User talk:Poiuytman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archives: 1
[edit] Metroid Prime 3 E3 Footage
I recieved your message regarding The E3 MP3 footage. Here the link where I found out about the true orgins of the Prime 3 trailer.(http://palgn.com.au/article.php?id=2794)
[edit] Image
| Image deletion warning | Image:Metroid Prime Hunter title screen, top display.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion. |
Thunderbrand 16:31, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Help on the Creatures in the Metroid series project?
I noticed that you proposed working on consolidating Metroid series fancruft on your user page. Would you mind helping me on the Creatures in the Metroid series project? I'm trying to compile a common page for all the various creatures of the Metroid series, with minor creatures' (e.g. Geruta, Dachora) pages redirecting there and major creatures' (e.g. Chozo, Kraid) having links to their main articles on that common page. (Main problem is, my schoolwork is taking up a LOT of my time...sigh...) ~GMH talk to me 05:56, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
By the way, also listed on my user page are several similar Metroid series projects that I've proposed. ~GMH talk to me 05:56, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] I appreciate it
Poiuyt Man, thank you very much for the kind words. :) It's been a pleasure working with you on the Metroid debate. The Missing Link 16:18, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] MZM response
Yes, but isn't it all Metroid, plus that one scene regarding Chozodia? - A Link to the Past (talk) 03:58, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
- Maybe Metroid should be removed, as MZM replaces it? - A Link to the Past (talk) 08:23, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding your comments on Talk:We Love Katamari
I noticed you expressed some doubt about whether it's appropriate for the King of All Cosmos to have his own article on Talk:We Love Katamari. Well, there's currently something of a dispute on that subject right now; could you please comment at Talk:King of All Cosmos? - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 21:02, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Zero Mission Arbitration
Dai Grepher: I was letting you know that I am going to contact the Arbitration Committee about the Zero Mission article and those reflecting it as a remake. On the Zero Mission talk page I have stated that I will submit a collection of facts for a prequel and against a remake. I suggested that the remake side do the same, but Andrevan feels that submitting the consensus will be enough for the remake side. I thought I would let you know in case you disagreed with that opinion and wanted to create the same type of presentation that I will submit. If you need time to prepare one then I do not mind waiting. Please reply this and let me know how you want to handle this issue. Dai Grepher 17:08, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Hi there
Nothing important, just got bored, so decided to say 'hi' to someone. What's up? - A Link to the Past (talk) 07:45, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Darth Vader
I removed your specific fact from the Vader article, since saying "one of the greatest villains" as I had it is basically the same thing as what you put, since Vader was in the top five, and, thus, "one of the greatest vilains." Both are correct, except my version glorifies Vader in a way, without breaking any POV rules, but still being accurate. The Wookieepedian 03:55, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image deletion
| Image deletion warning | Image:Kirby-blackbg(superstar).png has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2005 October 22. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion. |
Thunderbrand 23:04, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Please stop petty reverting on Darth Vader
It is NOT vandalism, as that information is already in the article (Sebastian Shaw portrayed the dying, middle-aged (and redeemed) man behind the mask in the theatrical release of Return of the Jedi and shortly after, as his ghost; however, in the most recent DVD release, Christensen is digitally inserted in Shaw's place.) Thus, your footnote is redundant. Copperchair 07:01, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
The difference is that Shaw is credited in the movie, while Hayden isn't. Copperchair 09:45, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] DDR supernova
you may want to see my comment on Talk:Dance Dance Revolution. SYSS Mouse 04:06, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] dabbing
sorry for the intrusion I just dabbing keyboard Gnangarra 15:29, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Prefix "The"
Please read the vote which I started on the CVG project page. Instead of using what is said on the Wii article as consensus when not everyone who contributes to games will see it. Havok (T/C/c) 22:28, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Samus_Aran_Sprites_(small).gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Samus_Aran_Sprites_(small).gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Gravity Suit.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Gravity Suit.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:02, 16 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 00:02, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Metroid 1 Mother Brain screenshot.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Metroid 1 Mother Brain screenshot.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:48, 22 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 03:48, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
