北爱尔兰问题
维基百科,自由的百科全书
北爱尔兰问题(英语:The Troubles),简称北爱问题,是用来描述从1960年代后期开始,到1990年代后期由1998年4月10日签订北爱和平协议中止,在北爱尔兰发生的包括共和派与保皇派准军事组织、皇家厄尔斯特警队,英国陆军与其他人员的公众暴力活动,是爱尔兰的周期性暴力中的最新一轮。
北爱问题经常以不同的方式被称作一场多方冲突,一场游击战,一场低烈度冲突,甚至一场内战。
目录 |
[编辑] 概述
北爱问题由30年来在北爱尔兰的民族主义者(主要是罗马天主教徒)社区和联合主义者(主要是新教徒)社区的成员之间不断重复发生的激烈暴力冲突组成。冲突是由北爱尔兰在联合王国内的争议性地位与对占少数的民族派社区的统治,以及占多数的联合派对民族派的歧视所导致。暴力活动的特征是由准军事集团进行的武装战斗,其中多数属于爱尔兰共和军临时派1969-1997年战斗活动,目标旨在终结英国在北爱的统治与建立一个新的,“全爱尔兰的”(all-Ireland),爱尔兰共和国。
为回应这场战役以及感觉北爱尔兰的英国特质和联合派的统治地位被不断侵蚀,保皇派准军事组织如UVF和UVA对民族派人口发动了他们自己的战役。政府部队——英国陆军与警察(皇家阿尔斯特警队)也牵涉其中。英国政府的观点是,它的部队在冲突中是中立的,试图在北爱尔兰维护法律与秩序。爱尔兰共和派却把政府部队视为冲突当中的“战斗员”,并以政府部队和保皇派相勾结的活动来证明这一点。警方调查官进行的“彻底”调查表明,英国部队,特别是RUC,与保皇派准军事组织勾结,参与谋杀,并在根据要求调查此事时妨碍司法。[1]见下文同谋——治安部队与保皇派准军事组织。
伴随着暴力,北爱主要政党之间,包括那些谴责暴力活动的在内,关于未来北爱尔兰地位与北爱尔兰政府构成问题上陷入了僵局。
北爱问题的终结来之不易,根据《贝尔法斯特协定》(一般被称为“耶稣受难日协定”),北爱和平进程包括多数准军事组织宣布停火并解除武装,警察部门的改革和相应地从街道和敏感界线上比如南阿马与弗马纳撤军。该文件重申了长久以来未被历任爱尔兰政府完全认可的英国的一贯立场,即北爱尔兰将保留在联合王国境内直到大多数人投票脱离。另一方面,英国政府第一次承认该原则:即从所谓的“爱尔兰因素”视角来看,爱尔兰岛的人民作为一个整体有权利,不受任何外界干扰,在双方自愿的情况下解决南北问题。[2] 后者是从民族主义和共和派方面赢得支持的关键。协议也确定在北爱尔兰建立一个权力共享的政府(现暂中止运作)。该政府必须由联合派和民族派双方党派组成。
虽然北爱问题中积极的参与者人数相对较少,宣称代表两个社区的准军事组织有时也并不能代表一般大众,但是北爱问题牵涉到北爱尔兰人民的日常生活,偶尔也会蔓延到英国和爱尔兰共和国。另外,在1969年至1998年之间有好几次看起来北爱问题可能升级为一场真实的内战,比如1972年血腥星期天之后,又比如1981年爱尔兰绝食运动当中,两派进行互相敌对的大规模武装。很多人今天仍然持有由于北爱问题形成的政治、社会与公共意见和观点。
[编辑] 背景
[编辑] 历史上的族群纷争 1609-1886
爱尔兰北部天主教徒和新教徒的冲突起源于英国1609年对阿尔斯特的移民式殖民运动,该运动没收当地人所有的土地,以英格兰和苏格兰新教徒移民阿尔斯特。当地天主教徒和殖民者之间的对抗导致了1641-1653年和1689-1691年两者之间两场血腥的民族-宗教冲突。英国新教徒在爱尔兰的政治统治地位在这些战争与爱尔兰刑法中得到保证,后者规定剥夺与英国国教会——圣公宗爱尔兰教会——抵触的所有人(包括天主教徒与不服国教者,比如长老会成员)的宗教、法律与政治权利。
18世纪后期刑法体系的崩溃预示了新一轮的社群冲突。特别是在1780年代解除对爱尔兰天主教徒的租地活动限制之后,使得竞争加剧。因为天主教徒从前被禁止而现在被允许买地与经商,新教的“黎明小伙”(Peep O'Day Boys)组织对他们的社区的攻击不断增加。[3] 在1790年代阿尔斯特的天主教徒建立了“保卫者”(The Defenders)组织进行反击。这使得双方阵营走向极端,新教社区之前对于民主改良主张日益开明的改革派人数剧减。
许多长老会教徒、天主教徒和自由派新教徒参加了联合爱尔兰人协会——一个受法国大革命鼓舞的民族主义运动组织,目标在于结束爱尔兰的教派分裂,建立一个不分教派的独立于英国的爱尔兰共和国。但是,联爱协的理想被1789年爱尔兰叛乱的失败,随之而来的镇压与不断持续的天主教徒和新教徒之间的教派暴力所击碎。此外,更加强硬的新教徒被政府积极武装起来以对抗激进分子。成立于1795年的橙带党是这场运动的历史悠久的表现。产生的效果就是将天主教徒和新教徒分成持久敌对的两个阵营。
1801年爱尔兰国会的取消与爱尔兰并入联合王国为两个社区的对立提供了一个新的政治框架。另外,长老会教徒大部分放弃了他们之前与激进共和派的政治联系,选择了一种作为“保皇派”新教社区的一分子,与圣公会更趋同的身份。1829年天主教解放运动通过丹尼尔·奥康奈尔的政治鼓动,大幅消灭了法律上对天主教徒(大约占爱尔兰人口的75%)、犹太人和其他不信国教者的歧视。但是奥康奈尔的长远目标(解放运动的本质)是要解散1801年的联合。他甚至在1843年1月1日自信但是错误地宣称联合王国将在那一年解散。奥康奈尔的和平主义、民主原则的民族主义迫切要求恢复爱尔兰国会(被称为“地方自治”)的主张,在之后的19世纪爱尔兰政治舞台上扮演了越来越重要的角色。新教徒害怕成为天主教统治的爱尔兰的少数派,趋向于支持继续由英国统治。
现在冲突表现在了支持联合法案的人和反对联合法案的人之间。至1886年,随着两个社区组织了相对立的民族主义和联合主义政党,这一转变得以完成。
至此,阿尔斯特联合派也有了经济动力——此地是爱尔兰工业最发达和最依赖与不列颠及英帝国的贸易的地区。当前冲突的直接原因可以在20世纪早期关于地方自治和爱尔兰独立的争论中找到。
[编辑] 爱尔兰分治 1912–1925
