Wikipedia:WikiProject Hong Kong/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Hong Kong

You have new messages (last change).

WikiProject Hong Kong

Main Navigation

Departments

Assessment

Announcements

Useful Tools

Welcome to the Assessments Page of the WikiProject Hong Kong. This department assesses the quality of Wikipedia's Hong Kong articles. The article ratings are also used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WPHK}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Hong Kong articles by quality and Category:Hong Kong articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist (Index · Statistics · Log).

[edit] Frequently asked questions

How can I get my article rated?: Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles?: Any member of the WikiProject Hong Kong community is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?: Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating?: You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective?: Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

[edit] Instructions

An article's assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WPHK}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Hong Kong
|class=
|importance=
|attention=
}}

[edit] Quality scale

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class Hong Kong articles)
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Hong Kong articles)
GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class Hong Kong articles)
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Hong Kong articles)
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Hong Kong articles)
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Hong Kong articles)
Dab (for disambiguation pages, adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Hong Kong articles)
Template (for templates, adds to Category:Template-Class Hong Kong articles)
Cat (for categories, adds to Category:Category-Class Hong Kong articles)

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Hong Kong articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

**Article progress grading scheme** **[ v • d • e ]**
Label	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editor's experience	Example
FA {{FA-Class}}	Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured article" status, and meet the current criteria for featured articles.	Definitive. Outstanding, thorough article; a great source for encyclopedic information.	No further editing is necessary unless new published information has come to light; but further improvements to the text are often possible.	Supernova (as of February 2007)
A {{A-Class}}	Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in How to write a great article. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from "hard" (peer-reviewed where appropriate) literature rather than websites. Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered for featured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard.	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points.	Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work. Peer-review would be helpful at this stage.	Durian (as of March 2007)
GA {{GA-Class}}	The article has passed through the Good article nomination process and been granted GA status, meeting the good article standards. This should be used for articles that still need some work to reach featured article standards, but that are otherwise good. Good articles that may succeed in FAC should be considered A-Class articles, but having completed the Good article designation process is not a requirement for A-Class.	Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject. No obvious problems, gaps, excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job.	Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fully wikified, now is the time.	International Space Station (as of February 2007)
B {{B-Class}}	Has several of the elements described in "start", usually a majority of the material needed for a completed article. Nonetheless, it has significant gaps or missing elements or references, needs substantial editing for English language usage and/or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, Neutral Point Of View (NPOV) or No Original Research (NOR). With NPOV a well written B-class may correspond to the "Wikipedia 0.5" or "usable" standard. Articles that are close to GA status but don't meet the Good article criteria should be B- or Start-class articles.	Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work.	Considerable editing is still needed, including filling in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Articles for which cleanup is needed will typically have this designation to start with.	Munich air disaster (as of May 2006) has a lot of helpful material but contains too many lists, and needs more prose content & references.
Start {{Start-Class}}	The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element. For example an article on Africa might cover the geography well, but be weak on history and culture. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following: a particularly useful picture or graphic multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article	Useful to some, provides a moderate amount of information, but many readers will need to find additional sources of information. The article clearly needs to be expanded.	Substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added. This article still needs to be completed, so an article cleanup tag is inappropriate at this stage.	Real analysis (as of November 2006)
Stub {{Stub-Class}}	The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible.	Possibly useful to someone who has no idea what the term meant. May be useless to a reader only passingly familiar with the term. At best a brief, informed dictionary definition.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful.	Coffee table book (as of July 2005)

[edit] Importance scale

The following values may be used for the importance parameter:

Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Hong Kong articles)
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Hong Kong articles)
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Hong Kong articles)
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Hong Kong articles)

Note: Articles for which a valid importance is not provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Hong Kong articles. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.

Label	Criteria	Examples
Top	Reserved exclusively for articles that provide an over encompassing view of Hong Kong.	Hong Kong, Geography of Hong Kong, Hongkonger, Hong Kong Island
High	Reserved for articles relating to Hong Kong that are of international and/or local historical importance. International corporations headquartered in Hong Kong or who have affected Hong Kong internationally.	Flag of Hong Kong, Hong Kong handover ceremony, Peninsula Hotel, Cathay Pacific
Mid	Actors, actresses, politicians, celebrities, other notably alike figures and their associated productions (ex. movies, books, albums, etc.). Includes local administration districts (as defined by the Hong Kong District Councils site), Hong Kong government organizations (and associated projects), internationally recognized Hong Kong tourist attractions, accredited higher learning institutions	Jackie Chan, Donald Tsang, Hong Kong Police Force, Urban Renewal Authority, Lan Kwai Fong, Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Low	Generally those articles meeting local notability guidelines. Local in interest and notability yet little known outside in the international community. All other un-official districts falling outside the scope of Hong Kong District Councils site are included (ex. Shau Kei Wan may be considered a district but is not an official administrative district). All Hong Kong educational institutions, private or public, offering pre post-secondary education.	Hong Kong roads, MTR stations, Hong Kong buildings, Shau Kei Wan, Rosaryhill School

[edit] Requesting an assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

[edit] Assessment log

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Day by day log (long)

Make visible or invisible by clicking Show or Hide, respectively.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../w/i/k/Wikipedia%7EWikiProject_Hong_Kong_Assessment_16c0.html"

Categories: WikiProject Hong Kong | WikiProject assessments

Wikipedia:WikiProject Hong Kong/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Frequently asked questions

[edit] Instructions

[edit] Quality scale

[edit] Importance scale

[edit] Requesting an assessment

[edit] Assessment log

[edit] April 1, 2007

[edit] March 30, 2007

[edit] March 26, 2007

[edit] March 24, 2007

[edit] March 22, 2007

[edit] March 20, 2007

[edit] March 18, 2007

[edit] March 16, 2007

[edit] March 14, 2007

[edit] March 12, 2007

[edit] March 11, 2007

[edit] March 10, 2007

[edit] March 8, 2007

[edit] March 6, 2007

[edit] March 4, 2007

[edit] March 2, 2007

[edit] February 28, 2007

[edit] February 26, 2007

[edit] February 25, 2007

[edit] February 24, 2007

[edit] February 23, 2007

[edit] February 22, 2007

[edit] February 21, 2007

[edit] February 20, 2007

[edit] February 19, 2007

[edit] February 18, 2007

[edit] February 17, 2007

[edit] February 16, 2007

[edit] February 15, 2007

[edit] February 14, 2007

[edit] February 13, 2007

[edit] February 12, 2007

Views

Navigation

interaction

Search