Gray Wolf
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
![]() |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Scientific classification | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Canis lupus Linnaeus, 1758 |
||||||||||||||
![]() Range map
|
The Gray Wolf (Canis lupus; also spelled Grey Wolf, see spelling differences; also known as Timber Wolf or Wolf) is a mammal in the order Carnivora. The Gray Wolf shares a common ancestry with the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris), as evidenced by DNA sequencing and genetic drift studies.[2] Gray wolves were once abundant and distributed over much of North America, Eurasia, and the Middle East. Today, for a variety of human-related reasons, including widespread habitat destruction and excessive hunting, wolves inhabit only a very limited portion of their former range. Though listed as a species of least concern for extinction worldwide, for some regions including the Continental United States, the species is listed as endangered or threatened.[3]
The Gray Wolf, being a keystone predator, is an important part of the ecosystems to which it typically belongs. The wide range of habitats where wolves thrive reflects their adaptability as a species, and includes temperate forests, mountains, tundra, taiga, and grasslands. In much of the world, with the exception of Northern regions, they are listed as endangered. They continue to be hunted in many areas of the world for their perceived threat to livestock, as well as for sport.
Contents |
[edit] Anatomy, physiology, and reproduction
[edit] Features and adaptations
The weight and size of the Gray Wolf can vary greatly worldwide, and tend to increase proportionally with latitude. Generally speaking, height varies from 0.6–0.9 meters (26–34 inches) at the shoulder, and weight from 32–62 kilograms (70–135 pounds), which together make Gray Wolves the largest of all wild canids.[4] Although rarely encountered, extreme specimens of more than 77 kg (170 lb) have been recorded in Alaska and Canada;[5] the heaviest wild wolf on record, which was killed in Alaska in 1939, was 80 kg (175 lb).[6] The smallest wolves come from the Arabian Wolf subspecies, the females of which may weigh as little as 10 kg (22 lb) at maturity. Females in a given population typically weigh about 20% less than their male counterparts.[7] Wolves can measure anywhere from 1.3–2 meters (4.5–6.5 feet) from nose to the tip of the tail, which itself accounts for approximately one.
Wolves are built for stamina, possessing features ideal for long-distance travel. Their narrow chests and powerful backs and legs facilitate efficient locomotion. They are capable of covering several miles trotting at about a pace of 10 km/h (6 mph), and have been known to reach speeds approaching 65 km/h (40 mph) during a chase.[8] While thus sprinting, wolves can cover up to 5 meters (16 ft) per bound.[9]
Wolf paws are able to tread easily on a wide variety of terrains, especially snow. There is a slight webbing between each toe, which allows wolves to move over snow more easily than comparatively hampered prey. Wolves are digitigrade, which, with the relative largeness of their feet, helps them to distribute their weight well on snowy surfaces. The front paws are larger than the hind paws, and have a fifth digit, a dewclaw, that is absent on hind paws. Bristled hairs and blunt claws enhance grip on slippery surfaces, and special blood vessels keep paw pads from freezing.[10] Scent glands located between a wolf's toes leave trace chemical markers behind, helping the wolf to effectively navigate over large expanses while concurrently keeping others informed of its whereabouts.[10]
A wolf sometimes seems heavier than it actually is due to its bulky coat, which is made of two layers. The first layer consists of tough guard hairs designed to repel water and dirt. The second is a dense, water-resistant undercoat that insulates the wolf. Wolves have distinct winter and summer pelages that alternate in spring and autumn. Females tend to keep their winter coats further into the spring than males.
Coloration varies greatly: it runs from gray to gray-brown, all the way through the canine spectrum of white, red, brown, and black. These colors tend to mix in many populations to form predominantly blended individuals, though it is certainly not uncommon for an individual or an entire population to be entirely one color (usually all black or all white). A multicolor coat characteristically lacks any clear pattern other than it tends to be lighter on the animal's underside. Fur color sometimes corresponds with a given wolf population's environment; for example, all-white wolves are much more common in areas with perennial snow cover. Aging wolves acquire a grayish tint in their coats.
At birth, wolf pups tend to have darker fur and blue eyes that will change to a yellow-gold or orange color when the pups are 8–16 weeks old.[11] Though extremely unusual, it is possible for an adult wolf to retain its blue-colored eyes.[12]
Wolves have stout, blocky muzzles that help distinguish them from coyotes and dogs. Wolves also differ in certain skull dimensions, having a smaller orbital angle, for example, than dogs (>53 degrees for dogs compared to <45 degrees for wolves) and a comparatively larger brain capacity.[13] Larger paw size, yellow eyes, longer legs, and bigger teeth further distinguish adult wolves from other canids, particularly dogs. Also, precaudal glands at the base of the tail are present in wolves but not in dogs.
Wolves and most larger dogs share identical dentition; the maxilla has six incisors, two canines, eight premolars, and four molars. The mandible has six incisors, two canines, eight premolars, and six molars.[14] The fourth upper premolars and first lower molars constitute the carnassial teeth, which are essential tools for shearing flesh. The long canine teeth are also important, in that they are designed to hold and subdue the prey. Powered by 1500 lb/sq. inch of pressure, a wolf's teeth are its main weapons as well as its primary tools.[6] Therefore, any injury to the jaw line or teeth could devastate a wolf, dooming it to starvation or incapacity.
