User talk:Mailer diablo

Leave a Message for mailer_diablo | Archives : A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z α β γ

"Wikipedia : neutral and unbiased compilation of previously written, verifiable facts." Help : FAQ aka "Why was my article deleted?"

---

Contents 1 Back? 2 Question 3 Camp Miriam 4 Zorpia's deletion and the meta-blacklist 5 Zorpia.com 6 Zorpia 7 Re: Zorpia.com 8 Zorpia deletion. 9 Zorpia is a geniuine social networking site! 10 Zorpia 11 Zorpia's deletion 12 Zorpia issue 13 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Zorpia 14 Off-wiki canvassing 15 I filed an RFP on your talk page. 16 prod deletion 17 My RfA 18 Hollywood Undead 19 Can you please explain why... 20 Can you review your decision on ChessDB 21 Baseball Channel 22 Thanks 23 MyWikiBiz 24 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latitude and wealth 25 Back already? 26 Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007. 27 Request 28 deletion james hulme 29 The DragStrippers 30 WHAT'S WRONG WITH YOU? I WASNT FINISHED W/MY WORK! 31 why is the company stub for malaysians company is deleted? 32 Procedural DRV request 33 Thank you for your support on my Request for Administration 34 user spamming 35 You deleted one of my articles 36 Trinity Christian HS AFD 37 RFA 38 7th Sun 39 Why??? 40 RFA Thanks 41 SGV & Co. 42 ok, yer a smart person 43 The use of Template:oldafdfull and Template:oldafdmulti 44 Gl trade 45 Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007. 46 RFA Thanks 47 User:Mailer diablo/P 48 User:Steve block/List of Escape Magazine contents 49 RfA thanks 50 Thank you 51 Hint 52 "Comedy Corner" Article Deletion 53 Re: Gunther Lotze 54 Happy adminship anniversary! 55 My RfA 56 concerning anti gambling 57 My RfA

[edit] Back?

Welcome back! : ) – riana_dzasta 12:06, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks to all of you, I appreciate the messages! Looks like all the controversies died down as quickly as they have begun. Now let's look towards building the future... =) - Mailer Diablo 12:07, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

• Hey it's good to see your name in blue again :) Welcome back! Majorly _{(o rly?)} 12:56, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

• Good to see you back. Happy editing. Terence Ong 13:17, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

=) - SpLoT // 14:55, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Good to see that name appearing again, welcome back! :) Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me Please review me!} 17:19, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

You probably get the point, but welcome back anyway! :) –Llama man^talk_contribs 18:50, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome back!! The Evil Clown

Welcome back, Mailer. Good to see you've returned.--Chaser T 11:58, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Yay! Kla'quot 18:19, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome back! Real96 22:42, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

• Me too!--Tdxiang 07:12, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm late to say it, but welcome back. — BillC ^talk 19:37, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Gasp! I can finally stop holding my breath. Looks like I missed your re-entry by almost a week! Good to have you back. James086^Talk 11:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Question

Last night I added a source to soon to be deleted article Nana's Cookie Company. The source, link to article is from CBS News 8 San Diego. According to WP:ORG#Primary criterion, to my knowledge, this reference qualilfies as primary criterion for a notable company. However, I did not post this source until after everyone had voted already voted 'delete'. Do you feel the source is questionable, or some how not adequate for nobality, beacuse the article was still deleted eventhough I added a what I understand to be a reliable source. Is there something wrong with the source I am using, I would like to know, so I can find sources that are notable in the future. Thanks. -ChristopherMannMcKay 16:27, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Camp Miriam

please take a look at this and get back to me. thanks very much

Talk:Camp Miriam

[edit] Zorpia's deletion and the meta-blacklist

If you came from zorpia.com/forum/1/195011 : The reason for the article's deletion was due to lack of verifiable sources to assert its notability. Can you find multiple independent, reputable sources (such as BBC, NYT, CNET, etc.) on the social networking website and cite them? If so, please make your appeal at deletion review with the sources you have found. (Blacklist issue - see below)

---

ZORPIA IS A LEGITIMATE SOCIAL NETWORKING SITE!!!

