Criticisms of The Da Vinci Code

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Da Vinci Code, a popular and controversial suspense novel by Dan Brown, has been generating criticism since it was first published in 2003. Apart from criticism of Dan Brown in general, many of the complaints center on the book's speculations and alleged misrepresentations of core aspects of Christianity and the history of the Roman Catholic Church, with additional criticisms being generated by the book's descriptions of European art, history, and architecture.

It currently remains difficult to assess how much of the controversy surrounding The Da Vinci Code was intended by the author, resulted from poorly executed research, or was merely a product of artistic license. However, it should be noted, that originally the author stated that it was merely a work of fiction; but now claims he believes it.

Contents 1 Fact or fiction 2 Religious disputes 2.1 Jesus and Mary Magdalene 2.2 Jesus in Church teaching 2.3 The "sacred feminine" 2.4 Mary Magdalene 2.4.1 Mary in Leonardo's Last Supper 2.5 Opus Dei 2.6 Early Israelites 2.7 The Vatican 2.8 Early Christian history 2.9 The Bible 2.10 Non-Abrahamic mythology and religion 3 Historical disputes 3.1 Leonardo da Vinci 3.2 The Knights Templar 3.3 The Priory of Sion 3.4 The Holy Grail and The Holy Blood 3.5 France 3.5.1 The Last Temptation of Christ 3.5.2 Paris 3.5.3 Language 3.5.4 Education 3.6 European geography 4 Scientific disputes 4.1 Astronomy 4.2 Technology and engineering 4.3 Miscellaneous 5 Linguistic Oversight 6 Literary criticism 7 Allegations of plagiarism 8 Christian response 9 Notes 10 References 11 External links

[edit] Fact or fiction

Although the book is readily identifiable as a thriller—a work of fiction—and not as a historical tome, Brown does preface his novel with a page he calls "Facts" and has published a page on his website title^[1] which repeats some disputed claims. Although Brown's website makes use of words such as "alleged," "rumored," and "seem to be," some critics consider the qualifiers misleading.

Much of the controversy caused by the book stems from the fact that the novel, as a work of fiction, asserts opinions on debates that have not been resolved as facts, and that a layperson might be confused and believe that the facts asserted as "true" for the purposes of the story are actually true. Multiple tourist attractions in Europe have had to post signs and release other information emphasizing that the descriptions in Brown's book about their locations are wrong—that there is no secret chamber under the floor in a particular chapel, that a particular building was not built by a secret society, and so forth.^[2]

These claims of the book, combined with the presentation of religious opinions that oppose or offend some within the communities discussed, has caused a great deal of debate and partisan material to erupt. Sometimes the book has been recognised even as a form of reference; for example, a front-page article in The Independent on May 10, 2006 refers specifically to the book in a feature about a senior British Government Minister: "Ms Kelly's early days as Education Secretary were dogged with questions about her religion, and her membership of the conservative Opus Dei organisation which features in the best-selling novel The Da Vinci Code."

[edit] Religious disputes

There have been widespread criticisms of the book reflecting antiquated Protestant calumnies against Catholicism (for example, on the BBC's Sunday program on 24 July 2005), or more general anticlerical traditions. On 15 March 2005, Tarcisio Cardinal Bertone, Archbishop of Genoa and former second-in-command of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, castigated the book and those who sell it on grounds of anti-Catholic bias, calling it "a throwback to the old anti-clerical pamphlets of the 1800s," and a "gross and absurd" distortion of history, full of "cheap lies." The Archbishop also objected to the book's portrayal of the Opus Dei, the Roman Catholic prelature.

On Easter Sunday, 2006, Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury, also attacked the book in his Easter sermon, asserting that the Bible was not compiled as a conspiracy to hide the truth, but was inspired by God. In May 2006, the primary topic on the televised religious program The Coral Ridge Hour was The Da Vinci Code, with the host repeatedly referring to Brown and his work as "deceptive." And brochures entitled, "The Da Vinci Code: A Catholic Response," have been distributed in Catholic churches to address the book and movie from various Christian points of view.

[edit] Jesus and Mary Magdalene

In the story, the "Holy Grail" is not a chalice, but rather a bloodline sprung from the marital union of Jesus and Mary Magdalene. This idea is not original to Brown; it was previously hypothesized by others, including Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh in their nonfiction 1982 book The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail. The claim has been characterized by many textual and historical scholars as unevidenced (Burstein, 2004). The Church Fathers, while admittedly making claims years after Jesus had died, were unanimous in their belief that Jesus was celibate.^[3]

While the book is correct that it was a cultural norm for Jewish males (especially rabbis) to be married, there were exceptions to the rule, like the Essenes (see the documents of the Dead Sea Scrolls). As portrayed in the canonical Gospels, Jesus was not a rabbi in the traditional sense of the Jewish office it would become after 70 AD, but an informal teacher; the Gospel of Mark refers to him as "the carpenter."^[4]

Women in the Gospels were usually identified with husbands or male relatives, especially if they shared their names with others. For example, there are many mentions of women called Mary, all designated differently (any possible identification with each other nonwithstanding). There is Mary "the mother of Jesus", Mary "the mother of James and Joses", Mary "the wife of Cl(e)opas", and Mary "the sister of Lazarus". However, Mary Magdalene stands out from the other Marys as she is not directly associated with any man. Mary "Magdalene" means "Mary of Magdala", just as Jesus "the Nazarene" means "Jesus of Nazareth." Some researchers have claimed that, if indeed Jesus and Mary were married, Mary Magdalene should have been called, by all logic, Mary "the wife of Jesus" (Bock, 2004). However, her special distinction as "the Magdalene" is taken by supporters of the Jesus/Mary bloodline theory (and other non-traditional Christians) as simply a sign of her "specialness" within the early church.^{[citation needed]}

The development of the term "bride of Christ" for the Church has been used to point against the existence of a typical marriage.^{[citation needed]} Though Jesus himself is never recorded as directly referring to the church or any group of believers as his "bride" (though he uses the metaphor of a "bridegroom" in some parables in the Gospel of Matthew, namely in verses 22:1-14 and 25:1-13), the comparison can be found as early as Paul (Ephesians 5:25-27, 2 Corinthians 11:2-3), and the Book of Revelation.

Also, some scholars have speculated that Jesus' teaching that "those people who can remain celibate, for the kingdom of heaven's sake (Matt. 19:12) should do so" was made in response to criticisms about his own celibacy (Olson and Miesel, 2004).

[edit] Jesus in Church teaching

According to the story, prior to AD 325, Christ was considered no more than a "mortal prophet" by his followers, and it was only as a consequence of Emperor Constantine's politicking and a close vote at the First Council of Nicaea that Christianity came to view him as divine. This claim has been disputed by various authors with extensive reference to the Bible and the Church Fathers, sources that pre-date the First Council of Nicaea^[5] (see also The Church in Crisis: A History of the General Councils, 325–1870 (1964) by Philip Hughes). According to these sources, the central question at the Council was whether Christ and God were homoousios, "of one substance", and thus one, or whether instead Christ was homoiousios, "of like substance", and thus the first created being, inferior to the Father, but still superior to all other beings (see Arianism). The vote at the Council was overwhelming against Arius (there is some debate over the actual number of voting Bishops, anywhere from 200 to 318) rather than being "close," as the book claims.[15]

[edit] The "sacred feminine"

Characters in the book claim that the sacred feminine has been suppressed by Christianity. The sacred feminine refers to the representation of the mystical power of the earth or mother Goddess and is often linked to symbols of fertility and reproduction. This is particularly true of the two primary goddesses which Brown discusses, Venus and Isis.