至20世纪第二个十年,权力下放,或者有限的爱尔兰自治,由于爱尔兰议会党的鼓动已经近在咫尺。大多数是新教徒并聚居在阿尔斯特的联合派反对自治和爱尔兰独立,害怕生活在一个罗马天主教会支配的压倒性优势的天主教国家。在1912年,联合派在爱德华·卡森(Edward Carson)的领导下签署了阿尔斯特同盟条约,誓言如有必要要用武力反抗权力下放。为此他们成立了准军事组织阿尔斯特志愿军并从德国进口武器(复活节起义中的叛乱分子在几年之后也照此办理)。民族主义者组建了爱尔兰志愿军,表面上的目的是确保一战之后的权力下放不遭到英国或者联合主义分子反抗。但是爱尔兰志愿军逐渐被爱尔兰共和兄弟会的成员渗透,比如帕特里克·皮尔斯。1914年第一次世界大战转移了危机,推迟了爱尔兰独立问题的解决。权力下放虽然被英国议会通过,但是在战争期间暂缓实行。
但是这个问题被爱尔兰志愿军的爱尔兰共和兄弟会分子在都柏林发动的复活节起义所激发。虽然叛乱被镇压,起义的15名领导人被处决使爱尔兰民族主义分子大大激进化。独立问题在1918年12月达到顶点,分立主义的新芬党赢得了爱尔兰的大部分议席,在都柏林成立了爱尔兰国会,脱离出联合王国,虽然当时并未被英国或其他国家承认。同时,兄弟会志愿者将自己看成爱尔兰共和国的军队,开始在接下来的1919年1月发动对政府部队的武装袭击,打死了在蒂珀雷里郡的索洛海德贝格(Soloheadbeg)运送葛里炸药的两名天主教警察。
1920年,一场爱尔兰共和军的志愿者对英国政府军的游击战期间,爱尔兰政府法案将爱尔兰岛分成两个分离的管辖区:“南爱尔兰”与“北爱尔兰”。爱尔兰的分裂被1921年英爱条约确认,该条约终结了南部的游击战,建立了爱尔兰自由邦——一个几乎独立的爱尔兰国家(在1949年成为共和国并完全独立)。这个协议承认了爱尔兰人民中主要集中在古代的阿尔斯特省,希望作为一部分留在联合王国内的新教徒和全体而言占压倒性优势的,要求从英国独立的天主教徒之间的巨大分歧。
北爱尔兰留在英国境内,虽然在一个独立的政府体系下它拥有自己的议会和权力下放的政府。这个制度并不是联合派要求的,但是却因政府急切希望摆脱困扰威斯敏斯特国会多年的“爱尔兰问题”而被包括在协议内。然而,联合主义分子立即向新政府示好,将北爱尔兰看成一个按照民主原则、法制和境内大多数人留在联合王国内的意愿成立的政体。但是爱尔兰民族主义者将爱尔兰分治看成是非法和专制地将爱尔兰岛违背大多数人民意愿而分裂开来,并且争论道北爱尔兰政府既不合法也不民主,而是故意划分的联合主义分子多数选区造就的。
北爱尔兰的民族派开始占人口35%[來源請求],并不接受新政府的合法地位。北爱问题的根本在于联合派政府在北爱尔兰整合天主教/民族派的失败,后者更倾向支持一个统一的爱尔兰,拒绝放弃民族统一。
北爱尔兰在暴力中诞生——共有557人在1920-1922年爱尔兰独立战争前后的政治性或宗教性暴力活动中被杀。其中303人是天主教徒(包括共和军成员),172人是新教徒,82人是皇家爱尔兰警队或者英国陆军人员。贝尔法斯特见证了大多数暴力事件的发生:452人被杀,267名是天主教徒,185名是新教徒。[4] (参见:东北部的爱尔兰独立战争。) 虽然在岛上其他地方,冲突很大程度上在爱尔兰共和派游击队和英国军警之间产生,在北方却被打上了天主教徒和新教徒之间的族群冲突的烙印。北方地区的暴力模式是,共和军袭击安全部队,保皇派组织(包括B特后备警察部队)杀害天主教徒作为报复。民族派将这种暴力活动——特别是在贝尔法斯特——描述为一场对本社区的“大屠杀”(pogrom)。
比如在1920年,共和军在利斯本的一个新教教堂周日礼拜之后,暗杀了警队的地区巡官斯旺奇,造成城内占四分之一的天主教区大部被焚毁。但是,尽管受害者中天主教徒占不成比例的多数(58%的受害者来自占贝尔法斯特30%人口的该社区),双方都对暴行负有责任,且近半数受害者是新教徒。爱尔兰其他地区的民族主义者为了回应对天主教徒的袭击组织了一场对北部商品的抵制,且某些人(包括爱尔兰自由邦的迈克尔·柯林斯)计划军事进攻北爱尔兰。[5]该计划被在爱尔兰民族主义者内部派别之间爆发的爱尔兰内战(1922-1923)打断,在此期间北方政府反而巩固了它的存在。另一个之后对北爱尔兰有着主要影响的爱尔兰内战后遗症是被边缘化的残存下来的爱尔兰共和军。它对两个政府而言都是非法的,在意识形态上也致力于用武力推翻两者重新建立1919-1921年的爱尔兰共和国。
1925年许多民族主义者期望废止分治,至少让边界委员会把北爱尔兰的大部分割让给自由邦。但是委员会建议不对边界做大的变动——事实上使爱尔兰分裂永久化。此时,爱尔兰自由邦正式承认与接受了边界。在1937年,埃蒙·德瓦莱拉在爱尔兰宪法第二条与第三条中主张整个爱尔兰都都是自由邦领土。但是,该条款规定“搁置对国家领土的重新整合”,南部国界与1922年相比保持不变。 [6]
[编辑] 北爱尔兰——“新教国家”? 1925–1968
双方都根据自己的解读叙述各自的观点。阿尔斯特联合党北爱尔兰总理詹姆斯·克雷格在1937年回应南方领导人埃蒙·德瓦莱拉1935年的爱尔兰是一个“天主教国家”的断言时说到了“新教国会和新教国家”。[7]从联合派观点来看,北爱尔兰的民族派天生不忠,下定决心要强迫他们(新教徒和联合派)进入一个统一的爱尔兰。这个威胁被看成必须给联合派在住房、就业和其他方面特殊待遇。天主教徒流行的大家庭和快速的人口增长也被看作威胁之一。
前北爱尔兰第一部长大卫·特林布尔承认这段时期的北爱尔兰对天主教徒成了“一幢冰冷的房子”。然而,直到1990年代,联合派政治家们都能以北爱与26郡政权相较而言的经济成功来为北爱尔兰的存在辩护。从民族派的观点来看,持续的对天主教徒的歧视只能证明北爱尔兰是个天生腐败的、英国人强加的政权。受人争议的爱尔兰共和国总理查尔斯·豪希(Charles Haughey)的家庭在1920年爱尔兰问题开始时逃到伦敦德里郡,他把北爱尔兰描述成“一个失败的政体”。联合派忽视了爱德华·卡森在1921年的警告——对天主教徒的疏远会使北爱尔兰一诞生就陷入不稳定。
在1920年代早期最初的爱尔兰问题之后,北爱尔兰时不时会有动乱事件发生,1940年代共和军有一场简短而成果有限的战役,在1950年代另有一场流产的战役。但在1960年代早期北爱十分平静。
但是,有一个潜在的不稳定信号,那就是某些极端保皇派在1966年建立了一个非法的准军事团体——阿尔斯特志愿军(名字来自1912年反权力下放民兵组织)。这个团体犯下三桩教派主义谋杀案,凶手被绳之以法,判刑入狱。该团体仍然存在并将在北爱问题中再次浮现。这些保皇派分子其中之一,加斯蒂·斯班斯(Gusty Spence),在为其长期效劳之后,为他的行为道歉并成为北爱主流政治成员之一。
[编辑] 北爱问题的开端