I am here to tell you that you are wrong about Zorpia, it is NOT a drug related spam site trying to sell pharmaceuticals, it is in fact a genuine social networking site that I have been an active member of for almost a year now. There are well over 4.5 million users that are members of Zorpia. I have had accounts on myspace and hi5 and this is as genuine as they are. I prefer Zorpia over them both because there is alot more interaction with all of the Zorpians with the use of the forums that is on Zorpia. I hope you will look into Zorpia more and finally realize that this is a legitimate site. Thank you for your time in reading this. Have a nice day. :)

Sincerely, Melissa Rodriguez—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.11.232.239 (talk) 12:05, 12 March 2007 (UTC).

This IP appears on lists of possibly insecure IPs. --A. B. ^(talk) 16:27, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

HI Mailer diablo,

It is shocked to know you ve black listed www.zorpia.com as a drug related spam site. Perhaps i feel zorpia is the only lively chat site in whole of internet. I am a member of zorpia for more than an year. I wish you reconsider your decision! And you can check it for yourself thanks..

Jeeva —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.92.104.161 (talk) 12:17, 12 March 2007 (UTC).

This IP appears on multiple spam blacklists. --A. B. ^(talk) 16:27, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

• Huh, blacklisted!? What pharmaceuticals? I can only perform deletions; I do not have the power to modify the spam blacklist, that's something at foundation level! I'm afraid you have to speak directly to them on this one. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 12:23, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
• The pharmaceuticals mentioned are in reference to the rather 'dubious' research done at [[1]] which resulted in this deletion. Here, A.B has said that he mostly finds Zorpia in connection with online pharmaceuticals. However, note that in all cases, the links to the search results start at item 700 on Google! Wikipedia itself suffers badly when this method is used. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 210.84.26.83 (talk) 14:43, 12 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Zorpia.com

Sir/Madam, This email is regarding the website www.zorpia.com, which has been stated as a fake website and is black listed. My name is Abhishek. i have been a member of zorpia.com since 15 Oct, 2006. Trust me this site is not a spam or a fake site. Zorpia.com does have 4.6 million members. how can u believe this? by joining zorpia.com and seeing it urself. i log on everyday and most of the time i am on zorpia and cant live without it. This is a genuine social networking website and doesnt have any stupid stuff on it. Please look upon the matter. Please give Zorpia.com its honour back. Beware: if u join zorpia, you will be addicted to it.

Thank you.

Yours Sincerely and Zorpia Addict

Abhishek Iamlucifer 21:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Iamlucifer (talk • contribs) 14:20, 12 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Zorpia

i am currently one of the users of the site, zorpia.com. i do not believe that there is a problem on drugs relating issue in this site. perharps there was a case or two in which i was never aware off, but i can assure you that none of the case has ever occured to my self, and i am a regular zorpia resident. perharps its just a single black spot on a white paper~

apart from the second case, regarding of the stats(4.6 million), i am sure there is a way to conclude it. but as it is out of my league, i cant prove anything right or wrong.

I've just got the news that this site has put Zorpia on the black list ddoubting its amount of members and accusing it of being a drug related spam site. I have been a member of the site for a long time now and the fact is, the site is populated because its very popular and isn't running dry. Its a fun site which a lot of people like to go on, so its amount of members shouldn't be so hard to believe. Also, I would clearly like to state that it is not, I repeat, it is NOT a spam site.

Hi!

I'd like to know why the Zorpia article has been deleted?

[edit] Re: Zorpia.com

Dear Mailer Diablo,

I am writing with regards to your decision to delete the article about Zorpia from Wikipedia.

