History of Latin America
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Translation Status: Stage 2 : In Progress (How-to)
Comment: (See #Talk) Madeinsane 15:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Requested by: Yug (talk) 08:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Interest of the translation: Latin America is now see as one big area. In french History university, we learn its history as one area, under european rules, then under american (commercial) rule. A true 6 pages article is need. The french text can do the 3 first pages. Yug (talk) 08:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Translator(s): Madeinsane
Translation progress:
15%Permanent link to the translated version: [1]
Join this translation --- Update this information (instructions)
Latin America refers to countries in the Americas where Latin-derived (Romance) languages are spoken; these countries generally lie south of the United States. By extension, some, particularly in the United States, incorrectly apply the term to the whole region south of the United States—including non-Romance-speaking countries such as Suriname, Jamaica, and Guyana.
This region was home to many indigenous peoples and advanced civilizations, including the notable Aztecs, Inca and Maya, before the arrival of Europeans in the late 15th century. Upon their arrival, most of Latin America was colonized, primarily by Spain and Portugal, and, to a lesser extent, by France. In the early 19th century most of the countries in the region attained their independence, although a few small colonies remain.
Contents |
[edit] Pre-Columbian
Latin American history extends back many centuries, possibly as long as 30,000 years. Precise dating is difficult because there are few text sources. However, highly-developed civilizations flourished at various times and places, such as the Andean Inca and the Central American Maya and the Aztecs.
[edit] Colonialism
Christopher Columbus "discovered" the Americas in 1492. Subsequently, the major sea powers in Europe sent expeditions to the New World to build market lines and colonies. First, concentrating on the central and southern parts of the Americas, the Spanish and Portuguese built large colonial empires in California, Mexico, and Brazil.
[edit] 19th century : Post-colonial area
Following the model of the U.S. and French revolutions, most of Latin America achieved its independence by 1825. However, Europe and the United States continued to play major roles, especially in the 19th and 20th centuries.
The independence of Latin American countries finally allowed the dislocation of the structures and old balances, justice and power are monopolized by new "owners" and a new law supporting the property.
Ejidos were put on sale, those who had land became owners by purchasing them. Poor people became submitted to the economy instead of landlords, without confucian principle of mutual respect between superior and vassal. Profitability attracted many to buy/exploit the lands: the poor do not have any more land of reserve.
In Brazil, in 1910, 85% of lands belonged to 1% of the population.
Thus, gold (in the post-independence societies of Latin America) and fruit (two-thirds of the raw materials produced by the exploitation of the farmers and their plantations) were monopolised by the owners of the land.
These 'Great Owners' totally controlled the local activity and furthermore were the principal employers and the main source of revenue. This led to a society of workers, little politicised and poor who thought these local 'lords' were lawful.
This ecomomy of large estates was adapted to the international market economy, from which it drew its capital, but underwent fluctuations of price. The inequality of the condition of their workers encouraged free competition with the more equalatarian states.
Mongrel reality was completely denied on the level of powerful, except in Mexico. The official culture was exclusively European, catholic, positivist, except in Mexico.
In spite of the proclamation of constitutions inspired by the constitutions of America and France, the lack of involvement of the population dissallowed their implementation to the middle-class who weren't really interested.
After the efforts of Great Bolivia, the Central-American Republic and of the United States of South America the the confusing nature of the borders provoked a number of interstate conflicts, whereas the interior of the countries was often plagued by the fights between federalists and centralists who finally asserted themselves only by action and military repression of the opponents. There remained a difficult to define national space, a nation resembling a state, since these states even were identified only by their European (Spanish or Portuguese) roots and their official population sharing the same language and origins.
The modernization of the networks was mainly justified by the need for control over the whole of its territory, and the capacity to quickly take action at its borders.
This militarisation of the Latin American company caused the recurring emergence of Caudillos, military chiefs whose hold on power depended on his abilities in battle, as a man of action. They entrusted the local authority to these Corronel writes of the local chiefs, 'holding their power of their personal richness and their political fidelity with the chief'
The regimes were either presidential, a little liberal and rather democratic; or Parliamentary that is to say more liberal, less democratic and more oligarchic. In both cases, the opinion of the average-man was devalued. The vote in any event often conditional, favourining a political life is limited to an oligarchy.
The political life, except with the Caudillos, was occupied by the conservatives and the liberals, who in both cases did not have a social policy. And the popular insurrections, when they were expressed, were often influential and repressed: 100,000 died simultaneously during a Colombian revolt around 1890.
Only some States manage to have some semblance of democracy: Uruguay, and partially Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica and Colombia. The others were clearly oligarchist, sometimes with a major support.
Economically, the Latin America was certainly dependent on Europe (mainly England) and the United States; independence left a place for an increased dependence especially in the ninteenth century which saw an increase in the dependence on the investment provided.
Specialist Vocabulary:
Estancias and Haciendas:large-scale farms in which exploitation was rampant.
Fazendas: breeding plantations of coffee/sugar
Ejido: collective ownership, guaranteeing certain rights to each one of the members of the community.
Propriety: the good of only one person.
[edit] 20th century under USA leadership
- See discussion page for how you can help translate this article or section.
- See also: Mexican Revolution
- See also: 1973 Chilean Coup against Salvador Allende
- See also: Just Cause operation in Panama.