[edit] Courtship and mating
Usually, the instinct to reproduce drives young wolves away from their birth packs, leading them to seek out mates and territories of their own. Dispersals occur at all times during the year, typically of wolves who have reached sexual maturity in the previous breeding season. It takes two such dispersals from two packs for the process to take place, for dispersing wolves from the same maternal pack tend not to mate.[15] Once two dispersing wolves meet and begin traveling together, they immediately begin the process of seeking out territory, preferably in time for the next mating season. The bond that forms between these wolves often lasts until one of them dies — with few exceptions.[16]
During the mating season, breeding wolves become very affectionate with one another in anticipation of the female's ovulation cycle. Overall, pack tension rises as each mature wolf feels urged to mate. In fact, during this time, the alpha male and alpha female may be forced to aggressively prevent other wolves from mating with one other.[15] Under normal circumstances, a pack can only support one litter per year; so the dominance of the alpha wolves is beneficial in the long run.[specify][15]
When the alpha female goes into estrus—which occurs once per year and lasts 5–14 days,[17]—she and her mate will spend an increased amount of time in seclusion. Pheromones in the female's urine and the swelling of her vulva make it known to the male that the female is in heat. The female is unreceptive for the first few days of estrus, during which time she sheds the lining of her uterus; but when she begins ovulating, the two wolves mate.
The male wolf will mount the female firmly from behind. After achieving coitus, the two form a copulatory tie once the male's bulbus glandis— an erectile tissue located near the base of the canine penis— swells and the female's vaginal muscles tighten. Ejaculation is induced by the thrusting of the male's pelvis and the undulation of the female's cervix. The two become physically inseparable for anywhere from 10 to 30 minutes, during which the male will ejaculate multiple times.[18][19] After the initial ejaculation, the male may lift one of his legs over the female such that they are standing end-to-end; this is believed to be a defensive measure.[19] The mating ritual is repeated many times throughout the female's brief ovulation period, which occurs once per year per female — unlike female dogs, whose estrus usually occurs twice per year.
[edit] Breeding and life cycle
Normally, only the alpha pair of the pack breeds (this is a kind of organization also found in other pack-hunting canids, including the Dhole and the African Hunting Dog). Mating occurs between January and April — the higher the latitude, the later it occurs.[16] A pack usually produces a single litter, unless the alpha male mates with one or more subordinate females. Under normal circumstances, the alpha female tries to prevent this during mating season by dominating the other females and keeping them away from the alpha male.
The gestation period lasts 60–63 days. The pups, at a weight of 0.5 kg (1 lb), are born blind, deaf, and completely dependent on their mother.[16][4] There are 1 to 14 pups per litter; the average litter size is about 4 to 6.[20] Pups reside in the den, where they are born deaf with their eyes closed, and stay there until they reach about three weeks of age.[11] The den is usually on high ground near an open water source, and has an open "room" at the end of an underground or hillside tunnel that can be up to a few meters long.[10] During this time, the pups will become more independent, and will eventually begin to explore the area immediately outside the den before gradually roaming up to a mile away from it at around 5 weeks of age.[11] They begin eating regurgitated foods after 2 weeks— by which time their milk teeth have emerged—and are fully weaned by 8–10 weeks.[11] During the first weeks of development, the mother usually stays with her litter alone, but eventually most members of the pack will contribute to the rearing of the pups in some way.[16]
After two months, the restless pups will be moved to a rendezvous site, where they can safely stay while most of the adults go out to hunt.[11] One or two adults stay behind to ensure the safety of the pups. After a few more weeks, the pups are permitted to join the adults if they are able, and will receive priority on anything killed, despite their low ranks. The pups tag along as observers until about 8 months, when they are large enough to actively participate.[11] The fighting over eating privileges results in a secondary ranking being formed among them, which allows them to practice the dominance/submission rituals essential to their later survival within packs.[16]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73592/735926194a77f1217a9c6f9cc793fcb3d8e4a63e" alt="A wolf in captivity at the Beardsley Zoo in Connecticut."
Wolves typically reach sexual maturity after two or three years, when many of them will be compelled to leave their birth packs and seek out mates and their own territories.[16][21] Wolves that reach maturity generally live 6 to 8 years in the wild, although in captivity they can live to twice that age.[20] High mortality rates give them a low overall life expectancy. Pups die when food is scarce; they can also fall prey to predators such as bears, or, less often, coyotes, foxes, or other wolves. The most significant causes of mortality for grown wolves are hunting and poaching, car accidents, and wounds inflicted while hunting prey. Grown wolves are occasionally killed by bears or big cats, but rival wolf packs are by far their most dangerous non-human predator.[citation needed] Wolves are susceptible to the same infections that affect domestic dogs, such as mange, heartworm, rabies and canine distemper. Epidemics of these can drastically reduce the population in an area.
[edit] Behavior
[edit] Body language
- See also: Dog communication
Wolves can visually communicate with an impressive variety of expressions and moods ranging from subtle signals, such as a slight shift in weight, to more obvious ones, such as rolling on their backs to indicate complete submission.[22]
- Dominance – A dominant wolf stands stiff legged and tall. The ears are erect and forward, and the hackles bristle slightly. Often the tail is held vertically and curled toward the back. This display asserts the wolf's rank to others in the pack. A dominant wolf may stare penetratingly at a submissive one, pin it to the ground, "ride up" on its shoulders, or even stand on its hind legs.
- Submission (active) – During active submission, the entire body is lowered, and the lips and ears are drawn back. Sometimes active submission is accompanied by muzzle licking, or the rapid thrusting out of the tongue and lowering of the hindquarters. The tail is placed down, or halfway or fully between the legs, and the muzzle often points up to the more dominant animal. The back may be partially arched as the submissive wolf humbles itself to its superior; a more arched back and more tucked tail indicate a greater level of submission.
- Submission (passive) – Passive submission is more intense than active submission. The wolf rolls on its back and exposes its vulnerable throat and underside. The paws are drawn into the body. This is often accompanied by whimpering.