Christians point out that the Catholic and Orthodox Churches do give special veneration to the Virgin Mary, who bore Jesus in her womb and gave birth to him. However, it is alleged in the book that this is a desexualised aspect of femininity, through which the sacred feminine is suppressed. Some scholars, such as Joseph Campbell, believe that this image of Mary was specifically derived from the image of Isis and her child Horus. Campbell states in The Power of Myth, "The antique model for the Madonna, actually, is Isis with Horus at her breast" (p. 176, 1988, first edition). Brown actually echoes this charge. Others counter that the symbol of the "Mother and Child" is universal and can be found in many faiths, being part of the general human experience; thus it makes no sense to claim that Christianity specifically copied this element from Egyptian mythology. (Olson and Miesel, 2004)

Early Christian devotion to female Martyrs (such as Perpetua and Felicity) and the apocryphal writings about figures like St. Thecla seem to indicate that women did play a role in the early Church, far more than is acknowledged by either Brown or some modern Christians and critics of Christianity today [16]; though a scenario of men and women sharing all roles of office, such as the priesthood, is not supported by the historical evidence (Olson and Miesel, 2004).

It is important to note that these documents and traditions tend to stress the virtues of chaste womanhood, but this is in keeping with a general notion in Christianity that chastity is a greater good, for both genders. Gnostic sects also seem to have taught a greater role for woman and discuss "Sophia" in a sense that sounds almost divine. However this should not be confused with Goddess worship, since the Gnostics (for example, in the Gospel of Thomas's famous ending verse where Jesus says he will make Mary into a male to make her worthy to enter the Kingdom) accepted the distinctly Greek notion of male and female being two degrees of human being rather than two types (as moderns tend to think of them), with "man" (masculine) being the norm or "natural" state of humanity. [17]

It is a matter of controversy whether various historical religions really held the view assigned to them in the Da Vinci Code of the Sacred Feminine. For example, as found in Symposium and other Greek works, in ancient Greece women were believed to play no role in human reproduction whatsoever; it was the men that planted the "seed" of life within the woman, who was likened to a field, and Hesiod's Works and Days contains numerous references to male deities who are able to reproduce life by themselves. Dan Brown may have been influenced by Neopaganism, which has a high regard for women but may distort the perception of women held by ancient religions.

[edit] Mary Magdalene

Historians have also disputed the claim that Mary Magdalene was of the tribe of Benjamin. There is no mention of this in the Bible or in other ancient sources.[18][19] The fact that Magdala was located in northern Israel, whereas the tribe of Benjamin resided in the south, weighs against it. Furthermore, Paul was a Benjamite but makes no mention of this supposed heritage.^{[citation needed]}

In chapter 58 it is suggested that the marriage of Jesus and Mary Magdalene created a "potent political union with the potential of making a legitimate claim to the throne."^[6] This idea comes from a fundamental misunderstanding of the dynastic relations within ancient Israel: While the first King of Israel and Judah, according to 1st Samuel, was indeed Saul of the tribe of Benjamin, both he and his son and heir, Jonathan, were killed at Mt. Gilboa by the Philistines (1st Samuel 31). After Saul, the kingship passed to David of the tribe of Judah, and the kingship of the southern kingdom of Judah remained within the house of David until the Babylonian Captivity. In the northern kingdom of Israel, a new dynasty was established by Jeroboam of the tribe of Ephraim after the death of David's son, Solomon (1 Kings 14). While the northern kingdom passed through several dynasties, never again did the tribe of Benjamin hold the kingship in either Israel or Judah. If either of the genealogies of Matthew 1 or Luke 3 is to be believed, Jesus would already have had a claim to the throne of Israel through his ties to the house of David (see Genealogy of Jesus); a marriage with one of the tribe of Benjamin would not have strengthened this claim, as the original Benjamite king, Saul, who, though he left direct heirs through his son Jonathan (1 Chronicles 9:40-44), did not found a monarchy with dynastic claims, nor would these claims pass down to Mary Magdalene, as such claims would pass through the firstborn son.^{[citation needed]}

Characters in the book also claim that Mary Magdalene was labeled a prostitute by the Church.^[7] In a sermon, Pope Gregory I did make a connection between figures mentioned in the Gospel of Luke, chapters 7 and 8, one of whom is Mary Magdalene, described as a victim of demonic possession: "Mary who is called Magdalene, out of whom seven devils were gone forth" (Luke 8:2). Gregory equated her with Mary of Bethany and an unnamed female "sinner." Later, Mary was also equated with the "woman taken in adultery" in the Gospel of John, increasingly connecting Mary with sexual sins. These claims are now rejected by the majority of biblical scholars, Catholic and non-Catholic alike. [20][21]

It is true that Catholic tradition has tended to defend these integrations in contrast to other Christian traditions,^[8] but there is no evidence that Catholic officials introduced this identification to defame Mary, who is considered a saint — moreover, one personally aided by Jesus who sent "seven demons" out of her, and more importantly, a witness to his resurrection as written in the Gospels. The "promotion" from adultery into prostitution arises from Mary's role as patron saint of repentant sinful women.^[9] The euphemistic term "magdalen" has been used to refer to repentant prostitutes because of this (see Magdalen Asylum), becoming attached to Mary herself. Also, Gregory I's teaching about Mary Magdalene, though popular throughout much of the Church's history, was never formally integrated into Catholic dogma; nor was he speaking infallibly at the time. (Olson and Miesel, 2004)

In any case, Mary Magdalene is revered as a saint in France and other Catholic countries; a cave in the Sainte-Baume mountains of Provence, where she is believed to have lived, is a popular pilgrimage site, and a famous church dedicated to her (known as l'Église de la Madeleine) is in the heart of Paris, near the Place de la Concorde and not very far from the Louvre. Surely Sophie Neveu (whose first reaction on hearing her name is "The prostitute?") would know about it.

[edit] Mary in Leonardo's Last Supper

The contention that Mary Magdalene is depicted sitting next to Jesus in Leonardo's famous "Last Supper" is disputed by virtually all art historians. [22] Since there are twelve disciples (including Judas), one would have to be missing for Mary to be present. The figure to the right of Christ, also wearing blue and red, is usually identified as St. John, who was customarily depicted in the Renaissance period as a beardless, often "effeminate" youth with very long hair.[23] Some speculators, before and after Brown, have entertained the idea that John was depicted in this way to hint that he was Mary Magdalene, but this is a decidedly minority view. [24][25]

Most other depictions of The Last Supper also present a very young St. John, as it was traditionally believed that he was identical with the Evangelist of the same name. He is usually seated next to Jesus because he was also identified to be the disciple whom Jesus loved. The "femininity" of the figure can be attributed to Leonardo's artistic training in a workshop of the Florentine School, which had a long tradition of often depicting young males as sweet, pretty, rather "effeminate" persons.^[10] Also, in rough sketches of the painting, the person next to Jesus is actually labeled "John".^[11]

Even so, the book points out the absence of the traditional chalice (the "Holy Grail") on the table in the painting as proof that Leonardo considered Mary Magdalene the "real" Grail. However, there is no established "tradition" of depicting a chalice in scenes of the Last Supper. Some paintings do depict a chalice. Others portray cups or wine-glasses. Leonardo depicts unadorned glasses filled with red wine. It could be argued that Leonardo eschewed traditional iconography for contemporary realism (compare with Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade for a similar treatment of the Grail).

