User talk:SGCommand
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Thank you for dropping by...have a nice day!
Please check the headings of other messages to see if there is a broad category where your question or comment would fit. Please leave all messages pertaining for the Whoniverse at the link on the right. Thanks in advance!
 The Vaults & Doctor Who Talk |
|---|
| Current Talk |
[edit] Re: Time Crisis 4, et. al.
Why on earth did you have to remove the content regarding about the characters in the game? You need to discuss the radical burnination first before you even burninate a section or two why you have to remove it. Otherwise, I have to really take it as being a vandalism violation. Considering that you removed the content without posting a reason why you had to remove it (please post a discussion why you had to do so), I'm gonna have to revert your burnination unless you post a comment why it's warranted. — Vesther (U * T/R * CTD) 01:45, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
P.S. This also applies to Time Crisis, Time Crisis II, Time Crisis 3, and Crisis Zone. It has came to my attention that you burninate without discussing first. Please discuss before you even burninate sections, or for the least, post a comment why you had to do so. Thanks.
[edit] A couple of answers
1. Yes. As well as being a character he also had his own eponymous series [1] (granted it was one in an annual and one in Dice Man but it counts). Currently Torquemada (comics) redirects to the Nemesis entry but I'd say go for it and make it into its own entry.
2. I don't know. It didn't get a cover so I am unsure. It might need a scan from a relelvant page but I'm not sure anyone stuck out as being iconic - possibly something from the first page of the first instalment?
Hope that helps. Nice work on Chiaroscuro (2000 AD) by the way. (Emperor 14:15, 2 October 2006 (UTC))
- Ahhhhhhhh I see you already started that entry. The problem is these micro-stubs with no information in. There is a case to be made for a standalone entry but it wasn't made by that stub. If you don't want to do a longer stub in one go, then develop it in your sandbox and then we can throw ideas in until it is looking more solid and then move it into the correct poisition. (Emperor 19:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC))
[edit] License tagging for Image:Torquemada2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Torquemada2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:10, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] User:SGCommand/Torquemada (comics)
OK I added the publication details but this: "I had to copy out the bio from the website in the article (with some slight rewording" makes me suspect that the bulk of it needs rewriting from scratch. The same happened with Hammerstein, also lifted from the same site - it all had to be removed so you may as well skip the hassle of removing and redoing by doing it right first time. There is no requirement to start an article in a near complete form just as long as the stub has information in it that it won't be removed immediately (as happened last ime). Also there is something wrong with the image you've uploaded (it has white squares all over it) - you can leave it out for now and we'll look around for the right one (I had a look on the 2000 AD site but have drawn a blank). (Emperor 19:45, 9 October 2006 (UTC))
- I've looked around and think this is the best [2] by Kevin O'Neill (Emperor 19:51, 9 October 2006 (UTC))
[edit] Image:NortAlly.JPG
Thanks for the image Image:NortAlly.JPG. However, its usefulness is spoilt because it is badly out-of-focus. Anthony Appleyard 12:59, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Griffin
I looked over the article and personally I didn't see anything wrong with it or really needs fixing up. Seems OK to me. Thunderbrand 14:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- I probably would, since they seem pretty similar and that the other Griffin one is pretty much a stub. Thunderbrand 18:30, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Nort/Southers, also Judge Dredd
1. Sure - I'd suggest just saying how Tor Cyan links into things. Any major information can go on the main Tor Cyan entry. 2. Any of the one's linked in from here is fine (as long as its a good solid stub).
Thanks for sorting out those other Judge Dredd entries. (Emperor 16:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC))
[edit] Rogue Trooper comics
- Have you got any old Rogue Trooper comics?
- What were you wanting images of? Anthony Appleyard 16:14, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- I don't keep them at my address I'm afraid, but if there's something you need let me know and I'll sort it when I next look at them if no-one else does it first.Richard75 15:43, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Day One
I haven't watched it yet, but I've never thought that a one-shot monster has ever deserved its own article. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 14:29, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry, no clue. Like I said, I haven't watched it yet. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 14:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Villains
No, because they still originated in Doctor Who. Besides which, it'd be a bitch to change all the links. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 11:21, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Griffin (The Invisible Man)
- In response to your request at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films:
Hi, in order to complete the above article, we need someone to list any movie versions of the above character. I am unable to do so due to knowing nothing about the character history--SGCommand (talk • contribs) 10:51, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'm a little busy, so I hope you'll forgive me for dumping this here rather than attempting a professional edit of the article at this point....
