User talk:Secretlondon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] I AM BARELY HERE - I CANNOT SOLVE YOUR PROBLEMS.
[edit] I DON'T WANT YOUR BULLETINS, BOT EDITS OR SPAM!.
[edit] PLEASE DELETE ALL FAIR USE PHOTOS UPLOADED SEVERAL YEARS AGO!
[edit] If you have a message regarding an edit I've actually made in the last year then feel free to leave me a message :)
Nice to see you editing again! Long may it continue... :-) -- ChrisO 18:08, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks :) I have good net today, thankfully. Secretlondon 18:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Last push for the Biography Assessment Drive
We've done great work so far on the WikiProject Biography Spring 2007 Assessment Drive, reducing the 135,345 backlog by 38,626 to 96,719 as of March 20, 2007. We have only 6,720 more to go to get below 90,000. That would be outstanding and any extra effort that you can offer in these last few days of the drive (which ends March 24, 2007) would be much appreciated. If you haven't already, you may want to load Outriggr's assessment script in your monobook.js. If you have any questions, please feel free to post them on my talk page. -- Jreferee 23:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hilary Armstrong - voting record
I saw your question on the talkpage. I've removed the voting record as its a clear copyvio. In case you're interested the information appears to be from this website which allows people to find out information on the voting behaviour of any MP. WjBscribe 08:05, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks! Secretlondon 08:06, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Rating
Hi there! I noticed your rating on the Talk:Susannah Constantine article. I am going to change the rating to a B as the article is well sourced and provides states of her career in detail with sources. I looked at some other articles you rated start class and I think it's above that. Many thanks, please feel free to consult me on my talk page, happy editing (keep up your hard work). Eagle Owl 11:06, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Fine. I'm going for coverage really. It's not very precise. Secretlondon 11:08, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Censorware
Hello - Thank you for your comments. I understand your warning and have joined in the discussion on the censorware discussion page. I do want to discuss my larger concern about pushing a particular point of view under the guise of neutrality. In examining articles on Wikipedia addressing Internet filtering and Internet censorship, I became aware that user LegitimateAndEvenCompelling was systematically deleting the phrase "censorware" out of every article that contained the phrase, whether it was appropriate or not - his argument being that the redirect justified removing the phrase because the article no longer existed. (The most egregious example was an attempt to edit the phrase "censorware" from the entry on Peacefire, an anti-filtering group that consistently uses the phrase censorware and was so described in the article.) That same user is appears to be editing articles to advance his view that Internet filtering is benign and cannot be considered censorship - certainly a disputed point. His user page, and especially his own web site, reflect an obvious bias on this issue. (Note: I see he has edited his user page to remove the information that reflected his biases - the last edition with that information was dated March 19th.) I believe he is introducing a bias into these articles. If you have suggestions on how to address this issue, I would appreciate any suggestions. Anonamaus 04:35, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
