Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This page is part of the Manual of Style, and is considered a guideline for Wikipedia. The consensus of many editors formed the conventions described here, and Wikipedia articles should heed these guidelines. Before making any major changes to these guidelines, please use the discussion page to ensure that your changes reflect consensus. |
 |
This page in a nutshell: Wikipedia articles should describe fiction and fictional elements from the perspective of the real world, not from the perspective of the fiction itself. |
Wikipedia contains numerous articles on fictional worlds and elements from them. Once a topic's notability has been established, the approach to writing about these subjects is the most important consideration to make. Articles dealing with fictional subjects, characters, objects, events, or locations should establish and discuss such things as their significance outside the narrative itself and their process of authorship. These guidelines describe some approaches to writing a proper article on fiction.
Contents |
[edit] Perspective
Articles on fiction can approach their subject from two angles. In one method, articles describe the subject matter from the perspective of the real world. This may include:
- the author or creator;
- the design;
- the development, both before its first appearance and over the course of the narrative;
- real-world factors that have influenced the work or fictional element;
- for fictional characters in dramatic productions, the actor who portrayed the role and his or her approach to playing that character;
- its popularity among the general public;
- its sales figures (for commercial offerings);
- its reception by critics;
- a critical analysis of the subject;
- the influence of the work on later creators and their projects; and
- a summary of the plot or elements of character and exposition, treated briefly, and clearly defined as fictional.
This is often called an out-of-universe perspective.
The second approach treats the fiction as if it were real, and describes it from the perspective of the people and characters of the fictional universe. Topics covered may include:
- the birth and death dates of fictional characters;
- a plot synopsis framed as biography;
- performance statistics or characteristics for fictional vehicles or devices;
- exposition framed as the history of fictional locations or organizations; and
- background information on fictional creatures presented as real-world science or anthropology.
This is often referred to as an in-universe perspective. Many non-Wikimedia wikis and independent fan-maintained websites take this approach, but it is not considered encyclopedic.
Wikipedia is an out-of-universe source, and all articles about fiction and elements of fiction should take an overall out-of-universe perspective.
[edit] Prose examples
Out-of-universe information needs context; details of creation, development, etc. are more helpful if the reader understands a fictional element's role in its own milieu. This often involves using the fiction to give plot summaries, character descriptions or biographies, or direct quotations. By convention, these synopses should be written in the present tense, as they describe a piece of fiction that does not change when it is read, watched, or played from one instance to the next. This is fine, provided such fictional passages are short, are given the proper context, and do not constitute the main portion of the article. If such passages stray into the realm of interpretation, secondary sources must be provided to avoid original research.
Plot summaries can be written from an out-of-universe perspective by referring to specific works or parts of works ("In the first book", "In Act II") or describing things from the author or creator's perspective ("The author introduces", "The story describes"). This gives the summary a more grounded tone and makes it more accessible to those unfamiliar with the source material. This style of writing should be preferred for plot summaries that encompass multiple works, such as a series of novels. Such conventions are not as important for plot summaries of single works, such as novels that are not part of a series; nevertheless, some real-world language at the beginning of such summaries is often good style.
The following contrived plot description about a series of novels does not discuss the real-world universe at all, even tangentially, and is an example of the type of writing that should thus be avoided on Wikipedia:
- In Star Year 8891 the Slibvorks of Blastio were infected with the Kroxyldyph virus by a bio-warfare special operations unit on a clandestine mission. The unit, acting under the leadership of Commander Sam Kinkaid and without the approval of Star Command, rewrote the Slibvorks' DNA and caused their skin to turn blue.
In contrast, the passage below treats the same subject in a way that is suitable for Wikipedia, because it discusses the fictional universe with respect to events, people, and things in this universe. Notice how this perspective allows the inclusion of information that an in-universe perspective would not:
- Ferdinand Howard's novel The Kroxyldyph Virus (1993) takes place in Star Year 8891. The story tells how the Slibvorks of Blastio are infected with the Kroxyldyph virus by a bio-warfare special operations unit on a clandestine mission. In the follow up novel, Commander Sam Kinkaid (1995), the unit, acting under the leadership of Commander Sam Kinkaid and without the approval of Star Command, rewrites the Slibvorks' DNA and caused their skin to turn blue.
Likewise, the lead section of an article written from an in-universe perspective about a fictional character might read something like this:
- His Royal Highness King Ludgar Wolventongue of Tympania (820 Age of the Mystic River–872 Age of the Mystic River) is a fictional character in the universe of RPG Co.'s Lands of Lustre series. Wolventongue was born into a powerful Tympanian family, the son of King Rodgast Horseheel and Queen Gebellynde of Hyrax. He ascended to the throne in 838 Age of the Mystic River and ruled as a caring and magnanimous king, although not without an occasional bout of moodiness. Wolventongue died in battle with Grufius the Gargler in the Battle of Ganzon Gulch.
