User talk:Ratzer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome!
Hi Ratzer, and a warm welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia? Don't fret! Be Bold! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!
- Editing tutorial, learn to have fun with Wikipedia.
- Picture tutorial, instructions on uploading images.
- How to write a great article, to make it an featured article status.
- Manual of Style, how articles should be written.
Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some open tasks that you may want to help out :
Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Once again, welcome! =)
- Mailer Diablo 20:37, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Trindade and Martim Vaz
Hi there - copying and pasting page contents isn't the preferred way of moving an article, as it splits the article history between two pages. The correct way is to use the "move" function, or if that's not available (because you're a new user), you can request page moves at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Regards, sjorford →•← 09:55, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Isla Sala-y-Gómez
Thanks for all your great work at Isla Sala-y-Gómez. The article has been vastly improved in the past couple days. Tomer TALK 20:52, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Okino Torishima
I'm not subscribed to the newspaper El Mundo online, so I can't send you the text, sorry. I just read the article when I bought the newspaper some time ago and I suppose somehow I got to the article online or it wasn't protected or something.
I did find the same photo with the data in the website of the Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera, here: http://www.corriere.it/gallery/Esteri/2005/05_Maggio/sindaco/1/SINDACO1.jpg
The corresponding article (in Italian) is here: http://www.corriere.it/Primo_Piano/Esteri/2005/05_Maggio/20/okinotorishima.shtml . I hope this info has been useful.
Sorry for taking so long. I don't really use Hotmail anymore... Sabbut 14:25, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Edit summaries
Hi, please use edit summaries. They help everyone. Short is fine, just be reasonably descriptive. Thanks - Taxman Talk 14:43, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Farallón Islands
Great work on that article. It's improved immensely...takes me back to Isla Sala-y-Gómez...
. Tomer TALK 03:48, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] I just spotted your recent comment in my 'units of area' archive
Hi,
I just spotted your recent comment in my 'units of area' archive. Thank you for reading through the discussion page. I will respond to your comments now.
- You said The problem I have with expressing areas that are in the orders of magnitude of 0.1 ha, 1 ha or 10 ha and that are approximate, in square meters, is that the use of these units pretends many more significant digits than there actually are.
- Units do not imply precision for readers. The number of trailing zeros is a commonly used guide. For example, text might say that the area of eqypt is 1,000,000 km². The precision is not stated. There are 6 trailing zeros, few reasonable readers would believe that it meant the precision is +/- 1 km².
- You said If you must stick to the strictest interpretation of the SI bible, and where the scientific notation is not practical, IMHO it would be more appropriate to say 0.001 km² than saying 1000 m².
- On a purely numeric basis, it seems odd to prefer 0.001 over 1000.
- On a comprehension basis, 1000 m² is easier to visualise than 0.001 km². Areas in square metres can be visualised directly, particularly since they are used in descriptions of homes, offices and gardens. Even without direct experience, it is easy to construct the area in the head by imagining an area of 10 by 100 m, perhaps as the area of a 100 m running track. It is difficult to visualise 0.001 km² or construct it in the head.
- However, if that is what you want, I don't mind.
- You said: What about "square hectometers" (hm²) (same as hectares), would that be totally SI-conformant? "Hecto" is a SI prefix, is it not?
- Yes. You are correct. As you can see at metre. The 'hectometre' is correct SI. So a square hectometre would be a correct form of 'hectare'. The hectare itself is not encouraged.
- I would not mind so much if people used square hectometres instead of hectares. But that it is not the real answer. It is a 'soft conversion' and just a translation word-for-word. Translations word-for-word are limited in what they can achieve. I can think in English and translate word for word into Spanish. I might be understood but it will be bad Spanish. It would be better to forget English and express the thoughts directly in Spanish. It is the same for translating metric units. A value in square hectometres just might be understood but the best way to express it is in square metres or square kilometres.
- It would be easy to test comprehension of area in both directions.
- 1.From real world to numeric value. Look at something and try to guess the area in hectares or hm². You would almost certainly be more accurate with m² or km².
- 2. From numeric value to real world. Take a given numeric value quoted in hectares or hm². Then identify an area in the real world that is equal to that numeric value. You would almost certainly be more accurate with m² or km².
Those are just my thoughts. Thanks for discussing it with me. Bobblewik 13:24, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Desecheo Island
There seems to be a grammar mistake or garble in the following:
The island belongs to the city of Mayaguez, barrio of Mona Island.