北爱问题广为人知的开端是在1968年,北爱尔兰民权协会(NICRA)的游行中暴动与骚乱此起彼伏。这个团体在1967年发动了一场和平民权运动,借用了美国马丁·路德·金博士的民权运动的语言和标志。NICRA寻求为北爱的天主教与民族派平反。他们特别希望:终结不公正的选区划分,这将所有天主教徒限制在有限的选区内,使地方评议会失去代表性(特别是在德里市);废止地方政府选举中的纳税人特权,这给了新教徒(往往更加富有)超出比例的选举权;以及废除被看成针对民族派社区的特别权力法案(许可拘留和其他镇压手段)
开始时,北爱总理特伦斯·奥尼尔对这场看来温和的运动赞赏有加,保证对北爱进行改革。但是他遭到许多联合主义强硬派分子强烈反对,其中包括威廉·克雷格与伊恩·佩斯理,后者指责他是“叛徒”(sell out)。某些联合主义者马上怀疑民权协会是爱尔兰共和军的“特洛伊木马”。暴力活动在几场民权游行中发生,保皇分子用大棒攻击民权示威者。皇家阿尔斯特警队被广泛谴责为支持保皇派,亦被认为应对允许暴力活动负责。
多数保皇派仇视民权运动的行为与领导人煽动联合派群众的恐惧感,宣扬共和军不止在幕后支持民权协会,而且在计划一轮新的攻势有关。实际上共和军已经穷途末路,只有很少的武器,日益强调非暴力政治。北爱问题的第一轮爆炸活动(主要指向电厂和其他基础设施)是由保皇派的UVF在1969年进行的,旨在训练和栽赃给共和军。
族群冲突在1969年恶化。在一月,一场“人民民主”组织从贝尔法斯特到德里的游行被保皇派在伦敦德里郡的本托雷特(Burntollet)袭击。RUC被指责未能保护游行者。接下来的几月在德里和贝尔法斯特的民族派区域立起了路障。这场骚乱在泽区暴动(1969年8月12日-1969年8月14日)到达顶点——一场大规模族群暴动在德里的警察和民族主义分子之间爆发。骚乱在泽区的天主教居民、警察与德里青年学徒成员之间爆发,因为后者沿着城墙游行时穿过泽区。
警察和保皇派为一方,泽区居民为另一方的骚乱在英国军队派来恢复秩序之前持续了两天。这场“战役”触发了贝尔法斯特、牛里、斯特拉贝恩等地从1969年8月14日开始的教派骚乱,使很多人丧生,多所住屋被焚烧。骚乱是由民族派为了支持泽区军民发起的示威引起的,在一颗手榴弹扔向一所警察局后骚乱升级。RUC作为回应部署了装备勃郎宁机枪的装甲车,并在贝尔法斯特民族派的福尔斯路地区打死一名9岁男童。保皇派群众以攻击天主教地区作为对暴力活动的回应,孟买街(Bombay Street)、马德里街和其他天主教区街道的大部分被付之一炬(见北爱尔兰1969年骚乱)。第一名被害的警察维克多·阿巴克尔(Bombay Street)是被保皇派而不是共和派射杀的。
民族派宣称皇家阿尔斯特警队在这些骚乱中辅助或至少没有积极反对保皇派。共和军也被自己的支持者广泛批评在1969年8月贝尔法斯特骚乱中没有能够保卫天主教社区,致使7人被害,750人受伤,1505家天主教徒无家可归——几乎是强占的新教徒房屋的五倍。一名天主教牧师报告说他的教区居民把共和军轻蔑地称作“跑路军”(I Ran Away)。
北爱政府要求英国政府在北爱尔兰部署英军恢复秩序。民族派一开始欢迎军队,经常为士兵送水送饭,因为他们不信任警察的行动会不偏不倚。但是因为军队下手过重而被认为偏向联合派,这种关系迅速恶化。
很多联合派分子将民权运动视为北爱问题的起因。他们坚持运动动摇了政府,制造权力真空使准军事组织见缝插针。其他人,主要但不是全部为民族派,坚持认为民权运动和伊恩·佩斯利与其他保皇派的反对,只不过是一个本身生来堕落,必定垮台的教派主义政府制度的先兆而已。
[编辑] 暴力顶峰与北爱议会的解体
1970年至1972年北爱尔兰经历了政治暴力活动的大爆发,1972年到达顶峰,近500人丧生。这些年份里暴力升级有许多原因。
联合派相信主要原因是脱离老爱尔兰共和军的爱尔兰共和军临时派(临时派共和军)的成立。当老共和军(被称为正统派共和军的残余成员)拥抱非暴力群众运动时,新的临时派共和军却决心发动“武装斗争”来反对英国在北爱的统治。新共和军希望展现“天主教社区保卫者”的教派特点,而不是像“正统派”一样寻求两个社区劳动阶级的联合。联合派将这场进行中的斗争看成是北爱问题的主要原因和持续因素。
民族派则坚持认为暴力活动突发是因为民权运动的希望变成失望,而接下去的镇压直接针对他们的社区。他们指出这几年中的很多事件来支持这一观点。其中一例是1970年7月的福尔斯宵禁,3000人军队强行在贝尔法斯特民族派的下福尔斯地区实行宵禁,在与共和军的枪战中发射弹药1500多次,打死四人。另一件事是1971年引入未经审判的拘留制度,一开始就有350多人被捕,只有两个人是新教徒,只有一人是保皇派。[來源請求]另外由于情报不尽人意,很少一部分被拘留的人是真的共和派积极分子,但是有些人因为自己的不幸经历接下去变成了共和派。在1971至1975年间,1981人被拘留,1874人是天主教徒/共和派,107人是新教徒/保皇派。被拘留的人受到虐待甚至拷打的说法在民族派社区中广为流传。最感情化的是,民族派指出1972年1月14名手无寸铁的民族派示威者被英国军队在德里射杀,这一天被称为血腥星期天。
临时派共和军(或者叫做“Provos”)在1969年下半年成立,立即因为对保皇派和警察袭击天主教社区后的反击行动中更富攻击性和战斗性而站稳脚跟,在1970年代的天主教贫民窟中作为“保卫者”获得支持。虽然正统派共和军内的改革派和马克思主义势力不断增加,他们也针对对现行的暴力活动和天主教社区与英国部队之间恶化的关系开展了自己武装斗争。从1970年以后,正统派和临时派都与英国军队开展过武装对抗。
至1972年,临时派的战斗密度极高,打死100名士兵,打伤500名,进行爆炸1300多次,大多数针对他们认为是“虚假经济”的商业目标。许多平民在爆炸活动中丧生,特别是在1972年7月的血腥星期五,22枚炸弹被安放在贝尔法斯特市中心。正统派共和军从来没有完全承认进行过武装行动,在1972年6月取消了他们的战斗活动。但是临时派,除了1972年临时停火与英国官员谈判之外,决心继续战斗活动直到爱尔兰统一的目标实现。