Notice how the prose is careful to label the subject as fictional, only to proceed to describe the character as if he were real for the remainder of the paragraph. Instead, the lead section and the whole article should persist with its out-of-universe view of the character:
- Ludgar Wolventongue is a fictional character in the universe of RPG Co.'s Lands of Lustre series. Introduced in the Mysteries of Tympania trilogy by Amanda Karbowski, the character plays an important role in many Lands of Lustre novels. Karbowski's trilogy describes Wolventongue's birth into a powerful Tympanian family as the son of King Rodgast Horseheel and Queen Gebellynde of Hyrax; he ascends to the throne in 838 Age of the Mystic River, as described in the second book. Various characters describe Wolventongue as "caring and magnanimous", and Karbowski offers numerous examples of these traits. However, the king shows a temper from time to time, as when he berates a young Sir Gyroban after the Battle of Rynsoth. In the later stand-alone novel Death in Tympania (1995), Wolventongue dies in 872 Age of the Mystic River during the Battle of Ganzon Gulch, a victim of Grufius the Gargler. The fact that Karbowski killed off the popular character shocked fans and prompted many negative reviews in science fiction magazines.
[edit] What's wrong with an in-universe perspective?
Wikipedia:Attribution is one of Wikipedia's two core content policies. It requires articles to rely on credible, third-party sources with a reputation for fact-checking and to refrain from publishing original research. Articles written from an in-universe perspective are overly reliant on the fiction itself as a primary source. Such articles are likely to lack any critical analysis on the subject and may invite creative interpretation. In other words, lacking critical analysis from secondary sources, Wikipedia editors and fans of the subject often feel compelled to provide such analysis themselves.
Consider this analogy: Would it be acceptable to write an article on flight based solely on watching birds flying? Furthermore, much of this analysis might seem on the surface to be quite sound. For example, assume that an editor creates an article on a starship recently introduced on a science fiction TV show. Using the episodes as reference, he or she writes, "Finn-class starfighters have purple shielding and can fly faster than Mach 3." But how do we really know that all Finn-class starships have purple shielding? What if there are green ones that just have not been introduced yet? And what if later episodes show that Finn-class starships come in slower or faster varieties, too? The editor has made an inference, based on limited fictional information. Framing things from the perspective of our own universe eliminates the problem altogether: "In Episode 37, Commander Kinkaid obtains a Finn-class starfighter with purple shielding. Vice Admiral Hancock calls the ship 'a real space ripper' and says that she can 'make it past Mach 3'."
In-universe writing can lead to skewed emphasis. For example, an article about a character from a particular film might begin with details of the character's early life, information that might only be found in an obscure novel. With such an approach, only later can the article describe the character's actual contribution to the famous film for which he or she is known. In other words, possibly irrelevant information is being given equal weight to more notable material. Likewise, the usefulness of in-universe writing is questionable. Interested individuals can, after all, find the fictional universe's account of events by simply reading the books, playing the games, or watching the films and television programs. On the other hand, articles written from an out-of-universe perspective, with their inclusion of details of creation, development, critical reaction, etc., serve our readers better.
Many resources might not seem to be primary source material themselves, but in reality are. For example, many science fiction franchises publish detailed guidebooks about the aliens, spacecraft, and weapons depicted in the series. However, these works generally do little more than reframe the source material in a pseudo-encyclopedic manner; many of these works even add new information and extrapolations of things only hinted at in the series itself. A good rule of thumb is that if a potential source treats a fictional subject from a mostly in-universe perspective, it is primary source material itself.
Another reason to avoid both in-universe perspective and lengthy, detailed plot synopses is that, in sufficient quantity, they may be construed as a copyright violation. Information about fictional worlds and plots of works of fiction can be provided only under a claim of fair use, and Wikipedia's fair-use policy holds that "the amount of copyrighted work used should be as little as possible."
[edit] Infoboxes and succession boxes
Infoboxes, usually placed in the upper-right portion of an article, give key data about the article's subject in tabular format. For entities within fiction, useful infobox data might include the creators or actors, first appearance, an image, and in-universe information essential to understanding the entity's context in the overall fiction. What qualifies as essential varies based on the nature of the work. With loose continuity, there may be no appropriate in-universe information at all to add. By contrast, an infobox on a character in a fantasy work with multiple warring factions may warrant data such as allegiance.
As with all infoboxes, trivial details should be avoided. An infobox for a real-life actor would not contain items such as favorite food, eye color, and hobbies; these details do not aid the reader in understanding the important characteristics of the subject. In the same way, infoboxes about fictional entities should avoid delving into minutiae, such as information only mentioned in supplementary backstory. For this reason, infoboxes meant for real-world entities should not be applied to their fictional counterparts, since, for example, information important to a description of a real-world company may be tangential to a fictional one. It is important to identify the revenue of Microsoft, whereas the fact that fictional MegaAcmeCorp makes 300 billion GalactiBucks in the year 2463 is probably unimportant.