Also, this and some of your other islands seems to me to be bordering on qualifying for deletion as not notable, but I'm not too familiar with the rules as they apply to physical geography. Maybe merge all of them into one article.
--David Woolley 12:52, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Egg War
Since you've contributed to the Farallon Islands article, I thought perhaps you'd be interested to know that I've put in a request for an article on the Egg War here. If you write the article, please remember to remove the article from that listing. Cheers, Tomertalk 17:39, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Kolbeinsey.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kolbeinsey.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 22:58, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:SEFI.png
Thanks for uploading Image:SEFI.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:06, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Possibly unfree Image:SEFI.png
[edit] Okinotorishima
Hi Ratzer,
I noticed you added a link to the Okinotori article, but it seems to direct to a 1976 bulliten board archive, and I couldn't find the section you described? Did you perhaps post the wrong link? Or am I blind and just don't see it on the page? (I'd say either are likely :D) Komdori 13:33, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Just search for "Parece Vela" on that page--Ratzer 06:07, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re Subdivisions of France
Hi Ratzer,
- I think you started messing things up by moving the template and the article to "administrative...". Are you aware that the article was just moved from "administrative..." to "subdivisions of france" less than a year ago, as you can see in its discussion page? It does not look like you read the discussion page. Or do you want to start a moving war? Now the article still has the ZEAT in it, which are not administrative and which you threw out of the template already...
Sorry if my (unfinished) work on this article (and all other "Administrative divisions of" / "Subdivisions of" articles) seems perturbing. My aim, with support from WP:WPCSub, is to clarify the distinction between administrative and other kinds of national divisions. Although not administrative divisions, the ZEATs are certainly relevant to the administrative division of France, so I've moved their mention in Administrative divisions of France to the #See also section, at least for the time being. Hope this is okay. I suppose a "See also" link to their article could be included in {{Administrative divisions of France}}, but at present I'm not sure if that's wise.
Meanwhile, perhaps you might like to add your views re "Administrative divisions of" / "Subdivisions of" in general to here and/or subsequent threads...?
Best wishes, David Kernow (talk) 07:47, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Tetiaroa
Thanks for uploading the map of Tetiaroa -Safay 05:25, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dumont d'Urville Station -- thanks for the picture
Great picture -- thanks for uploading it. It really makes the article. I suspect the day it was taken was probably the nicest of the year -- and it still looks like a cold, forbidding place albeit in a dramtic setting. --A. B. 16:20, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'm also looking for PD photos of Port Martin (previous station) and Charcot Station (former inland station). So far, there are not even articles for those stations in the en-Wikipedia. They are both interesting. It was said that after moving to Dumont d'Urville, that the new environment was much less hostile, with only half of the average wind speed compared to Port Martin. Charcot was largely dug into the snow so the wind would not blow it away. There was not much you could see from outside.Ratzer 12:50, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Map of Europa Island
Thanks,
I made it from the NASA satellite view and from my knowledge of the island. I am not completely sure of the north direction, so I didn't put it on. The former map was so bad and so wrong, I could not bare it anymore ! Unfortunately, I don't know the other scattered islands enough to draw their maps. If you want a caption in another language, give me the translations, I would make a new version and upload it.
Cheers
Channer 04:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
I turned the map 28° clockwise, the uploading was successful, but the new picture doesn't appear yet on the Commons image, nor in the english article. That's a mystery ! Just have to wait the computers do their job ?Channer 18:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Census Bureau area figures
There is a wealth of information available at the U.S. Census Bureau website if you know how and where to look. However, just looking at all the possible combinations of links you can click on might overwhelm and exasperate some people. It did me at first. Now I use it for all kinds of data. It's very comprehensive if you'd care to find out almost any kind of statistical data on any place in the United States that you would want.
How I found out that particular piece of information is this:
Go to the website at http://www.census.gov/
Choose American Factfinder at left side
Choose Data Sets > Decennial Census
It should default to the 2000 census tab here, but if not, choose it
Choose Census 2000 Summary File 1 (SF 1) 100-Percent Data
Choose Detailed Tables at right side
Choose Map tab among the five choices
This should give you a map of the United States
Choose the + (plus) sign at the top which allows you to drill down
Start clicking on Florida, and keep clicking until you get down to where you want (You have to know approximately where the place you're looking for is in order to do this!!)
