User:Wykypydya
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello! Welcome! My username is a spoof of the name "Wikipedia" but with all the non-a vowels turned into y's. I think the name is interesting because it imitates the name of the encyclopedia but makes the "ee"-sounding vowels completely uniform. There has been a debate about this username that (fortunately) resulted in keeping the status quo. ((See talk page))
I hereby vote this page the weirdest user page on Wikipedia. --Wykypydya 19:26, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] NEW! Play the Secret Message Game! Limited time offer!
Come one, come all, fellow Wikipedians! Please play my Secret Message Game! Instructions are at User_talk:Wykypydya/Secret Message Game. Hurry up! The winner is determined on a first-come-first-serve basis. Can YOU find the secret message? Good luck! --Wykypydya 19:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] My opinions about Wikipedia vandalism
I have deviant views about the acceptability of vandalism. I do not actually oppose policy or approve of blatant vandalism of any articles. In fact, I comprehend as much as any reasonable person that vandalism is a violation. However, I think there are different and distinct types of vandalism, and they should be recognized. My views stem from the non-aggression principle: as long as one's vandalism does not adulterate legitimate content, does not infringe on the freedom of anyone else to use and enjoy the encyclopedia, doesn't abuse other user's edits where such vandalism is not expected, and is limited or sequestered to appropriate places ("appropriate" being a loose definition), then it isn't really a violation at all. As long as proper discretion is exercised, it can be that vandalism doesn't victimize anyone.
If a user voluntarily permits or designates vandalism on certain pages or in certain sections within their own userspace (which other users besides me do, too), then how is that vandalism a violation? Users deserve to be entitled to such self-determination.
Obviously, illegitimate editing of mainstream Wikipedia articles is unacceptable. However, many administrators use the phrase "ruining others' hard work" when referring to or scolding a vandal, and even in this case, I don't believe that saying is always justified. One should consider the nature, effects, and intentions of the vandalism. While page-blanking or deleting text is obvious damage, adding words to or embellishing the article, even with nonsense and especially at the leading or trailing the rest of it, is not ruination "of others' hard work" but rather an addition of inappropriate content. Whether the edit was acceptable or not, if text has not been adulterated or removed inappropriately, then it hasn't been "ruined".
[edit] The most common vandalism line on Wikipedia (where vandalism is approved)
Quote: "Can I really edit here? --Jimbo Wales"
[edit] Hope for adminship
Here is my request that I put on the Wikipedia:admin coaching page -- I put it here becuase I believe it summarizes many of my objectives pretty well:
- I would like to learn to become an administrator to help improve the encyclopedia and help regulate it. I am quite flexible, am a liberal editor, and care about furthering fair procedure, practices, and guidelines rather than being authoritarian or imposing my beliefs on others. I am usually an inclusionist, yet I am conscientious (and admittedly nitpicky) about the need for templates, especially verification-related and disclaimer templates, to protect articles' and text's credibility. Also, I have good technical skills, and might write a bot or two in the future if I can find a good idea. Being an admin would allow me to benefit Wikipedia in these ways. How do I get coaching? Is this some sort of interactive session, or back-and-forth communication on talk pages? --Wykypydya 03:42, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Subpage index
[edit] Idiotic "reversal" subpages
[edit] Binary substitutions
The following articles are all the permutations of directly and oppositely swapping two and only two (and leaving alone one and only one) of the following three items: article title, article edit summary(ies), article content text. (3 permutations)
- /This article has its title and content reversed. Therefore, it is difficult to access, read, and edit, as the title becomes the content and the content becomes the title, forcing one to use the content as the page's URI.: Title-reversed stub article
- /Content-edit-summary-reversed_article: Added link on main userpage to whacked-up article that has its edit summaries and actual content reversed.
- /Added text describing that this is a self-referential article that has its title and edit summary reversed.: This article has its title and edit summaries in the wrong places.
[edit] Triangular substitutions
The following articles are all the permutations of all of the following three items concurrently being shuffled out-of-place, having been indirectly displaced and transposed betwixt each other: article title, article edit summary(ies), article content text. (2 permutations)
(todo)
[edit] Vandalism
You may do vandalism on this page limited to this section, or visit my dedicated vandalism pages: /Vandalism, /Vandalism/Vulgar vandalism, and /Vandalism/Incivil vandalism.