- Anger – An angry wolf's ears are erect, and its fur bristles. The lips may curl up or pull back, and the incisors are displayed. The wolf may also arch its back, lash out, or snarl.
- Fear – A frightened wolf tries to make its body look small and therefore less conspicuous. The ears flatten against the head, and the tail may be tucked between the legs, as with a submissive wolf. There may also be whimpering or barks of fear, and the wolf may arch its back.
- Defensive – A defensive wolf flattens its ears against its head.
- Aggression – An aggressive wolf snarls and its fur bristles. The wolf may crouch, ready to attack if necessary.
- Suspicion – Pulling back of the ears shows a wolf is suspicious. The wolf also narrows its eyes. The tail of a wolf that senses danger points straight out, parallel to the ground.
- Relaxedness – A relaxed wolf's tail points straight down, and the wolf may rest sphinx-like or on its side. The wolf may also wag its tail. The further down the tail droops, the more relaxed the wolf is.
- Tension – An aroused wolf's tail points straight out, and the wolf may crouch as if ready to spring.
- Happiness – As dogs do, a wolf may wag its tail if in a joyful mood. The tongue may loll out of the mouth.
- Hunting – A wolf that is hunting is tensed, and therefore the tail is horizontal and straight.
- Playfulness – A playful wolf holds its tail high and wags it. The wolf may frolic and dance around, or bow by placing the front of its body down to the ground, while holding the rear high, sometimes wagged. This resembles the playful behavior of domestic dogs.
[edit] Howling
Howling helps pack members keep in touch, allowing them to communicate effectively in thickly forested areas or over great distances. Howling also helps to call pack members to a specific location. Howling can also serve as a declaration of territory, as shown in a dominant wolf's tendency to respond to a human imitation of a "rival" wolf in an area the wolf considers its own. This behavior is stimulated when a pack has something to protect, such as a fresh kill. As a rule of thumb, large packs will more readily draw attention to themselves than will smaller packs. Adjacent packs may respond to each others' howls, which can mean trouble for the smaller of the two. Wolves therefore tend to howl with great care.[23]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aabc6/aabc63e9a24a99eb3df581b6fcc4bad70ba25ad7" alt="Howling adult wolf on glacial erratic at Little America Flats."
Wolves will also howl for communal reasons. Some scientists speculate that such group sessions strengthen the wolves' social bonds and camaraderie— similar to community singing among humans.[23] During such choral sessions, wolves will howl at different tones and varying pitches, making it difficult to estimate the number of wolves involved. This confusion of numbers makes a listening rival pack wary of what action to take. For example, confrontation could be disastrous if the rival pack gravely underestimates the howling pack's numbers. A wolf's howl may be heard from up to ten miles away, depending on weather conditions.
Observations of wolf packs suggest that howling occurs most often during the twilight hours, preceding the adults' departure to the hunt and following their return. Studies also show that wolves howl more frequently during the breeding season and subsequent rearing process. The pups themselves begin howling soon after emerging from their dens and can be provoked into howling sessions easily over the following two months. Such indiscriminate howling usually is intended for communication, and does not harm the wolf so early in its life.[23] Howling becomes less indiscriminate as wolves learn to distinguish howling pack members from rival wolves.
[edit] Other vocalizations
Growling, while teeth are bared, is the most visual and effective warning wolves use. Wolf growls have a distinct, deep, bass-like quality, and are often used to threaten rivals, though not necessarily to defend themselves. Wolves also growl at other wolves while being aggressively dominant.
Wolves bark when nervous or when they want to warn other wolves of danger. Wolves bark very discreetly, and will not generally bark loudly or repeatedly as dogs do; rather, they use a low-key, breathy "whuf" sound to immediately get attention of other wolves. Wolves also "bark-howl" by adding a brief howl to the end of a bark. Wolves bark-howl for the same reasons they normally bark. Generally, pups bark and bark-howl much more frequently than adults, using these vocalizations to cry for attention, care, or food.
Wolves can also whimper, usually when submitting to other wolves. Wolf pups whimper when they need the reassurance of security from their parents or other wolves.
[edit] Scent marking
Wolves, like other canines, use scent marking to lay claim to anything — from territory to fresh kills.[24] Alpha wolves use scent mark the most often; males do so more than females. The most widely used scent marker is urine. Male and female alpha wolves urine-mark objects with a raised-leg stance (all other pack members squat) to enforce rank and territory. They also use marks to identify food caches and to claim kills on behalf of the pack. Defecation markers are used for the same purposes as urine marks, and serve as a more visual warning, as well.[24] Defecation markers are particularly useful for navigation, keeping the pack from traversing the same terrain too often and also allowing each wolf to be aware of the whereabouts of its pack members. Above all, though, scent marking is used to inform other wolves and packs that a certain territory is occupied, and that they should therefore tread cautiously.
Wolves have scent glands all over their bodies, including at the base of the tail, between toes, and in the eyes, genitalia, and skin.[24] Pheromones secreted by these glands identify each individual wolf. A dominant wolf will "rub" its body against subordinate wolves to mark such wolves as being members of a particular pack. Wolves may also "paw" dirt to release pheromones instead of urine marking.[25]
Wolves' heavy reliance on odoriferous signals testifies greatly to their olfactory capabilities. Wolves can detect virtually any scent, including marks, from great distances, and can distinguish among them as well or better than humans can distinguish other humans visually.
[edit] Social structure and hunting
[edit] The pack
Wolves function as social predators and hunt in packs organized according to strict, rank-oriented social hierarchies.[16] It was originally thought that this comparatively high level of social organization had more to do with hunting success, and while this still may be true to a certain extent, emerging theories suggest that the pack has less to do with hunting and more to do with reproductive success.[citation needed]
The pack is led by the two individuals that sit atop the social hierarchy: the alpha male and the alpha female. The alpha pair (of whom only one may be the "top" alpha) has the greatest amount of social freedom compared to the rest of the pack, but they are not "leaders" in the human sense of the term. The alphas do not give the other wolves orders; rather, they simply have the most freedom in choosing where to go, what to do, and when to do it. Possessing strong instincts for fellowship, the rest of the pack usually follows.