It has been claimed that the painting does appear to contain a conventional chalice—on a shelf above the head of the leftmost Apostle.^[12] This detail was made visible due to the restoration of the painting. However most art historians consider this to depict decorative panelling on a door.^[13]

[edit] Opus Dei

The depiction of Opus Dei as a monastic order which is the Pope's "personal prelature" is inaccurate. In fact, there are no monks in Opus Dei, which has primarily lay membership and whose celibate lay members are called numeraries. Moreover, Opus Dei encourages its lay members to avoid practices that are perceived as fundamentalist to the outside world. The term personal prelature does not refer to a special relationship to the Pope; it means an institution in which the jurisdiction of the prelate is not linked to a territory but over persons, wherever they be. (Olson and Miesel, 2004)

Silas, the murderous "Opus Dei monk", uses a cilice and flagellates himself. Some members of Opus Dei do practice voluntary mortification of the flesh, as has been a Christian tradition since at least St. Anthony in the 3rd century and has also been practised by Mother Teresa, Padre Pio and slain archbishop Óscar Romero.^{[citation needed]} Critics charge Brown of greatly sensationalizing the practice of such mortifications and exaggerating the extent of their practice. It is impossible to gain the kind of wounds Silas is described as having from a normal cilice.

The book depicts the society as misogynistic, a claim which its defenders say has no basis in reality, because half of the leadership positions in Opus Dei are held by women.^[14]

Defenders also say that the novel's allegations of dealings between John Paul II and the society concerning the Vatican Bank also have no basis in reality. Allegedly due to these dealings, Opus Dei's founder was declared a Saint just 20 years after his death. In real life, Josemaría Escrivá was canonized 27 years after his death; admittedly faster than some others — but this is attributed to streamlining of the whole process and John Paul II's decision to make Escriva's sanctity and message known.^[15]

In the novel, the head of Opus Dei travels alone and makes momentous decisions on his own. In real life, the head of Opus Dei is usually accompanied by two other priests called custodes or guardians. Decision-making in Opus Dei is "collegial", i.e. the head only has one vote.

A part of the book's acknowledgments page is dedicated to five sources within Opus Dei itself, three active members and two former members. The Opus Dei Information Office though has asserted that Dan Brown never interviewed any active member of Opus Dei.^[16] Also, the Opus Dei Awareness Network's website is brought up within the narrative. This may indicate their web pages have been used as research source for the novels.

[edit] Early Israelites

While a character in the book claims that the early Israelites worshiped the goddess Shekinah as the equal to Yahweh, in fact, the term Shekinah (derived from Hebrew for "dwelling") does not appear in early Judaism at all, but was used in later Talmudic Judaism to refer to the "dwelling", or presence of God among his people. The term is used to describe a spiritual radiance.^[17] Dan Brown is probably confusing Shekinah with Asherah.

It is also suggested that the term Jehovah is an androgynous physical union between the masculine Jah and the pre-Hebraic name of Eve, Havah. YHWH (sometimes rendered Yahweh) is an ancient name while Jehovah is a medieval coinage created by inserting the vowels of Adonai into Yahweh. Neither of these names for God has any connection to the name of Eve, initial letter chet (ח), not hay (ה). It is generally believed that the four Hebrew letters that forms the Tetragrammaton (Yud, Hay, Vav, Hay) represent the tenses of the Hebrew word for to be – Quoting Exodus 3:14–15 (KJV), "And God said unto Moses, "I am that I am [...]". Actually, the phrase in Hebrew is "eh-yeh asher eh-yeh", which in English translation would be "I will be who (or what or that) I will be" as well as "I am who (or what or that) I am." Therefore, The Verb emphasizes God's absolute being.

[edit] The Vatican

In the story, it is repeatedly said that the Vatican was the center of power in the early Catholic Church, including reference to "the Vatican" suppressing Gnostic writings in the 4th century. Until the early Renaissance, the papal palace was in different locations, ranging from the cathedral of St. John Lateran, to Anagni, to Avignon. It was not until the 15th century that there was anything like official power in the vicinity of the Vatican Hill in Rome. In the 4th century, the Vatican was little more than a church and cemetery by the side of the road. Also, St. Peter's is referred to as a cathedral; it is technically a church. St Peter's is the second largest church in the world, and covers 5.7 acres; only the Basilica of Our Lady of Peace of Yamoussoukro is larger. The Pope's Cathedral Church (as it is more correctly called) is St. John Lateran, some distance away from the Vatican. St. Peter's is actually a basilica – a church of pilgrimage, built to house relics, in this case, those of Saint Peter.

[edit] Early Christian history

Characters in the novel suggest that the date of Christmas, the titles "Son of God" and "Light of the World" (the latter applied to Jesus in John, but applied to Jesus' disciples in Matthew), the virgin birth, Jesus' burial in a stone tomb and resurrection three days later were all copied from the pre-Christian devotion to Mithras. It is true that those scholars who apply practices of textual criticism to the books of the Bible believe there was a great deal of give and take of symbols and rituals (in both directions), but the specifics are hard to discern and can be conjectural only. Mithras is said to have been born fully grown out of a stone cave. There is no tradition about him having a mother, or about him dying and being resurrected.

It is stated that Christians observed the sabbath on Saturday until Constantine I changed the day to Sunday to syncretize it with the pagan veneration of the Sun. In the book of Acts it is written that Jesus's followers "gathered to break bread" on a Sunday Acts 3:21, and Paul instructs the Corinthians to put aside money every Sunday 1Corinthians 16:2. On the other hand many Christians did continue to observe the Jewish Sabbath for centuries. See Sabbath.

In the story, a character claims that the label "heretic" was used only after the Nicene Council, in order to persecute Gnostics. In fact, Irenaeus used the term "heresy" to label Gnostic teachings in the second century, long before the Church had any political power to persecute anyone.

[edit] The Bible

Brown is inaccurate in asserting that Constantine collated the present biblical canon and ordered the burning of the non-canonical Gospels, while editing others to suit his purposes. The Emperor exiled Arius and burned his works for his view that Jesus was a created being, divine but less than God the Father, but Arius did not write any "Gospels." Furthermore, Arianism did not call for the acceptance of Gnosticism or its Gospels. However, the Church hierarchy did attack various Gnostic teachings over history.

The book's claim of the Gospels being systematically edited after the Council of Nicaea is false, because of the impossible task of tracking down thousands of copies going around the Christian world (there was no "master registry" of Gospel manuscripts). There have been older pre-Nicene copies of the Gospel found to match post-Nicene ones. [26] The attitude that Brown has towards pre-Nicean Christians is that "until that moment in history, Jesus was viewed by His followers as a mortal prophet … a great and powerful man, but a man nonetheless." Why then would the canon of prominent second-century bishop Irenaeus take its cue from 1 Corinthians 8:6: "Yet for us there is but one God, the Father, from whom all things came and for whom we live; and there is but one Lord, Jesus Christ." The official Church canon was not decreed by Constantine; indeed, debate about the inclusion of the Apocrypha or deuterocanonical books continued after his time. The Council of Nicaea did not debate the canonical books, but about the relationship between Jesus and God. Constantine had very limited say in the Council.

The book also claims that the Gnostic Gospels (e.g. the Gospels of Thomas, Philip, Mary Magdalene, and the recently rediscovered Judas) are far older, less corrupted, and more accurate than the four included in the Bible. With the possible exception of Thomas, the other Gospels date from the 2nd Century through the 4th Century, while the canonical four are thought by most scholars to date from the 1st Century or early 2nd Century.[27] Gnostic Gospels also do not focus more on Jesus' humanity. The other Gospels we are aware of, for the most part, treat Jesus as more otherworldly and lack the humanizing detail of the Biblical accounts. The assertion of "more than eighty gospels" written, with only the familiar four chosen as canonical, greatly exaggerates the number of Gnostic Gospels written. There were indeed many Gnostic writings, but only a few claimed to be Gospels. Some of these so-called Gospels are only so called by some writers today. To these writers is also attributable the false identification of the writer of the Gnostic Gospel of Mary as Mary Magdalene. It is in fact not claimed within the work or by historical tradition that Mary Magdalene wrote that short work.

