User talk:Serte
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Serte's Talk Page |
---|
Start a new topic Speak in ![]() ![]() |
[edit] 2005-06 in Portuguese rink hockey
Someone tagged the article as non-notable. It is obviously notable, since rink hockey is a major sport in Portugal. I've contacted the user and removed the tag. Keep your good work. By the way, visit Portal:Portugal and give your help. Include rink hockey related articles in the "to do" list, if you want. Cheers! Afonso Silva 19:14, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Boas vindas
Olá Luís. Já vi que és relativamente novo por aqui, pelo menos no que a editar diz respeito. É sempre bom ver mais portugueses por cá, já que a maioria dos artigos relativos ao nosso país estão bastante abaixo do que seria de esperar. Gostava de te convidar a visitar e se quiseres colaborar no Portugal Portal. Qualquer dúvida que tenhas estou sempre disponível para te ajudar, e se quiseres, como primeira dica, quando não souberes como fazer algo, como por exemplo uma tabela, limita-te a copiá-la de um outro artigo substituindo o conteúdo. Com o tempo vais aprendendo. Já agora fica sabendo que para além de mim podes sempre contar com o Afonso Silva, provavelmente o utilizador mais activo aqui p'rós nossos lados lusitanos, que julgo que posso dizer, estará sempre disponível para te ajudar para além de ser uma óptima pessoa, de crítica construtiva e uma excelente ajuda em colaborações a meias (isto sou eu a ver se lhe dou graxa...). Bem, acho que disse tudo. Podes sempre ver a minha página de utilizador onde encontras a maior parte das minhas contribuições (a maior parte meio obsessivo-compulsivas). Alguma coisa User talk:Joaopais. Um abraço. Joaopais 04:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Bom trabalho
Hehe, tou a ver que o João já andou a falar de mim (Eu mudei de username). Queria só dar-te os parabéns pelo bom trabalho que fizeste com as freguesias de Barcelos. Começaste logo pelo mais difícil, nunca cheguei a perceber como é que aquilo tem 89 freguesias. És de lá? Já agora aproveito para confirmar o que o João disse, qualquer coisa que precises é só dizer, e ajuda com o Portal se quiseres. Se tiveres algum projecto que queiras realizar é só pedir ajuda. Mário 22:49, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Obrigado. Vou tentar ir fazendo outros concelhos à medida que ganhe paciência, porque é algo um bocado repetitivo e então tantas freguesias... Como é que acabou com 89 freguesias não faço ideia :P Obrigado por tudo pela disponibilidade --Serte 22:52, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Alves dos Reis
Thanks for the kind words. There was was one section in Portuguese I hid (inside <!-- --> tags) instead of removing it. Could you check if there was anything important? - Skysmith 13:55, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Football Article Improvement Drive
You left your comment in the right place. Are there any articles you had in mind for improvement? Anyone can nominate an article, just follow the instructions at the bottom of the page. Each Sunday, the article with most votes is the one selected. You can vote for as many or as few articles as you like. Oldelpaso 15:34, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure i agree with sunday being chosen as the day.--88.105.110.173 07:31, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Superliga Results
Just to say that the results table you replaced on the Superliga page looks perfect using every browser except Firefox. Its only on firefox that the names along the top are shown horizontally instead of Vertically. Table itself is perfect and prob looks better than the one you are using at present. Niall123 20:58, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Just pointing out that this is what the table looks like when I'm using Internet Explorer. [1] Niall123 23:20, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] G14
The problem with the G14 template is only temporary as I change all the club pages. Please give me another 5 minutes. I'm changing the template to be joinable to other templates used by Serie A and the Premier League. Niall123 23:37, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- No problem. Partly my fault. Should have done the club pages first for the extra coding. Check out the bottom of the AC Milan page to see what I'm doing. You can also use the template seperately by using the 2 tags "fb start" and "fb end" around it. Its the way all the templates for Premier League and Serie A are going. Looks better IMO. Niall123 23:43, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Michael Schumacher
My advice is to place a hold-on tag on the article, and I will ask an administrator to take a look. ---Charles 18:10, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
I deleted the article Responses to Michael Schumacher's retirement. This just seems like a long list of quotes, conflicting with Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. I think you could edit the main article just to say "Many important people, such as ___ and ___, commmented on his retirement" without actually including all the quotes verbatim. Thanks, NawlinWiki 18:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
- Could the quotes, which are retrivable from older versions of the Michael Schumacher article, could go to Wikiquote, which seems to be designed for this kind of thing? 4u1e
[edit] Schumacher
Good work on Schumacher - how do you feel about others editing it? I've got some ideas, but the easiest thing is probably to implement them. :) --4u1e 06:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'll have a go then, although it probably won't be this evening now. I'll warn you now, some of my ideas will make it rather shorter- I'll try and do it in such a way that it is easily reversible! Cheers. --4u1e 16:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'm just having a go at it now. Cheers. --4u1e 07:33, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- OK - I'm done. Mostly editing for length, rather than neutrality - where I think you've done a very good job. I'm wondering now whether, in the context of Schumacher's overall career, the 1998 British GP is noteworthy enough to mention here? What do you think? Feel free to revert my changes by the way - happy to discuss and start again if you wish. Good work on the main article too - looking much better now. --4u1e 08:12, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Fair enough - I was working from the view that if we need to get it shorter, it usually easier to over do it and then add stuff back in - gives us a better perspective on what's important. Let's see how it does down in the article! Cheers. --4u1e 09:45, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- OK - I'm done. Mostly editing for length, rather than neutrality - where I think you've done a very good job. I'm wondering now whether, in the context of Schumacher's overall career, the 1998 British GP is noteworthy enough to mention here? What do you think? Feel free to revert my changes by the way - happy to discuss and start again if you wish. Good work on the main article too - looking much better now. --4u1e 08:12, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- I'm just having a go at it now. Cheers. --4u1e 07:33, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Consecutive races