While most alpha pairs are monogamous, there are exceptions.[26] An alpha animal may preferentially mate with a lower-ranking animal, especially if the other alpha is closely related (a brother or sister, for example). The death of one alpha does not affect the status of the other alpha, who will quickly take another mate.[16]
Usually, only the alpha pair is able to successfully rear a litter of pups. Other wolves in a pack may breed, but will usually lack the resources required to raise the pups to maturity.[specify] All the wolves in the pack assist in raising wolf pups. Some mature individuals, usually females, may choose to stay in the original pack so as to reinforce it and help rear more pups. However, most will disperse, males particularly.
The size of the pack may change over time and is controlled by several factors, including habitat, personalities of individual wolves within a pack, and food supply. Packs can contain 2–20 wolves, though an average pack consists of 6 or 7.[27]New packs are formed when a wolf leaves its birth pack and claims a territory. Lone wolves searching for other individuals can travel very long distances seeking out suitable territories. Dispersing individuals must avoid the territories of other wolves because intruders on occupied territories are chased away or killed—this behavior may explain wolf "predation" of dogs. Most dogs, except perhaps large, specially bred attack dogs, do not stand much of a chance against a pack of wolves protecting its territory from an intrusion.
[edit] Hierarchy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17695/1769534161e9b2de5366f3de4507b6c6d7bb816d" alt="A wolf pack in Yellowstone National Park, with the alphas leading and the omega in the rear."
The hierarchy, led by the alpha male and female, affects all activity in the pack to some extent. In most larger packs there are two separate hierarchies in addition to an overbearing one: the first consists of the males, led by the alpha male, and the other consists of the females, led by the alpha female.[10] In this situation, the alpha male was originally assumed to be the "top" alpha, but biologists have since concluded that alpha females can and do take control over entire packs.[citation needed] The male and female hierarchies are interdependent, and are maintained constantly by aggressive and elaborate displays of dominance and submission.
After the alpha pair, there may also, especially in larger packs, be a beta wolf or wolves, a "second-in-command" to the alphas. Betas typically assume a more prominent role in assisting with the upbringing of the alpha pair's litter, often serving as surrogate mothers or fathers while the alpha pair is away. Beta wolves are the most likely to challenge their superiors for the role of the alpha, though some betas seem content with being second, and will sometimes even let lower ranking wolves leapfrog them for the position of alpha should circumstances necessitate such a happening, such as the death of the alpha. More ambitious beta wolves, however, will only wait so long before contending for alpha position unless they choose to disperse and create their own pack instead
Loss of rank can happen gradually or suddenly. An older wolf may simply choose to give way when a motivated challenger presents itself, yielding its position without bloodshed. On the other hand, the challenged individual may choose to fight back, with varying degrees of intensity. While the majority of wolf aggression is not injurious and is ritualized, a high-stakes fight can easily result in injury for either or both parties. The loser of such a confrontation is frequently chased away from the pack or, rarely, may be killed as other aggressive wolves contribute to the insurgency. These confrontations are more common during the mating season.
Rank order within a pack is established and maintained through a series of ritualized fights and posturing best described as "ritual bluffing". Wolves prefer psychological warfare to physical confrontations, meaning that high-ranking status is based more on personality or attitude than on size or physical strength. Rank, who holds it, and how it is enforced varies widely between packs and between individual animals. In large packs full of easygoing wolves, or in a group of juvenile wolves, rank order may shift almost constantly, or even be circular (for instance, animal A dominates animal B, who dominates animal C, who dominates animal A).
In a more typical pack, only one wolf will assume the role of the omega: the lowest-ranking member of a pack.[24] Omegas receive the most aggression from the rest of the pack, and may be subjected to truculence at any time— anything from constant dominance from other pack members to inimical, physical harassment. Although this arrangement may seem objectionable, the nature of pack dynamics demands that one wolf be at the bottom of the ranking order, and such individuals are perhaps better suited for constant displays of active and passive submission than they are for living alone. For wolves, camaraderie— no matter what the form— is preferable to solitude, and, indeed, submissive wolves tend to choose low rank over potential starvation. Despite the aggression they are subject to and being last to eat, omega wolves have also been observed to often be the most playful wolves in the group, often enticing all of the members of a pack into engaging in chasing games and other forms of play.
One theory about the domestication of the dog is that it occurred when certain wolves of a suitable temperament joined bands of human hunter-gatherers due to their organizational similarities with wolf packs.
[edit] Cooperative hunting and diet
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0fe85/0fe857f5831edb9fb747bbfafe53d13fb910d5ff" alt="An American Bison standing its ground, thereby increasing its chance for survival."
Packs of wolves cooperatively hunt any large herbivores in their range. Pack hunting revolves around the chase, as wolves are able to run for long periods before relenting. It takes careful cooperation for a pack to take down large prey, and the rate of success for such chases is very low. Wolves, in the interest of saving energy, will only chase one potential prey for the first thousand or so meters before giving up and trying at a different time against a different prey.[28] Therefore, like most other pack species, wolves must hunt continually to sustain themselves. Solitary wolves depend more on smaller animals, which they capture by pouncing and pinning them, with their front paws, to the ground— this technique is also common among canids such as foxes and coyotes.