The assertions that the Dead Sea Scrolls, discovered in 1947, contain lost or hidden Gospels is also false. The scrolls contain books of the Old Testament, apocryphal and pseudepigraphic books, and manuals used by the Jewish Essene community at Qumran. All of the scrolls were written before the time of Christ; no Christian documents - orthodox, Gnostic, or otherwise - have ever been found at this site.

[edit] Non-Abrahamic mythology and religion

The book makes the assertion that the original Olympics were held "as a tribute to the magic of Venus" (Chapter 6), that is, Aphrodite. Although the origins of the Olympic festivals remain in obscurity, it has been well documented that they were religious festivals in honor of Zeus and Pelops, not Aphrodite. In fact, no women were allowed at these events.

The book claims that the Egyptian gods Amun and Isis represent a divine couple. In Egyptian (and later, Greco-Roman) mythology, Isis was never the spouse of Amun, but of Osiris (god of the underworld). Amun's spouse was Mut. Dan Brown also misleadingly claims that Amun was the god of masculine fertility, which was in fact Min. Nevertheless, in a late phase of Amun worship, he was merged with Min as Amun-Min. Brown spells the name "Amon", which is a common variant form, though "Amun" is now normative. This is necessary to make the claim that the name forms part of an anagram of "Mona Lisa", however it also raises the question whether Brown intended to refer to the Hellenized version of the cult, in which the name is normally spelled "Ammon". Some of the confusion may come from Margaret Murray's debunked historical claims of secretive European worship of Ammon during the Middle Ages. Murray's theories were a major influence on Wicca.

[edit] Historical disputes

'The reality of Dan Brown's research is that it is superficial... Mr Brown knew very little about how the historical background was researched.'

Mr Justice Smith, April 2006

[edit] Leonardo da Vinci

The title The Da Vinci Code is not especially precise: Leonardo da Vinci is nearly always referred to by scholars as "Leonardo." The "da Vinci" part of his name is not his surname. It means "from Vinci" and refers to the town from which Leonardo's father came, and has generally not been used by itself to refer to him. However, naming conventions for artists are often inconsistent. (Michelangelo Buonarroti is known as "Michelangelo", while Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio is known as "Caravaggio", after his home town. Of course, this may simply be a convenient way to distinguish the two Michelangelos). The name "da Vinci" may have been used because it is more specific than "Leonardo", a relatively common name.

There is little in Leonardo da Vinci's biography that suggests any involvement with secret societies. Also Leonardo painted very little, and he considered his inventions and his intelligence far more important than his art. His drawings were often part of scientific study and were not intended as solely artistic endeavors.

The contention that the "Mona Lisa" was painted by Leonardo as a self-portrait and that its title is a coded reference to the names of the Egyptian gods Amon and Isis: Mona Lisa's historical identity is unknown, but the majority opinion is that the painting depicts Lisa Gherardini, a family friend of Leonardo's. However, some researchers have concluded, using "morphing" techniques, that the resemblance to Leonardo's alleged self-portrait is striking (Lillian Schwartz of Bell Labs, and Digby Quested of the Maudsley Hospital in London). At any rate, the title "Mona Lisa" was not chosen by Leonardo, and was not applied to the painting until the 19th century. "Mona" is a contraction of "madonna" (meaning 'lady' or 'madam'); "Lisa" is from an identification with Lisa Gherardini. It is also more commonly known as "La Gioconda" in Italian (Gherardini's married surname, the feminine form of "Giocondo"). The painting was kept by Leonardo and was with him when he died, which can be construed as a hint that the image had some special significance. It is, however, perfectly possible that the Mona Lisa was just another painting and Leonardo kept it for perfectly mundane reasons (eg. a dispute over payment).

The Last Supper was a commission and was the wall of a dining room in the Convent of Santa Maria delle Grazie in Milan, Italy.^[18] The notion of the Last Supper showing Mary Magdalene instead of John on the right of Jesus, and the connected claim of the absence of the chalice from the painting, are disputed for a few reasons, which have already been covered above.

There is no evidence for the contention that the first version of Leonardo's The Virgin of the Rocks was rejected by the church because of its heretical content. There is, however, evidence for a lengthy legal dispute over payments and expenses.

The book matter-of-factly states that Leonardo da Vinci was a "flamboyant homosexual." While there are clues about Leonardo's personal life that strongly suggest that he was homosexual, it is not conclusively known to be a fact, nor do scholars agree upon this. If Leonardo was homosexual, he must have been rather discreet and certainly not flamboyant.^{[citation needed]}

[edit] The Knights Templar

Main article: Knights Templar

See also: Knights Templar legends

The claim that the Order of the Knights Templar was formed by the Priory of Sion is entirely false. The Priory of Sion has been proven to be a hoax which was started in France in 1956 by Pierre Plantard. The Templars were founded in the early 12th century by Hughes de Payens, a French nobleman who was a veteran of the First Crusade.

The suggestion that all churches used by the Knights Templar were built round, and that roundness was considered an insult by the Church is false. Some churches used by the Templars were not round, and those that were round were so in tribute to the architecture already in place where the Templars had their headquarters in Jerusalem, such as the Dome of the Rock and the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. In fact, there are quite a number of round churches, including the famous Round Church in Cambridge and the Peterskirche in Vienna. The city of Rome itself boasts a good number of round churches, among them Sant'Andrea al Quirinale and San Bernardo alle Terme, Sant'Anna dei Palafrenieri, and Bramante's Tempietto, built on the site of St. Peter's crucifixion at the church of San Pietro in Montorio.

The statement that the Templars' initial headquarters was "a stable under the ruins" is false. King Baldwin II of Jerusalem gave them quarters in a wing of the royal palace on the southeastern portion of the Temple Mount platform, in the Al Aqsa Mosque.

One of the cryptex clues claims that the Knights Templar worshiped a pre-Christian fertility god (a "Horned God") named Baphomet. However, this is from a list of trumped-up charges that were generated during the Templars' trial by Inquisitors. Most of the 100-odd charges were complete fabrications generated by King Philip IV of France, in his effort to disband the Templars over a financial dispute in the early 1300s. The only Templars who "confessed" did so only under torture, and then tended to recant once the torture ceased. The Templars were in fact innocent of the charges, and King Philip is known to have instigated his campaign against the Templars mostly because he did not wish to repay his loans to them. The word Baphomet that appeared in Templar inquisition documents was probably a misspelling of the word "Mohammed." The image of the "horned god" did not become associated with the name Baphomet until the 19th century, when the name began to be associated with Satanism.

The allegation that the legend of Friday the 13th started with the arrest of the Templars in France on October 13, 1307 is false. Though it is true that that happened on a Friday that was the 13th, there is no credible evidence for the existence of a superstition about Friday the 13th existing before the early 1900s.

The claim that Rosslyn Chapel was built by the Knights Templar is false. It was actually founded by Sir William St Clair, third Earl of Orkney and Lord of Rosslyn. Furthermore, its construction began in 1470, long after the Knights were suppressed. The Templar Order was dissolved in 1312, with the majority of its assets being transferred to another Order at the time, the Knights Hospitaller.

The theory that Gothic architecture was designed by the Templars to record the secret of the sacred feminine is false. Historians note that Templars were not involved with European cathedrals of the time, which were generally commissioned by their own bishops. The Templars were actually very misogynistic, and their Rule forbid them from touching any women, even those in their own family. "The company of women is a dangerous thing, for by it the old devil has led many from the straight path to Paradise". (Piers Paul Read, The Templars, 1999, p. 102)

There are some who claim that the Templars were related to Freemasons, or who depict the Templars as builders, guild-founders and secret-bearers. However, this is demonstrably incorrect, and many point to abundant evidence that Templars did not themselves engage in building projects or found guilds for masons. The claim has been made that the Templars were largely illiterate men unlikely to know "sacred geometry," purportedly handed down from the pyramids' builders. Helen Nicholson points to membership information of the Templars and other documentary evidence that shows beyond all question that the purpose of the Templars was to defend the Holy Land, protect pilgrims visiting Jerusalem or other holy sites, defend Christendom against the Muslims, and to raise money for the paying and manning of castles in those war-torn regions in order to have bases from which to carry out sorties against the Saracens, to provide centres of authority and protection in regions where there was no central authority, and to provide a place of safety for Christians travelling far from home. (Nicholson, Helen. The Knights Templar: A New History. Sutton Publishing Limited, Gloucestershire, p.2).