please discuss the races with out retirement thing on his talk page so we ccan sort this out thanks--Lucy-marie 16:23, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: [2] on Michael Schumacher
Thanks for that, I didn't realise they were serving different purposes. And no, two is not too much, four is overkill though! Best regards -- Mark83 18:24, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Team Orders
I think there must be a better source to cite - not that I've found one yet. The thing is, team orders weren't unequivocally banned - the rule says something like "team orders which affect the outcome of a race". -- Ian Dalziel 12:15, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Why isn't that reference good? It is about the fact that team orders were banned after the two incidents with the ferraris in 2002, in Austria and USA. If you read the reference well, you'll see "The rule forbidding teams from determining the finish of their drivers resulted from Ferrari instructing Barrichello to let five-time champion chumacher pass him to win the Austrian Grand Prix earlier this year, and Barrichello winning the U.S. Grand Prix when Schumacher slowed down in a bid for a dead-heat finish.". This proves what is stated in the article. I think if something has to change, is the wikipedia article to match the reference, not the opposite. Cheers--Serte 13:32, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ian_Dalziel"
-
- True - the statement in Wikipedia is even more sweeping, I hadn't noticed that. -- Ian Dalziel 14:23, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- By way of a ref for the banning, see this:[3]. Those words now seem to appear in the sporting regulations for each season, which are also publised at www.fia.com. 4u1e
-
[edit] Gil Vicente
Sempre às ordens. Já agora, excelente trabalho o teu! Parabéns. Joaopais 18:39, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Football table templates
There are a number of issues with that template:
- There are no obvious benefits, as the table syntax is pretty simple already.
- The colours should be parametrised, not part of the name of each template.
- Standardised columns prevents extra information being added to the table later, such as a 'notes' column.
Thanks, ed g2s • talk 12:07, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Brabham
On the basis of taking a short break from Schumacher, I'm taking another stab at my pet project: Brabham Racing Organisation.
I'm too close to it to see it's faults, would you mind having a look and either editing or commenting on any improvements it needs. I'm thinking of putting it up for FA shortly.
Cheers. 4u1e 13:38, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] PMs Template
Excellent work, but should we not include António de Spínola and/or the National Salvation Junta before Palma Carlos? I did after all do something similar with Template:PortuguesePresidents. Biruitorul 06:03, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- Well, if that's what the list says, then let's stick with it. I think I may put the Junta in parentheses right before Palma Carlos, just to indicate that someone was in fact heading the Portuguese government during those three exciting weeks in spring 1974. Biruitorul 10:51, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- It looks fine. Thank you. Biruitorul 11:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Platini translation
My French is fairly basic, but I had a go at translating the Saint Etienne section in your sandbox. Its paraphrased in places, the bit I'm most unsure of is using mixed in place of bilan mitigé. Oldelpaso 11:45, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 04:35, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Jamieoliver.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jamieoliver.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Michael Schumacher Statistsic
Hi, I realized you have improved a contribution that 84.50.171.2 has made in regards to Michael Schumacher's perfermance in 1991 - 1993. 84.50.171.2 has also made a change to the number of GP for Michael Schumacher, and it seems like you had no trouble with it. However, according to the official formula 1 website, his GP is 250, not 249. Did you just happen to overlooked or is it really 249, in which I should not keep reverting it back to 250? --Cyktsui 00:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Not a problem. I am just worried that I have reverted something that I shouldn't have reverted. You have been excellent of making the article getting into GA standard! -Cyktsui 21:52, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Adrian Davison
A tag has been placed on Adrian Davison, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Paul 21:23, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Hermeticum.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Hermeticum.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:39, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Nocturn4.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Nocturn4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:30, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Football AID 28 Jan - 4 Feb
Rinus Michels has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.
[edit] Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Big Four of Thrash Metal
FYI, Wikipedia:WikiProject Big Four of Thrash Metal (in which you are listed as a participant) is being considered for deletion. You should check out the discussion.
As I stated at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Big Four of Thrash Metal, perhaps renaming & re-focusing the WikiProject to Wikipedia:WikiProject Thrash Metal or Wikipedia:WikiProject American Thrash Metal would avoid deletion and encourage greater participation. Please take a look at the MfD page and offer you opinion. -- Scientizzle 20:30, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Classicalbumsmetallica.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Classicalbumsmetallica.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 03:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Colorado Avalanche
Just dropping a line to say good job on the editing for the Colorado Avalanche article. It needed a cleanup and re-working pretty badly in some areas. Good job!!! Jmlk17 00:33, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Regarding notability of Football (soccer) players
Hi, seeing you are interested in football this is an invitation to contribute to this discussion to clarify certain issues about football player notability. I think clearer guidelines are needed to avoid repeated inappropriate nominations for deletion and time consuming discussions. Cheers! StephP 20:14, 29 March 2007 (UTC)