Wolves' diet includes, but is not limited to, elk, caribou, moose, deer, and other large ungulates. The American Bison is probably the largest animal wolves prey on; bison weighing more than a ton have been taken down by a pack. They also prey on rodents, small animals, and other canids like foxes and coyotes in a limited manner,[specify] for a typical adult wolf requires a minimum of 1.1 kg (2.5 lb) of food each day for sustenance, and approximately 2.2 kg (5 lb) to reproduce successfully.[20] Wolves do not always have the chance to eat each day; in fact, wolves rarely eat on a daily basis, but instead compensate by eating up to a maximum of 10 kg (22 lb) at a time.[20]
When pursuing large prey, wolves generally attack from all angles, targeting the necks and sides of their prey. Wolf packs test large populations of prey species by initiating a chase, targeting less-fit prey; such animals typically include the elderly, diseased, and young.[21] Healthy animals may also succumb through circumstance or by chance. However, most healthy, fit individuals will stand their ground against wolves, increasing the possibility of injury to the preying wolves;[specify] thus the weaker members of a species are easier and safer to hunt.
Like many other keystone predators, wolves are sensitive to fluctuations in the abundance of prey; they are likely to have minor changes in their populations as the abundance of their primary prey species gradually rises and drops over long periods of time. This balance between wolves and their prey prevents the mass starvation of both predator and prey.
[edit] Historical perceptions
The relationship between humans and wolves has had a long and turbulent history. Traditionally humans held a distasteful view of wolves, a creature they feared. It was also often accentuated in European folklore. Settlers brought this view with them as they settled North America. The gray wolf, once found in every ecosystem across the Northern Hemisphere, was one of the first species to be culled by settlers. As technology made the killing of wolves and predators easier, humans began to overhunt wolves and cause their numbers to dwindle significantly.
Wolves are nevertheless portrayed positively in some myths and legends, and many languages have names meaning "wolf". Some examples include, for instance: Scandinavian Ulf, Albanian "Ujk", Hebrew Ze'ev, Serbian Vuk, Bulgarian Vǎlko,
Historically, the fear of wolves has been responsible for most of the species' trouble, including its near extinction in Europe and the United States during the 20th century. Ecological research in the 20th century has shed new light on wolves and other predators, specifically with regard to their critical role in maintaining ecosystems to which they belong. This information has led to a more positive portrayal.
A general increase in environmental awareness began to take root sometime in the middle of the 20th century and forced people to rethink former notions, including those regarding predators. In North America people realized that in over one hundred years of documentation, there had been no verified human fatalities caused by an attack from a healthy wolf.[29][30] Wolves are actually naturally cautious and will almost always flee from humans, perhaps only carefully approaching a person out of curiosity. There are, however, some reports of possible wolf attacks in North America that people assumed happen on a regular basis.[31] Although attitudes have significantly changed, there are still many who hold more cautious views of the wolf.
In Central Asian nations such as that of Turkic peoples and Mongols, the wolf is a revered animal. The shamanic Turkic peoples even believed they were descendants of wolves in Turkic legends. The legend of Asena is an old Turkic myth that tells of how the Turkic people were created. In Northern China a small Turkic village was raided by Chinese soldiers, but one small baby was left behind. An old she-wolf with a sky-blue mane named Asena found the baby and nursed him, then the she-wolf gave birth to half wolf, half human cubs therefore the Turkic people were born. Also in Turkic mythology it is believed that a gray wolf showed the Turks the way out of their legendary homeland Ergenekon, which allowed them to spread and conquer their neighbours.[1][2][3]
[edit] Reintroduction
In certain parts of the world, debate about wolf reintroduction is ongoing and often heated, both where reintroduction is being considered and where it has already occurred. Where wolves have been successfully reintroduced, as in the greater Yellowstone area and Idaho, reintroduction opponents continue to cite livestock predation, surplus killing, and economic hardships caused by wolves as reason why they should never have been reintroduced to begin with, as well as why they should be removed or severely reduced.[32][33] Opponents in prospective areas echo these same concerns.
However, what the Yellowstone and Idaho reintroductions demonstrate is how compromise can be used to satisfy relevant interests. These reintroductions were the culmination of over two decades of research and debate. Ultimately, the economic concerns of the local ranching industry, arguably the single best reason used against reintroduction, was dealt with when Defenders of Wildlife decided to establish a fund that would compensate ranchers for livestock lost to wolves, shifting the economic burden from industry to the wolf proponents themselves.[34] The majority of the organizations opposing reintroduction relented their "no wolf, no way" stance when this crucial deal breaker was resolved.
As of 2005, there are over 450 wolves in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem and over 1,000 in Idaho. Both populations have long since met their recovery goals and the reintroduction experiment has been a resounding success. Still, lessons learned from this ordeal may yet prove useful where wolf reintroduction continues to create a sharp divide between industry and environmental interests, as it has in Arizona (where the Mexican Wolf was released beginning in 1998). In some other Western and Central European countries, the debate will likely impair wolf reintroduction efforts where they are being considered, but, as history has validated, industry need not be ignored for a reintroduction effort to be successful.
Prior to and even after reintroduction many hunters claimed that wolves would wipe out entire populations of elk, deer and other ungulates, most ecosystems where wolves have been reintroduced have become much healthier than they were before wolves. Since Wolves have arrived, the food chain within the Yellowstone ecosystem has been re-ordered to deliver a banquet that favors a more varied array of species. Prior to wolves, high numbers of elk were linked to declines in aspen and willow communities, which negatively affected beaver and moose. Pre-wolf, coyote numbers swelled, affecting small rodent populations, foxes, and the production of pronghorn antelope. Pre-wolf scavengers had slimmer pickings. Today with wolves taking elk, reducing their numbers, and leaving more carcasses on the landscape, grizzlies and wolverines have easier access to more meat, meaning a better chance for larger litters of cubs and pups. Coyote numbers have been significantly reduced, meaning more mice and pocket gophers for foxes and avian predators like hawks and eagles.[35] Wolves play an undeniably important role in the environment and through education organizations some people may be slowly getting the message that they are vital. In addition, reports have been published placing the value of revenue from wolf-watching as upward of $25 million.