I have been a member of Zorpia.com now for the last 2 or more years. I also worked closely with the Zorpia staff in the summer of 2006 combating online predators and reporting them to the VGT [2] . During this time we were also in contact with the Australian Federal police Agent Darryal Halmilton giving them information on suspected users Zorpia is one of the most active social networking sights that tries its upmost to keep a clean and safe environment for its users. Zorpia is constantly updating its servers and testing many methods for user enjoyment and safety. on my time on zorpia i have never seen any thing to do with selling drugs or anything of the sort. Zorpia has over 5millions users I'm not saying that none of these users use drugs. drugs are everywhere. And Knowing Zorpia and the way it works I'm sure if there was any hint of drug selling or anything of the sort it would have been stamped out the users banned and they're details handed over to the police of that persons area I ask you to consider these facts that i have wrote before making your final decision. I'm also sure if you were to check with the VGT and The Australian federal police about reports made last summer they will confirm this as it is logged on they're data base. Again the allegations of drug offences is no more then hateful rubbish is you condem zorpia with these alligations and ban them from your site then you should also ban myspace hi5 and other social networking websites because if there are drugs on zorpia im certain they are on the other sites too as many users have accounts on many sites. It is unfair to use zorpia as a scapegoat for this problem and to make an example of them. Are mysapce banned as 4 people have been killed from meeting people on there...

thanks for your time Tony

[edit] Zorpia deletion.

I don't know where your statistics come from but they seem askew. I have been an active member of Zorpia for over a year now and it is in now way a spamming site, nor does it have any ties with drugs whatsoever. I log on to Zorpia at least once a day because it is a fun and addictive social networking site. I kindly ask that you re-think your position on this issue. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.66.192.218 (talk) 18:04, 12 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Zorpia is a geniuine social networking site!

To: whom it may concern

I am here to tell you that you are wrong about Zorpia, it is NOT a drug related spam site trying to sell pharmaceuticals

I've been on that site and i've made many friends, learned many things and gained plenty of knowledge through socialising with people from all over the world. And the number of users....U see, this zorpia thing have been forwarded to people through emails, so if one sents them to all his contacts and they all sign up and further sent it to all their contacts and they sign up again then forward them and so on....So the fact tt it has over 4 million users should not be doubted.But although many have accounts at zorpia, no everyone uses them, so the number of online zorpians at any one time is not tt plentiful.

I believe at times, wikipedia.org do make mistakes which i've seen, and i strongly believe that this time round, u've made a grave mistake by blacklisting zorpia.com.Please double check again. Thank you.

Signs off Zorpian, natali the 2nd —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 220.255.59.53 (talk) 20:35, 12 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Zorpia

I seem to be really confused about the controversy so to speak going on about Zorpia. I assure you it's a great Bold textsocial networking Bold textsite. I've met some amazing people on that website who I've gotten very close to. I would like others to have their fair chance of going on a great website such as Zorpia and meeting new, intellectual and fun people. I don't understand how this whole misunderstanding started but again I assure you it is just a misunderstanding. The administrators also play a very active role in Zorpia, they try their best to make sure it is a safe site that everyone is able to enjoy.

I would really appreciate it if you tried out the site for yourself before making any false assumptions about it. I really hope you reconsider "boycotting" Zorpia from your website, and realize many love it and the people that use it. Thank you and have a great day :)

~Mimi~ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.12.200.72 (talk) 05:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Zorpia's deletion

Dear Diablo,

I've been a Zorpian member since June 2005. It is not the only social networking site I'm a member of, but it IS the ONLY site I am truly active in. It is a genuine website, NOT a pharmaceutical spamming company or what ever other nonsense you have come up with. I hope you realise what a mistake it was to deem this website falsely. Please correct the wrong you have made. Thank you,

Irnesa - Zorpian PROUD member. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by IrnyH (talk • contribs) 05:43, 13 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Zorpia issue

Hello, Mailer. Are these messages acts of trolling? If so, may I clean them up? Thanks.--Tdxiang 07:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

• Just leave them as it is, just happened that I got something like being slash-dotted. They should have read the notice/response I've made on the first Zorpia heading though. - Mailer Diablo 11:01, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Zorpia

dear Diablo

Again I'm writing to you about your Deleting of Zorpia.com from this site Zorpia works endlessly to keep perverts,predators,spam from its site users actively report them to a place on Zorpia called the ZORPIA REPORTING CENTRE [ There are aso a number of active user groups to fight this problem too ] also im you need further evidence that Zorpia acts on this problem I will quote you some reference case numbers from cases from online reporting site [3] and [4]

VGT please contact Katy MILNE and quote this case reported 27 June 2006 at 11:43:50 CCTM Certificate Number 2006/04/0007