The allegation that Pope Clement V burned the ashes of the Templars and threw them into the Tiber River in Rome is false. The last leaders of the Knights Templar were killed in France in 1314 by King Philip IV of France, being burned at the stake on a small island in the Seine. Pope Clement's administration was not even in Rome -- he had moved the papacy to Avignon.

The claim that the Templars gained power because of something they excavated in Jerusalem is false. They gained power for several reasons - one of those reasons is that one of the most powerful churchmen of the time, Bernard de Clairvaux (later declared a Saint), who was also a nephew of one of the original nine knights, supported them. He wrote a powerful letter called "In Praise of the New Knighthood", and spoke on their behalf at the Council of Troyes in 1128 (nine years after the Order's founding). It was at that council that the Order was officially recognized and confirmed, which is what triggered the support and donations that started pouring in from around Europe.

[edit] The Priory of Sion

Main article: The Priory of Sion in the Da Vinci Code

The portrayal of the Priory of Sion as an ancient organization connected to goddess-worship is incorrect: The actual "Priory of Sion" was founded in 1956 by Pierre Plantard, Andre Bonhomme and others, not in 1099 as claimed in the book, and it was named after a mountain in France, not the biblical Mount Zion. Les Dossiers Secrets was a forgery created by Philippe de Cherisey for Plantard. Plantard, under oath, eventually admitted that the whole thing was fabricated.^[19] There is evidence of a Templar-era monastic order by the name Abbey of Sion (not Priory), but there are no records of its continued existence beyond the 12th century, at which time the monks from the destroyed church belonging to the Abbey moved to Sicily. In 1617, those remaining monks became absorbed into the Jesuit Order. Some confusion may also be due to the use of the moniker to describe the Rosicrucian brotherhood, who may have been the focus of earlier ideas about a secretive, long-lasting secret society.

[edit] The Holy Grail and The Holy Blood

Main article: The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail

The legend of The Holy Grail alleged that a sacred relic (either the cup used at the Last Supper, or the cup said to have been used by Joseph of Arimathea to collect blood of Christ, or both) existed, which would bring untold blessings to any pure knight who found it. The story appeared around the time of the Crusades (for rather obvious reasons), disappeared, and then resurfaced in Thomas Malory's Le Morte d'Arthur. In old French, The Holy Grail would be translated as 'San Graal'. However the Da Vinci code has twisted this into 'Sang Real' which would mean 'Royal Blood'. The term "Sangreal" was coined by Medieval writers, giving the original Gothic word a false etymology to create an atmosphere of romanticism. There is also no evidence that the Knights Templar found any such thing under The Temple.

[edit] France

[edit] The Last Temptation of Christ

Teabing claims that the French government banned the film version of The Last Temptation of Christ. In fact, only the shooting of the film was banned.

[edit] Paris

Several claims about the Church of Saint-Sulpice in Paris are disputed. While there is a brass line running north-south through the church, it is not a part of the Paris Meridian, which passes about 100 metres east of it. The line is instead more of a gnomon or sundial/calendar, meant to mark the solstice and equinoxes. Further, there is no evidence that there was ever a temple of Isis on the site. This note has been on display in the church: "Contrary to fanciful allegations in a recent best-selling novel, this [the line in the floor] is not a vestige of a pagan temple. No such temple ever existed in this place. It was never called a Rose-Line. It does not coincide with the meridian traced through the middle of the Paris Observatory which serves as a reference for maps where longitudes are measured in degrees East or West of Paris. Please also note that the letters P and S in the small round windows at both ends of the transept refer to Peter and Sulpice, the patron saints of the church, and not an imaginary Priory of Sion." (Source: UK Channel 4 programme Tony Robinson's The Real Da Vinci Code, first broadcast 3 Feb 2005)

The reference to Paris having been founded by the Merovingians (Chapter 55) is false; in fact, the city was settled by Gauls by the 3rd Century BC. The Romans, who knew it as Lutetia, captured it in 52 BC under Julius Caesar, and left substantial ruins in the city, including an amphitheater and public baths. The Merovingians did not rule in France until the 6th century AD, by which time Paris was at least 800 years old.

The book states that at the explicit demand of French President François Mitterrand, the Louvre Pyramid in Paris was constructed with 666 panes of glass. According to GlassWeb, the pyramid contains 603 diamond-shaped and 70 triangular panes of glass, totalling 673.

The novel claims that the top of the Centre Pompidou can be seen from the Arc du Carrousel (chapter 3). This is incorrect.

The book erroneously places Versailles to the north-west of Paris, when actually it is approximately 25 kilometres west-south-west of Paris city centre.

Jacques Saunière is sporadically described as "the curator of the Louvre." Actually the Louvre has eight departments, each with a chief curator (conservateur en chef) and several subordinate curators. They are all civil servants (fonctionnaires), so that they cannot work, as Saunière is described as doing, at the post-retirement age of seventy-six.

The itinerary by which Langdon is taken from the Ritz to the Louvre is doubly wrong. a) It is stated that the Eiffel tower can be seen from the corner of the Rue de Rivoli and rue de Castiglione (coming from the Ritz). It can't. It only becomes visible when you reach the Place de la Concorde. b) Brown has the car enter the Jardin des Tuileries, which is doubly impossible : 1) the entrance at that point is atop a terrace, the car could not negotiate the stairs to go down to main garden level; 2) The gates would be closed at night, and even by day they are almost never open wide enough to admit a car.

[edit] Language

In Chapter 48 Langdon, who admittedly (and, for a supposed Harvard humanities professor specializing in the Middle Ages, strangely) doesn't know French, asks Sophie Neveu if her grandfather had ever spoken to her of something called la clef de voûte, to which she replies "The key to the vault?" Langdon then tries to explain to her about the architectural meaning. But clef de voûte is very commonly used in French, both in the literal, architectural sense of keystone (and keystones are readily visible all over France in arched doorways and other arches, such as the Arc de Triomphe and the Arc de Triomphe du Carrousel, both of which figure in the book) and in the figurative sense of the central point of a theory or system. Moreover, clef de voûte cannot possibly mean "key to the vault" since voûte is not the French term for a bank vault.

[edit] Education

The banker André Vernet is described as a graduate of a prep school and the Sorbonne, probably in an attempt to indicate his elite education.

However, this is not how the French educational system actually works. It is twofold, composed mainly of Grandes Ecoles ("Great Schools") and universities.

Elites stem out of the Grandes Ecoles, in which the studies last on average three years. Prior to those, French students have to take nationwide selections: top-graded students can enter the best schools, others (in decreasing order of ranking to the examination) have to take what remains available. To be specifically prepared to those examinations, French students study in the classes préparatoires for on average two to three years. The term can roughly be translated as "prep school". You don't graduate from prep school: if you fail to enter a school (or a school you think is good enough for you), you don't get any degree. Graduation comes at the end of the Grande Ecole.

Sorbonne, despite its historical fame, is in French terms "merely" a university (actually, three Paris universities share the name -- Paris I, III and IV). Although universities can be very good in specific fields, "mainstream" education (business, engineering, etc.) is better in the grandes écoles.

André Vernet's education would mean that he failed the grandes écoles exams at the end of prep school and afterwards attended the Sorbonne. This is not considered as elite education.

