Connecticut United States Senate election, 2006
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. Please discuss this issue on the talk page or replace this tag with a more specific message. This article has been tagged since August 2006. |
The 2006 election of a United States Senator from the state of Connecticut was held on November 7, 2006. Incumbent Senator Joe Lieberman won the election with approximately 50% of the vote, and will serve a six-year term from January 3, 2007 to January 3, 2013. In the August 8 Democratic primary, former Greenwich selectman Ned Lamont defeated Lieberman, the three-term incumbent. Lieberman ran in the general election under the newly formed Connecticut for Lieberman political party for re-election against Lamont. They also faced Republican nominee, former Derby Mayor Alan Schlesinger, Green Party nominee Ralph Ferrucci, as well as Timothy Knibbs of the Concerned Citizens Party. There were two registered write-in candidates, Carl E. Vassar and John M. Joy.
[edit] Candidates
[edit] Democrat: Ned Lamont
On August 8, Greenwich businessman Ned Lamont received 52% of the vote in the statewide Democratic Primary for one of Connecticut's seats in the United States Senate. He defeated incumbent Senator Joe Lieberman, who ran in the November election as a petitioning candidate of the Connecticut for Lieberman party line. In order to get onto the primary ballot on May 19, 2006, Lamont received 33% of the vote at the Democratic State Convention, well above the 15% threshold needed to appear on the primary ballot without having to collect signatures.[1] Sean Smith, who at the time was the campaign manager for Senator Lieberman, dismissed his performance, claiming that many delegates at the convention saw the endorsement question as a "free vote" to "register displeasure with Lieberman without it costing them anything," and speculated that those voters would return to Lieberman in the August primary. Lieberman dismissed Smith as his campaign manager the morning after Lieberman's primary defeat on August 8.[2]
Lamont differed from Lieberman on various issues. He opposed the Iraq War and the USA Patriot Act, supported same-sex marriage and universal health care, opposed the recent creditor-friendly changes to U.S. bankruptcy law, opposed federal intervention in cases such as Terri Schiavo's, opposed the federal earmark system (i.e. pork barrel projects), and said he would have led the charge against the Samuel Alito nomination.[3] (Although Lieberman was one of 41 Democrats who voted against the Alito confirmation, he was one of 18 Democrats to vote for cloture. If cloture did not pass, a vote on the confirmation would have been blocked (unless Republicans had taken the controversial step of invoking the so-called "nuclear option").[4][5]
[edit] Republican: Alan Schlesinger
On May 20, 2006, Connecticut Republicans nominated former Derby Mayor Alan Schlesinger. In July, it was revealed that he was involved in inappropriate gambling activities: Schlesinger gambled under the alias "Alan Gold" to avoid detection as a card counter. On July 21, the Hartford Courant reported that Schlesinger had been sued by two New Jersey casinos for gambling debts. Schlesinger quickly faced fire from state party officials and some, including Connecticut Governor Jodi Rell, called on him to withdraw.[6] Connecticut GOP chairman George Gallo had considered previous Republican Senate candidate Jack Orchulli as a possible replacement if Schlesinger had withdrawn.[7] On July 24, however, Courant colummist Kevin Rennie suggested former State Senator Bill Aniskovich of Branford — who was defeated in 2004 while seeking his eighth term — would replace Schlesinger if he withdrew.[8] Other possible replacements included U.S. Attorney Kevin O'Connor, State Senator John McKinney of Fairfield and Derby state representative Themis Klarides.[9]
[edit] Third party candidates
[edit] Connecticut for Lieberman: Joe Lieberman
Joe Lieberman, the incumbent three-term senator, was running for his fourth term. Lieberman was Al Gore's vice presidential running mate in the 2000 election. The Gore/Lieberman ticket won the popular vote but controversially lost the electoral college vote to George W. Bush.
