Talk:Ratchet & Clank: Going Commando
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
|
CVG To-do:
|
||
[edit] RYNO2: No relation to the original RYNO
I have to say I was disappointed with the RYNO2, it had absolutely no connection to its predecessor weapon, the R.Y.N.O. (Rip Ya a New One), with the exception of the multitargeting. Hardly useful when the weapon only fires one projectile at a time, unlike the original, black market weapon, that fired ten missiles simultaneously. --Bear Eagleson 21:43, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, the original RYNO fired 9, but yeah, the 2 sucks. I much prefer the other weapons. In fact, the Mini-Nuke is better because it can damage all the enemies around it. You can defeat the B2 Brawler in just around 5 hits with it. --RedZion 8:13, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Hang on! This aint a talk page ya know! It's not called the RYNO2 for a laugh. RYNO...then RYNO2...who cares if it's changed...there is no point to this at all. Insomniac made it that way, obviously. What am I doing? How did you get my number? Never call here again! Leemorrison 23:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
I think it's VERY GOOD! In the game it got me out of some tight spots. 20:27, 20 March 2007
[edit] Title
Why is the North American title of the game always referred to as Ratchet & Clank: Going Commando instead of Ratchet & Clank 2: Going Commando? Both the North American and European logo form the number 2, but only the European title gets a 2 (Ratchet & Clank 2: Locked and Loaded) when typed. Seems to me this article should be moved to Ratchet & Clank 2: Going Commando. --DT29 10 June 2006
- Insomniac's website has it only as Ratchet & Clank: Going Commando [1], as well as the official site [2]. That's just the way it is. I can see the logo with the number "2" in it, but the company uses it without it. Thunderbrand 16:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