[edit] European geography

The book's storyline that the "Albino Monk" was arrested in France, imprisoned in Andorra and escaped to Spain, demonstrates the lack of basic research that would be gleaned from a quick glance at a map or tourist guide. It is improbable that someone arrested along the French coast would be imprisoned in another country (in this case Andorra which is a different jurisdiction and several hundred kilometers away up in the Pyrenean mountains).

Later in the book, Silas escapes from the prison due to a strong earthquake (although Andorra is not a particularly seismically active region), takes a train and travels for 3 days until he reaches "a village" in which a missionary-bishop (Aringarosa) gives him refuge. The village turns out to be Oviedo, in which Silas lives for a few years and helps Aringarosa to build a new church. This is inaccurate because the actual Oviedo is a relatively rich city of around 200,000 inhabitants, and one of the economic, industrial and cultural centers of Asturias, in northern Spain. It is impossible to arrive there by train from Andorra, as Andorra has no train line. Moreover, it is hard to believe that the bishop of Oviedo (actually an archbishop) lives in an unfinished church rather than the 16th century Archbishop's Palace of the city.

In chapter 93, a police officer telephones the Opus Dei Centre in London. "This is the London police", he says. This body of officers does not exist and is never referred to as such. Law and order in the capital is the business of the Metropolitan police and the City of London Police.

After the scene in the Temple Church, London, the heroes of the story take the tube from Temple Station to King's College. In fact King's College is nearer to the Temple Church than to Temple Station, and any tube journey would have carried them further away from King's College.

The Chapter House at Westminster is described as "overlooking" College Gardens. This appears to be true from a guide-book plan, but in fact the windows of the Chapter House are above head height and made of opaque stained glass.

At the start of chapter 104, (Rosslyn Chapel), Brown states "The chapel's geographic coordinates fall precisely on the north-south meridian that runs through Glastonbury". This statement is incorrect: Rosslyn Chapel lies on longitude 3:07:13 west and Glastonbury Tor 2:42:05 west. Brown appears to have confused geographic north with magnetic north. Much significance has been placed on a statement that lodestones placed at each location will point at each other. Rosslyn Chapel currently lies within 1 degree of magnetic north of Glastonbury (the magnetic pole moves over time). However, with this level of accuracy, Rosslyn Chapel could lie anywhere between Glasgow and Edinburgh, which are 74 km (46 miles) apart, and the statement would still hold.

[edit] Scientific disputes

[edit] Astronomy

Venus is depicted as visible in the east shortly after sunset (Chapter 105), which is an astronomical impossibility. This was corrected to "west" in some later editions, such as the 28th printing of the British paperback, ISBN 0-552-14951-9 and apparently current printings of the US hardback.^[20]

Brown characterized the cycle of Venus as "trac[ing] a perfect pentacle across the ecliptic sky every four years", but Venus completes five cycles in eight years,^[21] a fact well-known to the ancient Greeks and Mayans. This was changed to "eight years" in some later editions such as the British paperback and at least the April 2003 printing of the US hardback.^[22]

[edit] Technology and engineering

• The Beechcraft Baron 58 is referred to as a turboprop. In fact, this aircraft is powered by two 300 hp Continental piston engines.
• GPS tracking device cannot work inside a heavily walled building. GPS antenna needs a clear view of at least a portion of the sky for satellite signal reception. The wavelength of the carrier wave (about 20 cm) would make the button size receiver (antenna) impractical (very inefficient). The GPS receiver described in the book is, however, also a transmitter. If so, then the tracking could have been done using the transmitted signal alone, without the GPS circuitry. Furthermore, the device could then easily contain a microphone, which would have been much more useful in the situation described, and--unlike the GPS device in the book--is technically feasible.
• A plane flying from New York to Rome would not fly over Portugal. Planes don't fly along straight lines on a Mercator map (which would intersect Portugal). Instead, planes fly (and ships sail) along great circles, which (over such long east-west distances) take them much more north. See [28]. Furthermore, a cell phone would not work inside a plane at cruise altitude (typically above 35,000 ft at such a late stage of the flight).
• When the taxi driver pulls over in the Bois de Boulogne, he is said to put the car "in park". Minutes later, when Langdon climbs into the front seat, he struggles with the clutch and stickshift. Manual transmission cars do not have a "Park" gear.

[edit] Miscellaneous

• The allegation that "the Church burned at the stake five million women" as witches has been a problem for many critics because data does not exist to permit an estimate. Reports have ranged from between the extremely high figures of 9 million and extremely low figures of mere hundreds, both of which have been vigorously challenged. More considered estimates range between 40,000 and 60,000 (of which 20 percent were men). Witch trials were mostly carried out by secular courts, and not by the Catholic Church. Witch burnings were much more prevalent in later Protestant denominations. The witch hunts were not an organized policy of the Catholic Church against women; rather, they were the result of superstition, paranoia and folk belief. Many clergymen spoke out against the witch craze. One of the most virulent witch-hunter books, the Malleus Maleficarum, was actually rejected by clerical scholars and banned by the Inquisition. The German Jesuit Friedrich von Spee wrote the Cautio Criminalis, a book that condemned the witch trials and torture in general.

• The association of "left" with terms such as "sinister" and other negative overtones is older than Christianity. The pre-Christian Latin word for left was sinister, with negative implications, and the word for right was dexter (a root-word for the word Dexterity, for example), with positive implications. The distinction also exists in other cultures, such as Hinduism (for instance, "left hand tantra"). While the claim that "left brain" colloquially means irrational, emotional mind is true, the theory from which this popular notion arose has long been discredited - the left hemisphere of the brain is associated with analysis and detailed thought and control of the right side of the body. In addition, its inclusion seems to suggest that the church was able to control the functioning of all human brains in order to propagate bias against women. The book's insinuation that liberal parties' delegation to the left wing of legislatures is derived from early Christian slander against the left is also false, as the term originates from the French Revolution, when liberal deputies from the Third Estate generally sat to the left of the president's chair, while the more conservative nobility, members of the Second Estate, generally sat to the right, a habit which began in the Estates General of 1789 and not at the beginning of Christianity.

• Brown's hero, Robert Langdon, is a world-renowned professor of "religious symbology" at Harvard University. In real life, there is no such formal discipline as "religious symbology". It is more properly defined as an approach or model of study within the anthropology of religion or symbolic anthropology. Related to symbology is semiotics or semiology, which is a formal discipline and the field of such people as Ferdinand de Saussure and Umberto Eco. Also, Harvard does not offer a course in semiotics, religion-related or not.

• Albinos typically have very poor vision; in fact, many are legally blind. It is therefore highly unlikely that the albino Silas could ever become an expert marksman, or even that he could drive at night.

• It is stated that the Dead Sea Scrolls were found in "the 1950s", when in fact the initial discovery was made in 1947, with additional documents being located up to 1956.

• In his lecture on the Divine Proportion, Langdon states that the proportion of male to female bees in a hive is always in this ratio. This is false, as the ratio can vary widely and is nonetheless usually greater than the Divine Proportion. Some other claims regarding the occurrence of this ratio in nature, such as the spirals in the shell of a Nautilus, are either false or dubious.

• In the novel, the Gospel of Philip refers to Mary Magdalene as Jesus' "companion", and that Aramaic scholars know this means "wife". However, Professor James Robinson, an authority on the gnostic gospels, has pointed out, "companion" was not necessarily a sex-related term. Also, "the Gospel of Philip is in Coptic, translated from Greek, so there is no word in the text for Aramaic scholars to consider".

• In the novel, Brown says the gnostic gospels found in Nag Hammadi, Egypt, in 1945, were "scrolls". They were actually codices- individual pages bound together as books.