After a heated primary, Lieberman was defeated by Lamont 52% to 48%. Soon after his defeat, his campaign submitted the required signatures to run under the new Connecticut for Lieberman Party. While many of his Democratic colleagues tried to convince him to drop his bid, he stood firm on his promise to run. The day after losing in the primary, Lieberman fired the majority of his campaign staff including his campaign manager[10] in order to include more Republicans in the campaign for the general election.[11]
[edit] Green: Ralph Ferrucci
Ralph Ferrucci - Connecticut Green Party nominee, artist, truck driver, 2004 congressional candidate, and 2003 "Guilty Party" New Haven mayoral candidate. Ferrucci received more than 15% of the vote when he challenged New Haven mayor John DeStefano in 2003. Ferrucci had the least amount of money on hand of all the candidates and claimed to be the only candidate to publicly state his disapproval over Israel's invasion of Lebanon.[12]
[edit] Concerned Citizens: Timothy Knibbs
Timothy Knibbs ran as the nominee of the Concerned Citizens Party. He also ran for senate in 2004 against incumbent Chris Dodd.
[edit] Write-in candidates
Carl E. Vassar and John M. Joy
[edit] No longer running
- Herschal Collins - a Vietnam War veteran and frequent litigant, was the first to file for the Senate seat, but had no campaign organization and was not a serious candidate. He has a lawsuit pending claiming that Lieberman's Senate term is invalid because he permitted the Department of Interior to approve two casinos for use on Indian lands in Connecticut.[13] His name was not listed on absentee ballots or the Secretary of State's website.
- Paul Streitz - an author, immigration control activist, and 2004 candidate; dropped out of the race just before the convention and seconded Schlesinger's nomination there.[14]
- Diana Urban - Republican state representative from North Stonington who was running as a petitioning candidate on an anti-war platform. On August 9, she announced she had not garnered enough signatures to qualify for the ballot.[15]
[edit] Primary election
The primary election for Connecticut was held on August 8, 2006. The Democratic Party primary pitted incumbent Joe Lieberman against cable executive Ned Lamont while Alan Schlesinger ran unopposed in the Republican Party primary.
| Candidate | Votes[16] | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Ned Lamont | 146,587 | 52% |
| Joe Lieberman | 136,468 | 48% |
As a Democratic stronghold, Connecticut's Senate seat is considered safe to remain as a Democratic seat by political analysts,[17][18] but Lieberman's continued support for the Iraq War, Patriot Act, and other conservative and Bush administration policies made him vulnerable to a Democratic primary challenger. On March 13, 2006, Ned Lamont announced his candidacy for the Democratic nomination. Early polling showed Lieberman with as much as a 46 point lead,[19] but subsequent polls showed Lamont gaining until just weeks before the primary Lamont took the lead.[20] The final polls were shown to be accurate when Lamont defeated Lieberman 51.79% to 48.21%.[21] However, in his concession speech, Lieberman announced that he would stand by his prior statements that he'd run as an independent if he lost the Democratic primary.[22]
In the Republican Party primary, Alan Schlesinger drew fire in July when it was revealed that he had been gambling under an alias in order to avoid detection as a card counter. Despite calls to withdraw from the race, Schlesinger remained in the race,[6] ultimately becoming the Republican nominee when no other Republican challengers entered the race.
[edit] General election campaign
[edit] Lieberman's candidacy in Connecticut for Lieberman party
On June 12, Ned Lamont began running radio ads promising if he lost the primary to endorse Lieberman, challenging Lieberman to abandon consideration of an independent run by making a similar pledge. Lieberman refused to make this pledge; his campaign manager, Sean Smith said, "Are we going to support Ned Lamont? Ah, no!"[23]
On July 3 in Hartford, Lieberman announced that he would collect signatures in order to guarantee himself a position on the November ballot. Both Lieberman and Smith said that Lieberman will run as a "petitioning Democrat" and will caucus with Senate Democrats if elected.[24] On July 10, the Lieberman campaign officially filed paperwork allowing him to collect signatures to form a new political party, the Connecticut for Lieberman party.[25]
Upon Lieberman's announcement, independent polls continued to show him favored to win a plurality or outright majority of the vote in a three-way general election (see below). The petition issue led to charges against the Lieberman campaign of political opportunism and lack of respect for the political process.[26]
On August 29, Lieberman began airing an ad, named "Soothing", featuring images of a sunset over an ocean beach, while a female narrator says "you might enjoy a break from Ned Lamont's negative advertising. So just sit back and think about - good stuff." The Lamont campaign stood by their advertisements.[27]
There was some debate over what impact Lieberman's campaign would have on several tight House races in Connecticut. Some argued that Lieberman would bring out Republican supporters, who would vote for Lieberman and then cross over to support the Republican House candidates. Others, such as Rahm Emanuel, argued that having two Democrats running against each other will increase the Democratic turnout, which will then benefit the Democratic House candidates.[citation needed]
[edit] Democratic reaction to Lieberman's independent run
On August 9, Democratic Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid and DSCC Chair Chuck Schumer issued the following joint statement on the Connecticut Senate race:
| “ | The Democratic voters of Connecticut have spoken and chosen Ned Lamont as their nominee. Both we and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) fully support Mr. Lamont’s candidacy. Congratulations to Ned on his victory and on a race well run.
