User talk:Plumcouch
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
| Archive_1 |
| Archive_2 |
| Archive_3 |
| Archive_4 |
| Archive_5 |
| Archive_6 |
| Archive_7 |
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:AmritaRao.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:AmritaRao.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 20:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Vijay article
Hey dude if the picture in the Vijay article is not free, then what is?? Most of the photos of Vijay, and for that matter almost everything, are from the Internet only. You don't expect us to knock on his door and get a photo of him do you? Please explain what is possibly wrong with that photo and what you define as a "free photo". Thanks in advance man! -Vijay
[edit] Re: Tree marriages
Lol, I'm truly as baffled as you are. This is the first time I'm hearing of such a thing too. I could find 26 different news sources on google that talk about this. No discourtesy to anyone, but I couldn't help but laugh out loud the first time I read it. I'm honestly surprised someone like Ash would do such a thing. But then, I also found this news report on CNN-IBN, where Amitabh Bachan denies any astrological problems for Ash. *me shrugs* Maybe as the case proceeds, more information would become available. --thunderboltz(Deepu) 10:20, 4 February 2007 (UTC) PS: I'm doing much better now. Thank you. I'm thinking of continuing on with the wikibreak for a bit longer, however.
[edit] Hello Friend
May I ask who destroyed the Ajith articles because it looks a mess, I for one is very disturbed by it's current state.
Happy Editing my goo friend ur present is waiting
I'll give it to you on Valentine's day
King Dracula 18:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Good Point
I don't mean to single out a person but User:Anwar_saadat I believe seems to be adding false information about box office details of Ajith films, as he is a fan he is trying to make ajith seem larger than life. His opening page for Aalwar was up for deletion recently as it was clearly not necessary.
I believe he makes some good edits but mostly unneccessary ones, which makes the article seem written in a fans view!
Please let us discuss this issue further
King Dracula 22:39, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] == See my user page ==
I think pa_7 is verbally abusing me with another unknown user name to get back at me when I never used such language with her and if IMDB is not the format then, the way the film maker used the cast order as in the film should be the wisest choice to be displayed on wikipedia. I'll edit that. Thanks. Please make pa_7 understand. I know you get me. All she did was work on Zinta's references. How can she put 20 references in one day whereas where i put two for rani and they are taken back. She's unfair. - shez_15 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shez 15 (talk • contribs) 03:25, 6 February 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Correct
You are right miss Plumcouch. We shall gradually start on the project and maybe get it to be like Madhavan's article, as it has improved from past times.
I like the ideas you put forth, hopefully together with the help of various other editers we shall improve the article!
King Dracula 20:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:SandraBennet.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:SandraBennet.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:CharlesDeveaux.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:CharlesDeveaux.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:LyleBennet.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:LyleBennet.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 23:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] ==Preetam?==
Can you find out if Preity's first real name is Preetam? There's nothing on the internet though because she never blurted it out. It's such a sweet name and I think we should put real names on the page as Mukherjee. I believe I found it somewhere on the net that it's Preetam, but nothing official on it. If she is Sikh, which she is, then it must be Preetam because I have a friend who is Sikh and her name is Preetam too. But people call her Preity. Thanks! I don't know if you can find out but I think we can only find answers going to Mumbai. Heheheee... Though, it's not important, it would be good to know! - shez_15 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shez 15 (talk • contribs) 00:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC).
[edit] ==Confirmed==
I just watched the Filmfare Awards 1998 yesterday and I saw Gul Panang give away Best Female Debut to Preity Zinta and it was not called Lux. Lux was an old sponsor till 1994. Then it became a part of Zee Cine Awards. If you notice Zinta won Lux New Face for Zee not Filmfare. We just called it debut here on wikipedia since it's confusing. Another thing: No debut has won two awards for best debut twice up until recently when they started treating debuts with some importance. Like Vidya Balan and Kangana on Filmfare. The Filmfare Awards site is not even a proper site, otherwise it would be updated for the new 2007 awards but it's not. Go see Preity's own site which states she won Best Debut and nothing on Lux: http://www.preityzintaworld.com/ Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.71.210.183 (talk) 01:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC).
[edit] == Hey ==
How's it going? Just wanted to tell you that this user: 77.124.12.104 is violation Rani's page by removing references for no reason. Plz do something. I think he/she should be blocked bcoz this guy or girl is not helping wikipedia, just deleting stuff instead. He's vandalizing. Thanks. -shez_15 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shez 15 (talk • contribs) 21:24, 3 March 2007 (UTC).
[edit] == Filmfare Awards ==
Hey, I think we should change the dates for the Filmfare Awards. It shows dates of film release not when the award ceremony was held or when the recipient won. It's confusing for some because all other awards are managed how they're supposed to be with years ceremony held not for which year the awards are given. I'll ask Zora and Pa_7 too. - shez_15 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shez 15 (talk • contribs) 23:57, 4 March 2007 (UTC).
[edit] == New Fun List ==
Hey! Did you know Madhuri Dixit just topped the Best Actresses List Ever. It was just a special article released recently on Women's International Day. Here's the link for it: http://specials.rediff.com/women07/2007/mar/06wslid11.htm And here's the link to see all from the beginning: http://specials.rediff.com/women07/2007/mar/06wslid1.htm I know opinions may differ, but I think she deserved it. Now, be happy. - shez_15 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shez 15 (talk • contribs) 00:23, 14 March 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Persondata template at Amrita Rao
Hey, I was the one who added the {{Persondata}} template to the Amrita Rao page. However, I see you have been removing it (I think twice now!). However, I think it should be added — not just there but all biography articles. The template does not show up on the rendering on the article but it is very helpful for automated processing of articles. It exposes certain metadate (defined by the fields) in a specific format (in that sense it can be thought of as a microformat). So, when an automated program (like search engine spiders) analyzes Wikipedia content, it wont be just a text index but it will know certain info about the content - like what other names the person is known by, years active, age etc etc, which it can use to refine search hits. Also, if it is present, pages can be analyzed better - like an SQL query can pull up living people born after certain date. Since an article has no specific schema, without Persondata, it is very hard to do such analyses. I suggest you reconsider. --soum (0_o) 21:54, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Done! :) --Plumcouch Talk2Me 23:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- Help add it to as many articles as you can. Google is already using it. The more article get it, the more useful it will be. Cheers. --soum (0_o) 22:06, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image in Aishwarya Rai
Please let know the reasons before removing an added image. That image comes under fair use and perfectly usable in article. Thanks Gnanapiti 22:04, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Added image is from Promo wallpaper. Please go through image page. thanks Gnanapiti 22:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- That's very interesting. I've come across tons of articles which use fair use images in those templates. But it certainly looks like fair use images can't be used in the template as you have pointed out. I'll contact an admin and let's see what he has to say. Thanks for bringing this up. Gnanapiti 22:53, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
