Talk:Yarralumla, Australian Capital Territory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Yarralumla, Australian Capital Territory is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 3, 2007.
Article Milestones Date Process Result December 4, 2004 Featured article candidate Not promoted November 11, 2005 Featured article candidate Promoted Current Status: Featured article

This article has been selected for Version 0.5 and the next release version of Wikipedia. This Geography article has been rated FA-Class on the assessment scale.

Portal	Yarralumla, Australian Capital Territory is maintained by WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
FA	This article has been rated as FA-class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been selected for the featured article queue of the Australia Portal.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canberra.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

Archives Archive 1

Contents 1 Map Ref 2 Ref fix 3 Geology 4 Pronunciation 5 2006 brickworks fires 6 coordinates 7 Weird boxes on article page 8 Image:Yarralumla IBMap-MJC.png 9 Proposed nuclear facility?

[edit] Map Ref

The map's lat long is wrong in Google Earth: long=149.060 lat=-35.180. This comes up closer to Hall than Yarralumla. Frobu 07:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

fixed --Astrokey44 22:26, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ref fix

I fixed one of the references, which had a closing bracket missing, but the corresponding note tag was missing so it broke the numbering of the other references. I tried to fix it (the note I was looking for seemed to be orphaned at the end of the article) but it'd be a good idea if someone familiar with the subject checked it was ok. Image:Yemen flag large.png CTOAGN (talk) 14:46, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for that, I must have been distracted when I added that last ref. You seem to have fixed it up fine. --Martyman-(talk) 20:18, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

references pruned from the article:

• ^  ACT Heritage Council (2004) Entry to the ACT Heritage Register - Brickworks. Retrieved Nov. 3, 2005.
• ^ Ann Gugler (2000) IFHAA Perspectives on Ausralian History Where They Lived 1910-1959. An Overview of the Times. Retrieved Nov. 4, 2004.

--Martyman-(talk) 03:48, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Geology

This section looks *very* dodgy, someone integrate it and kill it appropriately. By the way, congrats to all contributors on getting her featured! Cheers, - >>michaelg | talk 03:02, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

Please god no edit war straight after featured. Geology is a part of geography, or would fit in nicely enough under that section. Maybe even a geology sub-section under geography. It doesn't deserve it's own. Cheers, - >>michaelg | talk 04:23, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

• Can you please clarify what about the section looks dodgy. Further why should a section on geology be "killed"? The Yarralumla formation is regarded as a significant geological feature of the ACT. Geology and Geography although physical geography makes use of geological information so if it was a sub-section of geography it would not bother me and hence changed accordingly. --A Y Arktos 04:34, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

If it's a significant geography feature of the ACT, why isn't it mentioned in that article? Just becuase it's name is Yarralumla, and a small part of the suburb is contained in the formation - it is not reason enough to warrant it's inclusion in the article. I'm completely against it's inclusion but if it must be in there it should be integrated into 'geography'. I really don't think it deserves it's own section/sub-section either. Cheers, - >>michaelg | talk 04:47, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

I added the information about the geology on prompting from someone during the FAC process. I agree it is not super relavent to the suburb, and also think it was much better the way it was originaly (no heading). I think by creating a section called geology people may expect it to be a comprehensive dealing on the subject which it is not, it is mearly a mention of the most notable geologic formation in the suburb. --Martyman-(talk) 05:29, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

Agree with Martyman. Cheers, - >>michaelg | talk 05:35, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

Also agree with Martyman. It's too short to be a section on its own (and is thus ugly), and is not important enough to be expanded any further in the current article. Ambi 07:07, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pronunciation

Hello, I am going to try recording a spoken version of this article over Easter. How should I pronounce these words?

• Ngunnawal
• gazetted (GAZetted? gaZETted?)
• Scrivener Dam (Scry-venner? Scriv-venner?)
• Schlich Street (I imagine the sch- is like schnitzel, rhymes with slick or stitch?)
• William Klensendorlffe

Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 07:46, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Ngunnawal is like Nun-a-wall, scrivener is like the i in give, not sure on the others. -- Astrokey44|talk 08:49, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 2006 brickworks fires

fire near the brickworks should be mentioned sss333 03:48, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] coordinates

Hi, I just noticed the coordinates for Yarralumla are way off. The current ones link to scrubland north of Canberra. Not sure how to fix this - Jack (talk) 01:09, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Weird boxes on article page

Erm, why am I seeing transparent boxes on the right side of the article page that link to Penis? There are three of them, each a different size. Weird...

Fixed. Whew!

[edit] Image:Yarralumla IBMap-MJC.png

I was unsuccessfully trying to add the town name to the map on top (it's not clear from the map that the red spot isn't South Canberra). Maybe someone can fix this? ~ trialsanderrors 10:31, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed nuclear facility?

What ever happened to the nuclear power plant they proposed 50 years ago? Westlake Nuclear Facility?? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.161.3.183 (talk) 17:04, 3 January 2007 (UTC).