CEOP child Expolitation and Online Protection Centre/ Ref NO CEOP-2006-31 case study Kelly Murray

im sure if you contacted these sites and also Public-OCSET-OMC@afp.gov.au tis is the direct line to report internet predators to the Australian Feds and contact Agent Darryl Hamilton will confirm that in 2006 were working with Zorpia.com on 2 cases Zorpia.com reported to them

These are legitimate law Agencies im sure this this can give you some sufficient Evidence to go on not only does this show that zorpia.com is fighting online predators actively it also shows that Zorpia.com is against online crime Drugs Spamming and Perverts. It would be a very unwise move if Zorpia was doing what you claim them to be doing while aslo working on this problem —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bigtony79 (talk • contribs) 07:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Off-wiki canvassing

Hello Mailer. The large number of IP and SPA comments on your page regarding Zorpia got me a little curious, and a Google search turned up a plea at www.zorpia.com/menjopm?zorpiasid=1dd18e461bee9429c7fdd7efd60b1f1b95daec09 to contact you personally (blacklisted site, so no link). I didn't find anyway of getting in touch with "Mike" via email to ask him to remove the link to your personal talk page and instead redirect them to Wikipedia talk:Deletion review/Log/2007 March 12/Zorpia, so looks like you may keep getting these for a bit. Anyway, just a heads up. -- Satori Son 14:40, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

I see now above that you already know you got "slash-dotted", so to speak. Unfortunately, since the off-wiki link includes the "action=edit&section=new" code, these guys are probably not even seeing your comments before they create a new topic. But I see you're on top of it, and good luck. -- Satori Son 14:47, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi. I am the 'Mike' referred to above. I only used a link to this page because there was a link to it from the original deletion discussion. However, if it is not a suitable place to direct people to, I am only too happy to remove it. I apologise for any inconvenience. See, I'm not the monster you thought I was!--Menjo 16:06, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello Menjo! I certainly hope I didn't imply that you were a "monster" or up to no good. I was just trying to let Mailer Diablo know why he was getting so many "new topic" messages here. IMHO, the link on your site should probably point to Wikipedia talk:Deletion review/Log/2007 March 12/Zorpia, but that is really Mailer's call. Thanks for your input and dialogue, and happy editing. -- Satori Son 16:15, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

No problem. Thank you for pointing it out.--Menjo 17:01, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

•  :) - Mailer Diablo 10:24, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I filed an RFP on your talk page.

Welcome back, Mailer Diablo. I'm glad you didn't die in NS. Please don't let the trolls get to you. I have filed an RFP on your talk page - hope that helps. --J.L.W.S. The Special One 04:15, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] prod deletion

Hi could you delete List of Iberian Jews/Cervantes and Columbus. it has been proposed fro deletion over 6 days. it is a content fork partially from list of sephardic jews. thank you.

[edit] My RfA

Thank you for supporting my recent RfA. I hope I can do some good with the new tools. Shimeru 15:52, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hollywood Undead

Why was it deleted? 69.91.17.202 02:48, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hollywood Undead - Mailer Diablo 06:51, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Can you please explain why...

you deleted the entry Technology and Innovations in Education (TIE)? It references (WP:CSD#G5)but I cannot find any Deletion Criteria that would apply to the entry.

Can we bring it back? We have had several people contribute to it already.

Thank you for your help.

Lennie Symes Education Technology Specialist TIE

lsymes@tie.net

• Oh apologies, the deletion code was incorrect, it should be G11. The article has to sound less like an ad and have reliable sources to assert its notability in order to stay, are you able to do that? - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 06:50, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
  • I am not sure I understand--an ad to what? We are a non-profit group who does services for K-12 schools. If we describe our services, is that considered an advertisement? Specifically, what do we need to avoid? - Lennie
    • Tone is important, the article needs a substantial rewrite. e.g. "beautiful Black Hills" sounds promotional - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 15:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Can you review your decision on ChessDB

Sorry if this was not you, since I'm not 100% sure, but I think I have the right person. An article on a piece of chess software (ChessDB) was deleted some time back (months). I wrote an article on ChessDB too, unaware one had been deleted previously. Looking at the discussion of the deletion of the original, I don't believe the critisms can be applied to what I wrote. Hence I would like you to look at this again.

