Talk:Pica (disorder)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've removed the following, which I assume to be jokes. If you wish to add them back to the list, please give a reference supporting the claim that these are real disorders.

• xylophagia (consumption of wood toothpicks)
• coniophagia (consumption of dust from Venetian blinds)
• gooberphagia (pathological consumption of peanuts)

--Woggly 19:31, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I am restoring these because of [1], which does appear to be an independent source (i.e. not quoting wikipedia) it also mentions "pagophagia, a hankering for ice" not mentioned in this article. It is also referenced by a couple of other sites including The Woman Who Vomited Frogs. Egad!--ZayZayEM 06:57, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

On the subject of a "hankering for ice" I do know this to be real as I experienced it myself during my twin pregnancy, and it was discussed with one of my midwives as a not uncommon thing to happen to pregnant women - however, I can't remember the name for it.

Kchapman 09:59, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

• xylophagia: xylo- means wood and -phagia means eating, so, wood-eating. There may be no sources but that's what it means. Maybe not just wooden toothpicks, but just plain wood.
• coniophagia: complete lie.
• gooberphagia: complete lie again -- since when was peanuts not food?

12:28, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Contents 1 non-foods? 2 crayons? 3 i doubt it... 4 Pica 5 Peanuts and potatoes 6 error 7 How do you define Pica? 8 Citation Needed

[edit] non-foods?

Flour is food. So is starch--ZayZayEM 06:50, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• • Very true, but starch and flour are not normally eaten raw. Of course, very few people would go and buy a bag of flour, open it then wolf it down! Ditto for starch, which reminds me, can you even buy starch? It's normally added (or already in) foods? ^KILO-_LIMA 21:21, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] crayons?

Hi there,

Here is a source for crayon eating even although it comes from Ebaumsworld [2] Even although I wouldn't really trust Ebaumsworld, this appears to be from a magazine. Thanks, 12:00, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] i doubt it...

"There is a lack of major studies and research in this field, possibly because of strong aversion to the subject as "gross" and "disgusting"."

Since when would a researcher be put off by something being culturally "gross" or "disgusting"? Ever read the influential 2004 paper "homosexual necrophilia in the Mallard Anas platyrhynchos"? researchers aren't put off by gay corpse fucking ducks, but apparently are by dirt eating? --86.135.179.53 19:08, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pica

Wouldn't eating paper be considered pica?

[edit] Peanuts and potatoes

"Pathological consumption of peanuts" and "abnormal ingestion of raw potatoes" are currently in the list of examples. I question their inclusion, as both peanuts and potatoes are food. Excessive consumption may be some form of eating disorder, but it seems that by definition it isn't pica. I suppose that raw potatoes could be considered a borderline case, for the same reason as plain flour. However, I think that without supporting evidence, the peanut entry at least should definitely be removed from the list. --Icarus 22:09, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

I agree, the "gooberphagia" thing has been brought up before and it's probably the same person who keeps putting it back after it gets removed. Phobia had a similar problem with jokey conditions/real conditions ("fear of peanut butter sticking to the roof of the mouth," etc) so I've posted over there asking for advice or help. I'd say gooberphagia is OK to delete though, unless whoever is adding it wants to explain themselves (yeah, right). Recury 02:47, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] error

alot of this article is incorrect but i do not feel i should fix it because i do not believe all of this information should be discredited. i did a lot of research into this subject and a majority of my reliable sources(medical textbooks and case studies) expressly said that Pica is more rarely a psychological disorder than it is a biochemical defeciency. i added a paragraph to the page but i did not remove anything. i also added my sources and they seem more reliable than the other sources such as "The Straight Dope". they are the internet version of a medical book and one case study of a man who compulsively ate matches. i am not however going to deny that some cases of Pica are caused by psychological dysfunction.

[edit] How do you define Pica?

I want to know more about this disorder. I know a lot of people who like to eat stuff that normally would be considered gross, like raw potato and powdered milk. Is it always a disorder when you eat things like that? I like to eat paper, in little bits at a time. Is this Pica? Should I stop doing it? Even if it is Pica, is paper dangerous to eat? --Jonathan ^talk 15:36, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Citation Needed

Someone seems to have gone a little "citation needed" crazy. I mean, I'm sure that "Most developmental centers have a no-smoking policy" needs a citation, but does "due to this fact" need a citation? And is the paragraph in question even needed? FruitMart07 23:35, 13 February 2007 (UTC)