Canada–United States relations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Canada | United States |
The Canada–United States relations span more than two centuries, marked by a shared British colonial heritage, conflict during the early years of the U.S., and the eventual development of one of the most successful international relationships in the modern world. The most serious breach in the relationship was the War of 1812, which saw numerous American invasion attempts on then British North America. Friendship would be solidified in the 20th century with the shared experience of the world wars and a close alliance during the Cold War.
Canada and the United States are currently the world's largest trading partners, share the world's longest border, and have significant interoperability within the defense sphere. Modern difficulties have included repeated trade disputes (despite a continental trade agreement), environmental concerns, and debates over immigration and the movement of people across the shared border. While the foreign policies of the neighbours have been largely aligned for much of the post-war era, significant disputes have arisen, including over the Vietnam war, the status of Cuba, and the Iraq war and War on Terror.
Contents |
[edit] History
At the outset of the American Revolution, the American revolutionaries hoped the French Canadians in Quebec and the Yankees in Nova Scotia would join their rebellion and they were pre-approved for joining the United States in the Articles of Confederation. When Canada was invaded during the American Revolutionary War, most Canadians remained neutral, while some joined the invaders. The American effort was a fiasco and Britain tightened its grip on its northern possessions. In peace negotiations, Benjamin Franklin unsuccessfully attempted to convince British diplomats to cede Canada to the United States. The continued presence of the British Empire in Canada after the war helped to sour relations in the succeeding years, particularly since a great number of Loyalist refugees from the American colonies resettled in Canada during and after the war. Thomas Jefferson in particular saw the nearby British presence as a threat to republicanism in the United States.
The Treaty of Paris (1783) which ended the war called for the British to vacate all their forts south of the Great Lakes border. The British refused to do so, citing failure of the United States to provide financial restitution for Loyalists who had lost property in the war. The Jay Treaty in 1795 with Great Britain resolved that lingering issue and the British departed the forts. Tensions mounted again after 1805, erupting into the War of 1812, when the Americans declared war on Britain. The Americans were angered by British harassment of U.S. ships on the high seas and seizure ("impressment") of 6,000 American sailors, as well as severe restrictions against neutral American trade with France. The Americans were outgunned by more than 10-1 by the Royal Navy, and so a land invasion of Canada was proposed as the only feasible means of attacking the British Empire. Americans on the western frontier also hoped an invasion would bring an end to what they saw as British support of American Indian resistance to the westward expansion of the United States, typified by Tecumseh's coalition of tribes. The early strategy was to temporarily seize Canada as a means of forcing concessions from the British. As in 1775 many Americans hoped the Canadians would welcome the chance to overthrow their British rulers. However, the American invasion attempts were repeatedly repulsed, and the war ended as a stalemate.
Canada became a self-governing dominion in 1867 while retaining ties to the British crown. Strained relations with the United States continued, however, due to a series of armed incursions named the Fenian raids by Irish-American Civil War veterans across the border from 1866 to 1871 in an attempt to overthrow British interests in North America. While officially the American government did not openly endorse the raids, and did eventually move to disarm the Fenians, the raids created lasting anger in Canada. Many Canadians believed that President Andrew Johnson initially supported the raids, and that the American government turned a blind eye to these armed incursions for far too long.
A boundary dispute in the Oregon Country (Fifty-Four Forty or Fight!) was the most serious disturbance, but was peacefully resolved. In the 1930s, the United States studied plans to invade Canada in War Plan Red, albeit as an academic exercise. Canadian defence was organized against an American invasion until the onset of World War II.
Following co-operation in the two World Wars, Canada and the United States lost much of their previous animosity. As Britain's influence as a global superpower declined, Canada and the United States became extremely close partners. Canada was a close ally of the United States during the Cold War.
The Canadian military has fought along side the U.S. in most major wars since World War II, including the Korean War, the Gulf War, the Kosovo War, and most recently, the war in Afghanistan. The main exceptions to this were the Canadian government's opposition to the Vietnam War and the Iraq War, which caused some brief diplomatic tensions. Despite these issues, military relations have remained close.