Joe Lieberman has been an effective Democratic Senator for Connecticut and for America. But the perception was that he was too close to George Bush and this election was, in many respects, a referendum on the President more than anything else. The results bode well for Democratic victories in November and our efforts to take the country in a new direction.[28] |
” |
According to The Hill, a Democratic aide to a high-ranking senator commented that Lieberman might be stripped of his Democratic privileges in the Senate. "At this point Lieberman cannot expect to just keep his seniority," said the aide. "He can’t run against a Democrat and expect to waltz back to the caucus with the same seniority as before. It would give the view that the Senate is a country club rather than representative of a political party and political movement."[29]
On August 21, 2006 a group of New Haven Democrats cited Connecticut General Statutes section 9-61 in a complaint filed with the New Haven Democratic Registrar of Voters, Sharon Ferrucci, demanding that she purge Lieberman from the Democratic voter rolls. The statute reads in part: "Knowingly becoming a candidate for office on ticket of a new party automatically separates voter from his former party."[30] Lieberman's campaign manager called it a "dirty political trick". Ferrucci rejected the complaint.[31]
[edit] Waterbury statement controversy
Lamont campaign manager Tom Swan criticized the strongly pro-Lieberman city of Waterbury for alleged corruption, describing it as a meeting place for "forces of evil" in a published interview.[32] Waterbury's Democratic Mayor Michael Jarjura, had endorsed Lieberman after the primary.[33] Swan later apologized for the statement saying the comment was aimed at former Mayor Philip Giordano, who was arrested for sexual crimes with a minor, as "slime" and former Governor John Rowland, a Waterbury native, who was indicted for corruption, as "evil". Both Giordano and Rowland were forced to resign from their positions due to criminal activities.[34] As Jarjura failed to accept Swan's "apology", Lamont himself was forced to apologize for the comments.[35] On August 22 Lamont announced former Democratic state chairman George Jepsen would be the chairman of the general election campaign. He denied this was a demotion of Swan.[36]
[edit] Lamont called the "Al-Qaeda candidate"
On August 11, CNN Headline News anchor Chuck Roberts asked Hotline senior editor John Mercurio about the effects of the recent London terrorist plot on the 2006 Connecticut Senate race:
| “ | How does this factor into the Lieberman/Lamont contest? And might some argue, as some have, that Lamont is the Al-Qaeda candidate? | ” |
Roberts later apologized personally to Lamont on the air:[37]
| “ | You know, I owe you an apology. Last week, I led into an interview with a guest analyst and really botched the set-up. The guest had wanted to discuss the Dick Cheney and Joe Lieberman statements suggesting that terror groups — Al Qaeda type, to use Cheney’s words — would be buoyed by your win, but I posed it badly, stupidly ad-libbing about "some saying Lamont is the Al-Qaeda candidate." No one, in fact, used that construction. Anyway, I wanted to correct the record, and I'm glad we had this chance to do it. | ” |
[edit] Impact of Lamont allies
Opinion columnist Robert Novak stated that Democratic leaders feared the visible role black activists Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson had at Lamont's primary night rally "might drive Republican, independent and even some Democratic voters into support of Lieberman's independent candidacy."[38]
[edit] Vets For Freedom
On August 15, 2006, the Stamford Advocate reported that an organization called Vets For Freedom had run full page ads in the Hartford Courant in support of Lieberman. Lamont supporters claim that Vets for Freedom is a de facto Republican organization and point out the similarities between this organization and the Swift Vets, who had connections to Republican officials.[39]