[edit] Wolf hunting
[edit] Livestock predation
As long as there is enough prey, wolves seem to avoid taking livestock, often ignoring them entirely.[36] However, some wolves or packs can specialize in hunting livestock once the behavior is learned despite natural prey abundance. In such situations, sheep are usually the most vulnerable, but horses and cattle are also at risk. Wolf-secure fences, relocation where applicable and sometimes hunting wolves are the only known methods to effectively stop livestock predation.
Over several centuries, shepherds and dog breeders have used selective breeding to "create" large livestock-guarding dogs that can stand up to wolves preying on flocks.[37] In the U.S., in light of the gray wolf and other large predators having recently been reintroduced to certain areas, the United States Department of Agriculture has been looking into the use of breeds such as the Akbash from Turkey, the Maremma from Italy, the Great Pyrenees from France, and the Kuvasz from Hungary, among others, to help limit wolf-livestock interactions.
While wolf predation on livestock does happen, loss of livestock by wolves makes up only a small percentage of total losses. Since the state of Montana began recording livestock losses due to wolves back in 1987, only 1,200 sheep and cattle have been killed. 1,200 killings in twenty years is not very significant when in the greater Yellowstone region 8,300 cattle and 13,000 sheep die from natural causes. To put depredation in perspective, in 1986 the wolf population was at about 1,300-1,400, there were an estimated 232,000 cattle and 16,000 sheep in Minnesota's wolf range. During that year 26 cattle, about 0.01% of the cattle available, and 13 sheep, around 0.08% of the sheep available, were verified as being killed by wolves. Similarly, in 1996 an estimated 68,000 households owned dogs in wolf range and only 10, approximately 0.00015% of the households, experienced wolf depredation.[38] Furthermore, Jim Dutcher, a film maker who raised a captive wolf pack observed that wolves are very reluctant to try meat that they have not eaten or seen another wolf eat before possibly explaining why livestock depredation is unlikely except for in cases of desperation.[39]
In some areas across the world, hunters or state officials will hunt wolves from helicopters or light planes to control populations (or for sport in some instances), citing it as the most effective way to control wolf numbers, given that traditional poisons are largely banned. The method is used where interactions between livestock and wolves are common, or where sport or subsistence hunters desire more game animals with less competition. Aerial hunting is seen as highly controversial. In areas where aerial hunting is used to limit livestock-wolf interactions or to boost populations of game animals, arguments against it are usually centered around whether or not the reasons behind such predator elimination are scientifically valid.
In Alaska, for example, wolves are sometimes hunted from aircraft.
Other, non- or less-lethal methods of protecting livestock from wolves have been under development for the past decade. Such methods include rubber ammunition and use of guard animals.[40]
[edit] Trapping and breeding for fur
Wolves are frequently trapped, in the areas where it is legal, using snares or leg hold traps. The economic value of wolf pelts is limited, so it is mainly a recreation activity. Wolf trapping has come under heavy fire from animal rights groups, who allege that unskilled trappers can create unnecessary suffering for the animal involved.[41] Proponents counter that trapping, using the right tools and equipment, can be considered as humane as traditional hunting.[42] In countries where wolves are seen as pest or vermin, such as in Canada, trappers need a small game seal and do not have to report the number of wolves killed. These lax rules and regulations have caused concern for many biologists who claim that these methods will destroy the wolf population.
Wolves are also bred for their fur in a very few locations, but they are considered as a rather problematic animal to breed, and, combined with the low value of the pelt, most fur farms utilize other animals. Wolves' varied coats make it difficult to create fur coats.
Biologists may also trap wolves for research purposes. Darting and foot hold traps are the tools of choice for such professionals, who often use these and similar techniques to fit wolves and other animals with collars holding radio transmitters and to check their health before releasing them. Use of such technology also allows them to keep track of population numbers and dispersal trends, among other things. Radio collars can also be used to monitor wolves when they come near livestock, and to identify a wolf or a pack that preys on livestock, allowing proper action to be prompter and more accurate.
[edit] Taxonomy
[edit] Classification and relation to the dog
Much debate has occurred over the relationship between the wolf and the domestic dog. Most authorities see the wolf as the dog's direct ancestor, but others have postulated descent from the Golden Jackal. Because the canids have evolved recently and different canids interbreed readily, untangling the true relationships has presented difficulties. However, molecular systematics now indicate very strongly that domestic dogs and wolves are more closely related than either is to any other canid, and the domestic dog is now normally classified as a subspecies of the wolf: Canis lupus familiaris. The main differences between wolves and domestic dogs are that wolves have, on average, 30% larger brains, a better immune system, better sense of smell, and are generally much larger than domestic dogs.[43]
The classification of wolves and closely related creatures offers many challenges. Although taxonomists have proposed many species over the years, most types clearly do not comprise true species. Indeed, only a single wolf species may exist. While scientists have proposed a host of subspecies, wolf taxonomy at this level remains controversial.[44] Further taxonomic modification will continue for years to come.
[edit] Subspecies of the wolf
It was once believed there were up to 50 subspecies. However, the last decade has seen a new and widely accepted list that has been condensed to 13 living subspecies, 15 including the common dog and dingo, and 2 recently extinct subspecies. This takes into account the anatomy, distribution, and migration of various wolf colonies.