First, my article is not 'advert like', which was a critism of the original. There are very few external links (perhaps 2 or 3 IIRC). I believe the software is notable. A web site listing free chess software, rates this as the 4th best piece of free chess software: http://freechess.50webs.com/best.html Another site has a very positive review: http://chessforblood.blogspot.com/2007_02_01_archive.html

There are numerous references to ChessDB on the web - reviews such as this one: http://freechess.50webs.com/chessdb.html but there are also several more in other languages. Others are trying to get the package uploaded to Debian (http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/message/20070213.145721.fa0be66a.en.html). There are Gentoo ebuilds for this too. I've just checked the sourceforge web site and see there have been 2567 downloads - that's about 1 per hour on average. I believe the software is sufficiently notable and so the entry I wrote should be undeleted.

BTW, 'BlueValour', who writes a lot on Wikipedia (an admin??), added a "red link" to ChessDB from Scid. Clearly he/she felt there should be a page on ChessDB. Spiderpop 05:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Baseball Channel

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Baseball Channel. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for your comments on the peer review page for Siddha Yoga, they were appreciated.TheRingess (talk) 20:53, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] MyWikiBiz

You speedily deleted this article and cited recreation of deleted material, which applies when "revisions made clearly do not address the reasons for which the page was deleted". Please review the original deletion log and deleted article. It was deleted originally for nonnotability; my rewritten article includes citations to several major news sources (Associated Press, Die Welt). As I asked in the edit comments, is there still any doubt about the notability of this topic? Aaronbrick 21:02, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Latitude and wealth

Hey MD, assuming you're not changing your closure of this I'll send it to DRV. There were too may delete !voters who were either outright dismissive or made it clear that they have no grasp of the subject to let this closure stand. Take care, trialsanderrors 19:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Nomination added at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 March 21. Your comments as closer are appreciated. ~ trialsanderrors 20:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Back already?

Massive geek! The lure of Wikipedia has snared you once again. Excellent. - NYC JD (interrogatories) 19:51, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 12	20 March 2007	About the Signpost

WikiWorld comic: "Wilhelm Scream"	News and notes: Bad sin, milestones
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Request

You supported my RFA, which is still pending. Several participants have expressed concern that I don't have enough experience with AFD. If my RFA is granted, would you be willing to serve as a mentor to whom I could ask questions as I gain more experience with AFD? I would begin by observing AFD for a while to become familiar with it; I would only need to ask you about cases where I don't understand the reasoning of the closing admin. I am asking you because you have a great deal of experience with AFD. CMummert · talk 15:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

• Thank you. Would you mind if I add a line to my RFA stating "User:Mailer diablo is willing to assist me as an AFD mentor."? I don't want to put words in your mouth. CMummert · talk 15:27, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
  • That's great. Thanks again, CMummert · talk 16:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Heh, you two both need mentoring on how to keep conversation threads unfragmented. :) Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:43, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] deletion james hulme

I believe that the Director of Communications at an influential UK think tank is worthy of a page on wikipedia. Please can you explain why you deleted this without asking me first? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.133.226.4 (talk) 16:19, 21 March 2007 (UTC).

• Have you got any reliable sources to assert the subject's notability? - Mailer Diablo 11:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The DragStrippers

Why was my article on The DragStrippers deleted?

[edit] WHAT'S WRONG WITH YOU? I WASNT FINISHED W/MY WORK!

You aren't American, are you?

I don't know if you know this,

but www.89.com is one of the premier

adult directories in the entire world wide

web. OGabyss co-created that site.

He is an extremely relevant figure in the

on-line erotica revolution.

I demand a response ASAP.

Remember this, He will get his respect here

and he will not be deleted again.

you are a moderator, a smee if you will, I am

going over your head and reporting you to the

executives here. I have their personal e-mail

addresses. take care now, and before I demand

them to terminate your privileges, I will stay

civil for now and listen to your explanation.

sincerely,

Mr. Information —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mrinformation (talk • contribs) 17:56, 21 March 2007 (UTC). PS====YOU HAVE 4 HOURS UNTIL I DEMAND THAT YOUR PRIVILEGES BE TERMINATED.

my e-mail address: prodigalson111@gmail.com

That(my e-mail address) is the only forum for an explanation that I will accept.