[edit] Lieberman, Lewinsky, and a Lamont e-mail released by the Lieberman campaign
In early September, Lamont attacked Lieberman's response to the 1998 scandal involving President Clinton's affair with intern Monica Lewinsky, claiming Lieberman had created a "media spectacle". Lieberman responded by releasing an e-mail Lamont sent the senator at the time, in which Lamont wrote he reluctantly supported Lieberman's stance critical of Clinton.[40]
| “ | I reluctantly supported the moral outrage you expressed on September 3. I was reluctant because I thought it might make matters worse; I was reluctant because nobody expressed moral outrage over how Reagan treated his kids or Gingrich lied about supporting term limits (in other words, it was selective outrage); I was reluctant because the Starr inquisition is much more threatening to our civil liberties and national interest than Clinton's misbehavior... | ” |
Lamont then called for Lieberman to "move on" from publicly criticizing Clinton:
| “ | You have expressed your outrage about the president's conduct; now stand up and use your moral authority to put an end to this snowballing mess. We all know the facts, a lot more than any of us care to know and should know. We've made up our minds that Clinton did wrong, confessed to his sin, maybe he should be censured for lying--and let's move on. | ” |
Lieberman's speech in 1998 had occurred after the President had gone on prime time television to admit his relationship with Lewinsky. Lieberman believes his speech defused partisan tension over a "media spectacle" already present prior to the senator's speech.[41]
[edit] "Turncoat" ads
In late September, Lamont's campaign aired a controversial television ad that depicted various actors portraying Connecticut voters referring to Lieberman as a "turncoat". One of these ads suggested that voters should wear their coats inside out to protest Lieberman's campaign as an independent candidate.[42]
Lieberman responded with the "Blackboard" ad, where the words "Democrat" and "Republican" are separated by a line and Lieberman erased it, stressing his appeal was primarily to the state's largest voter bloc, unaffiliated voters.[43]
[edit] Opinion polls
Every general election poll showed Lieberman ahead, with polls close to the actual date indicating a wide margin. Lieberman indicated that he would caucus with the Democrats if he retained his seniority.[44]
[edit] American Research Group
| Date | Ned Lamont (D) | Alan Schlesinger (R) | Joe Lieberman (CFL) | Margin of Error (+/- %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 20, 2006[2] | 37% | 8% | 49% | 4% |
| September 19, 2006[45] | 45% | 3% | 47% | 4% |
| August 22, 2006[46] | 42% | 3% | 44% | 3.5% |
[edit] Quinnipiac
| Date | Ned Lamont (D) | Alan Schlesinger (R) | Joe Lieberman (CFL) | Margin of Error (+/- %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 6, 2006[47] | 38% | 8% | 50% | 3.8% |
| November 1, 2006[48] | 37% | 8% | 49% | 3.2% |
| October 20, 2006[49] | 35% | 7% | 52% | 3.3% |
| September 28, 2006[50] | 39% | 5% | 49% | 2.9% |
| August 17, 2006[51] | 41% | 4% | 53% | 2.7% |
| July 20, 2006[52] | 27% | 9% | 51% | 2% |
| June 8, 2006[53] | 18% | 8% | 56% | 2.1% |
| May 2, 2006[54] | 13% | 10% | 56% | 2.5% |
[edit] Rasmussen Reports
| Date | Ned Lamont (D) | Alan Schlesinger (R) | Joe Lieberman (CFL) | Margin of Error (+/- %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 31, 2006[55] | 40% | 9% | 48% | 4.5% |
| October 5, 2006[56] | 40% | 6% | 50% | 4.5% |
| September 14, 2006[57] | 43% | 5% | 45% | 4.5% |
| August 21, 2006[58] | 43% | 6% | 45% | 4.5% |
| August 12, 2006[59] | 41% | 6% | 46% | 4.5% |
| July 23, 2006[60] | 40% | 13% | 40% | 3% |
| June 19, 2006[61] | 29% | 15% | 44% | 4.5% |
[edit] Research 2000
| Date | Ned Lamont (D) | Alan Schlesinger (R) | Joe Lieberman (CFL) | Margin of Error (+/- %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 3, 2006[62] | 39% | 7% | 51% | 4% |