Subspecies | Classification | Status | Historic Range (see map) |
---|---|---|---|
Arabian Wolf | Canis lupus arabs | Critically endangered, declining | Israel, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Oman |
A very small subspecies. Typically blended brown or completely brown with a thin coat. Hunted regularly as a nuisance animal, though rarely encountered. | |||
Arctic Wolf | Canis lupus arctos | Stable | Canadian Arctic, Greenland |
An average-sized subspecies. Almost exclusively white or creamy white with a thick coat. Hunted legally, though rarely encountered. | |||
Caspian Sea Wolf | Canis lupus cubanensis | Endangered, declining | Between the Caspian and Black seas |
A smaller subspecies. Hunted as a nuisance animal. | |||
Dingo | Canis lupus dingo | Vulnerable (pure breed) |
Australia & southeast Asia |
Hunted as a nuisance animal. Pure breed declining from interbreeding with the Domestic Dog. | |||
Domestic Dog | Canis lupus familiaris | Stable | Worldwide |
Typically, a smaller subspecies, with 20% smaller brains, more feeble immune system, and poorer sense of smell. Maintained as pets, although some small feral populations do exist. Raised for their meat in some parts of the world. | |||
Eastern Timber Wolf | Canis lupus lycaon | At risk | Southeastern Canada, Eastern United States |
A larger subspecies. Full canine color spectrum represented, though blended pelages predominate. First subspecies to be recognized in North America. Hunted legally in parts of Canada. | |||
Egyptian Wolf | Canis lupus lupaster | Critically endangered, probably extinct | Far Northern Africa |
A smaller subspecies. Usually a grizzled or tinged gray or brown. Lanky. Very rarely encountered. | |||
Eurasian Wolf | Canis lupus lupus | Stable | Western Europe, Scandinavia, Russia, China, Mongolia, Himalaya Mountains |
An average-sized subspecies. Generally short, blended gray fur. Largest range among wolf subspecies. Most common wolf subspecies in Europe and Asia. Population roughly 100,000. Hunted legally in some places, protected in others. | |||
Great Plains Wolf | Canis lupus nubilus | Stable | Southern Rocky Mountains, Midwestern United States, Eastern and Northeastern Canada, far Southwestern Canada, and Southeastern Alaska |
An average-sized subspecies. Usually gray, black, buff, or reddish. The most common subspecies in the contiguous U.S. Hunted legally in parts of Canada. | |||
Hokkaido Wolf | Canis lupus hattai | Extinct | Japanese island of Hokkaido |
A smaller subspecies. Became extinct in 1889 as a result of poisoning campaigns. | |||
Honshu Wolf | Canis lupus hodophilax | Extinct | Japanese islands of Honshu, Shikoku, and Kyushu |
A very small subspecies. Became extinct in 1905 from a combination of rabies and human eradication efforts. | |||
Indian Wolf | Canis lupus pallipes | Endangered, declining | Israel, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India |
A very small subspecies. Typically tawny, buff, or reddish with a short, dense coat. Hunted as a nuisance animal. | |||
Italian Wolf | Canis lupus italicus | Endangered | Italian peninsula |
An average-sized subspecies. Full canine color spectrum represented. Occupy comparatively smaller territories. Protected. | |||
Mackenzie Valley Wolf | Canis lupus occidentalis | Stable | Alaska, Northern Rockies, Western and Central Canada |
A very large subspecies. Usually black or a blended gray or brown, but full color spectrum represented. This subspecies was reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park and Idaho starting in 1995. Hunted legally in Alaska and parts of Canada. Protected in the contiguous states. | |||
Mexican Wolf | Canis lupus baileyi | Critically endangered | Central Mexico, Western Texas, Southern New Mexico and Arizona |
A smaller subspecies. Usually tawny brown or rusty in color. Reintroduced to Arizona starting in 1998. Current wild population 35-50. Current captive population 300. Protected. | |||
Russian Wolf | Canis lupus communis | Stable, declining | Central Russia |
A very large subspecies. Hunted legally. | |||
Tundra Wolf | Canis lupus albus | Stable | Northern Russia, Siberia |
A larger subspecies. Typically creamy white or gray, though full spectrum is represented. Hunted legally. |
[edit] Media
- Wolf howl recording (file info) — play in browser (beta)
- Problems playing the files? See media help.
[edit] See also
- Werewolf
- Wolves in fiction
- Wolfdog
- Dog communication
- Attitudes toward wolves
- Wolf reintroduction
- Wolf hunting
- International Wolf Center
- Wild Canid Survival and Research Center
- L. David Mech
- Wiktionary:Wolf
- Wikiquote:Wolf
Three other extant canid species also known as wolves:
Extinct wolves:
Pseudo wolves:
[edit] References
- ^ Mech & Boitani (2004). Canis lupus. 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN 2006. Retrieved on 2006-05-05. Database entry includes justification for why this species is of least concern.
- ^ Lindblad-Toh, K, et al. (2005). "Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog". Nature 438: 803-819.
- ^ Species Profile: Gray wolf (Canis lupus). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Retrieved on 2007-01-11.
- ^ a b Error on call to Template:cite web: Parameters url and title must be specified. Yellowstone-Bearman (November 2002). Retrieved on 2007-03-17.
- ^ Persecution and Hunting. Endangered Species Handbook. Animal Welfare Institute. Retrieved on 2006-08-20.
- ^ a b Wolf Facts. California Wolf Center. Retrieved on 2006-08-21.
- ^ Dog Family. Safari Club International Foundation. Retrieved on 2006-08-22.
- ^ Gray Wolf Biologue. Midwest Region. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Retrieved on 2006-08-21.
- ^ "Wolf". The Columbia Encyclopedia (Sixth Edition). New York: Columbia University Press. Retrieved on 2006-08-21.