保皇派准军事组织,包括阿尔斯特志愿军与新成立的阿尔斯特防卫协会以针对民族派的教派主义暗杀活动作为对激增的暴力活动的反应,并简单地把天主教徒等同于民族派。其中的某些谋杀特别骇人听闻——比如香基尔屠夫案,犯罪人在殴打和折磨受害者之后杀死他们。临时派共和军也犯下教派主义谋杀罪行。例如在1976年1月,他们为报复六名天主教平民被保皇派杀害而进行的1976年金斯米尔大屠杀,10名新教徒平民被机枪扫射致死。政治暴力的另一个特点是天主教徒和新教徒都不情愿或者被迫地从先前的混居区域中搬迁。例如,在贝尔法斯特,新教徒被迫从列拿度(Lenadoon)搬出,天主教徒从拉斯库尔(Rathcoole )区和西谷(Westvale)地区。在德里市几乎所有的新教徒都逃到了保皇派绝对多数的喷泉区(Fountain Estate)与西侧(Waterside)地区。
伦敦的英国政府看到被爱尔兰政府无力应对安全局势,于1972年暂停了联合派掌控的斯多蒙特权力下放政府的运作,从伦敦进行“直接统治”。该政府解决了许多民权运动关注的问题,比如重新划定选区边界以使其更具代表性,给予所有公民在地方选举中的投票权以及将公共住房的分配权转移到一个独立的北爱住房委员会。直接统治开始时被认为是一个短期计划,中期方案是在联合派与民族派双方都能接受的基础上恢复北爱自治。但是协议被证明难以达成,北爱问题在政治僵持的情况下持续到1970年代和1980年代。
[编辑] 桑宁代尔协议
1973年,主流民族派和联合派政党与英国和爱尔兰政府就桑宁代尔协定举行谈判,该协定旨在北爱尔兰内部产生政治解决方案,但是爱尔兰共和国政府在所谓的“爱尔兰因素”下牵涉进来。协定提供了民族派和联合派之间的“权力共享”方案,以及一个促进南北爱双边合作的“爱尔兰理事会”。北爱社会民主工党的肖莫斯·马龙指出桑宁代尔协议和1998年贝尔法斯特协议之间明显的相同之处。他以形容后者为“笨学生的桑宁代尔”而著称。[8]
但是联合派却在桑宁代尔问题上分裂了,共和军也反对这一方案,他们的目标除了终结北爱作为联合王国的一部分以外别无其他。很多联合主义分子反对权力共享的计划,坚称与那些追求消灭本省的人(民族派)共享权力是不切实际。然而也许更重要的是联合派对“爱尔兰因素”和爱尔兰理事会的反对,后者被看成是全爱尔兰国会的预演版。社民工党地方议员休·罗格对都柏林三一学院的听众发表评论说,桑宁代尔是会把“联合派会推向一个统一的爱尔兰”的工具,注定要失败。
1974年1月,布赖恩·福克纳(Brian Faulkner)以微弱差距失去了在联合党内的领导权,被哈里·韦斯特(Harry West)取代。1974年英国大选给了反对桑宁代尔协议的联合派一个机会测试联合派对“都柏林就是桑宁代尔的未来”这句口号的态度,结果令他们的反对者大惊失色:他们赢得了12个席位中的11席,赢得了58%的选票,其他选票大多数流向民族派和支持桑宁代尔协议的联合派。
但是最终,桑宁代尔协议被保皇派(主要是当时人数超过2 0000人的阿尔斯特防卫协会)和新教徒工人的群众活动所推翻,后者建立了阿尔斯特工人理事会。他们组织了一场总罢工——阿尔斯特工人理事会罢工。该罢工使北爱所有商业活动停止,必不可少的公共服务,如供水供电,也被切断。民族派坚称英国政府没有尽力停止罢工,提高了桑宁代尔协议的执行门槛。但是就事论事,面对如此坚决的反对,赞成桑宁代尔协定的联合派只得从权力共享政府辞职,使新政府倒台。
1970年代的之后几年中暴力活动持续不断。临时派共和军在1975年宣布停火,但是在1976年回归暴力活动。至此他们已经失去在1970年代早期的希望,即可以迅速迫使英国从北爱尔兰撤退,取而代之的是一个全新的被称为“持久战”的战略,包括较低烈度的但更持久的,可以无限持续的暴力活动。而正统派共和军在1972年的停火却成为永久性的,“正统派”的活动也逐渐演变为完全拒绝暴力的爱尔兰工人党。但是1974年从“正统派”当中分裂出来的一个分支——爱尔兰国民解放军仍然继续暴力活动。
至1970年代后期,双方民众对战争的厌倦已经显现。其中的一个表现就是被称为“和平人民”的组织成立,并在1976年赢得诺贝尔和平奖。和平人民组织了大型的示威呼吁准军事组织停止暴力。但是他们的活动在呼吁民族派向安全部队提供共和军的情报后失去了动力。军队和警察在很多天主教地区非常不受欢迎,此举被看作欠缺客观理性。
[编辑] 绝食与新芬党再现
历任英国政府都在尝试取得使北爱“正常化”的政治解决方案上无功而返。问题包括废除不加审判的拘留和取消准军事组织囚犯的政治犯地位。从1976年开始,准军事组织由无陪审团的迪普洛克法庭审判,以免陪审员受到胁迫。如果有罪,被告会被当作一般的罪犯处理。共和派囚犯对这一政策的反抗导致了在梅兹监狱超过500人的毛毯示威和秽物示威。他们的示威在1980年和1981年的绝食示威中到达顶峰,目标是恢复政治犯地位。
1981年爱尔兰绝食抗议中,十名共和派囚犯(七名为临时派共和军,三名为爱尔兰民族解放军)饿死。第一名饿死的抗议者鲍比·桑兹(Bobby Sands)由反拘押票选入国会,桑兹死后由他的代理人欧文·卡龙(Owen Carron)接替议席。绝食示威被证明是牵动民族派社区的感情的事件——超过10万人参加了在双溪的圣路加教堂举行的葬礼。群众也参加了接下来的其他葬礼。
从爱尔兰共和派的观点来看,这些事件的重要性在于显示了一种政治和选举的策略的潜力。在绝食者的守灵式上,新芬党——临时派共和军的政治组织——开始首次在北爱尔兰和爱尔兰共和国同时进行竞选。1986年,新芬党承认了爱尔兰警察的合法性,使得一小部分强硬共和派分裂组成共和新芬党。
从联合派的观点看,绝食表明民族派社区支持恐怖主义,而这种感觉加深了教派对立。
[编辑] “漫长的战争”
Paramilitary campaigns continued on both sides until the respective republican and loyalists ceasefires of 1994 ("non-authorised" killings such as vendettas or drugs-related killings still continue today). Fewer people were killed in the 1980s and 1990s than in the 1970s, but the duration and seemingly interminable nature of the political violence has left behind a very negative sociological legacy.