• Reply : Threats struck out. This isn't the way to make requests. - Mailer Diablo 11:18, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] why is the company stub for malaysians company is deleted?

Hi i would like to know why is the malaysian company stub for ezyfocus is deleted? thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 219.94.115.234 (talk) 09:31, 22 March 2007 (UTC). Dear Diable, just to let you know the article did not promote the company and it is a fact that it was the first malaysian free web directory for the public to use to promote Malaysia.

• The article has no reliable sources to assert its notability, criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia. Given that it is a MSC company, I'm sure you'll have independent sources, such as the New Straits Times to back it up? - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 11:18, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Procedural DRV request

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Bloodless bullfighting. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. (I entered it on behalf of Pebs96, who clearly doesn't understand policy and procedure. Apologies.) fethers 13:51, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

• This is not a matter of me understanding what policies and procedures are, some of us just don't have all day long to play on Wikipedia as some of us do have a life. This is simple.... it's one particular user name fethers who is having a power trip on one particular subject and will not stop until the article gets deleted. I on the other hand will defend the article until it gets "undeleted" and I have also been requesting that user fethers be kept away from it per the conversation on here... [[5]]

• By you deleting the bloodless bullfighting article made yourself an unfair admin/editor. What were your findings and conclusions? Did you research the whole topic? Did you even notify me to get my opinion on any of this? NO, you just flat out deleted it with no form of communication. It's amazing but true..... people really do abuse their privileges. --Webmistress Diva 04:10, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you for your support on my Request for Administration

I'm happy to say that thanks in part to your support, my RfA passed with a unanimous score of 40/0/0. I solemnly swear to use these shiny new tools with honour and insanity integrity. --Wafulz 15:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] user spamming

Hi Mailer. This user User:Swshbcklr seems to be an account created entirely to promote the website the daily croshatch, using links of dubious notability. Here's a link to his/her contributions page: [6] I would have posted to the User's talkpage, but there doesn't seem to be one. Perhaps you could contact him/her? NoahB 18:41, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] You deleted one of my articles

Back in July 2006 I wrote an article and I came today to revise it and I noticed that it was deleted. Why did you delete it?

14:42, 8 August 2006 Mailer diablo (Talk | contribs) deleted "Jewels of Tau" (Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2006 July 18/Articles)

Please explain your reseaoning behind this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SapphireTre (talk • contribs) 00:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Trinity Christian HS AFD

I'm curious about something - TCHS as above was on AFD, and you did a "keep". If anything, I would have called a "no consensus" for the purpose (largely owing to the flamage), but I'm curious about one thing: what drove you to the keep decision? --Dennisthe2 18:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Re WP:ILIKEIT, you sure can call it. =) But good point, and if that's sufficient attribution for a school, then I think I can work with that. Thanks! --Dennisthe2 20:34, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RFA

Thanks for supportgin my RFA, it was successful. Cheers, SGGH 20:28, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 7th Sun

in afd, if i am the nom, as per this instance, does my nomination imply a delete? or do i have to say, 'delete per i was there when i nominated the article, so i pretty much know what i am talking about.' :) the_undertow ^talk 07:59, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

i could see it as being rationally implied. you make sense. i mean, realistically, why would i propose an afd if i was in favor of keeping the article? who would of thunk that i would actually exhibit some common sense? its definitely a breakthrough. :) the_undertow ^talk 08:23, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

i just thought i would let you know, that since such an highly esteemed member has graced my talk page with you presence, i will be selling said screenshots on ebay. i have to make a living. the_undertow ^talk 10:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

you have to be kidding me. please tell me you had that bookmarked should such an occasion arise? that reminds me of why beer and wiki don't mix. 'i basically started out wanting this article deleted, but after another ale, i decided i would want to keep it...' that made my day. what a quintessential example. ps. i, the_undertow, in no way believe that alcohol and wiki cannot exist. some may call it liquid courage, however, i see it as a reason to really express what i am thinking. the_undertow ^talk 10:19, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

classics. reminds me of [7]. the irony was lost on a few users. say it LOUD and LOUDER - thus the nature of the game itself. nice to see wiki peeps have a sense of humor. the_undertow ^talk 10:31, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Why???

hello diablo (cheesy nick...maybe not if you're 11 though. Are you?</w>)

anyway, you could have left the "List of Group Stock Characters" article alone...i saw someone in the log trying to stop that from happening...if an article is good enough for even one person to read n learn from it, it deserves to be on Wikipedia.