• In the novel, Brown states that the English "sinister" comes from the Italian sinistra, "left". However, he is wrong in assuming that this is why radical political thought is commonly called "left wing". The political distinction between "left" and "right" arose from the seating arrangement in the French National Assembly during the Revolution. Those for the Revolution sat on the left, and those against, on the right. (Some argue that the distinction originated from Frankfurt Parliament during the Revolutions of 1848)

• Brown claims that the modern word "horny" is derived from the horns belonging to the god Amon, the supposed Egyptian god of fertility (see further up the page). It is actually from the 19th century phrase "to have the horn", where the "horn" in question is a euphemism for the penis.^[23]

• Brown claims that "minstrel" shares an etymological root with "minister" because minstrels were ministers of the Church of Mary Magdalene. The link is actually that the word used to apply to jesters whose jobs were considered a court position, and therefore ministerial. There is no religious connection, and the job of jester/minstrel in this context was considered entertainment, and doesn't apply to the use of song to convey religious ideas as Brown suggests. The definition changed in the 16th century to include storytellers, but the word minstrel is three centuries older than that.^[24]

• Since the name Isis was changed to L'Isa (meaning 'the Isis'), Amon should have read L'Amon since both names begin with a vowel.

• It is surprising that Brown did not note the relationship between Earth and Venus. The ratio of Venus' year to Earth's year is approximately 1.618.

• Dan Brown claimed that Ariel from Disney's The Little Mermaid was Walt Disney's personal hint of knowing the Holy Grail/Sacred Feminine conspiracy, he cited Ariel's possession of a Da Vinci painting and her red hair. Walt Disney had been dead for several years before the Disney Studio even planned to make the Little Mermaid. Brown also claims that the word SEX appears in a scene in The Lion King. What actually appears is SFX, a reference to the CGI-work used in many of the film's sequences.

• The verse from Job 38:11 that is "only seven words" long actually has 17 words. The full verse reads: "And said, Hitherto shalt thou come, but no further: and here shall thy proud waves be stayed?".

• The term "dark con", supposedly used by the Priory of Sion for centuries, is anachronistic: the word "con" was coined in the United States after 1889, when the term "confidence man" first appeared[29]

[edit] Linguistic Oversight

On page 403, Langdon and Teabing explain why English is a superior language: "The Priory, like many European secret societies at odds with the Church, had considered English the only European pure language for centuries. Unlike French, Spanish and Italian, which were rooted in Latin - the tongue of the Vatican - English was linguistically removed from Rome's propaganda machine, and therefore became a sacred, secret tongue for those brotherhoods educated enough to use it."

The passage seems to suggest that English, alone among European languages, is removed from Latin origins. In fact, most European languages, including all Germanic and Slavic languages, did not directly descend from Latin. Also, because English is an Indo-European language, it is distantly related to Latin; there exist several other European languages, including Hungarian, Finnish, and Basque that are not. The fact that English derives substantial portions of its vocabulary from French and Latin means that English is closer to Latin than many European languages, a fact of which the characters seem to be unaware. Besides, at the period in history discussed, English had not yet become a major language and was one of many regional European languages that would not have been comparable to French, Italian or Latin.

When the Vatican and the Latin language were challenged, it was through the vernacular of German, in the writings of Martin Luther. German, not English, was the first significant language of opposition to the Vatican, culminating in the Reformation. Later, German nationalists of the Romantic period did also argue that German was a "pure language", which, unlike English, was uncorrupted by Latin. This fact is ignored by the characters in the book.

[edit] Literary criticism

The novel has also attracted criticism in literary circles for its supposed lack of artistic or literary merit and its allegedly stereotyped portrayal of British and French characters.

• The acclaimed author Salman Rushdie called it "a book so bad it makes bad books look good," and stated that "Even Dan Brown must live. Preferably not write, but live."

• Stephen Fry has referred to Brown's writings as "complete loose stool-water" and "arse gravy of the worst kind." In a live chat on 14 June 2006, he clarified, "I just loathe all those book[s] about the Holy Grail and Masons and Catholic conspiracies and all that botty-dribble. I mean, there's so much more that's interesting and exciting in art and in history. It plays to the worst and laziest in humanity, the desire to think the worst of the past and the desire to feel superior to it in some fatuous way."^[25]

• In his 2005 University of Maine Commencement Address, best-selling author Stephen King put Dan Brown's work and "Jokes for the John" on the same level, calling such literature the "intellectual equivalent of Kraft Macaroni and Cheese."^[26]

• The New York Times, while reviewing the movie based on the book, called the book "Dan Brown's best-selling primer on how not to write an English sentence".^[27]

• The New Yorker reviewer Anthony Lane refers to it as "unmitigated junk" and decries "the crumbling coarseness of the style."^[28]

• Linguist Geoffrey Pullum and others have been posting several entries critical of Dan Brown's writing, at Language Log.^[29]

• The comedian Stewart Lee used his dislike of "The Da Vinci Code", and Dan Brown's work in general, to drive part of his 2005 show, "90s Comedian". Presenting disbelief at the writer's popularity and telling his audience that "this is not literature, and you must understand that", he facetiously describes an imagined anti-Dan Brown poster campaign involving a picture of a toilet, with some excrement in it, and a copy of "The Da Vinci Code". A speech bubble emanating from one of the pieces of excrement would say "Oh no, there goes the neighbourhood". Invariably, his audiences applaud this sentiment.

• Roger Ebert described it as "potboiler written with little grace and style," although he did say it did "supply an intriguing plot."^[30]

[edit] Allegations of plagiarism

Two lawsuits have been brought alleging plagiarism in The Da Vinci Code.^[31] —both were unsuccessful.

On April 11, 2005, novelist Lewis Perdue sued Brown and his publisher Random House for plagiarizing his novels The Da Vinci Legacy (1983) and Daughter of God (2000), claiming "there are far too many parallels between my books and The Da Vinci Code for it to be an accident." ² On 4 August 2005, District Judge George B. Daniels granted a motion for summary judgment and dismissed the suit, ruling that "a reasonable average lay observer would not conclude that The Da Vinci Code is substantially similar to Daughter of God. Any slightly similar elements are on the level of generalized or otherwise unprotectable ideas." He affirmed that The Da Vinci Code does not infringe upon copyrights held by Perdue (see^[32]).

In February 2006, Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, two of the three authors of The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail, took the UK publisher of The Da Vinci Code to court for breach of copyright, alleging plagiarism.^[33] Some sources suggested the lawsuit was a publicity stunt^[34] intended to boost sales of The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail (a boost which did in fact occur). However, the projected court costs of over 1 million pounds outweigh or at least substantially reduce the financial benefit of the lawsuit.^[35]

Dan Brown repeatedly said in his defence that history cannot be plagiarised and therefore the accusations of the two authors were false. Leigh stated, "It's not that Dan Brown has lifted certain ideas because a number of people have done that before. It's rather that he's lifted the whole architecture - the whole jigsaw puzzle - and hung it on to the peg of a fictional thriller".^[36] Dan Brown has admitted some of the ideas taken from Baigent and Leigh's work were indispensable to the book but stated that there were many other sources also behind it. However, he admitted that neither he nor his wife had read Baigent and Leigh's book when he produced his original "synopsis" of the novel.^[37] Many readers have noticed, however, that Sir Leigh Teabing's surname happens to be an anagram of "Baigent", and his first name happens to be "Leigh."

On 7 April 2006, High Court judge Peter Smith rejected the copyright-infringement claim by Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, and Dan Brown won the court case.^[38] However, in the published extracts of his judgement^[39] the judge criticised the non-appearance of Blythe Brown and the vagueness of Dan Brown's evidence saying "He has presented himself as being a deep and thorough researcher...evidence in this case demonstrates that as regards DVC [The Da Vinci Code] that is simply not correct with respect to historical lectures".^[40]

The judge, Peter Smith, also included a code in his judgment. Throughout the judgment, apparently random letters are italicised and these form the message. The letters in the first paragraphs spell smithy code and the rest appear as follows "jaeiextostgpsacgreamqwfkadpmqzv". This was subsequently decoded to read "Smithy Code Jackie Fisher who are you Dreadnought",^[41] referring to the British admiral whom Judge Smith admires. As with the book, this secret message made use of Fibonacci numbers for its encoding.