The PIRA's "Long War" was boosted by large donations of arms to them from Libya in 1986 (see Provisional IRA arms importation) due to Moammar Qaddafi's fury at Thatcher's government for assisting the Reagan government's bombing of Tripoli, which killed one of Qaddafi's children. Although they were now killing fewer soldiers, the PIRA's capacity for assassinations and bombings appeared boundless. Many of their operations were directed at local unionist targets such as off-duty policemen, part-time soldiers and Protestant civilians, such as those killed during the Remembrance Day massacre of 1987. The PIRA also targeted construction workers, cleaners, and other workers, both Catholics and Protestants, who were employed on jobs at police stations and Army bases.
In the mid to late 1980s loyalist paramilitaries including the Ulster Volunteer Force, the Ulster Defence Association and Ulster Resistance, imported arms and explosives from South Africa. The weapons obtained were divided between the UDA, the UVF, and Ulster Resistance and led to an escalation in the assassination of Catholics, although some of the weaponry (such as RPGs) were hardly used due to loyalist incompetence. These killings were in response to the 1985 Anglo-Irish Agreement which gave the Irish government a "consultative role" in the internal government of Northern Ireland.
[编辑] 同谋——治安部队与保皇派准军事组织
An emotive and highly controversial aspect of the conflict has been the confirmed collusion between the state security forces and loyalist paramilitaries.
[编辑] 防卫旅与保皇派
A problem highlighted by recently released documents (3 May 2006) by the pro-nationalist Irish News site, "Nuzhound". The British Government documents from the early 1970s allegedly show overlapping membership between British Army units like the Ulster Defence Regiment (UDR) and loyalist paramilitary groups. The documents include a report titled "Subversion in the UDR" which details the problem. In 1973;
- An estimated 5-15% of UDR soldiers were directly linked to loyalist paramilitary groups,
- It was believed that the "best single source of weapons, and the only significant source of modern weapons, for Protestant extremist groups was the UDR",
- It was feared UDR troops were loyal to "Ulster" alone rather than to "Her Majesty's Government",
- The British Government knew that UDR weapons were being used in the assassination and attempted assassination of Catholic civilians by loyalist paramilitaries.[9]
Despite knowing that over 200 weapons had been passed from British Army hands to loyalist paramilitaries by 1973, the British Government went on to increase the role of the UDR in "maintaining order" in Northern Ireland. This was part of the wider "Normalisation, Ulsterisation, and Criminalisation" strategy to quell the violence of the PIRA.
[编辑] 特别巡逻队与格伦内恩指控
In the mid 1970s, the Royal Ulster Constabulary anti-terrorist unit, the Special Patrol Group (RUC) was implicated in aiding and participating in a number of sectarian murders in the mid-Ulster area, including the Reavey and O'Dowd killings of 1976. Two SPG members, John Weir and Billy McCaughey were convicted in 1980 of a 1977 murder, an attack on pub in Keady and the kidnap of a Catholic priest. They implicated their immediate colleagues in at least 11 other killings and alleged that they were part of a wider conspiracy involving the RUC Special Branch, British military intelligence and the UVF [10]. The Special Patrol Group was stood down after the men's conviction. The nationalist Pat Finucane Centre has claimed that the group of British Army, RUC UDR and UVF members that Wier and McCaughey referred to, which they called the, "Glenane gang", was responsible for 87 killings in the 1970s, including the Dublin and Monaghan bombings of 1974 and the Miami Showband killings of 1975 [11].
[编辑] 1980年代与1990年代的同谋事件
Elements within the Army and police have been shown to have leaked intelligence to loyalists from the late 1980s to target republican activists. In 1992, a British agent within the UDA, Brian Nelson, revealed Army complicity in his activities which included murder and importing arms[12][13]. The British Army and RUC are known to have cooperated with Nelson and the UDA through the British Intelligence group called the Force Research Unit. Since the late 1990s, loyalists have confirmed to journalists such as Peter Taylor that they also received files and intelligence from security sources on republican targets.[14][15]
In a report released on the 22 January 2007, the Police Ombudsman Nuala O'Loan stated UVF informers committed serious crimes, including murder, with the full knowledge of their handlers.[16] The report alleged Special Branch officers created false statements, blocked evidence searches and "baby-sat" suspects during interviews. DUP councillor and former Police Federation chairman Jimmy Spratt said if the report "had had one shred of credible evidence then we could have expected charges against former Police Officers. There are no charges, so the public should draw their own conclusion, the report is clearly based on little fact".[17] However, Northern Ireland Secretary of State Peter Hain said that he was "convinced that at least one prosecution will arise out of today's report".[18]. Peter Hain also said "There are all sorts of opportunities for prosecutions to follow. The fact that some retired police officers obstructed the investigation and refused to co-operate with the Police Ombudsman is very serious in itself. There will be consequences for those involved and it is a matter for the relevant bodies to take up" [19]. However, the chances of successful prosecutions are very low, given the nature of the crimes committed. Where evidence has been destroyed, altered, or deliberately not gathered, it is very hard to ground any kind of charge. DUP councillor and former Police Federation chairman Jimmy Spratt's statement is therefore not valid, as the crimes specifically set out to frustrate the course of justice, and were successful in doing so, according to the Ballast Report.
[编辑] 杀人灭口
In addition, republicans allege that the security forces operated a policy of "shoot-to-kill" - killing rather than arresting IRA suspects. The security forces denied this and point out that in incidents such as killing of eight IRA men at Loughgall in 1987, that the paramilitaries who were killed were heavily armed.
Although incidents such as the shooting of three unarmed IRA members in Gibraltar by the SAS ten months later only confirmed suspicions among republicans, and in the British and Irish media, of a tacit British "shoot-to-kill" policy of suspected IRA terrorists.[20]
[编辑] 准军事组织的停火与和平进程
Main article Northern Ireland peace process
[编辑] 准军事组织的活动
Since the late 1980s, Sinn Féin, led since 1983 by Gerry Adams, sought a negotiated end to the conflict (though the IRA continued its armed campaign), although Adams knew that this would be a very long process. In the 1970s he himself predicted that the war would last another 20 years. This was manifested in open talks with John Hume - the SDLP leader and secret talks with Government officials. The loyalists were also engaged in behind the scenes talks to end the violence, liaising with the British and Irish governments through Protestant clergy, in particular, the Presbyterian Rev. Roy Magee and Anglican Archbishop Robin Eames. After a prolonged period of political manoeuvring in the background, both loyalist and republican paramilitaries declared ceasefires in 1994.
The year leading up to the ceasefires was a particularly tense one, marked by atrocities. The UDA and UVF stepped up their killings of Catholics (for the first time killing more civilians than Republicans in a year in 1993). The IRA responded with the Shankill Road bombing in October 1993 that aimed to wipe out the UDA leadership, but in fact killed nine Protestant civilians. The UDA in turn retaliated with the Greysteel massacre and the shootings at Castlerock, County Londonderry.
On June 16 1994, just before the ceasefires, the INLA killed two UVF members in a gun attack on the Shankill road. In revenge, three days later, the UVF shot up a pub in Loughinisland, County Down, killing six civilians. The IRA, in the remaining month before its ceasefire, killed four senior loyalists, three from the UDA and one from the UVF. There are various interpretations of the spike in violence before the ceasefires. One theory is that the loyalists feared the peace process represented an imminent "sellout" of the Union and ratcheted up their violence accordingly. Another explanation is that the republicans were "settling old scores" before the end of their campaigns and wanted to enter the political process from a position of military strength rather than weakness.