On a more practical note, that article in no way harbored any shortcoming worthy of deletion come to think of it. Lets not get tangled up with minor details of Wikipedia's quality control, the bottom line is that with the article now no longer on Wikipedia, a very valuable lesson on an important aspect of fiction writing is not available for the masses to benefit from...by deleting it you have surely let down what Wikipedia stands for...

Anyone....is there anyway that article to be reinstated??

• Reply : Ageiet comments struck out. And no, the article won't get restored. - Mailer Diablo 13:29, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RFA Thanks

I would like to thank you for your support in my recent RFA. As you may or may not be aware, it passed with approximately 99% support. I ensure you that I will use the tools well, and if I ever disappoint you, I am open to recall. If you ever need anything, don't hesitate to leave me a note on my talkpage. Thanks again, ^demon^{[omg plz]} 20:34, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] SGV & Co.

Hi, would just like to inquire why SyCip Gorres Velayo and Company (SGV & Co.) was deleted. I have tried to update it's content and still finding other sources when the article was deleted. May I ask you to reconsider?

Also, pardon my ignorance but I have just having just registered and use wikipedia, I am not familiar with most of its rules, I am having a hard time figuring and understanding policies (too many and is just inter-linked with each other). Hope you can bear with me and help me be a contributor. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BURUGUDUY (talk • contribs) 04:33, 26 March 2007 (UTC).

I know I just messaged you but I'm not sure if I will read it but I see that you are responding to this page. Pls see a copy of my message below.

Hi, would just like to inquire why SyCip Gorres Velayo and Company (SGV & Co.) was deleted. I have tried to update it's content and still finding other sources when the article was deleted. May I ask you to reconsider?

Also, pardon my ignorance but I have just having just registered and use wikipedia, I am not familiar with most of its rules, I am having a hard time figuring and understanding policies (too many and is just inter-linked with each other). Hope you can bear with me and help me be a contributor.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by BURUGUDUY (talk • contribs) 04:39, 26 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] ok, yer a smart person

what is that machine, used to conduct electricity, that has two prongs, and shows the current ascending. i know you have better things to do, but in this case, im in need of an answer. they use it in horror movies, although it has no practical value, whatsoever. what is it? the_undertow ^talk 09:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

You're thinking of a Jacob's ladder. Try the Wikipedia Reference Desk next time, and your answer may be faster. Cheers, ➪HiDrNick! 01:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The use of Template:oldafdfull and Template:oldafdmulti

Dear Mailer diablo,

I noticed you just closed the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Korean family names (2nd nomination) and added Template:oldafdfull to the talk page of the article (Talk:List of Korean family names). You used the template in combination with "subst:". To keep maintenance of AfD templates easier, they are preferably not substituted, however. In addition, you might want to think about using Template:oldafdmulti instead, especially when the article has been listed on AfD before (see the talk page I mentioned for an example). Since you often close AfD debates, I thought I'd just let you know. Regards, --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 10:34, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick reply, but I think you might have missed my comment about preferably not substituting these templates (from a quick glance at your contributions). Happy editing, --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 10:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

I didn't realize you were running a script for that. Cheers, --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 11:04, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gl trade

hi, can you tell me why you deleted Gl trade? this was not advertising, merely stating what they do, they are one of the biggest IT suppliers in the banking world. Also, they are a French based company and this article was a translation for the French wikipedia site, which had been around for a few years. Is this also incorrect?

[edit] Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

Volume 3, Issue 13	26 March 2007	About the Signpost

From the editor: Tardiness, volunteers, RSS
Patrick and Wool resign in office shakeup	WikiWorld comic: "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo"
News and notes: Board resolutions, milestones	Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:06, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RFA Thanks

Thanks for your support on my Request for adminship, which was successful, with votes of 49/0/0. Lemme know if you need help on something I might know a little something about....(check my userpage).
cheers, Casliber | talk | contribs 14:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Mailer diablo/P

Just a note to let you know that the sub-page about deletions is an excellent reference. Kudos to you!