You should be able to do this with the Farallon Islands. (You will probably come up with an answer of Block Group 2, Census Tract 604, San Francisco County, California. If you don't, then I've made a big mistake.)
By the way, I tried to look up this same information on the Dry Tortugas and could not find it. I just could not find the place on the map. Maybe you can. Good luck! It's nice to know that there are other people here besides me who are interested in arcane geographical matters, such as land area and population.
Farallon Islands: Block Group 2, Census Tract 604, San Francisco County, California United States Census Bureau Backspace 00:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Miles vs. kilometers
Direct quote from the Wikipedia manual of style "For subjects dealing with the United States, it might be more appropriate to use U.S. measurements first, i.e. mile, foot, U.S. gallon. " The article pertains to a place under jurisdiction of the USA, therefore USA measurements should be used. The distance between islands in the USA is measured in yards, feet or miles, not kilometers or meters. If metric measurements MUST be used for the rest of the English speaking world outside of where the article pertains, they should be listed in the parenthesis, not the USA ones, since the area the article pertains to is in USA and is subject to measurements used in the USA. - Oh, and the USA is not even close to changing over to metric. I'm not sure where you got your information, but you've been sadly misinformed. - Marc Averette 03:44, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Lets keep this discussion in the place where it started, which is your discussion page User talk:Averette#miles_or_kilometers.3F.--Ratzer 06:41, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Table alignments
Text should be aligned left, and numbers right. I've never heard that before in my life or on Wikipedia, and I thought the centered looked better, but you clearly feel more strongly in the other direction, so feel free to revert! jengod 17:43, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Dude, I already conceded to your greater wisdom. Why? Because I didn't want to drag out the debate. Go do whatever it is that you want to do. I don't care. And I'm not sure if the Averette thing was directed at me or not, but when someone posts on my talk page, I like to respond on other people's talk pages, because otherwise they might not check back and see if I've responded. jengod 18:53, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fiordland
Gruess dich! Danke fuer die Daten ueber Fiordland. Allerdings habe ich den Teil etwas umgeschrieben, und deine Quellenangabe in den Text eingebaut (guck es dir mal an wenn du moechtest, inline-Referenzen sind immer die besten). Die Daten der Quellenangabe NICHT in das Editreview schreiben! Da bleiben sie zwar auch bestehen, aber es wird sie nie wieder jemand finden! gruss, MadMaxDog 04:41, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Grüße dich auch! Es heißt ja, dass man beim Editieren immer seine Quellen angeben soll. Das habe ich getan. In diesem Fall habe ich die Quelle nicht für so wichtig gehalten, sie gleich in den Text einzubauen. Ich stimme zu, dass normale Leser die Quelle so nicht sehen, aber jeder, der sich die Sache genauer anschaut (wie du z.B.) findet sie, sie geht ja nicht verloren.--Ratzer 19:02, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Territorial authorities of New Zealand
I was unable to find the reference in your edit summary for this article, but the changes you made to this article seem implausible. Waiheke Island is part of the Auckland City Council, and has a population of many thousands. Is there another Waiheke Island that I'm not aware of? If so, the link should be changed.
Our article on Mayor Island/Tuhua says it was inhabited until 1901. If it is inhabited again, our article should be updated.
The Territorial authorities section of the stats department page says "All off-shore islands, with the exception of Mayor, Motiti and White Islands in the Bay of Plenty Region, are included in territorial authorities."
For the time being, I'll remove Waiheke Island from the list as the most obvious problem.
If you can fix these problems, please add a link to your source in the article (not just the edit summary).-gadfium 18:17, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- I took the discussion to the discussion page of the article in question, [1], hoping to invite people with local knowledge to resolve the open questions
- That's fine, thanks for your efforts.-gadfium 21:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] San Juan list
It's nothing personal but sections under construction are best kept out of an article until they are finished. Plus prose is better than bulleted lists. Joelito (talk) 22:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Rockall
23 metres tall - above mean sea level? Above lowest spring tide at Dublin Bar at noon on 1 June 1892 or whatever? Please add. --Red King 00:13, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know. The source (Rockall article in de-Wikipedia) also does not specify this. There seem to be many wikipedia articles that are missing this reference, also the article about the world's highest mountain, Mount Everest.--Ratzer 13:09, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