(see Wikipedia article, The Invisible Man (1933 film))
(see Wikipedia article, The Invisible Man Returns)
(see Wikipedia article, Invisible Agent)
(see Wikipedia article, The Invisible Man's Revenge)
(see Wikipedia article, Abbott and Costello Meet the Invisible Man)
aka The Invisible Man in Istanbul
- Matinee Theatre (1955) at the Internet Movie Database (TV episode "The Invisible Man")
- Invisible Man (1958-1960) at the Internet Movie Database (TV Series)
- The Invisible Man (1975) at the Internet Movie Database (TV)
- The Invisible Man (1975-1976) at the Internet Movie Database (TV Series)
- Riding with Death (1976) at the Internet Movie Database (TV) (uncredited)
- Gemini Man (1976) at the Internet Movie Database (TV)
- Gemini Man (1976) at the Internet Movie Database (TV Series)
(see Wikipedia article, Gemini Man)
aka The Invisible Man
- The Invisible Man (1984) at the Internet Movie Database (TV)
- "The Invisible Man" (2000-2002) at the Internet Movie Database (TV Series)
- Source: H.G. Wells at the Internet Movie Database.
- HTH
- TheMadBaron 17:12, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Minor characters
Gut feel - don't like the idea myself, but that doesn't stop you from raising it on the Wikiproject page to discuss it. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 10:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dredd Continuity
We'd need a source for that (although Logan is pretty reliable I'd like to see it in writing) - problem is even if John Wagner doesn't like it the whole Hammerstein thing is consistent through the various Pat Mills stories and Wagner's work doesn't really touch on that period (Origins may seek to address some of this although so far it doesn't contradcit it). If there is a source then it'd certainly be worth a mention. Worth running past Richard75 for his opinion. (Emperor 20:30, 31 October 2006 (UTC))
[edit] 30 Days of Night Annual 2004
You should be able to buy it here but it isn't cheap. If not ebay or a box of back issues are your best shot. Sillythekid 22:56, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dredd pics
I have posted suggestions for images on the Otto Sump, PJ Maybe and Mechanismo talk pages (also Judge Dredd vs. Aliens, Banzai Battalion, Detective-Judge Armitage and Origins (Judge Dredd story) and beyond JD Stone Island (2000AD) and Harry Kipling). If we can get a consensus on them I'll do a batch of uploads. I'll have a nose through the others and post some suggestions.
Doomsday Dogs? I saw that and was unsure - I doubt it needs its own entry. Best consult with Richard75 on that one to be sure. (Emperor 19:51, 3 November 2006 (UTC))
- I wouldn't really describe those as finished - PJ Maybe perhaps but there is plenty more that can be written about Torquemada and if Bint and Sardini only merit a paragraph then they may as well go back in the minor characters list. (Emperor 20:09, 3 November 2006 (UTC))
-
- He was the villian in nearly every Nemesis story and had his own outtings so there is a lot - your Sandboxed version was 5 or 6 times the size of the current entry (it just unfortunately copy violated the main source - itself a very large page). So it can't be considered "finished" - it also doesn't mean you have to "finish" it. It is Wikipedia very little is ever really finished. (Emperor 14:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC))
-
-
- The others? Most of them sill look a bit skimpy. The Orlok one in particular has room for plenty more content. Again its not necessarily down to you to "finish" them but if Blint and Sardini are finished then they seem a bit too short to justify entries but it is a grey area with those two. They are good starts. (Emperor 14:32, 7 November 2006 (UTC))
-
-
-
-
- On the 3rd of Novemeber you said: "On a possibly unrelated subject, I have finished off the entries for the following: Torquemada (comics), PJ Maybe, Armon Gill, Oola Blint and Jacob Sardini." All I've subsequently said was I don't think some of them are finished (Torquemada and maybe Maybe) and if some of the others are finished then they possibly aren't big enough for their own entry (Blint and Sardini).