Eventually, in August 1994, the Provisional IRA declared a ceasefire. The loyalist paramilitaries, temporarily united in the Combined Loyalist Military Command, reciprocated six weeks later. Although these ceasefires failed leading to further violence, they mark an effective end to large-scale political violence in the Troubles as it paved the way for the final ceasefire.
[编辑] 第二次停火
Less than two years after the signing of the Ceasefire the IRA revoked it on February 9th 1996. Later that day a half tonne bomb was exploded in the Canary Wharf area of London killing two people and doing £85 million in damage to the city's financial centre. The failure of the ceasefire was blamed on the British Governments refusal to begin all party negotiations until the IRA decommissioned its weapons.[21]
The attack was followed by several more, most notably being the Manchester Bombing which destroyed much of the centre of the city on 15th June 1996. It was the largest bomb attack in Great Britain since World War II but the attack avoided any fatalities due to the telephone warning. Over 200 people where still injured in the attack.
The IRA reinstated their ceasefire in July 1997 as negotiations for the document that would become known as the Good Friday Agreement were starting without Sinn Fein. In September of the same year Sinn Fein signed The Mitchell Principles and was invited into the talks.
The UVF was the first paramilitary grouping to split as a result of their ceasefire, spawning the Loyalist Volunteer Force in 1996. In December 1997, the INLA assassinated Loyalist Volunteer Force leader Billy Wright, leading to a series of revenge killings of Catholics by loyalist groups. In addition, two hardline splinter groups from the Provisional IRA, the Real IRA and the Continuity IRA, who rejected the Provisional's ceasefire, continued a bombing campaign.
In August 1998, a RIRA bomb in Omagh killed 29 civilians (and two unborn children). This atrocity largely discredited the "dissident" republicans and their campaigns in the eyes of most nationalists. They are now small and uninfluential groups. The INLA also declared a ceasefire after the Belfast Agreement was passed in 1998.
Since then, most paramilitary violence has been directed inwards, at their "own" communities and at other factions within their organisations. The UDA, for example has come to blows with their fellow loyalists, the UVF on two occasions since 2000 and has also been torn apart repeatedly by internal feuding between "Brigade commanders" over power within the organisation and the proceeds of organised crime. On the republican side, the tendency for internecine violence has been less marked, but the Provisional IRA has been accused of killing at least one double-agent (Denis Donaldson) and its members have also been accused of intimidating and expelling Catholics, assaulting men and women, and, in the most extreme cases, killings of young men such as Robert McCartney, Matthew Ignatius Burns and Andrew Kearney.
The PIRA decommissioned most of its weaponry in August-September 2005, meaning that it no longer has the capacity for a large-scale military campaign in the immediate future. The loyalists have yet to indicate a wish to disarm.
[编辑] 政治进程
After the ceasefires, talks began between the main political parties in Northern Ireland with the aim of establishing political agreement. These talks eventually produced the Belfast Agreement of 1998. This Agreement restored self-government to Northern Ireland on the basis of "power-sharing", and an executive was formed in 1999 consisting of the four main parties, including Sinn Féin. Other reforms included reform of the police (which was renamed as the Police Service of Northern Ireland and required to recruit a minimum quota of Catholics.
However, the power-sharing Executive and Assembly have been suspended since 2002, when unionists withdrew following the exposure of a Provisional IRA spy ring within the Sinn Féin office (which was later revealed to have been started by an undercover British agent Denis Donaldson). This was on top ongoing tensions between unionists and Sinn Féin about Provisional IRA failure to disarm fully and sufficiently quickly. PIRA decommissioning has since been completed (in September 2005) to the satisfaction of most, but the Democratic Unionist Party continued to be wary over republican claims that the "war was over".
A feature of Northern Irish politics since the Agreement has been the eclipse in electoral terms of the relatively moderate parties such as the Social Democratic and Labour Party and Ulster Unionist Party by more extreme parties - Sinn Féin and the Democratic Unionist Party.
Similarly, although political violence is greatly reduced, sectarian animosity has not disappeared and residential areas are more segregated between Catholic nationalists and Protestant unionists than ever. Because of this, progress towards restoring the power-sharing institutions looks likely to be slow and tortuous. Though the "peace process" is slow-going, movements are forming to assist in this process and give those affected by The Troubles a voice in their communities. In particular, the Corrymeela Community in Ballycastle teaches the prejudice-reduction model that has been adopted by the Ulster Project International to improve relations between Protestant and Catholic families across the country.
[编辑] 游行问题
Inter-communal tensions rise and violence often breaks out during the "marching season" when the Protestant Orange Order parades take place across Northern Ireland. The parades are held to commemorate William of Orange's victory in the Battle of the Boyne in 1690, which secured the Protestant Ascendancy and British rule in Ireland. One particular flashpoint that has caused repeated strife is the Garvaghy Road area in Portadown, where an Orange parade from Drumcree Church passes by a predominantly nationalist estate off the Garvaghy Road. This parade has now been banned indefinitely, following nationalist riots against the parade, and also loyalist counter-riots against its banning. In 1995, 1996 and 1997, there were several weeks of prolonged rioting throughout the North over the impasse at Drumcree. A number of people died in this violence, including a Catholic taxi driver, killed by the Loyalist Volunteer Force, and three (out of a total of four) nominally Catholic brothers (from a mixed-religion family) died when their house in Ballymoney was petrol-bombed.
Disputes have also occurred in Belfast over parade routes along the heavily Catholic Ormeau and Crumlin Roads. Orangemen hold that to march their "traditional route" is their civil right. Nationalists argue that by parading through hostile areas, the Orange Order is being unnecessarily provocative. Symbolically, the ability to either parade or to block a parade is viewed as expressing ownership of "territory" and influence over the government of Northern Ireland.
Many commentators have expressed the view that the violence over the parades issue has provided an outlet for the violence of paramilitary groups who are otherwise on ceasefire.
[编辑] 伤亡:简要统计
[编辑] 负责方
Between 1969 and 2001, 3,523 people were killed as a result of the Troubles.
Approximately 60% of the victims were killed by republicans, 30% by loyalists and 10% by the British, Irish and Northern Irish security forces.
Responsibility for killing [6] | |
---|---|
Responsible party | No. |
Republican Paramilitary Groups | 2055 |
Loyalist Paramilitary Groups | 1020 |
Security Forces | 368 |
Persons unknown | 80 |
[编辑] 身份
Most of those killed were civilians or members of the security forces, with smaller groups of victims identified with republican and loyalist paramilitary groups. It is often disputed whether some civilians were members of paramilitary organisations due to their secretive nature. Several PIRA paramilitaries were claimed to be civilians by CAIN but are now claimed as by the IRA as their members, Padraig O'Seanachain for example.[22] At least three UVF (Ulster Volunteer Force) members killed were also UDR (Ulster Defence Regiment) soldiers[23]. At least one civilian victim was an off-duty member of the TA[24].