Another common type of template, succession boxes, should not be used to describe in-universe relationships in articles about fictional entities. Succession boxes assume continuity, which may not exist. Even if it does exist, the fiction's creators may choose to rewrite it later, invalidating any previous canon. In-universe succession boxes cannot adapt to these situations. Furthermore, the story that each work of fiction depicts does not change despite the continuation of stories across serial works or sequels, and as a consequence, the events within one work of fiction are always in the present whenever it is read, watched, or listened to. In-universe temporal designations such as current or previous are therefore inappropriate.
[edit] Sources for articles on fiction
In addition to the source material, there are many sources of in-depth information for writers of article on fictional subjects (although some are more reliable than others). Note that when using the fictional work itself to give plot summaries, character biographies, and the like, the work of fiction must be cited as a source. For instance, a video game article should cite the game text, but it should also cite a reliable secondary source when necessary.
Example source types include the following:
- Annotated books or screenplays;
- Behind-the-scenes documentaries;
- Critical reviews;
- Distribution materials;
- DVD commentary tracks;
- Interviews with creators, actors, etc.;
- Press coverage;
- Production diaries;
- Sales figures;
- Scholarly introductions to editions of the work;
- Strategy guides (for video games);
- Texts from fields like cultural studies, film studies, etc.;
- Third-party analyses; and
- Websites or blogs run by the creators or recommended by them.
Remember to cite your sources.
[edit] In-universe template
If you notice an article that predominantly describes a fictional topic from an in-universe perspective, or even provides no indication that a fictional subject is fictional, either improve it yourself or add the {{In-universe}} template to bring the issue to the attention of others. Be sure to leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your objections. This template looks like this:
 |
This article or section describes a work or element of fiction in a primarily in-universe style and may need cleanup. Please help rewrite this article according to the guidelines on writing about fiction, or discuss the issue on the talk page. |
[edit] Example articles
The following is a partial list of articles about fiction or elements from fiction that follow an out-of-universe perspective. These are good examples to follow for editors seeking to cover fictional subjects on Wikipedia. Keep in mind that the content in these articles may have changed since the time of their original listing here.
[edit] Characters
- Captain Marvel (DC Comics) (comic book character)
- Felix the Cat (classic cartoon character)
- Palpatine, Padmé Amidala, and Jabba the Hutt (Star Wars characters)
- Link (The Legend of Zelda series) (video game character)
- Characters of Final Fantasy VIII (an article covering the characters of the game, as well as their creation)
[edit] Complete works (films, television series, video games, etc.)
- The Adventures of Tintin (comic book series)
- Doctor Who (television series)
- Donkey Kong (video game)
- Krazy Kat (comic strip)
- The Illuminatus! Trilogy (science fiction novels)
- The Lord of the Rings (fantasy novel)
- Red vs. Blue (machinima science fiction parody serial)
- Tenebrae (film) (horror film)
[edit] Miscellaneous
- Spoo (fictional food)
- Three Laws of Robotics (fictional ethics)
[edit] Alternative outlets for fictional universe articles
Some other Wikipedia-like projects prefer in-universe perspective. These are a good alternative for editors interested in such topics. The following is a partial list:
- 24 Wikia — Describes the universe of the 24 television show.
- Battlestar Wiki — A Battlestar Galactica-related encyclopedia.
- Bulbapedia — Describes the Pokémon universe.
- Comixpedia's Webcomic Encyclopedia — A wiki about webcomics.
- DC Database — An unofficial DC Comics wiki.
- Encyclopedia Gamia — A wiki about computer and video games, board, card and pen and paper games.
- GameWikis — Community fansite/wiki for two computer games: Guild Wars and The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion.
- Lostpedia — A wiki dedicated to the Lost universe.
- Marvel Database — An unofficial Marvel Comics wiki.
- Marvel Universe — The official Marvel Comics wiki.
- Memory Alpha — Describes the Star Trek universe.
- SimpsonsWiki — A Simpsons-related wiki.
- Tenchi in Tokyo — A wiki dedicated to the Tenchi anime series.
- Tolkien Gateway — A wiki dedicated to J.R.R. Tolkien and his works.
- The TV IV — A user-edited compedium of television knowledge.
- Wookieepedia — Describes the Star Wars universe.
- WoWWiki — A wiki for the World of Warcraft videogame.
- See also: List of wikis
[edit] See also
- Wikipedia:Notability (fiction)
- Wikipedia:Fancruft
- Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles#Check your fiction
- Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information (#7, Plot summaries)
- User:Uncle G/Describe this universe
- Wikipedia:Naming conventions: TV | Books | Films
[edit] Related WikiProjects
These are some of the more important WikiProjects that deal with fiction material. They may have additional suggestions, article templates and styles that you might wish to make yourself familiar with.