Please view /Vandalism guidelines to know what you should and shouldn't do; reading this is a good idea.
Update: Vandalism subpage tree has been deleted by party-pooping administrative debate to which I was no party. Sorry to vandalism enthusiasts! :-( But fear not, the fight to maintain isolated user-subpage vandalism lives on.
 |
This section is intended for vandalism. It is an approved designated userspace-scope vandalism sandbox space. It should not be taken as a violation of policy so long as it is benign, is limited to the scope of this section, does not inappropriately abuse other users' serious edits, and does not infringe upon any legitimate articles. There is no guarantee of sensible acceptability of content here. Please do not write serious edits here as they will most likely not be taken seriously. Please censor content very sparingly only in cases of extreme or unjustifiable inappropriateness or, if applicable, if it is too offensive or unreasonable to juxtapose such text with other legitimate text on the same page. talk page. |
Please vandalize me below the following horizontal line:
Can I really edit here? --Jimbooooooo Wales
- Nooooooo sh*t, Sherlooooooock! --Wykypydya 03:59, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Why shooooooould I believe yooooooou? --Jimbooooooo Wales
- Because I already said it's oooooookay tooooooo vandalize this sectiooooooon ooooooof my user page, yooooooou dimwit! --Wykypydya
- All right, if yooooooou say sooooooo. Just in case yooooooou didn't knooooooow, vandalizing Wikipedia is my absooooooolute favoooooooritest activity in the whooooooole wide wooooooorld! --Jimbooooooo Wales
- Get a life, man. --Wykypydya
- All right, if yooooooou say sooooooo. Just in case yooooooou didn't knooooooow, vandalizing Wikipedia is my absooooooolute favoooooooritest activity in the whooooooole wide wooooooorld! --Jimbooooooo Wales
- Because I already said it's oooooookay tooooooo vandalize this sectiooooooon ooooooof my user page, yooooooou dimwit! --Wykypydya
- Why shooooooould I believe yooooooou? --Jimbooooooo Wales
Hey, it's me again -- Jimbooooooo. I just wanted tooooooo check up again and make sure that it's oooooookay tooooooo edit freely here. --Jimbooooooo Wales
- Yooooooou sickooooooo. Dooooooon't yooooooou get it? Yooooooou dooooooon't have tooooooo f'n ask if it's oooooookay tooooooo edit. Just gooooooo by the instructiooooooons preceding, and if there's any update in vandalism permissiooooooon, I'll nooooooote it here. --Wykypydya 04:07, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ah, someone changed my own vandalism with lots of "oooos", but I guess it's ooooooooooooookay because it makes it weirderrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. --Wykypydya 18:50, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Once upon a time, there was a little bunny who had no friends, but then he made some friends and everyone was happy. The end.
An olde hare hoare, and an olde hare hoare, is verie goode meate in Lent. But a hare that is hoare, is too much for a score, when it hoars 'ere it be spent! Ha ha... Get it?
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!
The following words allow me to speak my current state of mind:
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!! AaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAa AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHH!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHH!!!
As you can see, each word varies in length, number of A's, number of H's, capitalization patterns, and number of exclamation points. This is a testament to the effect of entropy in holding down certain keys and the Shift key for random lengths of time. --Wykypydya 19:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie. Pie is simply the coolest thing in the world.
[edit] Salad Fingers
Hello. Hello. Today, I've been enjoying the pleasures... of nettles. Oh... what's this queer-looking contraption? You can be called... a... nettle carrier. There you go.
Oh... it seems nettles... have made the milk... drop out... from inside my teat. The nettles make me think happy times. Oh, Bubble Trumps.
Oh, hello! You've picked a rather late hour to be visiting me! Have you got a name? I think... you're called... Milford Cubicle! Why don't you come in? You can have a sit-down and rest those weary legs. I'll give you a hand, if you're feeling rather fatigued, Milford Cubicle. Is that comfortable? I say... would you like a warm glass of milk, Milford Cubicle?
[edit] A lovely bedtime story
Once upon a time, there was a little bunny who had no friends, but then he made some friends and everyone was happy. The end!