[edit] SurveyUSA
| Date | Ned Lamont (D) | Alan Schlesinger (R) | Joe Lieberman (CFL) | Margin of Error (+/- %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 5, 2006[63] | 38% | 9% | 49% | 3.9% |
| October 11, 2006[64] | 40% | 4% | 53% | 4.2% |
| September 12, 2006[65] | 38% | 7% | 51% | 4.2% |
[edit] Zogby/Reuters
| Date | Ned Lamont (D) | Alan Schlesinger (R) | Joe Lieberman (CFL) | Margin of Error (+/- %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 2, 2006[3] | 37% | 8% | 49% | 4.1% |
| October 5, 2006[4] | 33% | 4% | 53% | 4.1% |
[edit] Zogby/Wall Street Journal
| Date | Ned Lamont (D) | Alan Schlesinger (R) | Joe Lieberman (CFL) | Margin of Error (+/- %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 31, 2006[5] [6] | 42.5% | 6% | 47.4% | 4.3% |
| October 19, 2006[7] [8] | 43.2% | 4% | 48.6% | 4.3% |
| September 28, 2006[9] [10] | 44% | 4% | 45.8% | 4.2% |
| September 10, 2006[11] | 42.1% | 3% | 46% | 4.3% |
| August 28, 2006[66] | 39.4% | 2% | 49.4% | 4.2% |
[edit] Finances
Lieberman and Lamont fought a hotly contested and expensive primary battle for the Democratic nomination. Republican candidate Schlesinger gained his party's nomination through the Republican convention and has raised and spent relatively little. Minor candidates' fundraising has been almost nonexistent.
According to the Center for Responsive Politics,[67] fundraising and cash on hand (as of dates specified) are as follows:
| Candidate | Report date | Raised | Spent | Cash on hand |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lieberman (CfL) | 2006-07-19 | $8,904,642 | $6,512,697 | $3,487,184 |
| Lamont (D) | 2006-07-19 | $4,116,131 | $3,763,327 | $352,953 |
| Schlesinger (R) | 2006-06-30 | $113,581 | $38,001 | $75,578 |
| Ferruci (G) | 2006-06-30 | $1,290 | $604 | $684 |
In the days before the Democratic Party primary, the Lieberman campaign invoked the "millionaire rule", believing that Lamont's personal campaign contributions had exceeded federal limits. Despite having more than double Lamont's funding, Lieberman accepted contributions up to a higher $6,300 limit per individual. The normal limit is $2,100. Since the primary Lamont has added over $2 million of his own money to his campaign effort.[68][69] According to published reports, as of late October, Lamont has spent over $12.7 million of personal funds on his campaign, while Lieberman has raised over $14 million.[70]
[edit] Endorsements
[edit] For Lieberman
* = candidate for U.S. Senate in his home state
|
[edit] For Lamont
[edit] Election results
| 2006 United States Senate election, Connecticut | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
| Connecticut for Lieberman | Joe Lieberman (incumbent) | 564,095 | 49.7 | -13.5 | |
| Democratic | Ned Lamont | 450,844 | 39.7 | n/a | |
| Republican | Alan Schlesinger | 109,196 | 9.6 | -24.6 | |
| Green | Ralph Ferrucci | 5,922 | 0.5 | n/a | |
| Concerned Citizens | Timothy Knibbs | 4,638 | 0.4 | -1.6 | |
| Write-in | Carl E. Vassar | 80 | 0.0 | n/a | |
| Write-in | John M. Joy | 3 | 0.0 | n/a | |
| Majority | 113,251 | 10.0 | |||
| Turnout | 1,134,762 | ||||
| Connecticut for Lieberman gain from Democratic | Swing | ||||
From the results as compared to their change in support from the 2000 election, where Lieberman overwhelmingly won alongside a weak Republican challenger, the support from Republicans and Democrats for Lieberman can be gathered. The Democratic vote for Lieberman in 2000 was 63.2%, and fell to 39.7% for Lamont. Based on the assumption that this loss in support coincided with a gain for Lieberman, the Democratic swing to Lieberman was worth 23.5% of the 49.7% Lieberman received. Similarly with the Republican vote, it dropped from 34.2% in 2000 to 9.6% in 2006, an assumed swing to Lieberman of 24.6%.
It can then be stated that Lieberman received about half his support from people that voted for the Democrat (him) in 2000, and about half his support from people that voted for the Republican in 2000.
