment... but then they'll go and get a different screen name and know to check things out a little more thoroughly next time." ^[9] Posey and Perverted-Justice.com founder Xavier Von Erck faced off on a Fox News interview shortly thereafter. Regarding the Perverted Justice wesbite, Posey remarked, "It’s more of an entertainment site, actually. You go there, you click on a link of a picture that takes you to that person’s chat-log and that person has a scale—a sliminess scale as he calls it—and you can rate the pervert from, I think it’s, one to five. To me, that kind of gives a sense of entertainment. Anybody that finds entertainment value in exploiting children, I have a problem with it." ^[32]

Some law-enforcement agencies have also stated that, while they appreciate the site's mission, they do not agree with some of the operators' and volunteers' practices. In a December 2004 article in the New York Sun, Bradley Russ, the training director for the federal Internet Crimes Against Children Taskforce, which employs about 200 federal agents nationwide, said the tactics of perverted-justice sometimes run counter to the task force's standards. For instance, Russ said, by accepting child pornography from their "busts" to bolster a potential legal case, the volunteers are themselves in possession of unlawful images. He said federal authorities have begun considering whether to seize "PeeJ" contributors' computers. "It's a noble effort gone too far," Russ told the newspaper. He also said the site's tactics can make it more difficult for law enforcement to prosecute cases they present because those cases can be considered tainted by entrapment claims.^[33] According to Russ, "I have a real problem with any citizens' group conducting any investigation into any crime... It's a mistake for law enforcement to abdicate its responsibility to citizens." [3] Said Russ, "I think it's a huge mistake when law enforcement partners with citizens to do investigations. ... I'm very concerned about entrapment issues." ^[34]

They do not consider their methods to be entrapment, arguing that they initiate nothing, and instead wait for their target to come to them. To date, not one entrapment defense has worked in a case with evidence brought by the website. ^[35]

Ironically, the site has also been criticized for "disseminating its own brand of child pornography." Defense attorney Peter D. Greenspun argues that the content posted on Perverted-Justice.com could even encourage child predators. "They are putting out for unfiltered, unrestricted public consumption the most graphic sexual material that they themselves say is of a perverted nature." ^[2]

As to the reports on child pornography, the site's operators state that when they or their volunteers are sent child pornography, they "immediately report it to the police and without fail." Furthermore, every time this has happened it has resulted in a conviction against the one sending the pornography, not against Perverted-Justice, the operators say.^[36]

In the FAQ at their site, they claim the criticism against them lacks coherence, that none of the criticisms made are unanswerable, and many criticisms stem from objections to age of consent laws.^[37]

[edit] See also

• To Catch a Predator

[edit] References

1. ^ ^{a b} Perverted-Justice.com main web site
2. ^ ^{a b c} "Web Site Hunts Pedophiles and TV Goes Along", By Allen Salkin, New York Times, March 23, 2007
3. ^ ^{a b} "Perverted-Justice.com convictions", Perverted-Justice.com
4. ^ From June 2004 to June 2006: The Numbers!. Perverted-Justice.com web site (2006-6-18). Retrieved on 2006-7-28.
5. ^ ^{a b} Riemland, Kim "Internet Sleuth Finds Kidnapped Teen", Komo 1000 News, September 14, 2004
6. ^ Kennedy, Tracy. "Vigilante Web site used to charge city man", The Register Citizen, October 13, 2004
7. ^ "Information for Police", Perverted-Justice, retrieved March 6, 2006
8. ^ "Perverted-Justice conviction report for jaydan003", Perverted-Justice, retrieved March 6, 2006
9. ^ ^{a b c} "Controversial Web Site Claims to 'Out' Would-Be Child Molesters" by Jonathan Silverstein, ABC News, 10 January 2005
10. ^ "Bank teller's phone number mistakenly posted on predator website", Associated Press, 29 September 2004
11. ^ "CKNW Radio Interview with Xavier Von Erck and Scott Morrow" by Peter Watten, CKNW, August 2004
12. ^ "Dangers Children face Online" by Chris Hansen, Dateline NBC, November 11, 2004
13. ^ "The Shame Game", by Douglass McCollam, "Columbia Journalism Review", January/February 2007
14. ^ "'Dateline' Pedophile Sting: One More Point" by Paul Farhi, Washington Post, April 9, 2006
15. ^ "Teen recovers after frightful imprisonment by older man", Katu News, 13 September 2004
16. ^ Perverted-Justice.com Archives, Perverted-Justice.com, retrieved March 6, 2006
17. ^ "Transcripts - March 17, 2007" Larry King Live, March, 2007
18. ^ "'Scarborough Country' for Feb. 6th" Scarborough Country, February 6th, 2006
19. ^ "A parade of potential predators in a small town" Dateline NBC
20. ^ "'To Catch a Predator' III" Dateline NBC
21. ^ "A cyber twilight zone in Ft. Myers, Fla." Dateline NBC
22. ^ "The scariest potential predator" Dateline NBC
23. ^ "Perverted-Justice.com Updates Perverted-Justice.com
24. ^ "CHRIS HANSEN, DATELINE NBC AND PERVERTED JUSTICE HONORED BY LOVE OUR CHILDREN USA" Love Our Children USA
25. ^ "Why is Perverted Justice So Controversial?" Child Seek Network
26. ^ "Letter from Orrin Hatch" Perverted-Justice
27. ^ "Online group involved in man's arrest," Roanoke Times, 22 January 2005
28. ^ "Strange Bedfellows" By John Cook, , Radar, September, 2006
29. ^ "Campaign against child sex predators draws critics", Jason Trahan, Dallas Morning News, September 26, 2006.
30. ^ "'Vigilante' Web Site Posts 'Pedophile' Information", WBAL11, February 26, 2004
31. ^ "Aren't you just driving potential pedophiles further underground with Followup, making it more difficult for them to be caught?" from the Perverted-Justice FAQ, retrieved March 6, 2006
32. ^ "Fighting Online Predators - Dayside with Linda Vester"
33. ^ "Firefighter Nabbed by Cyber-Vigilantes" by Geoffrey Gray, The New York Sun, December 29, 2004
34. ^ "Campaign against child sex predators draws critics", Jason Trahan, Dallas Morning News, September 26, 2006.
35. ^ "Is it entrapment?" from the Perverted-Justice FAQ, retrieved March 6, 2006
36. ^ "Is it true that contributors send out pics of child porn when they are doing a bust? That's where they get their pictures!" from the Perverted-Justice FAQ, retrieved March 6, 2006
37. ^ "What about critics of the website?", from the Perverted-Justice FAQ, retrieved April 24, 2006

[edit] Further reading

• Perverted Justice Official Website
• Corrupted-Justice.com, a website critical of Perverted-Justice.com
• Corrupted-Justice.net, a rebuttal website to the claims against Perverted-Justice.com