Wikipedia:WikiProject Anglicanism/COTM
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
The current Anglicanism Collaboration of the Month is William Wilberforce The next collaboration will be selected on March 30, 2007. (Vote here) |
 Archives |
|---|
Contents |
[edit] Anglicanism Collaboration of the Month
| Collaborations |
|---|
|
Article Creation and |
| Arts & entertainment |
| Games & sports |
|
Football (soccer) |
| Geography & places |
| Government & politics |
| Religion |
|
Anglicanism |
| Science & technology |
|
Aviation |
| Miscellaneous |
|
|
The purpose of this page is to establish an Anglicanism Collaboration of the Month.
Rules:
- The article must have something to do with Anglicanism or the Anglican Communion: its history, doctrine, institutions, and notable figures.
- The article with the most people supporting it will win. If there is a tie, the one that was nominated first will be the collaboration of the month.
- Nominations can stay up for 2 months, and then will be removed.
- The winner will be selected on or around the 27th of the month for the following month.
How to nominate:
- Place {{AngCOTM}} on the top of the talk page of the article you are nominating.
- Place your nomination below, at the bottom of the list, with once sentence why you are nominating it. Please sign your nomination with four tildes ~~~~.
[edit] Archives
Archived COTM nominations for can be accessed via the above link. Apparently, protocol is that if anyone wants to renominate an article, they need to do so - we can't just carry over from one month to the next. If you would like to know which nominations failed - please check there. Fishhead64 21:44, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Current nominations for April
Please add nominations for April below. Please indicate your support for the nomination.
[edit] Renominations
Per the guidelines, the unsuccessful nominees are being retained for voting for the following month.
- I nominate the English Reformation. The historical background behind the formation of the Church of England is a top priority and I think this could be an excellent article. User:Roger Arguile has done some excellent work on the subject, and I feel there could be potential for featured article nomination! PMJ 23:18, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'm nominating Anglican views of homosexuality for improvement. There's some good material there, but this is such a significant topic as far as Anglicanism is concerned - and its profile in the media in some countries - that you would reasonably expect this article to be one of the more visited in Wikipedia amongst those seeking information about Anglicanism. The current state of the debate urgently needs to be explained in more detail. I would try and improve it if I felt confident enough about the facts. Pgg7 09:27, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Support: As the article Anglican realignment is still not up to the level it needs to be, and as this article is mixing some of those (church-political) issues in with the pure questions about homosexuality, I feel this whole complex of subjectts could use further work. One of the other candidates is a bit too "special interest" to be taken up at this point (if the big points are covered well, we can worry about details like individual biographies), and the other is too well-done at the current moment to be worthy of receiving such focus.--Bhuck 00:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Support as well, for Bhuck's convincing reasons. I'm currently working on a project revising the article on Anglican doctrine and am doing so with the spectre of this debate looming in the background. There are a constellation of relevant articles here, some of which are radiating more heat than light or simply enumerating stances and actions without providing necessary historical or doctrinal context. It would be nice to bring these up to a standard of some excellence, devoid of PsOV and agendas, especially since it is this debate which is crystallizing Anglican self-definition and is the portal through which much of the non-Anglican world is viewing the Communion. Fishhead64 03:19, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Support; article is already a good start and is on a very important, up-to-date topic. —Angr 10:38, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