- ^ a b c d Gray Wolf. Corwin's Carnival of Creatures. Animal Planet. Retrieved on 2006-05-24.
- ^ a b c d e f Wolf Pup Development. Wolf Basics. International Wolf Center (November 2004). Retrieved on 2006-08-23.
- ^ About Wolves. The Wolf Spirits. Retrieved on 2006-08-21.
- ^ Wolf. 4to40.com. Retrieved on 2006-08-22.
- ^ The skull of Canis lupus. World of the Wolf. Natural Worlds. Retrieved on 2005-08-21.
- ^ a b c Mating system. Department of Biology, Davidson College. Retrieved on 2006-08-22.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Dewey, Tanya (2002). Canis lupus. Animal Diversity Web. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology. Retrieved on 2005-08-18.
- ^ Gray Wolf. Discover Life in America. Retrieved on 2005-05-05.
- ^ Wolves, Coyotes and Fox. MountainNature.com. Retrieved on 2006-08-23.
- ^ a b Wolfmovie.com Forum Index - Wild Wolves. Wolf Movie Forums. Retrieved on 2006-08-23.
- ^ a b c d Harper, Liz (November 2002). FAQ. Wolf Basics. International Wolf Center. Retrieved on 2005-08-21.
- ^ a b Gray Wolf Biology and Status. Wolf Basics (March 2005). Retrieved on 2006-08-23.
- ^ Communication. Wolfdancer Holding Company. Retrieved on 2005-08-21.
- ^ a b c Harrington, Fred H. (November 2000). What's in a Howl?. NOVA Online. PBS. Retrieved on 2005-08-21.
- ^ a b c d Frequently Asked Questions About Wolves. Wolf Park. Retrieved on 2006-08-22.
- ^ Species Wolf, Gray (1996-03-14). Retrieved on 2006-08-23.
- ^ Wolf Family Life. Wolf Trust. Retrieved on 2005-08-21.
- ^ Wolf Pack Size and Food Acquisition. Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center. U.S. Geological Survey. Retrieved on 2005-08-21.
- ^ Nature Guides: Gray Wolf. eNature.com. Retrieved on 2006-09-03.
- ^ Gray Wolf. Animal Facts. WNC Nature Center. Retrieved on 2006-09-07.
- ^ Wolves in the North Cascades: Questions and Answers. National Park Service (March 2004). Retrieved on 2006-09-07.
- ^ Gray wolves in Utah. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. Retrieved on 2006-09-07.
- ^ Vanderpool, Tim. "Politics of the Wolf", Tucson Weekly, 2002-06-20. Retrieved on 2006-08-27.
- ^ Preserve Arizona's Wolves. Timber Wolf Information Network. Retrieved on 2006-08-27.
- ^ The Bailey Wildlife Foundation Wolf Compensation Trust. Defenders of Wildlife. Retrieved on 2006-08-27.
- ^ cite web| url =http://www.wildlifeconservation.org/ | title= A Brewing Backlash Against Lobos | publisher= Wildlife Conservation | first = Todd | last= Wilkinson | Date = March/April 2007| Accessdate = 2007/02/27}}
- ^ Wolf Predation Plays Small Role in Livestock Losses in 2005. Defenders of Wildlife. Retrieved on 2006-08-30.
- ^ Schulman, Mark (2005-04-15). Switzerland and the wolf. Feature Stories. World Wide Fund for Nature. Retrieved on 2006-08-30.
- ^ Wolf Depredation. International Wolf Center (August 2005)).
- ^ Dutcher, Jim and Jamie (2002). Wolves at our door. Touchstone. Retrieved on 2007-02-27.
- ^ Naughton, Lisa, Adrian Treves, Rebecca Grossberg, and David Wilcove. Summary Report: 2004/2005 Public Opinion Survey: Wolf Management in Wisconsin (PDF). Living with Wolves. UW-Madison Geography. Retrieved on 2005-08-30.
- ^ Persecution and Hunting: Wolves, Wild Dogs and Foxes: Page 4. Endangered Species Handbook. Animal Welfare Institute. Retrieved on 2006-08-23.
- ^ Anti-trapping Forces Set Sights on Idaho. Wildlife Ecology Website. The International Foundation for the Conservation of Natural Resources (2002-12-13). Retrieved on 2006-08-23.
- ^ Frequently asked questions about Wolf Watch UK. Wolf Watch UK. Retrieved on 2006-08-23.
- ^ Saunders, Stephen C. (2000-06-09). Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposal To Reclassify and Remove the Gray Wolf From the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife in Portions of the Conterminous United States; Proposal To Establish Three Special Regulations for Threatened Gray Wolves End Hierarchical Links. Federal Register Environmental Documents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved on 2006-08-23.
[edit] External links
- Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History species account-Gray Wolf
- Defenders of Wildlife
- LIFE III Project "Conservation and Management of Wolves in Croatia
- Wolf Management Plan for Croatia
- High-Resolution Images of the Canis Lupus Brain
- Mission: Wolf
- Wolf Gallery: Wolf Languages, Quotes and Images
- Sinapu
- WolfSource
- Wolf Park
- Wolf Song of Alaska
- Wolf Trust
Categories: Least Concern species | Articles lacking sources from March 2007 | All articles lacking sources | Articles with unsourced statements since March 2007 | All articles with unsourced statements | Wikipedia articles needing factual verification | Wolves | Arctic land animals | Fauna of Europe | Fauna of Canada | Fauna of Ireland | Fauna of Kazakhstan | Fauna of the Middle East | Fauna of North America | Fauna of Russia | Fauna of the United States | Mammals of Europe | Mammals of the United States | Mammals of India | Mammals of Asia