[edit] Defense and international conflict
U.S. defense arrangements with Canada are more extensive than with any other country. The Permanent Joint Board of Defense, established in 1940, provides policy-level consultation on bilateral defense matters. The United States and Canada share NATO mutual security commitments. In addition, U.S. and Canadian military forces have cooperated since 1958 on continental air defense within the framework of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD). There is also an active military exchange program between the two countries under which Canadian Forces personnel have been involved in Iraq. Moreover, interoperability with the American armed forces has been a guiding principle of Canadian military force structuring and doctrine since the end of the Cold War. Canadian navy frigates, for instance, integrate seamlessly into U.S. carrier battle groups.
[edit] War in Afghanistan
Canada's JTF2 unit joined American special forces in Afghanistan shortly after the Al-Qaeda attacks on September 11, 2001. Canadian forces joined the multinational coalition in Operation Anaconda in January 2002. On April 18, 2002, an American pilot attacked Canadian forces involved in a training exercise, killing four and wounding eight Canadians. A joint US-Canadian inquiry determined the cause of the incident to be pilot error, in which the pilot interpreted ground fire as an attack; the pilot ignored orders that he felt were "second-guessing" his field tactical decision.[1][2] Canadian forces assumed a six-month command rotation of the International Security Assistance Force in 2003; in 2005, Canadians assumed operational command of the multi-national Brigade in Kandahar, with 2,300 troops, and supervises the Provincial Reconstruction Team in Kandahar, where Al-Qaeda forces are most active. Canada has also deployed naval forces in the Persian Gulf since 1991 in support of the UN Gulf Multinational Interdiction Force.[3]
The Canadian Embassy in Washington, DC maintains a public relations web site named CanadianAlly.com, which is intended "to give American citizens a better sense of the scope of Canada's role in North American and Global Security and the War on Terror."
The New Democratic Party and some recent Liberal leadership candidates have expressed opposition to Canada's expanded role in the Afghan conflict on the ground that it is inconsistent with Canada's historic role (since the Second World War) of peacekeeping operations.
[edit] 2003 Invasion of Iraq
- See also: Canada and the Iraq War
According to contemporary polls, the vast majority of Canadians were opposed to the 2003 invasion of Iraq. The Canadian government under Prime Minister Jean Chrétien maintained a wait-and-see position with emphasis on UN authority. Many Canadians, and the former Liberal government of Paul Martin (as well as some Americans such as Bill Clinton[4]), made a policy distinction between conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, unlike the Bush doctrine which links these together in a "Global war on terror".
[edit] Trade
Canada and the United States have the world's largest trading relationship, with huge quantities of goods and people flowing across the border each year. Since the 1987 Canadian-American Free Trade Agreement there have been no tariffs on most goods passed between the two countries.
With such a massive trading relationship, trade disputes between the two countries are frequent and inevitable. Americans have placed ongoing tariffs on Canadian softwood lumber despite losing various appeals placed by Canada in the NAFTA and WTO panels. The softwood lumber dispute remains a growing issue between the two countries and is degrading the trade relationship on both sides of the border. Other notable disputes include the Canadian Wheat Board, and Canadian cultural "restrictions" on magazines and television (See CRTC, CBC and National Film Board of Canada). Canadians have complained about such things as the ban on beef since a case of Mad Cow disease was discovered in 2003 with cows from United States of America (and a few subsequent cases) and the high American agricultural subsidies. Concerns in Canada also run high over aspects of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) such as Chapter 11, which many worry makes it difficult for the Canadian government to protect Canada's environment.
One ongoing and complex trade issue involves the importation of cheaper prescription drugs from Canada to the United States. Due to the Canadian government's price controls as part of their state-run medical system, prices for prescription drugs can be a fraction of the price paid by consumers in the unregulated U.S. market. While laws in the United States have been passed at the national level against such sales, specific state and local governments have passed their own legislation to allow the trade to continue. American drug companies--often supporters of political campaigns--have obviously come out against the practice.
According to a 2003 study commissioned by the Canadian Embassy in the United States, based on 2001 data, Canada-U.S. trade supported 5.2 million U.S. jobs.