Deaths by status of victim [7] | |
---|---|
Status | No. |
Civilian | 1855 |
Members of security forces (and reserves) | 1123 |
of whom: | |
— British Army | 499 |
— Royal Ulster Constabulary | 301 |
— Ulster Defence Regiment | 197 |
— Northern Ireland Prison Service | 24 |
— Garda Síochána (Republic of Ireland police) | 9 |
— Royal Irish Regiment | 7 |
— Territorial Army | 7 |
— English police forces | 6 |
— Royal Air Force | 4 |
— Royal Navy | 3 |
— Irish Army | 1 |
Members of Republican Paramilitary Groups | 394 |
Members of Loyalist Paramilitary Groups | 151 |
[编辑] 地点
Most killings took place within Northern Ireland, especially Belfast, although surrounding counties, Dublin and large English cities (such as London and Birmingham) were affected, albeit to a lesser degree than in Northern Ireland itself. Occasionally, violence also took place in western Europe, especially against the British Army in Germany.
Geographic distribution of deaths in Northern Ireland conflict[8] | |
---|---|
Location | No. |
County Antrim | 207 |
County Armagh | 276 |
East Belfast | 128 |
North Belfast | 576 |
West Belfast | 623 |
County Down | 243 |
England | 125 |
Continental Europe | 18 |
County Fermanagh | 112 |
Derry City | 227 |
County Londonderry | 123 |
Republic of Ireland | 113 |
County Tyrone | 339 |
[编辑] 年度统计表
与北爱冲突有关的死亡人数。
死亡人数格式为:“与冲突有关(不确定是否与冲突有关)”([9]). |
|
---|---|
年份 | 人数 |
2006 | 1 (2) |
2005 | 5 (7) |
2004 | 2 (3) |
2003 | 10 (3) |
2002 | 11 (5) |
2001 | 16 |
2000 | 19 |
1999 | 8 |
1998 | 55 |
1997 | 21 |
1996 | 18 |
1995 | 9 |
1994 | 64 |
1993 | 88 |
1992 | 89 |
1991 | 96 |
1990 | 81 |
1989 | 75 |
1988 | 104 |
1987 | 98 |
1986 | 61 |
1985 | 57 |
1984 | 69 |
1983 | 85 |
1982 | 110 |
1981 | 113 |
1980 | 80 |
1979 | 121 |
1978 | 81 |
1977 | 111 |
1976 | 295 |
1975 | 260 |
1974 | 294 |
1973 | 253 |
1972 | 479 |
1971 | 171 |
1970 | 26 |
1969 | 16 |
[编辑] 附加统计
Additional estimated statistics on the conflict[來源請求] | |
---|---|
Incident | No. |
Injury | 47,000 |
Shooting | 37,000 |
Armed robbery | 22,500 |
Persons imprisoned for paramilitary offences | 19,600 |
Bombing and attempted bombing | 16,200 |
Arson | 2,200 |
[编辑] 分析观点
[编辑] 宗教,阶级与地区
Religion and class are the two major determinants of political allegiance in Northern Ireland. Almost all Protestants are Unionists, and the overwhelming majority of Catholics are nationalists; many republicans. Working-class Catholics and Protestants are more likely to support paramilitary groups and radical political parties on either side. Moreover, the paramilitaries have their strongholds in urban working-class areas and it is this social class which is the most segregated along sectarian lines.
The radical political parties associated with paramilitaries have sometimes offered far more radical political analyses than the more middle-class and conservative parties. Sinn Féin, from the late 1970s, adopted a radical "anti-imperialist" perspective of the political situation, comparing it to "liberation struggles" elsewhere such as in the Palestinian Territories and South Africa. Their analysis also defined the conflict partly in terms of "class struggle", although unlike the Marxist Official IRA, they did not take this to mean that the loyalist working class were potential allies. Loyalists in the 1970s even advocated majoritarian forms of an "independent Ulster". There is little support for this idea today. In the 1980s, some loyalists, notably John McMichael of the UDA (who was assassinated by the PIRA), advocated a power-sharing, egalitarian solution to the conflict, which they released in a pamphlet titled, Common Sense.
It has been suggested by many loyalists that mainstream Unionists resisted reform and used the IRA scare tactic in part to maintain their political and economic power at the expense of both Nationalists as well as the impoverished Unionist/Loyalist communities. Parties such as the UUP [Ulster Unionist Party] maintained their dominance in part by using the "union" and IRA issues as a means to maintain voting unity from the working-class Unionists who, politically, gained little from the UUP's policies. It is argued, for example by the Progressive Unionist Party that one reason Loyalist paramilitary groups formed in such great numbers is the true disenfranchisement of the poorer Protestant segments of Northern Irish society.
Religious commitment is sometimes, but not normally, an indicator of extreme political views. For example, Ian Paisley and his supporters combine strict Presbyterianism with hardline unionist politics. Of the paramilitaries, Catholic piety is generally not combined with militant republicanism, and loyalist paramilitaries are rarely overtly religious. However, there have been prominent republican paramilitaries who have also publicly displayed their religious faith (such as Gerry McGeough, Sean Mac Stiofain, Anthony Mangan, and Billy McKee). Assassinated loyalist leader Billy Wright also prominently displayed his faith, but theology and religion (as opposed to communal identification based on religion) are not prominent in republican and loyalist ideologies.
Region also plays role in determining the politics of people in Northern Ireland. Some areas, notably West Belfast, South Armagh and much of County Tyrone, are noted for their hardline Irish republican politics. Other Catholic-dominated areas such as Derry City have a relatively moderate political tradition with a high level of support for the non-violent SDLP. Similarly, certain regions, notably East Belfast, the Portadown area and northern County Antrim are known for their staunchly pro-loyalist politics.
[编辑] 治安
Since the existence of Northern Ireland has been disputed by some since its inception, its means of coercion, its police force, has necessarily also been an area of dispute. Specifically, the issues surrounding policing in Northern Ireland concern the composition of the police force - i.e. whether it is representative of the population, its political orientation - whether it favours unionists over nationalists, and its role - whether it is primarily a service to uphold the rule of law, or it is a force with the goal of defending the Northern Ireland state.
The Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC), the police force in Northern Ireland, was since its inception, largely, though not totally, Protestant for a number of reasons. Catholics did not join in the numbers expected by the British when the force was first created. Some of those who did reported an unwelcoming working environment. Those Catholics who did join were also often targeted for assassination by the PIRA, yet a number of Catholics did join the RUC. One (James Flanagan) served as Chief Constable, and was later knighted, while the current leader of the Social Democratic and Labour Party, Mark Durkan, is the son of a Catholic RUC officer. Musicians Phil Coulter and Marilla Ness’ fathers were also policemen.
The result was that critics of the unionist and loyalist communities portrayed the police force as a "unionist police force". Sinn Féin produced posters in the 1990s which said of the RUC, "90% Protestant, 100% unionist" and depicted an officer wearing an Orange sash.
Even more than the regular police force, this perception was widely held by nationalists about the B-Specials, a part time police force mobilised in times of emergency. The B-Specials were disbanded in 1970, but were replaced by the Ulster Defence Regiment - a locally recruited part-time unit of the British Army - intended for security duties in Northern Ireland. While the UDR killed only 8 people during the Troubles and often carried out security duties professionally and well, many of its members were found to have been involved with loyalist paramilitary groups and in a number of killings of Catholics nationalists. For this reason, the nationalists also viewed the UDR as a partisan force. The UDR were disbanded in 1992 and incorporated into the regular Royal Irish Regiment.
