Proto-Esperanto
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Proto-Esperanto (or pra-Esperanto in the language itself) is the modern term for any of the stages in the evolution of L. L. Zamenhof's language project, prior to the publication of his Unua Libro in 1887.
As a child, Zamenhof had the idea to introduce an international auxiliary language for communication between different nationalities. He originally wanted to revive some form of simplified Latin or Greek, but as he grew older he came to believe that it would be better to create a new language for his purpose. During his teenage years he worked on a language project until he thought it ready for public demonstration. On December 17, 1878 (about one year before the first publication of Volapük), Zamenhof celebrated his birthday and the birth of the language with some friends, who liked the project. Zamenhof himself called his language Lingwe Uniwersala ("world language").
While at university, Zamenhof handed his work over to his father, Mordechai, for safe-keeping until he had completed his medical studies. His father, not understanding the ideas of his son and perhaps anticipating problems from the Tsarist police, burned the work. Zamenhof didn't find out about this until 1881, at which point he had to create a new version of his language.
Contents |
[edit] The Lingwe uniwersala
We now have only four lines of the Lingwe uniwersala stage of the language from 1878, from an early song that Zamenhof composed:
| Malamikete de las nacjes, | Enmity of nations, | ||
| Cadó, Cadó, jam temp' está; | Fall, Fall, it is time!; | ||
| La tot' homoze in familje | All humanity in a family | ||
| Konunigare so debá. | Must unite. |
In modern Esperanto, this would be,
- Malamikeco de la nacioj,
- Falu, falu, jam temp' estas;
- La tuta homar' en familion
- Kununuigi sin devas.
[edit] The Lingvo universala
Zamenhof restarted his project after his return from university, and refined his ideas for the language for the next several years. Most of his refinements came through translation of literature and poetry in other languages. An early sample from this second phase is this extract of a letter from 1881:
- Ma plej kara miko, kvan ma plekulpa plumo faktidźas tiranno pu to. Mo poté de cen taj brivoj kluri ke sciigoj de fu-ći specco debé blessi tal fradal kordol ...
Modern: Mia plej kara amiko, kiel mia plej kulpa [?] plumo fariĝas tirano por vi. Mi povas de cent da viaj leteroj konkludi ke sciigoj de tiu-ĉi speco devas vundi vian fratan koron ...
- (My dearest friend, how my most guilty pen has become a tyrant for you. From a hundred of your letters I can conclude that announcements of this kind must wound your brotherly heart ...)
By this time the letter v had replaced w for the [v] sound; verbal inflection for person and number had been dropped; the nominal plural was -oj in place of -es; and the noun cases were down to the current two (though a genitive -es survives today in the correlatives). Beside the stronger Slavic flavor of the orthography (ć, dź, ħ, ś, ź for ĉ, ĝ, ĥ, ŝ, ĵ) compared to the modern language, and an accusative case suffix -l, some verb forms still had final stress.
The verbal conjugation was present tense -é, past -u, future -uj, conditional -á, jussive -ó, and infinitive -e or -i.
The pronouns ended in a nominal o (and an adjectival a for possessives), but there were other differences as well, including gender in the third-person plural:
| 1881 pronouns | singular | plural |
| 1st person | mo | no |
| 2nd person | to | vo |
| 3rd masculine | ro | po |
| 3rd feminine | śo | o |
| 3rd reflexive | so | |
Later the final stress in the verb conjugations was rejected in favour of always stressing the second-last syllable, and the old plural -s became a marker of finite tenses. The Slavic-style acute diacritics became circumflexes to avoid overt appearances of nationalism, and the new bases of the letters ĵ, ĝ (for Slavic ź, dź) helped preserve the appearance of Romance and Germanic vocabulary.
In 1887, Zamenhof published the Unua Libro ("First Book"), which contained the Esperanto language as we now know it. In a letter to Nikolai Borovko he later wrote,
- I've worked for six years perfecting and testing the language, when in the year 1878 it had already seemed completely ready to me.
Gaston Waringhien, in his book Lingvo kaj Vivo ("Language and Life"), analyzed the evolution of the language through manuscripts from 1881, 1882, and 1885.
[edit] Archaic Esperanto
As Esperanto was published recently, it has scarcely experienced language evolution. Authors who want archaic language either for effect or to translate archaism from other languages have tried to incorporate features from Proto-Esperanto. Kalman Kalocsay however published in 1931 a translation [1] of the Funeral Sermon and Prayer, the first Hungarian text (12th century), with hypothetic forms as if Esperanto were a Romance language deriving from Vulgar Latin. Manuel Halvelik in 1969 published a book on Arcaicam Esperantom, giving rules to transform modern Esperanto into an apparent ancestor language.
[edit] References
- ^ Elektronika Bulteno de EASL includes the short story La Mezepoka Esperanto from Lingvo Stilo Formo, 2nd cheap edition, Kalman Kalocsay, Budapest, Literatura Mondo, 1931.