[edit] Notes
- ^ Susan Haigh. "Lieberman wins nomination, but Lamont forces primary", The Boston Globe, 2006-05-19.
- ^ Chris Cillizza. "Conn. Senate: Lieberman's Primary Fight Getting More Interesting", Washington Post, 2006-05-22.
- ^ Sam Seder (March 21, 2006). Why Ned Lamont is a Democrat. In These Times. Retrieved on 2006-11-09.
- ^ On the Cloture Motion (Motion to Invoke Cloture On The Nomination of Samuel A. Alito, Jr. of New Jersey, To Be An Associate Justice Of The Supreme Court ). U.S. Senate (2006-01-30).
- ^ On the Nomination (Confirmation Samuel A. Alito, Jr., of New Jersey, to be an Associate Justice ). U.S. Senate (2006-01-31).
- ^ a b Susan Haigh. "Republican U.S. Senate candidate says he won't step aside", The Boston Globe, July 13, 2006. Retrieved on 2006-11-09.
- ^ Don Michak. "Orchulli in the wings for Republicans? But Schlesinger insists he won't fold", Journal Inquirer, July 14, 2006.
- ^ Kevin Rennie (2006-07-24). Will Dole Enter the Fray in Connecticut?. Political Wire.
- ^ The Replacements. Connecticut Local Politics (2006-07-25).
- ^ Susan Haigh. "Lieberman Starts Campaign as an Independent As Favorite To Win Senate Race in November", The New York Sun, 2006-08-11.
- ^ David Lightman. "JOE'S TEAM COMES HOME; PRIMARY LESSON DRAWS OLD CREW TO TURN IT AROUND", Hartford Courant, August 15, 2006, p. A1. Retrieved on 2006-11-12.
- ^ Israel Invasion of Lebanon (July 31, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-11-12.
- ^ Joe Goes to Iraq (Again) (November 29, 2005). Retrieved on 2006-11-12.
- ^ Cara Rubinsky. "Republicans nominate Rell to run for term of her own", Associated Press, May 20, 2006. Retrieved on 2006-11-12.
- ^ "Rep. Diana Urban falls short in efforts to run as an independent", Associated Press, August 9, 2006. Retrieved on 2006-11-12.
- ^ Election results. Hartford Courant August 10, 2006.
- ^ CQPolitics
- ^ Sabato's Crystal Ball
- ^ Rell Flying High In Connecticut Gov Race, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Anti-Bush, Anti-War Feeling Does Not Hurt Lieberman. Quinnipiac University (2006-05-02). Retrieved on 2006-08-25.
- ^ Lamont Inches Ahead Of Lieberman In Dem Primary, Quinnipiac University Connecticut Poll Finds; Incumbent Still Leads In 3-Way November Matchup. Quinnipiac University (2006-07-20). Retrieved on 2006-08-25.
- ^ "Connecticut primary results", Hartford Courant, 2006-08-10. Retrieved on 2006-08-25.
- ^ "Joe Lieberman's Concession Speech", WFSB, 2006-08-09. Retrieved on 2006-08-25.
- ^ Lieberman Rebuffs Lamont Challenge - Will Not Support if Lamont Wins (June 13, 2006).
- ^ Lieberman to run regardless of primary results. CNN.com (July 3, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-11-09.
- ^ Haigh, Susan. "Lieberman campaign files forms to run as petitioning candidate", Associated Press, July 10, 2006. Retrieved on 2006-11-09.
- ^ "Democracy an insult to those who live only for power", Journal Inquirer, June 16, 2006. Retrieved on 2006-11-09.
- ^ "News and notes from the campaign trail", Associated Press, August 30, 2006. Retrieved on 2006-11-09.
- ^ "Democratic leadership quickly backs Lamont", CNN, 2006-08-09. Retrieved on 2006-10-31.
- ^ Bolton, Alexander. "Dem angst escalates", The Hill, 2006-08-16. Retrieved on 2006-10-31.
- ^ [1]
- ^ Bailey, Melissa. "City Won't Un-"Democrat" Joe", New Haven Independent, 2006-08-24. Retrieved on 2006-10-31.
- ^ Mayor wants apology from Lamont campaign. WTNH (August 10, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-11-09.