One of the major social problems created by the Troubles was the takeover of law enforcement in certain areas by either republican or loyalists paramilitaries, who punished local criminals with beatings, kneecappings and even murder. One of the principle aims of the peace process, therefore, has been to re-establish the police as the sole enforcers of law and order.
Sinn Féin entered the negotiations that led to the Belfast Agreement in 1998 with the demand that the RUC be disbanded. A policing review, part of the Good Friday Agreement, has led to some reforms of policing, including more rigorous accountability, measures to increase the number of Catholic officers, and the renaming of the RUC to the Police Service of Northern Ireland.
While most of the reforms have been introduced, Sinn Féin continued, until January 2007, to withhold its support from the new Police Service of Northern Ireland until they are "implemented in full". Unionists and some moderate nationalists have voiced the fear that Sinn Féin wish to place former republican paramilitaries/operatives into the new Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI), something which, if true, would collapse the GFA, possibly permanently.
In January 2007, a report by Police Ombudsman, Nuala O'Loan, found that Police Special Branch officers had co-operated with the UVF in a large number of murders in Belfast in the 1990s.[25] (see collusion section)
Also in January 2007, Sinn Fein voted at a Special Árd Fheis to recognise the Police Service of Northern Ireland. They are now prepared, for the first time, to call on republicans to cooperate with the Police and for their supporters to join the PSNI. It remains to be seen whether or not this Árd Fheis decision will give the Peace Process the forward momentum that it needs to progress.
[编辑] 军事理论
French journalist Roger Faligot noted in Guerre spéciale en Europe (1980) that Frank Kitson's 1971 book, Low Intensity Operations: Subversion, Insurgency and Peacekeeping, considered as the "Bible" used by the British Army during the Troubles, quoted most of all Roger Trinquier, French military officer who had theorized counter-insurgency, including the systemic use of torture during the Algerian War (1954-62). There is however no direct evidence of torture being used by security forces in Northern Ireland.
[编辑] 时间表
Main article: Chronology of the Northern Ireland Troubles
[编辑] 名录
Main Article: Directory of the Northern Ireland Troubles
[编辑] 流行文化对北爱问题的反映
[编辑] 关于北爱问题的歌曲
- "There Were Roses" by Mick Moloney
- "The Island" by Paul Brady
- "Theme from Harry's Game" by Clannad
- "Oliver's Army" by Elvis Costello
- "Zombie" by The Cranberries
- "Belfast" by Elton John
- "Sunday Bloody Sunday" by John Lennon and Yoko Ono
- "Belfast" by Boney M
- "Sunrise" by The Divine Comedy
- "Forgotten Sons" by Marillion
- "Give Ireland Back to the Irish" by Paul McCartney
- "Belfast" by Katie Melua
- "Invisible Sun" by The Police
- "Streets of Sorrow/Birmingham Six" and "Flogging Molly" by The Pogues
- "The Troubles" by The Roches
- "Belfast Child" by Simple Minds
- "Through the barricades" by Spandau Ballet[26][27]
- "Each Dollar a Bullet" and others by Stiff Little Fingers
- "God Kicks", "Potato Junkie" and "Church of Noise" by Therapy?
- "Sunday Bloody Sunday", "Please", "Peace on Earth" and "North and South of The River" by U2
- "The Troubles" by XTC
[编辑] 关于北爱问题的诗歌
- Ballad of Claudy, by James Simmons
[编辑] 注释
- ↑ 彻底报告: "...警方调查官得出结论,这是某些警官与身分确定为UVF告密者之间的串通一气。
- ↑ 国会辩论: "英国政府同意,爱尔兰岛人民应独自地,在双方同意下,在自由的、南北双方一致的赞成基础上行使他们的自决权,依其意愿建立一个统一的爱尔兰。"
- ↑ Wright, Frank (1996) Ulster: Two Lands, One Soil, p 17.
- ↑ English, Richard, Armed Struggle: a History of the IRA, pp.39-40
- ↑ Hopkinson, Michael, Green Against Green, pp.83-88: 共和军“实际上在1922年4月至7月沿边界发动了一场联合攻势,但是被证明成效不卓。”
- ↑ Collins, M.E., Ireland 1868-1966, p.364
- ↑ Bardon, Jonathan (1992), A History of Ulster, p.538
- ↑ Ó Ceallaigh, Daltún, Along The road to Irish unity? - 某些材料与马龙所说的完全不符:“正如一名政治学家所说,受难日协定是‘笨学生的桑宁代尔’的说法是‘误导与转移话题,因为该协定是比桑宁代尔所达到的更加细致和包容的一项交易’。另有一项欧洲研究专家说:‘……(桑宁代尔于贝尔法斯特)有很大不同,无论是在内容上还是在谈判环境、落实情况和操作上都是这样。’该协定被更确切地描述为:‘一言以蔽之,联合主义主流派只输在谈判中,问题是他们会输多少。’”
- ↑ May 2, 2006 edition of the Irish News available here.
- ↑ http://www.seeingred.com/Copy/2.1_CODE_weiraff.html
- ↑ http://www.serve.com/pfc/sarmagh/sarmagh.html
- ↑ BBC News
- ↑ CAIN website
- ↑ [1]
- ↑ [2]
- ↑ Statement by the Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland on her investigations into the circumstances surrounding the death of Raymond McCord Junior and related matters
- ↑ BBC News, Monday, 22 January 2007. Reaction to Ombudsman's report
- ↑ BBC News, Monday, 22 January 2007. NI police colluded with killers
- ↑ BBC News, Monday, 22 January 2007. Reaction to Ombudsman's report
- ↑ Murder on the Rock by Maxine Williams - article also includes a list of suspected shoot-to-kill victims between 1982–1986.
- ↑ [3]
- ↑ Bloody Sunday victim did volunteer for us, says IRA The Guardian 19 May 2002
- ↑ See the following quotes of 1975's chapter of Sutton chronology:[4]
- 27 July 1975 William Hanna (46) Protestant
- 31 July 1975 Harris Boyle (22) Protestant
- 31 July 1975 Wesley Somerville (34) Protestant
- ↑ Robert Dunseath, killed in the Teebane massacre was a member of the Royal Irish Rangers:
- ↑ [5]
- ↑ http://arts.guardian.co.uk/fridayreview/story/0,12102,880592,00.html
- ↑ http://hometown. aol. co.uk/KHA200/Irish_History_Song.pdf
[编辑] 传记
- David McKittrick, Seamus Kelters, Brian Feeney and Chris Thornton (1999), Lost Lives: The stories of the men, women and children who died as a result of the Northern Ireland troubles, Mainstream Publishing Company. ISBN 1-84018-227-X.
- Greg Harkin and Martin Ingram (2004), Stakeknife: Britain's secret agents in Ireland, O'Brien Press
- Richard English (2003), Armed Struggle: The History of the IRA, Oxford University Press,
- Kevin Myers (2006), Watching the Door A Memoir 1971-1978, Lilliput Press, Dublin.
[编辑] 参见
- 关于北爱尔兰的主题列表
- 北爱尔兰壁画