- See also: João_Goulart#The military overthrow of Goulart (brazil)
[edit] 1900-1920
A few agreements were signed with the American intervention in Cuba in 1898 and Platt Amendment in 1902, which authorized the U.S. to intervene in Cuba if necessary. The old Monroe Doctrine, which impeded European interventions, was therefore replaced by the Big Stick Doctrine, a more interventionist doctrine aimed to defend U.S. interests.
In Colombia, the concession of the Panama Canal was repurchased in 1903, but the Colombian elites opposed this american seizure. A Panamanian insurrection then appears, armed with marked military material of the "U.S." sign, independence is imposed, and Panama becomes an ally of the United States.
In Mexico, Porfirio Díaz promised that he would withdraw from power in 1908. Francisco Madero, a moderate liberal whose aim was to modernize the country calmly in order to avoid a socialist revolution, launches an election campaign to defend the liberal ideas in 1910. But Díaz organizes a seventh faked election, which prompted the Mexican Revolution. Riots are organized and some key leaders appear: Pancho Villa in the north, Emiliano Zapata in the west, and a more moderate Francisco I. Madero in Mexico City. The United States releases finally Porfirio Díaz in 1911, who will resign in May 27, and flee leaving the scene to Madero who will become President in November 6, 1911. Madero undertakes a democratization process, but little is made in relation of the agrarian claims while Zapata continues the revolution. In February 18, 1913 Adolfo de la Huerta, a conservative general organizes with the support of the United States a coup d'état: Madero is killed on the 22th. Other revolutionary chiefs: Pancho Villa, Zapata, and Venustiano Carranza reject this "usurper" who is released soon by the United States, dissatisfied with his dictatorial behavior. Zapata and Villa, allies, take Mexico City in March 1914, but in this working city they are not on their ground and prefer to withdraw towards their respective bastions. This allowed Carranza, after the escape of Huerta in July 1914, to carry out a battle for victory. He then organizes the rebellious repression of the armies of Villa and Zapata, in particular by general Álvaro Obregón who gains decisive victories in 1915, takes Mexico City and becomes a de facto president in October 1915. The Mexican constitution of 1917 is proclaimed, but little was applied.
Under the orders of Carranza and with the American military support, Obregón continues his military pressure on the rebels. Zapata is finally assassinated in April 10, 1919. Carranza, the president, is assassinated in May 15, 1920, leaving the place to Obregón, who becomes an elected president. Finally in 1923, it is Pancho Villa who is assassinated.
Mexico finally becomes pacified by the accession of that liberal president, but agrarian aspirations of the work force remained unsatsfied.
- Further information: Mexican Revolution
Please do not make any sections in French. Save it for a French language page.
[edit] American policies and doctrines imposed on Latin America
- See discussion page for how you can help translate this article or section.
- Big Stick Doctrine (1890-1920) : USA may be cop of other amican countries, to protect USA interests.
- Drago Convention (1902) :
- Tobarc Doctrine (1907) : non-acknowledge/recognize militarian coups.
- Wilson Doctrine : croisade for democraty.
- Good Neighbouring doctrine (from Hoover to Roosevelt) : equal to equal diplomaty.
- Reagan Doctrine (80') : fight against communism and socialism, even backing military Coups d'États.
- Nowadays : keep good relation with latin american countries, second area of oil, keep their neutral position about anti-integrist wars.
[edit] See also
- Pre-Columbian :
Mesoamerica : Aztec, Huastec, Mixtec, Maya, Olmec, Pipil, Tarascan, Teotihuacán, Toltec, Totonac, Zapotec
South America : Chavin, Chibcha, Chimor, Chachapoya, Huari, Inca, Moche, Nazca, Tiwanaku
- Colonization :
British, danish, Dutch and New Netherland, French and New France, Portuguese, Russian , Spanish, New Spain, Conquistador, Spanish conquest of Yucatan, Spanish conquest of Mexico, Spanish missions in California, Swedish
- History by Region :
History of South America, History of Central America, History of the Caribbean, History of the Americas
- History by Country :
Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Puerto Rico, Uruguay, Venezuela.
Other Topics : Relations with the USA, Relations with Europe, Relations with the PRC, Feminist history in Latin America, History of the Jews in Latin America, Landless Workers' Movement
[edit] Bibliography
Introductions
- Bakewell, Peter, A History of Latin America (Blackwell History of the World (Paperback)), Blackwell Publishers 1997
- Brown, Jonathan C. Latin America: A Social History of the Colonial Period, Wadsworth Publishing Company, 2nd edition 2004
- Burns, Bradford, Latin America: A Concise Interpretive History, paperback, PrenticeHall 2001, 7th edition
- Green, Duncan, Silent Revolution: The Rise and Crisis of Market Economics in Latin America, New York University Press 2003
- Herring, Hubert, A History of Latin America: from the Beginnings to the Present, 1955. ISBN 0-07-553562-9
- Schoultz, Lars, Beneath the United States: A History of U.S. Policy Toward Latin America, Harvard University Press 1998,
- Skidmore, Thomas E. and Smith, Peter H., Modern Latin America, Oxford University Press 2005
Handbooks
- The Cambridge history of Latin America (11 vls)
- The Cambridge history of the native peoples of the Americas (3vls)