U.S. State | U.S. Jobs Supported | Rank |
---|---|---|
Alabama | 72,000 | 24 |
Alaska | 13,000 | 48 |
Arizona | 89,000 | 22 |
Arkansas | 45,000 | 32 |
California | 626,000 | 1 |
Colorado | 93,000 | 21 |
Connecticut | 67,000 | 27 |
Delaware | 16,000 | 46 |
Florida | 289,000 | 4 |
Georgia | 152,000 | 10 |
Hawaii | 26,000 | 39 |
Idaho | 23,000 | 43 |
Illinois | 237,000 | 5 |
Indiana | 112,000 | 14 |
Iowa | 55,000 | 30 |
Kansas | 51,000 | 31 |
Kentucky | 69,000 | 26 |
Louisiana | 73,000 | 23 |
Maine | 24,000 | 41 |
Maryland | 101,000 | 20 |
Massachusetts | 134,000 | 13 |
Michigan | 174,000 | 8 |
Minnesota | 103,000 | 19 |
Mississippi | 43,000 | 34 |
Missouri | 108,000 | 16 |
Montana | 16,000 | 45 |
Nebraska | 36,000 | 36 |
Nevada | 43,000 | 35 |
New Hampshire | 24,000 | 42 |
New Jersey | 153,000 | 9 |
New Mexico | 30,000 | 37 |
New York | 348,000 | 3 |
North Carolina | 151,000 | 11 |
North Dakota | 13,000 | 49 |
Ohio | 212,000 | 7 |
Oklahoma | 58,000 | 29 |
Oregon | 63,000 | 28 |
Pennsylvania | 219,000 | 6 |
Rhode Island | 19,000 | 44 |
South Carolina | 69,000 | 25 |
South Dakota | 15,000 | 47 |
Tennessee | 108,000 | 15 |
Texas | 369,000 | 2 |
Utah | 44,000 | 33 |
Vermont | 12,000 | 50 |
Virginia | 141,000 | 12 |
Washington | 108,000 | 17 |
Washington, DC | 29,000 | 38 |
West Virginia | 25,000 | 40 |
Wisconsin | 103,000 | 18 |
Wyoming | 9,000 | 51 |
Total | 5,210,000 |
http://www.canadianembassy.org/2005map/2005_map_front.pdf http://www.canadianally.com
[edit] Arctic disputes
A long-simmering dispute between Canada and the U.S. involves the issue of Canadian sovereignty over the Northwest Passage (the sea passages in the Arctic). Canada’s assertion that the Northwest Passage represents internal (territorial) waters has been challenged by other countries, especially the U.S., which argue that these waters constitute an international strait (international waters). Canadians were incensed when Americans drove the reinforced oil tanker Manhattan through the Northwest Passage in 1969, followed by the icebreaker Polar Sea in 1985, both without asking for Canadian permission. In 1970, the Canadian government enacted the Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act, which asserts Canadian regulatory control over pollution within a 100-mile zone. In response, the Americans in 1970 stated, “We cannot accept the assertion of a Canadian claim that the Arctic waters are internal waters of Canada.... Such acceptance would jeopardize the freedom of navigation essential for United States naval activities worldwide.” A compromise of sorts was reached in 1988, by an agreement on “Arctic Cooperation,” which pledges that voyages of American icebreakers “will be undertaken with the consent of the Government of Canada.” However the agreement did not alter either country’s basic legal position. In January 2006 David Wilkins, the American ambassador to Canada, said his government opposes Stephen Harper's proposed plan to deploy military icebreakers in the Arctic to detect interlopers and assert Canadian sovereignty over those waters. [5]
[edit] Environmental issues
The two countries work closely to resolve transboundary environmental issues, an area of increasing importance in the bilateral relationship. A principal instrument of this cooperation is the International Joint Commission (IJC), established as part of the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 to resolve differences and promote international cooperation on boundary waters. The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1972 is another historic example of joint cooperation in controlling transboundary water pollution. However, there have been some disputes. Most recently, the Devil's Lake Outlet, a project instituted by North Dakota, has angered Manitobans who fear that their water may soon become polluted as a result of this project. The two governments also consult semi-annually on transboundary air pollution. Under the Air Quality Agreement of 1991, both countries have made substantial progress in coordinating and implementing their acid rain control programs and signed an annex on ground level ozone in 2000. Despite this transborder air pollution remains an issue, particularly in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence watershed during the summer. The main source of this transborder pollution results from Coal fired power stations, most of them located in the Midwest US.
There is also concern over sewage disposal in British Columbia, as current legislation allows the province to dispose of their sewage in the Pacific Ocean.
