Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Art, architecture, literature and media

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Shortcut: WP:RFC/ART

Requests for comment on Art, architecture, literature and media Please help out by providing comment on another dispute listed here List newer entries on top, stating briefly and neutrally what the debate is about. Provide a link to the relevant section on the article's talk page. Sign entries with the date only, by using five tildes: ~~~~~. Do not continue the debate here, or make personal comments on this page.

• Purushottam Nagesh Oak long dispute/edit war about reliable souces for criticism of the Indian writer who claims that the Taj Mahal was once a Hindu temple. 00:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Meerkat Manor - on the page,so many pranksteres have added false things in the past it is almost impossible now to tell what is fact,and there has been a recent dispute over an event that happens to one of tha main charecters where theres a few people who believe its pranksteres and a few people who believe its true.22:22, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Vote for the Worst - Should Vote for the Worst be considered a practical joke and included in the practical joke category?--Isotope23 16:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Stoopid Monkey‎ - Dispute over inclusion of a long (42-item) and unreferenced (since referenced) list of logos for a TV production company. Article currently not protected, though one side has made no attempt to deal with concerns and has resumed adding the list, sourced to a fanwiki. Article in general has no real sources, either. 05:57, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Deadhead#Please remove the section Celebrity Heads - IP users continue to remove the sourced inclusions of Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, etc. due to them "not being part of the counter culture" that the Dead stood for. I have since tailored the section heading to perhaps appease the worried parties, shown here. 18:03, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle#Be_aware_of_WP:SPS - users are edit warring to try to include their blogs as sources despite WP:SPS. --Tjsynkral 18:40, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:From Genesis to Revelation#Request for Comment: From Genesis to Revelation - relisting due to still-active dispute. Question on whether a particular re-release of an album, with additional material not present on previous releases, is notable enough to include track listing of the re-release in the album's article. RJASE1 ^Talk 18:07, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Shock site#Article RFC - whether to include shock sites in the list of examples without reliable sources. 19:20, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows#Request for Comment: Inclusion of published theories concerning what "Deathly Hallows" are – whether to include published theories about the final book in the Harry Potter series, to be published in 4 months. 05:32, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:List of Pokémon (1-20) - A merger has been lengthily discussed at the relevant project regarding the large number of species aticles. 22:57, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:McCoy (pottery) - A dispute over external links included in the external links section of the article. 15:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:WWE Raw - A dispute over whether to apply MoS:TM and the results of a RM discussion to the entire article or only part of it. 00:13, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Par Avion - There is a dispute over whether it should be up to Wikipedia editors to decide if events in Lost (TV series) are "errors" because they depict occurances that may be at odds with real-life. 23:56, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Cults_and_new_religious_movements_in_literature_and_popular_culture#RFC_Summary - A dispute about the appropriateness of the inclusion of literary works of Mark Twain, Willa Cather, Wilhelm Reich, Ayn Rand, and Fred Newman in this article. 20:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Dante's_Cove#Request_for_Comment:_Language - Should one part of the article Dante's Cove read "bugger" or "have sex with" 18:44, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Star_Wars_Galaxies#Request_for_Comment:_Rumors - If editors write about rumors on a topic in a manner that complies with WP:ATT, WP:NOTE, WP:RS and WP:NPOV, on what basis can it be excluded from the article? 22:22, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Surrealism - Merge Surrealism, History of surrealism and Surrealism in the arts? 18:41, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:The Bridge (film) - Should a screenshot from the film The Bridge (film) be used to depict the dedication at the end of the film? 06:07, 15 March 2007 (UTC).
• Talk:The_Satanic_Scriptures#Request_for_Comment:_Does_Book_meet_.5B.5BWP:BK.5D.5D_standards_for_inclusion_in_wikipedia - Would like comment on the notability of the book per guidelines in WP:BK to resolve on going dispute. -- 128.138.82.195 19:58, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Old_Farmer's_Almanac#RFC:_Employee-Suggested_Edits - Employee seeks review of external "white paper" for potential publication on Wiki. 21:32, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Image development (visual arts)- This is a debate about none of the statements in this article being attributable to a reliable source. 19:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:The Bridge (film) - Should an external link to watch the film The Bridge (film) be allowed, in the External Link section of the article? 17:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC).
• Talk:Just What Is It that Makes Today's Homes So Different, So Appealing? Heated discussion with ad hominem arguments, reversions, and the like. Spills into Pop art, John McHale (artist) and Richard Hamilton (artist). Assertions are made that McHale created the piece directing Hamilton. Whether the published sources of the assertion are citeable on wikipedia is uncertain. Historical sources attribute the creation to Hamilton. 04:29, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Egyptian_pyramids#See_Also This debate concerns both a list of other pyramids included in this, and other pyramid articles. The list includes two articles which include pyramid in their name, but which -in fact- are not pyramids. A compromise has been suggested, and would benefit from some additional input. Both "see also" sections of the talk page are part of the debate. 17:02, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Knight-errant#Request for comment This is a dispute about whether information about Chinese Youxia belongs on the "Knight-errant" page as opposed to a new page of its own. 01:52, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Ultimate Showdown of Ultimate Destiny#Request for Comment Should this article contain a detailed analysis of all the "fighters" in the cartoon and other trivia? Should the article instead just be a redirect to Neil Cicierega#The Ultimate Showdown of Ultimate Destiny? 02:19, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Swan_maiden#Request for comment This is a dispute about whether it is proper to describe the term "swan may" or "swanmay" as occurring in fantasy fiction and Dungeons and Dragons. 02:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:TNA Impact! A debate on whether MoS:TM applies to the name of this TV show. (TNA iMPACT!) 02:40, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Barenaked Ladies Are Men#Request for Comment: Barenaked Ladies Are Men There is currently a debate as to whether or not the release Barenaked Ladies Are Men should have an article separate from Barenaked Ladies Are Me 06:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:At Last — one user continues to add a non-notable subsection to this article after consensus had been reached. Volatile 03:18, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
• Fleet_captain_(Star_Trek)#RfC - content addition/erasure between two editors over notability and citation. 15:16, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
• Talk:Academy Awards article has a thought of the academy forbidding the sale of the trophies, who endoreses this embargo? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by The Technodrome's Toilet (talk • contribs) 12:23, 4 April 2007 (UTC).