I award this Barnstar to Mailer diablo for for braving the waters of deletion and helping keep WP clean. — MrDolomite • T • 03/29/2007

— MrDolomite • Talk 11:03, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Steve block/List of Escape Magazine contents

You deleted List of Escape Magazine contents, per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Escape Magazine contents. I'm sure you won't mind, but courtesy demands I let you know I've userfied it to User:Steve block/List of Escape Magazine contents, since I feel it's useful information. I'm not around much anymore, so you don't need to reply. If you think I'm wrong just delete it from my user space with my permission. And take care of yourself, you earnt my respect ten times over around here. Steve block Talk 19:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RfA thanks

Thank you for your Support on my recent nomination for adminship, which passed with a final tally of 89/1/1. If there's anything I can help with, then you know where to find me. Cheers. - Michael Billington (talk) 10:40, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you

Thank you for the explanation. Will surely rebuild the article but this time on my own words. Hope that I can finish it. Again, my appreciation.

~BURUGUDUY (SGV article)

[edit] Hint

You removed the AfD tag on United States Senate elections, 2012, but you forgot to actually close Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States Senate elections, 2012 (2nd nomination). Just FYI. :) —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 14:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Need me to close it for you? ;p —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 19:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Comedy Corner" Article Deletion

Hello,

I provided the majority of the information for the Wikipedia entry "Comedy Corner", which was recently deleted for being "not notable". I tried to add more information to the article (which was already quite extensive) but apparently it was still deemed inadequate.

As an alumni of the organization who served as a writer, performer, director, and producer throughout my tenure, I feel that the article adequately expresses the noteworthiness of the organization due to the inclusion of the following information:

1) Comedy Corner was the first college comedy troupe in Arizona, and was the first in the country to combine sketch comedy and improvisational comedy into one troupe/performance.

2) Comedy Corner is one of only a few college sketch comedy troupes that performs on a weekly basis, rather than once per semester.

3) As expressed in the deleted article, every college comedy troupe in Arizona spawned from Comedy Corner. Literally: every single one.

4) It is one of the few college comedy troupes in the country that receives funding directly from its educational institution. It is not a club. It is a university-sponsored organization. This is rare in the world of college comedy, and therefore notable.

5) The S.I.C.K. Comedy Festival, which is entirely organized and hosted by Comedy Corner, is currently in it's 15th year and was the first comedy festival of any kind ever held in the state of Arizona.

Comedy Corner as a university organization is unique on a national level. Furthermore, as a comedic presence in the state of Arizona, it's importance and cultural impact have been undeniably notable. For these reasons, I feel that the "Comedy Corner" entry that was recently deleted deserves undeletion.

Please let me know if I can provide any more information to better assist you in the undeletion process. I have to believe that if "A List of Problems That McGyver Has Solved" is noteworthy of a Wikipedia entry, then this organization is too!

Thanks, Justin Thomas infinipede@hotmail.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.136.116.10 (talk) 19:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Re: Gunther Lotze

Thanks for deleting this page - I wasnt quite sure how to tag it for CSD since I couldn't understand a word of it. Could you advise me please how to tag for CSD when you come across a page you cannot make head or tail of, other than doing a patent nonsense db? Thanks. Thor Malmjursson 20:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Happy adminship anniversary!

Wishing Mailer diablo a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! -Mschel 03:23, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

-Mschel 03:23, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

	Happy Adminship	from the Birthday Committee
	Wishing Mailer diablo a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! -- Paloma Walker 06:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

--Paloma Walker 06:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] My RfA

Thank you for your support in my recent successful RfA.--Anthony.bradbury 10:53, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] concerning anti gambling

Why was it deleted?

[edit] My RfA

• Thanks for the support position. However, I've decided to withdraw my acceptance because of real WP:CIVIL concerns. I will try again later when I've proven to myself and others that my anger will no longer interfere with my abilities as a Wikipedia editor. Thanks again, and I'll see you around here shortly. :) JuJube 04:23, 1 April 2007 (UTC)