Currently neither of the countries governments support the Kyoto Protocol, which set out time scheduled curbing of greenhouse gas emissions. Unlike the United States, Canada has ratified the agreement. However, the Liberal government did not enforce the Kyoto protocol; instead of reducing Carbon Dioxide emissions by 6%, it actually increased by 24%. The recently elected Conservative minority government has decided that the Protocol's goals were unlikely to be reached, mostly due to increasing oil and natural gas production in recent years.
[edit] Illicit drugs
The U.S. has expressed concern that Canada is an illicit producer of cannabis for the domestic drug market; the use of hydroponics technology permits growers to plant large quantities of high-quality marijuana indoors.
In 2003 the American government became quite irate when members of the Canadian government announced plans to decriminalize marijuana. David Murray, an assistant to U.S. Drug Czar John P. Walters, said in a CBC interview that, "We would have to respond. We would be forced to respond." [3]. However the election of the Conservative Party in early 2006 has halted the liberalization of marijuana laws for the foreseeable future. The Canadian government currently grows marijuana for medicinal purposes only in former mines.
[edit] Arar affair
On September 26, 2002, U.S. officials detained on suspicion of terrorist links a Canadian citizen named Maher Arar who had been travelling through New York as part of a trip home to Canada, from vacation in Tunisia.
Despite travelling on a Canadian passport, Arar was deported to Syria, a country he had not visited since his teenage years. He was imprisoned there for over a year and tortured repeatedly. The decision by U.S. officials to deport him to Syria, his imprisonment and torture there, and the extent of collaboration between U.S. and Canadian officials became a major political issue in Canada at the time.
Canadian officials have since said that Arar was not linked in any way to terrorism, and the Canadian prime minister, Stephen Harper, has issued a formal apology to Arar, but he remains on an American terrorist watchlist.
[edit] Territorial disputes
These include maritime boundary disputes: |
Territorial land disputes:
|
and disputes over the international status of the: |
[edit] Quotes
- U.S. President John F. Kennedy: "Geography has made us neighbors. History has made us friends. Economics has made us partners. And necessity has made us allies. Those whom nature hath so joined together, let no man put asunder."[6].
- Former Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau described relations as being like "sleeping with an elephant. No matter how friendly and even-tempered is the beast," quipped Trudeau, "one is affected by every twitch and grunt."[7]
[edit] Notes
- ^ U.S. 'friendly fire' pilot won't face court martial. CBC News (2004-07-06). Retrieved on 2004-01-28.
- ^ Pilots blamed for 'friendly fire' deaths. BBC News (2002-08-22). Retrieved on 2007-01-28.
- ^ Spector, Norman (2006-11-20). Clinton speaks on Afghanistan, and Canada listens. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved on 2007-01-28.
- ^ Matthew Carnaghan, Allison Goody, "Canadian Arctic Sovereignty" (Library of Parliament: Political and Social Affairs Division, 26 January 2006) at [1]; 2006 news at [2]
- ^ John F. Kennedy. Address Before the Canadian Parliament in Ottawa. The American Presidency Project.
- ^ From a speech by Trudeau to the National Press Club in Washington, DC, on 25 March 1969; authorship of the speech was later attributed to Ivan Head, Trudeau's adviser. (It should be noted, as well, that Trudeau's quote is commonly, although incorrectly, remembered as casting Canada as a mouse; this was in fact the creation of an editorial cartoon that followed Trudeau's speech.)
[edit] See also
- Anti-Americanism
- Anti-Canadianism
- Canada and the American Civil War
- Canada and the United States presidential elections
- Canada and the Vietnam War
- Canada in the Cold War
- Canadian and American economies compared
- Canadian and American politics compared
- Foreign relations of Canada
- Foreign relations of the United States
- David Wilkins, List of United States Ambassadors to Canada
- Michael Wilson, List of Canadian ambassadors to the United States
- Australia-New Zealand relations
- Western World
- South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut
[edit] Further reading
- Graeme S. Mount and Edelgard Mahant, An Introduction to Canadian-American Relations (1984, updated 1989)
- Graeme S. Mount and Edelgard Mahant, Invisible and Inaudible in Washington: American Policies toward Canada during the Cold War (1999)
[edit] External links
- Canadian Embassy in Washington, D.C.
- Embassy of the United States of America in Ottawa, Ontario
- Canadian Society of New York - formed in 1897 to foster a spirit of good will between Canada and the United States. For 106 years it held an annual gala to honour distinguished Canadians or Americans who devoted their careers to strengthening the ties between the two countries.
- Canadian Association of New York