User talk:Bhadani

[edit] Examples

• Edit Summary

I am trying to record some peculiar edit summaries, and to begin with I have started some specimen from User:Dbachmann's edit summaries - this shall give me many examples (of wikipedia-trivia) for my forthcoming book: [2]. --Bhadani (talk) 18:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Some examples of edit summary:

1. huh

   huh was the edit summary. Was it foolish or funny? [3]

2. just a little bit tongue-in-cheek, no?

   Behind the innocuous looking summary is veiled something different

[edit] Hello

Thanks for the hello. It is great that u are going to write a book. Best of Luck. Can u comment at the PR of Kaziranga and help me a bit with it.Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 04:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Sure, Amartya. It is my pleasure. --Bhadani (talk) 10:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Some help

Hi, I saw your edits to issues related to Direct Action Day and would like to get your attention to a matter of serious misrepresentation:

A new user named

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Teabing-Leigh

has started a bunch of bullshit POV forks based on unreliable pakistani propaganda websites and afrocentric pseudohistory propaganda

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gandhi%27s_racism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahomed_Ali_Jinnah%27s_11th_August_speech http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gandhi%27s_views_on_race

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_League%27s_Civil_Disobedience_Movement http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_League%27s_Direct_Action_Day

are both POV forks of

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_Action_Day

Some of them have been AfD'ed, but others remain.I suggest in the strongest terms that these articles be deleted immediately. The references cited in Direct Action Day by this editor are falsely represented by him and not in the citations given (I am well-familiar with them). In contrast, he has removed numerous references that did, in fact, exist before that were reliable.

In particular, this website: http://www.cwo.com/~lucumi/gandhi.html

cited by him across these numerous articles,

Is an Afrocentric pseudohistory website with no mainstream credibility.

Thanks for your attention. Kjartan8 12:37, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

I thank you for your mail message. However, I think that the community of wikipedians are intelligent to understand the issues involved and over a period of time the collective efforts shall prevail to build encyclopedic contents. As such, no direct intervention is required in my opinion. --Bhadani (talk) 13:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

copied & pasted --Bhadani (talk) 13:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RFA Thanks

[edit] Me a Fool!

Bhadani, you are a fool. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Snitha (talk • contribs). of 28.03.07

I am aware of that :) [4] --Bhadani (talk) 17:55, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Bhadani, you are a fool —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Snitha (talk • contribs). of 28.03.07

My dear Snitha. You need not repeat that - I am aware that I am a fool. Thanks for reminding me :) --Bhadani (talk) 18:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Question for you

Hi Bhadaniji, I had a question for you in response to your comments on my talk page if you have a minute. - Taxman ^Talk 18:05, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi nice to find you on my page. Yes. I am here only. --Bhadani (talk) 18:07, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

It should be: मैं समझ सकता हूँ और मैं बोल सकता हूँ. This is better. But, you are really great! --Bhadani (talk) 18:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Voice of India

You should jump into the mud more often. too much pseudo-aryan migration crap is going on wikipedia. Many are admins who are writing this and they threaten others. Some admins won't even do a thing to stop it. Noble eagle has left wikipedia. an afr has been filed on freedom skies. I think wiki is going down the tube. it's really not the same as it was.--D-Boy 06:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. For all practical purpose, I have stopped doing any edit to wikipedia, and may be treated as having "left" for the time being as there is no meaning to talk with a section of editors who want to harm the long term interests of wikipedia. Perhaps there are many who shall be around to help wikipedia maintain its creditability. Regards. --Bhadani (talk) 06:14, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

I have basically left too. It's not worth staying around. they took the swatika off our welcome template. I felt this was self censorship and ignorance. another 50 years of censorship for it. They took off the indian flag on wikiproject template because some paks were complaining it was nationalist. I felt extremely betrayed by dagizza and dab abuse his powers as an admin.--D-Boy 06:25, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