-
-
-
-
-
- On the Satanus front there is a move afoot to mvoe this entry to a Satanus one: Dinosaurs in 2000 AD with some stuff being removed and some being jiggled around. So I'd hold off on doing anything there. (Emperor 20:13, 7 November 2006 (UTC))
-
-
[edit] Doomsday Dogs
Since the Doomsday Dogs only appeared in the Father Earth story, there probably isn't much we can say about them that doesn't already belong in the Father Earth section, as they were only FE's henchmen. I would take out the red link (unless you think there is anything useful to say about them that would just get in the way if it was in the FE section).Richard75 19:27, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- I agree - may be worth their own section in the List of Minor Characters but don't need the entry: Doomsday Dogs. There just isn't enough to justify their own entry. (Emperor 20:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC))
[edit] Sin/Dex
OK I want t clear my "to do" list but will have a look at that and see what I can do. (Emperor 16:18, 13 November 2006 (UTC))
[edit] "The Getaway" article modifications
How's things? Regarding The Getaway, it sounds good if you've got the information necessary for such additions, by all means, go right ahead. I see you're a Dredd fan. I was a big fan, myself, until the Megazine became so expensive I couldn't justify paying 30 bucks for a comic. Import costs, I suppose. Gamer Junkie 04:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Doctorwhoimage.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Doctorwhoimage.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:11, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:DoctorWho3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DoctorWho3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:41, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:HelghanFlag.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:HelghanFlag.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:10, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Copyright problems with Image:DoctorWho3.jpg
— pd_THOR | =/\= | 15:58, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] image licensing
You have been adding to {{GFDL}} to images whose sources do not show GFDL licensing. Most of these you have been mixing a fair-use license (which is applicable, as far as I can tell) with this GFDL license (which doesn't seem to apply at all). I've reverted all the {{GFDL}}s you added assuming that you are mis-understanding the licensing nature of these tags. If you have any questions, let me know. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 16:01, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Tenthdoctor.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tenthdoctor.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:22, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Gangs of The Getaway
Hello, SGCommand. Regarding the gangs section you've recently created. There is an article pertaining to the actual 14K Triad here on Wikipedia. Perhaps you would like to link it to you're recent additions? Here is is: 14K Triad. Cheers. Gamer Junkie 22:19, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] images for speedy deletion
Hi SGCommand. Why have you tagged images with {{delete}}? --Fang Aili talk 18:24, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Images
We can look at the upload log for a particular user, yes. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 22:36, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- See User talk:SGCommand/Deleted images. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 14:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- The list is still there at User talk:SGCommand/Deleted images. It has not been updated since the last time you asked and I'm sorry but I don't have the time to sort through the logs again just for that. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 14:33, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of your own images
Hi there. If you wish to have images you have uploaded speedily deleted, please use {{db-author}} rather than just the standard {{delete}} or {{db}} (as you did on Image:Human.JPG). Thanks. --TheParanoidOne 23:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Hannibal Rising
I need to read the book before making an opinion. But I would just make individual articles for the major characters like we did for the other books.--CyberGhostface 20:00, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] A deletion in Norts
- What is the matter with Norts#Allies? You deleted it. Anthony Appleyard 20:38, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Stub Categories
Hi, I notice you've created a number of stubs recently - it's more useful if you can create a specific stub such as {{tv-prog-stub}} instead of just a basic {{stub}}. A full list of stubs can be found here. Thanks, Jeodesic 16:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Subspecies (film series) character section
- I'm not sure what you're talking about. I only edited Subspecies (film series) once, and that was to move it to where it is now for consistency with other film series articles. If you can clarify what you mean, I might be able to answer. --Myles Long 18:11, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] your image
Yup, your sources are fine. Cheers, Fang Aili talk 23:25, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AfD Nomination: Firefly Family
I've nominated the article Firefly Family for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Firefly Family satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Firefly Family. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Firefly Family during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion.--CyberGhostface 21:19, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Hello Reinhard tan
Hi there.
Regarding the helping on the LoGH titles, may i know on which topic that you need help? Reinhard tan 15:19, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] License tagging for Image:VolganInsignia.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:VolganInsignia.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:VolganInsignia.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:VolganInsignia.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:28, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:GeneralAdams.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:GeneralAdams.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 18:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hannibal
Yeah, go ahead and create them if you want.--CyberGhostface 21:24, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Battle Royale Red Links
Hi there, regarding the comment you left on my talk page, do you have a link to the page you saw those red links on? I'm struggling to think why I might be the right person to talk to about this because I can't recall having typed it! Addyboy 20:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hitman
Well, I don't know exactly what articles I deleted, so if you could show me, that'd be appreciated. As for the List of villains, well that was deleted under AfD. There was no objection to keep the article at all, and I doubt this listcruft would make it again in DRV. Nishkid64 17:25, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] The Invisible Man
I just cleaned up the article Griffin (The Invisible Man) as instructed. I removed the references to Griffin's supposed relations in the Universal movies as I did not feel they were relevant to the article. If you would like me to make any further changes let me know. Mosquitor, 01:13, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Subterranean Monsters in popular culture
An editor has nominated Subterranean Monsters in popular culture, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subterranean Monsters in popular culture and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:48, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Primeval
We did, but it explains in a different manner. Would it be an idea for a WikiProject on the show, it has a 2nd season commissioned. Mr. Garrison (talk • contribs)