[edit] Christian response

US Catholic bishops launched a website rebutting the key claims in the novel. The bishops are concerned about what they perceive as errors and serious mis-statements in The Da Vinci Code.

The Catholic personal prelature Opus Dei worked with American and British TV networks on independent documentaries about the organisation to be broadcast around the movie's release. Reporters were invited to tour the headquarters in the US, which is a residence for Opus Dei members and a centre for community activities.

Christian organizations also planned to meet moviegoers with protests and prayers outside theaters nationwide, termed "Rejecting The Da Vinci Code Protests" by the Catholic "American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property (TFP)". After collecting more than 60,000 signatures in protest of the "blasphemous film", the Catholic organization set out for a one-thousand theater protest with tens of thousands of people around the country.

At a conference on April 28 2006 Archbishop Angelo Amato, the secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, a Vatican curial department, specifically called for a boycott of the film version of The Da Vinci Code; he said the movie is "full of calumnies, offenses, and historical and theological errors."^[42]

In contrast, some Catholic groups did not urge protests or boycotts but sought to use interest in this book and film as a means to educate Catholics and non-Catholics on what the Catholic Church teaches regarding Jesus Christ and the history of the Church.^[43]

Also, many other Christians have looked to use the film as a tool for evangelism.^[44] For instance, in Australia, the Anglican Church set up a website called "Challenging Da Vinci",^[45] and sought to have trailers before the movie inviting patrons to visit the site. Numerous Anglican churches simultaneously held events discussing the claims of the book and film.

In India, home to 18 million catholics (1.8% of the population), the Central Board of Film Certification gave the film an adult rating on condition that disclaimers saying it was a work of fiction were inserted at the beginning and end of the film.[30]

In Pakistan the small Christian minority, which constitutes around 1% of the population, successfully lobbied against the release of the film. As such the film adaptation is officially banned in Pakistan.

[edit] Notes

1. ^ "Bizarre True Facts from The Da Vinci Code,"
2. ^ Geobiology.com
3. ^ [1]
4. ^ Mark 16:3
5. ^ [2]
6. ^ [3]
7. ^ [4]
8. ^ Catholic Encyclopedia article
9. ^ Catholic Forum: Saint Mary Magdalene
10. ^ [5]
11. ^ [6]
12. ^ Da Vinci Grail
13. ^ Extremely detailed views of these are to be found in P.B. Barcilon and P.C. Marinin, Leonardo: The Last Supper, University of Chicago Press, 1999. pp.179, 308-11. Barcilon states that "The door's decorative molding, which probably simulated different wood grains, is embellished at the center by a clypeus motif in light tones." p.345
14. ^ See books on Opus Dei by John Allen, Jr. and Vittorio Messori.
15. ^ John Allen, Jr. (2005). Opus Dei: An Objective Look Behind the Myths and Reality of the Most Controversial Force in the Catholic Church. Doubleday Religion. 
16. ^ [7]
17. ^ Bible History: Shekinah Glory
18. ^ Art History: The Last Supper
19. ^ Priory of Sion.com, Paul Smith's website
20. ^ [8]
21. ^ [9]; Freemasonry information
22. ^ [10]
23. ^ Etymology of "horny"
24. ^ Etymology of "minstrel"
25. ^ Douglas Adams viewtopic
26. ^ Stephen King address, University of Maine
27. ^ New York Times review
28. ^ New Yorker review
29. ^ Language Log, The Dan Brown code (also follow other links at the bottom of that page)
30. ^ [11]
31. ^ Report in The Scotsman
32. ^ full ruling, PDF
33. ^ Maev Kennedy, In a packed high court, a new twist in The Da Vinci Code begins to unfold, The Guardian, 28 February 2006
34. ^ Expanding on a theory isn't plagiarism, Collegiate Times, 14 March 2006
35. ^ Publish and be damned if you don't sell more, The Birmingham Post, 10 March 2006
36. ^ Da Vinci trial pits history against art, The Observer, 26 February 2006
37. ^ The key to "The Da Vinci Code?" Dan Brown's wife, Reuters/Yahoo! News, 16 March 2006
38. ^ Court rejects Da Vinci copy claim, BBC News, 7 April 2006
39. ^ The Da Vinci Code case judgement, BBC News, 7 April 2006
40. ^ Full text
41. ^ . Judge's own Da Vinci code cracked (HTML). BBC News. Retrieved on April 28, 2006.
42. ^ ANSA Christian Post Catholic World News
43. ^ [12] [13]
44. ^ [14]
45. ^ Challenging Da Vinci

In fact, the American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property ended up insipring well over two thousand theater protests against the film nationwide.

[edit] References

• Amy Welborn, De-coding da Vinci: The Facts Behind the Fiction of the Da Vinci Code (Our Sunday Visitor, 2004). ISBN 1-59276-101-1
• Richard Abanes, The Truth Behind the Da Vinci Code (Harvest House Publishers, 2004). ISBN 0-7369-1439-0
• Darrel Bock, Breaking The Da Vinci Code: Answers to the Questions Everybody's Asking (Nelson Books, 2004). ISBN 0-7852-6046-3
• Dan Burstein (ed), Secrets of the Code (CDS Books, 2004). ISBN 1-59315-022-9
• Bart D. Ehrman, Truth and Fiction in The Da Vinci Code (Oxford University Press, 2004). ISBN 0-19-518140-9
• Nicky Gumbel, The Da Vinci Code: a response (Alpha International). ISBN 1-904074-81-2
• Hank Hanegraaff and Paul Maier, Da Vinci Code: Fact or Fiction? (Tyndale House Publishers, 2004). ISBN 1-4143-0279-7
• Steve Kellmeyer, Fact and Fiction in The Da Vinci Code (Bridegroom Press, 2004). ISBN 0-9718128-6-1
• Martin Lunn, Da Vinci Code Decoded (The Disinformation Company, 2004). ISBN 0-9729529-7-7
• Carl Olson, Sandra Miesel, The Da Vinci Hoax (Ignatius Press, 2004). ISBN 1-58617-034-1
• Essak, Shelley, The Florentine School and the Portrayal of Male Youth. Accessed at About.com
• Esaak, Shelley, Leonardo da Vinci - The Last Supper. Accessed at About.com
• Opus Dei al dia Blogs & books about Opus Dei (in Spanish)

[edit] External links

• Da Vinci Code Correlations with Gulliver's Travels - Items on Alexander Pope and Isaac Newton
• History vs The Da Vinci Code Analysis of the historical claims made in the novel compared to the evidence, from a non-religious perspective.
• The Da Vinci Code (Theopedia - has multimedia resources)
• The Key to The Da Vinci Code (Crombie Jardine Publishing, 2005)
• Debunking the "Da Vinci Code" Debunkers and the Jesus Myth (Article by Geoff Price)
• The Biblical Resource Database Links and Resources
• The Da Vinci Code, the Catholic Church and Opus Dei Official Opus Dei response - Compares assertions from the Da Vinci Code to the existing Opus Dei
• The Da Vinci Code A critique by a priest of the Opus Dei prelature in Sydney.
• The Da Vinci Codex Metaphor As Code
• Decoding Da Vinci An Article comparing history to the novel
• The Da Vinci Code - the book, the movie, the deception
• About-Jesus.org article refuting claims that paganism influenced Christianity
• Howstuffworks:How The Da Vinci Code Doesn't Work
• Why Is The Da Vinci Code So Popular?