- ^ Steve Gambini (August 11, 2006). Jarjura supports maverick campaign: Write-in veteran backs Lieberman independent run. Republican-American. Retrieved on 2006-11-09.
- ^ "Lamont aide to apologize for comment", Associated Press, August 11, 2006. Retrieved on 2006-11-09.
- ^ Lamont apologizes for campaign manager's Waterbury comments. Boston.com (August 15, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-11-09.
- ^ "News and notes from the campaign trail", Associated Press, August 22, 2006. Retrieved on 2006-11-09.
- ^ Chuck Roberts apologizes to Lamont for saying he’s "the Al-Qaeda candidate" (August 15, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-11-09.
- ^ Robert Novak. "Dems worry Sharpton, Jackson could send Lamont voters to Lieberman's side", Chicago Sun-Times, August 13, 2006. Retrieved on 2006-11-09.
- ^ Anne E. Kornblut. "G.O.P. Deserts One of Its Own For Lieberman", New York Times, August 19, 2006. Retrieved on 2006-11-09.
- ^ Text of Lamont's email (September 9, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-11-12.
- ^ John Cristofferson (September 9, 2006). Lieberman Defends 1998 Rebuke of Clinton. Associated Press. Retrieved on 2006-11-12.
- ^ Mark Panizokas. "Lamont's Approach Leaves Some Perplexed", Hartford Courant, September 20, 2006, p. B1.
- ^ Miga, Andrew. "Lieberman pushes unity in new ad", Boston Globe, 2006-09-14. Retrieved on 2006-11-20.
- ^ Alexander Bolton (October 3, 2006). Lieberman Says He Has Been Promised Seniority. Truthout.org. Retrieved on 2006-11-09.
- ^ Connecticut US Senate. American Research Group. September 19, 2006. Accessed on September 20, 2006.
- ^ Lieberman and Lamont Tied in Connecticut. American Research Group. August 22, 2006. Last accessdate September 5, 2006.
- ^ Lieberman Has 12-Point Lead In Connecticut, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds (November 6, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-11-15.
- ^ Lieberman Has 12-Point Lead In Connecticut, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Rell Is Up By 24 Points With Six Days To Go (November 1, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-11-15.
- ^ Lieberman Opens 17-Point Lead In Connecticut, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Dem Challenger Gains Slightly On Rell (October 20, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-11-14.
- ^ Lieberman has 10-point lead in Connecticut, Quinnipiac University poll finds; Dem challenger gains no ground on Rell. Quinnipiac University (September 28, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-11-15.
- ^ Lieberman Leads Among Likely Connecticut Voters, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Strong Democratic Boost Gives Rell 2 -1 Lead. Quinnipiac University (August 17, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-11-15.
- ^ Lamont Inches Ahead Of Lieberman In Dem Primary, Quinnipiac University Connecticut Poll Finds; Incumbent Still Leads In 3-Way November Matchup. Quinnipiac University (July 20, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-09-05.
- ^ Lamont Gains On Lieberman Among Connecticut Dems, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Rell Rules In Governor's Race. Quinnipiac University (June 8, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-09-05.
- ^ Rell Flying High In Connecticut Gov Race, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Anti-Bush, Anti-War Feeling Does Not Hurt Lieberman. Quinnipiac University (May 2, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-09-05.
- ^ Connecticut Races: Lieberman Lead Declines. Rasmussen Reports (October 31, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-11-15.
- ^ Connecticut Senate: Lieberman Lead Reaches Double Digits. Rasmussen Reports (October 5, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-11-15.
- ^ Connecticut Senate: Lieberman (I) 45% Lamont (D) 43%. Rasmussen Reports (September 14, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-11-15.
- ^ Connecticut Senate: Lieberman, Lamont Still in a Toss-Up. Rasmussen Reports (August 21, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-09-05.
- ^ Connecticut Senate: Two Days After Primary, Lieberman Ahead by 5. Rasmussen Reports (August 12, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-09-05.
- ^ Connecticut Senate: Lieberman Neck and Neck With Lamont. Rasmussen Reports (July 23, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-09-05.
- ^ Connecticut Senate:Lieberman (D) by 38 or 15.... Rasmussen Reports (June 19, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-09-05.