I do not have any comments to offer - I do not feel anything except that majority of the persons are not aware of so many things, and actions based on ignorance look highly funny and ludicrous. It is interesting :) and a good pastime to watch their action. In case, you want, just hang around like me, and watch the drama: many elements of national socialism may be marauding the length and breadth of wikipedia in innocent incarnations - who knows? Please also understand that there is life beyond wikipedia - for exmaple you may come to Wikindia for a change, and It is strongly recommended that users create accounts there to avoid impersonation:[5]. --Bhadani (talk) 06:34, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Dangerous-Boy, can you please provide an instance when I "abused my admin powers." According to my memory, I gave a warning to you about not adhering to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy. It is one thing to have strong points of view but another to lie to people. Come on now., you know better. You don't tend to see things from a practical perspective. We are here to build an encyclopedia, not to glorify Indian and Hindu culture. As Bhadaniji has suggested, WikiIndia may be a better place for that. I plead to you to just respect other people's perspectives. It is obvious that you haven't read the Bible, Koran or the Vedas for that matter. And neither have I. Calling the Aryan-Migration theory crap is not helping Wikipedia in any way. Opposing the theory is up to you and nobody is preventing you to freely believe in whatever you want to believe in. But if linguists and archaeologists all around the world after years of study have concluded that an Aryan Migration is probable, it doesn't mean they have any anti-Indian agenda. Many of these people are fascinated with Indian history and culture. Dab himself said he enjoys studying Vedic civilisation.

All I want you to understand is that Wikipedia respects and represents all points of view, no matter how bizarre. I you wish that one day the Islam article will say it is a barbaric evil religion , this is not the place for you. I hope that such as day never comes from any perspective. Wikipedia will crumble if it becomes, anti-Hindu, anti-Islam, anti-atheist, anti-socialist, anti-Harry Potter or anti-anything. You can always create your own wiki, just Conservapedia if want an encyclopedia with a Hindutvaadi perspective. Just remember one thing that Shri Krishna says in the Gita: "I look upon all creatures equally; none are less dear to me and none more dear." If everyone, whether it be Indian/Pakistani/Macedonian follows Bhagawanji's own view, everyone will edit and improve the encyclopedia peacefully and having lots of fun along the way. Best wishes and have a nice day! Gizza^{Chat ©} 09:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Gizza for coming to my page. I am still clueless to offer comments on so many points, except asserting that I have read all the books you have referred to, and did not find much difference in them - perhaps all paths lead to one point ONLY about which I (like countless other souls) am not aware of exactly. --Bhadani (talk) 10:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Deleted comments & my reply - in more than two years, I may have so deleted hardly two or three comments from talk page. This one was highly conceited. --Bhadani (talk) 15:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Moreover, I do not like person/s uploading images and symbols associated with Nazis. --Bhadani (talk) 16:03, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia should stop direct or indirect glorification of Nazism - this is my personal opinion, and others are free to follow the call of their conscience. --Bhadani (talk) 16:19, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

That's doublespeak. You act as a propagandist of pro-Nazi Hindutva ideology and delete the comments of Dab who is one of the ablest exterminators of Hindutva pov crap. It is the ideology that you helps propagate which embodies Nazism now.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.91.253.183 (talk • contribs).

The use of Bhang is unhealthy and has many unsavory side effects huh sockpuppet of Rudrasharman (talk • contribs)?Bakaman 21:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Baka, why do you accuse the anon of being Rudra? Yes that anon is a troll but without any evidence, all you are doing is lighting a match and hoping for someone to provide some petrol. I think my previous comments which were directed as Dangerous-Boy should also inspire you to act in a more neutral manner while editing Wikipedia. Just because somebody, such as Rudra, has differing views with you on many topics does not mean every anon that vandalises your page is Rudra. Just like D-Boy, you are a very capable Wikipedian and have shown that with your contributions to East Indian history. However, you must realise how fragile Wikipedia is and that its success depends upon everyone understanding as well as following the Neutral Point of View policy. Not respecting other views and people will only cause further detriment to your time on Wikipedia. Gizza^{Chat ©} 05:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC)