Talk:Crawdaunt
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Stage-1 TCG card
I'm a little concerned about this sentence in the TCG section: "Most Crawdaunt cards are Stage-1 Pokémon cards, and are primarily used to play stronger cards (such as Stage-2 Pokémon, like Charizard)." First of all, isn't Crawdaunt always a Stage-1 card? More importantly, I'm afraid we're stating that Crawdaunt can be used to play a Stage-2 card, but Crawdaunt doesn't evolve. --Brandon Dilbeck 18:09, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Appearance/Biology
Should the last paragraph in the introduction be made into an Appearance/Biology section? I'd like to but I'm not sure if its a good idea... --Floramage! 20:41, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
- All it is is a description of Crawdaunt's appearance—to me, this doesn't seem broad enough for the introduction. --Brandon Dilbeck 00:44, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Name Origin
It should probably be noted that Crawdaunt's name sounds a lot like Commandant a rank in the US military, which fits nicely with Corphish possibly being derived from Corporal or Corps. Also, the combination of the star on his head, and the v-shaped stripes looks a lot like the medals given out in the military.
--Wikey 22:18, 16 November 2006
[edit] Improving article content
This is a proposal to remove some of the content that I believe is unnecessary to the Crawdaunt article. Addressing Vikrant's question, yes, I want this article to be a GA. I am not trying to prevent that.—M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 16:28, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- [Removed sections] Since no one has replied and the article seems to be improving somewhat, I'm removing these sections. I will work on the article and try to explain my edits well enough in the edit summaries to justify my changes (and content pruning where it seems useful).—M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 15:37, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GA pass
I am very impressed with this article. I think it should soon be nominated for FA. Also...I actually put A class into the project templates because I think it is good enough for A class (better than GA). Funpika 00:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Categories: Wikipedia good articles | GA-Class Good articles | Wikipedia CD Selection-GAs | A-Class video game articles | Low-priority video game articles | WikiProject Video games articles | A-Class Nintendo articles | A-Class Pokémon Collaborative Project articles | Low-importance Pokémon Collaborative Project articles