- ^ Don Michak (November 3, 2006). Lieberman up 12 points in JI poll. Journal Inquirer. Retrieved on 2006-11-15.
- ^ Connecticut Lieberman Re-Elected to U.S. Senate. SurveyUSA (November 5, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-11-15.
- ^ Independent Lieberman Still 13 Points Atop Democrat Lamont for U.S. Senate. SurveyUSA (October 11, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-11-15.
- ^ Independent Lieberman 13 Points Atop Democrat Lamont for U.S. Senate. SurveyUSA (September 12, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-11-15.
- ^ Battleground States Poll. Wall Street Journal.
- ^ http://opensecrets.org/races/summary.asp?ID=CTS1&Cycle=2006
- ^ http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/09/14/politics/p084158D10.DTL&type=politics
- ^ http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15034232/
- ^ http://www.courant.com/news/local/hc-money1022.artoct22,0,7210160.story
- ^ http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/08/10/mg.thu/
- ^ http://www.nola.com/search/index.ssf?/base/news-1/1154844444102520.xml?NSDC&coll=1
- ^ http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/08/10/mg.thu/
- ^ http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/08/10/mg.thu/
- ^ http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/08/10/mg.thu/
- ^ http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2006/Aug/16/op/FP608160318.html
- ^ http://www.hannity.com/index/news-app/story.801
- ^ http://www.atlantaprogressivenews.com/news/0075.html
- ^ http://www.forward.com/article/democrats-drop-lieberman-gop-paints-vote-as-anti/
- ^ http://www.wtnh.com/Global/story.asp?S=5278356&nav=3YeX
- ^ http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/09/17/republican_bloomberg_to_help_lieberman/
- ^ Maggie Haberman. "Rudy: Joe is "exceptional"", New York Post, August 17, 2006. Retrieved on 2006-11-09.
- ^ "2006 Campaign Notebook", Hartford Courant, September 22, 2006. Retrieved on 2006-11-09.
- ^ http://www.newhavenindependent.org/archives/2006/08/lieberman_neith.php
- ^ http://www.markkennedy06.com/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=17262
- ^ http://www.theolympian.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060810/NEWS/60810004
- ^ http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/30/nyregion/30lieberman.html
- ^ http://www.connpost.com/search//ci_4176160
- ^ http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZDIyY2M1NzNmNTI0ZmY1NmFlMmVmZmE3NGJhOTdhOGQ=
- ^ http://www.nypost.com/seven/10202006/postopinion/editorials/lieberman_for_senate_editorials_.htm
- ^ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/09/AR2006080901632.html
- ^ BobGeiger.com
- ^ http://www.opinionjournal.com/cc/?id=110008837
- ^ http://securingamerica.com/node/1314
- ^ http://www.newhavenindependent.org/archives/2006/08/a_heavyweight_s.php
- ^ http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/08/11/lieberman.senate/index.html
- ^ http://www.forwardtogetherpac.com/contents/show/216
- ^ "Lamont support growing", Connecticut Post Online, August 17, 2006. Retrieved on 2006-11-09.
- ^ "As the Senator on the Outside, Lieberman Walks a Tricky Path", New York Times, September 9, 2006. Retrieved on 2006-11-09.
- ^ Mark Panizokas. "Democratic Primary Winner Ned Lamont wins the United Auto Workers' Endorsement", Hartford Courant, August 24, 2006, p. B1. Retrieved on 2006-11-09.
- ^ "A Union Boost For Lamont, DeStefano", Hartford Courant, August 29, 2006. Retrieved on 2006-08-29.
[edit] External links
- State of Connecticut Secretary of State: 2006 Primary and Election Information
- State of Connecticut Secretary of State: Statement of Vote
- Lieberman campaign website
- Lamont campaign website
- Schlesinger campaign website
- Ferrucci campaign website
- Knibbs campaign website
- Differences on the issues between Joe Lieberman and Ned Lamont (whereIstand.com)
- Connecticut United States Senate election, 2006 at Discourse DB
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Senate |
Arizona • California • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Hawaii • Indiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Dakota • Ohio • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming |
| House |
Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming |
| Governors |
Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Iowa • Kansas • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Mexico • New York • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Vermont • Wisconsin • Wyoming |
| State |
Alabama • Alaska • Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming |
